Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-385-7 | CAS number: 58-55-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Micronucleated Erythrocyte Frequency in Peripheral Blood of B6C3F1 Mice from Short-Term, Prechronic, and Chronic Studies of the NTP Carcinogenesis Bioassay Program.
- Author:
- Witt K.L.
- Year:
- 2 000
- Bibliographic source:
- Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 36: 163-194
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- Micronucleated Erythrocyte Frequency in Peripheral Blood of B6C3F1 Mice from Short-Term, Prechronic, and Chronic Studies of the NTP Carcinogenesis Bioassay Program.
- Author:
- Witt K.L.
- Year:
- 2 000
- Bibliographic source:
- Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 36: 163-194, cited in: OECD SIDS for CAS-No. 58-55-9, 2004
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- According to MacGregor, J.T. et al. (1990): Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 14, 513-522
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Theophylline
- EC Number:
- 200-385-7
- EC Name:
- Theophylline
- Cas Number:
- 58-55-9
- Molecular formula:
- C7H8N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,3-dimethyl-2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): theophylline;
- Analytical purity: according to NTP, 1998, the purity was >99%:
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: approximately 4 weeks;
- Housing: 1 per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): NIH-07 open formula rodent feed; mash for the dosed-feed studies; ad libitum;
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water; ad libitum;
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.1 - 25 °C;
- Humidity (%): 35 - 70 %;
- Air changes (per hr): 10;
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12h/12h
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: none;
- Details on exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Dose formulations were prepared weekly during the 13-week studies by mixing theophylline with feed to the
the required concentrations. Homogeneity and stability studies of the dose formulations were performed using HPLC and ultraviolet/visible spectroscopy. Homogeneity was confirmed for the feed formulations. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 13 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- continuously in the diet
- Post exposure period:
- none
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
ca. 175, 400, 800 mg/kg bw/d (males); ca. 225, 425, 850 mg/kg bw/d (females) (1000, 2000, 4000 ppm in the diet)
Basis:
nominal in diet
Peripheral blood samples were collected from groups of 10 mice/sex at the end of a 13-week feeding study (see chapter 7.5.1).
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Positive control(s):
- none;
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- peripheral blood; normochromatic erythrocyte (NCE) and polychromatic erythrocyte (PCE) populations.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
Dose levels for the studies were selected after evaluation of the results of previous 14-day repeated-dose studies (Lindamood et al.,
1988, Fundam.Appl.Toxicol.10,477-489).
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields):
The National Toxicology Program has conducted 13-week subchronic toxicity studies in B6C3F mice (10 animals/group) following administration of theophylline via the diet (feed): 0, 1000, 2000 and 4000 ppm.
Blood was obtained immediately before or at the time of sacrifice by retro-orbital bleeding; less often other methods were employed, including heart puncture, puncture of the ventral tail vessels, or tail clip.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Peripheral blood smears were prepared from B6C3F1 mice. Drops of blood were spread on precleaned standard glass microscope air dried, and fixed in absolute methanol for 5 min. Staining was performed with either Hoechst 33258/pyronin Y or acridine orange, except in cases where all study slides had previously been stained with a Giemsa-based stain. All slides were coded prior to scoring.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Slides stained with acridine orange or Hoechst 33258/pyronin Y were scored at 630x or 1000x magnification by epifluorescence microscopy, and slides stained with Giemsa were scored by Koehler microscopy at 1000x.
Polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were scored by direct manual counting. Normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) were scored using a semiautomated
method described by Jauhar et al. (1988), in which cell counts were determined by counting a subfield of approximately 1/16th of the full microscope field. Routine micronucleus frequency scores were based on approximately 10,000 NCE or 1000 PCE per sample, and the percentage of PCE among the total erythrocyte population was based on the number of PCE among approximately 10,000 or 5,000 erythrocytes. - Evaluation criteria:
- The decision to classify a test as negative, equivocal, or positive for induction of micronuclei in this in vivo assay was based on a broader evaluation of a number of factors that determined the biological relevance of the results, including the appropriateness of the concurrent control data, the magnitude of the observed response and the presence of a dose-dependent increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells.
Test chemicals were evaluated separately in each gender; results from tests in male and female mice were not combined to reach an overall conclusion.
Positive controls were not included, because the toxicity assays from which the test animals were obtained did not include positive control groups. - Statistics:
- The frequency of micronucleated cells among NCE or PCE was analyzed by a statistical software package that tested for increasing trend over exposure groups using a one-tailed Cochran-Armitage trend test, followed by pairwise comparisons between each exposure group and the control group.
Pairwise comparisons between each treatment group and the concurrent solvent control group were performed using an unadjusted one-tailed Pearson χ2-Test (Chi-Square-Test).
A test was considered positive if (1) the trend test P value was 0.025 or less or (2) the P value for any single exposure group was 0.025/N or less where N is the number of test chemical treatment groups. Trend test P values between 0.025 and 0.05 were considered to be equivocal if accompanied by a monotonic increase in the frequency of micronuclei over the dose range investigated. All other responses were considered to be negative.
The percentage of polychromatic erythrocytes (%PCE) data were analyzed by a standard ANOVA to determine if significant PCE suppression or stimulation occurred.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- A slight cytotoxic effect was observed based on the decrease in percent PCE.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Additional information on results:
- Theophylline induced increases (weak to marginal) in micronucleated cells only in male mice. However, the effect noted with theophylline in the dosed-feed study, despite producing a significant trend test (P = 0.009), was judged not to be of sufficient magnitude to be considered positive and therefore the dosed-feed study with theophylline in male mice was concluded to be equivocal.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Dose (ppm) |
Number of animals |
Gender |
micronuclei / 1000 NCE |
P value (Witt) |
% PCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
10 |
Males |
1.90 ± 0.17 |
|
1.95 ± 0.29 |
1000 |
10 |
Males |
1.72 ± 0.12 |
0.8641 |
1.87 ± 0.18 |
2000 |
10 |
Males |
2.02 ± 0.09 |
0.2348 |
1.91 ± 0.22 |
4000 |
10 |
Males |
2.25 ± 0.19 |
0.0445 |
1.65 ± 0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend test (Witt) |
|
|
P = 0.009 |
|
|
Trend test (NTP) |
|
|
P = 0.096 |
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
P = 0.613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
10 |
Females |
1.31 ± 0.13 |
|
1.81 ± 0.11 |
1000 |
10 |
Females |
1.70 ± 0.20 |
0.0320 |
1.53 ± 0.11 |
2000 |
10 |
Females |
1.56 ± 0.10 |
0.1292 |
1.55 ± 0.17 |
4000 |
10 |
Females |
1.85 ± 0.24 |
0.0128 |
1.63 ± 0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend test (Witt) |
|
|
P = 0.032 |
|
|
Trend test (NTP) |
|
|
P = 0.034 |
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
P = 0.384 |
% PCE = percentage of polychromatic erythrocytes 5000 or 10000 total erythrocytes. |
|||
NCE = normochromatic erythrocytes |
|
|
|
The NCE/PCE ratio is based on the scoring of 1000 erythrocytes |
|
||
P value: Comparison of treated group to control χ2-Test (Chi-Square-Test). |
|||
Trend test: One-tailed trend test, significant at P ≤ 0.025. |
|
||
ANOVA Test: Analysis of variance, significant at P ≤ 0.025. |
|
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.