Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
26.08.2004 to 14.12.2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study was performed according to the OECD guideline 407 and in compliance with GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
OS Menthol Ester
IUPAC Name:
OS Menthol Ester
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl (2R,5R)-5-hydroxy-1,3-oxathiolane-2-carboxylate
EC Number:
604-569-1
Cas Number:
147126-62-3
Molecular formula:
C14H24O4S
IUPAC Name:
(1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl (2R,5R)-5-hydroxy-1,3-oxathiolane-2-carboxylate
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
(2R, 5R)-5-Hydroxy-[1,3]oxatbiolane-2-carboxylic acid, 2S-isopropyl-5R-methyl-1R-cyclohexyl ester
IUPAC Name:
(2R, 5R)-5-Hydroxy-[1,3]oxatbiolane-2-carboxylic acid, 2S-isopropyl-5R-methyl-1R-cyclohexyl ester
Test material form:
other: White powder

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Age at study initiation: 49-56 days (at study initiation / at test item administration)
- Weight at study initiation: males 252-319 g, females 175-209 g
- Fasting period before study: overnight
- Housing: individually
- Diet: Teklad Certified Rodent Diet #8728C ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: Methyl cellulose
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in water: 1 %
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg
- Justification for choice of vehicle: The test system is an internationally accepted species for use in toxicity studies.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): 2489E

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL/kg
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
The Blank is the solvent blank and should be less than the MDL. The Calibration Verification Standard (CVS) is an independently prepared standard inDCM which should be between 75 and . 125 % recovery. The fit(~) of the calibration curve should be better than 0.99 and the Relative Percent
Difference of the duplicates should be less than 25%.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 consecutive days follwoed by a 14-day recovery period in a dedicated subset of rats.
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
62.5 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
other: Nominal amount of 6.25 mg/ml of vehicle
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
125 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
other: Nominal amount of 12.5 mg/ml of vehicle
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
250 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
other: Nominal amount of 25.0 mg/ml of vehicle
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Each 5 males and 5 females in all 4 groups for necropsy after 28 days of treatment and each 5 males and 5 females in groups 1 (vehicle control) and group 4 (high dose) for a 14-day recovery period follwoing the treatment period.
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Doses selected for this study were based on results of a range finding study in which dose levels ranging from 125 to 2000 mg/kg bw/day were tested with a treatment for up to 12 days.
Positive control:
None

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Moratlity: Twice daily
- Cage side observations/clinical signs: Twice daily
- Weighing: Day 0 (prior to dosing), Day 1 and weekly thereafter
- Food consumption: During acclimation and weekly thereafter until scheduled necropsy
- Water consumption: Monitored daily
- Ophthalmoscopy: During the last week of treatment
- Clinical pathology: At scheduled necropsy
- Organ weights: At necropsy
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
All animals were eufuanized as per fue protocol schedule upon completion of the treatment and post-treatment periods by Isoflurane
overexposure, followed by exsanguination. Gross necropsy included an examination of the external surfaces of the body; all orifices; cranial
cavity; external surfaces of the brain and spinal cord; nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses; joints; thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cavities and viscera.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes

With the exception of the animal-identification, the tissues listed under Tissue Preservation from all Control and High Dose, Main Study and Recovery animalswere prepared for microscopic examination by embedding in paraffin wax, sectioning and staining with hematoxylin and eosin: Tissues of selected Low Dose and Mid Dose rats that were macroscopically abnormal were similarly processed.
Statistics:
In -life data was collected using the ·current Lab-Cat® In-Life module (Version 6.1; July 5/00). Necropsy data and organ weights were collected using the current Organ Weights/Necropsy module (V3.28; Apr. 23/99 - Innovative Programming Associates). Numerical data collected during the course of the study was subjected to calculation of group means and standard deviations. The data for males and females was separately analyzed for homogeneity of variance and for normality. Homogenous data was analyzed using the Analysis of Variance (at p=0.05) and the significance of intergroup differences was analyzed using Duncan's or other appropriate test. Heterogenous data was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis· test and the significance of intergroup differences between the control and treated groups were assessed using Dunn's or another appropriate test.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
No mortality was observed. Three females at 250 mg/kg bw/day showed piloerection and lethargy at the end of treatment week 1.
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence):
No mortality was observed. Three females at 250 mg/kg bw/day showed piloerection and lethargy at the end of treatment week 1.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
In one male and 3 females at 250 mg/kg bw/day a transient weight loss without statistical significance.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No significant effects in test item treated groups.
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No effects were noted.
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No effects in all test item treated groups.
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
All data within histroical control ranges at the end of treatment and recovery period.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
A marginal increase group mean for alanine aminotransferase (AL T) in high dose females at end of treatment. It was considered minimal, and to be a result of hepatocellular leakage caused by "fatty liver" as observed at necropsy and histopathology.
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No eefetcs at all dose levels.
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
No statistical significant changes noted in males. Increased liver weights and decreased spllen and thymus weights in females at 250 mg/kg bw/day. No differences at end of recovery.
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Only standard background findings were noted.
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
High dose: Lymphoid tissue, activity spleen reduced, local irritant stomach/forestomach mucosa. No relevant findings at low and mid dose.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
Animals from all treatment and control groups survived the 28-day treatment period.

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
Despite the weight loss observed in one male and three females from the High Dose Group, there were no statistically significant differences (ANOV A; p=0.05)in body weights and food consumption between the control and test groups, and among the test groups for males and females analyzed separately during thetreatment and recovery periods.

GROSS PATHOLOGY
The most prominent gross findings in High Dose female animals were the presence of microulcers in the glandular portion of the stomach (four
animals), and fatty infiltration of livers (two animals).
Gross findings in animals from all other groups were unremarkable, or incidental. Findings in some animals which were considered incidental were as follows: lung haemorrhaging (terminal), hydronephrosis, enlarged uterine horns etc. These findings are common in laboratory rats and are not considered treatment-related.
At the end of recovery period, no microulceration or fatty livers or any other relevant findings were observed in High Dose female animals.

HISTOPATHOLOGY:
Some animals treated with the test article at 250.0 mg/kg/day exhibited weight loss, piloerection, lethargy, local irritation of the mucosa of the
stomach and hepatic steatosis. Female animals appeared more affected than males indicating that there may be a gender difference in response to
the treatment. Lack or lower intensity of these observations in the recovery animals was suggestive of the reversibility of the pathologic processes induced by the test article.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: see 'Remark'

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Body weights of rats

Dose (mg/kg bw/day)

Mean body weights (g)

Final weight relative to vehicle controls (%)

Initial*

final

Change**

Males

0

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

-

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Females

0

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

-

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Test item

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

X ± Y

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In this 4-week oral toxicity study in the rat a combined NOAEL of 125 mg/kg bw was found.
Executive summary:

In conclusion, analysis of all generated data, including clinical observations, clinical pathology, gross necropsy and histopathology revealed no test item related toxicity in rats treated orally at 62.5 and 125.0 mglkg/day for 28 days. Some animals treated with the test item at 250.0 mglkg/day exhibited weight loss, piloerection, lethargy, local irritation of the mucosa of the stomach due to local irritation and hepatic steatosis. Female animals appeared more affected than males indicating that there may be a gender difference in response to the treatment. Lack or lower intensity of these observations in the recovery animals was suggestive of the reversibility of the pathologic processes induced by the test item.