Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)][6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-)

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

Acute Oral Toxicity: 

In Acute oral toxicity ,LD50 value was predicted based on OECD QSAR toolbox for target substance Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) was estimated to be 2711.4 mg/kg bw,and for differentstudies available on the structurally similar read across substance Aluminium, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid complex (CAS No. – 15790-07-5) was considered to be >2000 mg/kg bw and for Allura red (25956-17-6) was considered to be >2000 mg/kg bw. All these studies concluded that the LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

acute toxicity: oral

Type of information:

(Q)SAR

Adequacy of study:

weight of evidence

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification

Justification for type of information:

Data is predicted using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and QMRF report has been attached

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

other: as mentioned below

Principles of method if other than guideline:

Prediction was done by using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3,2018

GLP compliance:

not specified

Test type:

other: estimated data

Limit test:

no

Specific details on test material used for the study:

- Name of test material: Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-)
- IUPAC name: Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)][6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-)
- Molecular formula: C33H22CoN9O11S2. 2 Na
- Molecular weight: 890 g/mole
- Smiles :Cc1cc(N(=O)=O)c2c(c1)N=N1c3c4ccc(S(O)(=O)=O)cc4ccc3N[Co]{2+}113(Nc4ccc5cc(S(=O)(=O)N C)ccc5c4N1=Nc1ccc(N(=O)=O) cc1O{-}.3).O{-}2Na
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid

Species:

rat

Strain:

other: Tif. RAI

Sex:

male/female

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

No data available

Route of administration:

oral: gavage

Vehicle:

unchanged (no vehicle)

Details on oral exposure:

No data available

Doses:

2711.4 mg/kg bw

No. of animals per sex per dose:

No data available

Control animals:

not specified

Details on study design:

No data available

Statistics:

No data available

Preliminary study:

No data available

Sex:

male/female

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

2 711.4 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Remarks on result:

other: 50% mortality was observed

Mortality:

No data available

Clinical signs:

other: No data available

Gross pathology:

No data available

Other findings:

No data available

The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 6 nearest neighbours
Domain  logical expression:Result: In Domain

((((("a" or "b" )  and ("c" and ( not "d") )  )  and ("e" and ( not "f") )  )  and ("g" and ( not "h") )  )  and ("i" and "j" )  )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Radical OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Diazenes OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitro Azoarenes OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation >> Nitro Azoarenes by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3 ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as SN1 OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic nitro by DNA binding by OECD ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non binder, MW>500 by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, OH grooup OR Non binder, impaired OH or NH2 group OR Non binder, without OH or NH2 group OR Strong binder, NH2 group OR Strong binder, OH group OR Very strong binder, OH group OR Weak binder, OH group by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Ester aminolysis OR Acylation >> Ester aminolysis >> Amides OR SNAr OR SNAr >> Nucleophilic aromatic substitution on activated aryl and heteroaryl compounds OR SNAr >> Nucleophilic aromatic substitution on activated aryl and heteroaryl compounds >> Activated aryl and heteroaryl compounds by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct Acylation Involving a Leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct Acylation Involving a Leaving group >> Acetates by Protein binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "i"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is >= 843 Da

Domain logical expression index: "j"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is <= 913 Da

Interpretation of results:

other: not classified

Conclusions:

The LD50 value was estimated to be 2711.4 mg/kg bw,when male and female Tif. RAI rats were orally exposed with Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) via gavage.

Executive summary:

In a prediction done by SSS (2018) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1).The LD50 was estimated to be 2711.4 mg/kg bw,when male and female Tif. RAI rats were orally exposed with Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) via gavage.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Value:

2 711.4 mg/kg bw

Quality of whole database:

Data is Klimisch 2 and from QSAR toolbox 3.3

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Additional information

Acute Oral Toxicity: 

In different studies, Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often the studies are based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) along with the study available on the structurally similar read across substance Aluminium, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid complex (CAS No. – 15790-07-5) and Allura red (25956-17-6). The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies. The studies are summarized as below –

In a prediction done by SSS (2018) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1).The LD50 was estimated to be 2711.4 mg/kg bw,when male and female Tif. RAI rats were orally exposed with Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) via gavage.

The above study was further supported by Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB (study number: 107, 2013-04-28) for the structurally similar read across substances Aluminium, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid complex (CAS No. – 15790-07-5). The study now reported was designed and conducted to determine the acute oral toxicity profile of Aluminium, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid complex (CAS No. 15790-07-5) in wistar albino female rats. The study was conducted under the OECD Guideline-423 for testing of chemicals.The healthy wistar albino rats of body weight 200±20 gm were selected for study after acclimatization to standard laboratory condition and divided into test compound and vehicle control group each having three animals. Initially, the test compound was mixed with distilled water and administered orally at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight (dose volume 10ml/kg) to three female rats. However; vehicle control group treated with distilled water at the dose level of 10 ml/kg b.wt. The treated animals were closely observed for clinical signs of intoxication during first 4 hours of test compound administration. Thereafter, all the animals were observed periodically at 1 hour interval for 24 hrs and twice daily for a period of 14 days. The necropsy was performed on all animals at the termination of the study. The test compound did not produce any mortality at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight during the entire observation period. Animals did not produce any clinical signs of toxicity during the entire observation period. Animals showed normal gain in body weight on day 7th and 14th as compared to control group. No significant gross pathological changes related to compound toxicity were observed. Skin and hair coat was observed wet. It was concluded that the test compound Aluminium, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid complex (CAS No. 15790-07-5) is non-toxic at the tested dose level 2000 mg/kg body weight. According to criteria of CLP, it comes under the “Category Not classified".

This is further supported by Yu F. Sasaki et. al.( Mutation Research 519 (2002) 103–119) for the structurally similar read across substance Allura red (25956-17-6). Acute oral toxicity study was performed in mice using test material Allura red  (CAS No. 25956-17-6).No mortality was observed at dose 2000 mg/kg bw. Hence,LD50 value was considered to be >2000 mg/kg bw,when mice were treated with Allura red  (CAS No. 25956-17-6) orally.

Thus, based on the above studies on Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) and it’s structurally similar read across substances Aluminium, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid complex (CAS No. – 15790-07-5) and Allura red (25956-17-6), it can be concluded that LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the above experimental studies and prediction on Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1)and it’s structurally similar read across substances Aluminium, 6-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid complex (CAS No. – 15790-07-5) and Allura red (25956-17-6), it can be concluded that LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, Disodium [6-amino-5-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-sulphonamidato(2-)] [6-amino-5- [(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl) azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato(3-)]cobaltate(2-) (75314-27-1) cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.