Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-472-8 | CAS number: 7575-23-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
No Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test is available for PETMP.
Based on the categroy approach, it is beeing evaluated, if GDMP can be used as worst-case substance for the category of GDMP, PETMP, TMPMP and Di-PETMP (for details see category approach attached in 13.1). If GDMP can be used as worst-case substance for the categroy, a combined repeated dose toxicity test and reproduction/ developmental toxicity screening test will be performed with GDMP to be used as source for the reproductive toxicity enpoint. Depending on the outcome of the study, performance of an reproduction/developmental toxicity screening assay with PETMP may be necessary.
The worst-case approach will be reevaluated as soon as new data with GDMP has been generated.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Justification for type of information:
- Currently, no data on toxicokinetics/metabolism is available for this category. Based on structural features (e.g. sterical hindrance) it is however assumed, that ester cleavage would not be fast and complete, especially since the substances contain up to 6 ester functions, which are in addition sterically shielded. Therefore, it seems more reasonable to base the category hypothesis on structural similarity.
In addition, it is not clear yet, whether the strength of the effects vary in a predictable manner, or if no relevant variations occur. However, there are variations in structure (number of ester bonds and consequently number of free -SH groups) and physicochemical properties (especially water solubility and log Kow). It is assumed that these variations will also be reflected by variations in effect levels. Therefore, scenario 4 is the working hypothesis for the time being.
More data points within the category are needed to further strengthen the category hypothesis . The scenario selection will be re-evaluated after the studies are finished.
This currently selected scenario covers the category approach for which the read-across hypothesis is based on structural similarity. For the REACH information requirement under consideration, the property investigated in studies conducted with different source substances is used to predict the property that would be observed in a study with the target substance if it were to be conducted. Similar properties are observed for the different source substances; this may include absence of effects for every member of the category.
There are expected to be differences in strength of the effects forming a regular pattern. The prediction will be based on a worst-case approach. The read-across is a category approach based on the hypothesis that the substances in this category share structural similarities with common functional groups. This approach serves to use existing data on skin/eye irritation, skin sensitisation, genetic toxicity, acute toxicity, repeated-dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints for substances in this category.
The hypothesis corresponds to Scenario 4 of the RAAF. The substances GDMP, TMPMP, PETMP, and Di-PETMP are esters of a common acid, 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA). The key functionality of the substances within this category is the presence of free SH-groups. It is hypothesised that the strength of effects correlates with the number of SH-groups. In addition, differences in bioavailability are expected to influence the strength of effects.
For detailed information, refer to section 13.2 - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
Reference
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available (further information necessary)
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
The oral administration of PETMP to pregnant rats by oral gavage during gestation at dose levels of 50, 120 and 300/200 mg/kg bw/day (incorporating a correction factor for 97.4 % purity), resulted in treatment-related effects for females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day with an associated effect on fetal growth.
The No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the pregnant females and the survival, growth and embryofetal development of the offspring was considered to be 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-06-19 - 2015-01-07
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: guideline study, GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 30 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 22 January 2001
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD(SD) IGS BR
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 190 to 264 g (on arrival)
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: ndividually in solid-floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids furnished with softwood flakes (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK), containign environmental enrichment
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted diet (Rodent 2018C Teklad Global Certified Diet, Harlan UK, Oxon, UK), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 - 2 d
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Animals were delivered in two batches containing time mated females prior to Day 3 (Day 0 or Day 1) of gestation. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
emulsion in Corn Oil
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 12.5, 30, 75/50 mg a.i./L
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): dose volume 4 mL/kg bw/d - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The test item concentrations were determined by HPLC with UV detection (215 nm) using an external standard.
Samples were extracted with acetonitrile (ultra-sonicated for 15 min and then centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 10 min). - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: purchased timed pregnant
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 3 to Day 19 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- animals were killed on Day 20 of gestation
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: based on dose range finding study
- Maternal examinations:
- Morbidity/Mortality Inspection
Twice daily, early and late during the working period.
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Once daily during the gestation period; immediately before and soon after dosing, half an hour post dosing, one hour post dosing and approximately four hours post dosing
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Day 3 (before start of treatment), and on Days 4, 5, 8, 11, 14 and 17 of gestation. Body weights were also recorded for surviving animals at terminal kill (Day 20)
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
-Day 3, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20 of gestation
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
Monitored daily by visual inspection of water bottles
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day #20
- Organs examined: Full external and internal macroscopic examination of adult females. Any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
As macroscopic changes were noted in the stomach of the decedent females; the stomach from all females surviving to termination were retained at necropsy. The ovaries and uteri of pregnant females were removed, examined and the following data recorded. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: all per litter
- fetal weight
- placental weight
- fetal sex - Statistics:
- Group mean values were calculated to include data from all females with live fetuses on Day 20 of gestation.
The following parameters were analyzed statistically, where appropriate, using the test methods outlined below:
Female body weight change, food consumption and gravid uterus weight: Shapiro Wilk normality test and Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance and one way analysis of variance, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test or, if unequal variances were observed, on alternative multiple comparison test.
All caesarean necropsy parameters and fetal parameters: Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance; and a subsequent pairwise analysis of control values against treated values using the Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test, where significance was seen.
Fetal evaluation parameters, including skeletal or visceral findings: Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test. - Indices:
- Pre and Post Implantation Loss
Sex Ratio - Historical control data:
- Historical control data for Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD® (SD) IGS BR Rat are provided in the study report for the following parameters: Gestation Body Weights, Gestation Food Consumption, Litter Data, External Fetal Observations, Visceral Fetal Findings, Skeletal Fetal Findings
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Mortality
One female treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day was killed in extremis on Day 8 due to the persistence of clinical observations of clonic convulsions, splayed gait, occasional body tremors and ataxia. Multiple raised areas were apparent in the non-glandular region of the stomach at necropsy.
One female treated with 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day was found dead on Day 13 following observations of clonic convulsions, decreased respiratory rate, laboured respiration, gasping respiration, staining of the fur and increased salivation immediately post dose. This animal was found to have an oily red fluid in the thoracic cavity at necropsy, and sloughing of the glandular region of the stomach was also apparent. The death of this animal was considered to have been caused by a dosing trauma or aspiration of the test item when dosed.
Clinical Observations
A number of females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day had transient episodes of occasional body tremors, tonic and clonic convulsions, hunched posture, ataxia, lethargy, piloerection, splayed gait and, laboured respiration and decreased respiratory rate up to Day 11. Thereafter no such observations were apparent.
The majority of animals at this dose level also had episodes of increased salivation post-dose from Day 8 onwards. Observations of this nature are commonly experienced following the oral administration of an unpalatable or slightly irritant test item formulation and in isolation are considered not to be of toxicological importance. No such effects were detected in females surviving to necropsy at 50 or 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day.
Body Weight
Females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day showed group mean body weight losses between Day 3 and Day 4 with differences from control attaining statistical significance. Recovery was evident thereafter although group mean body weight gains were slightly lower than control from Day 14 onwards. Consequently, cumulative body weight gains to Day 5 were statistically significantly lower than controls and thereafter remained lower than control throughout the treatment period.
Gravid uterus weight for females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day was slightly lower than controls however statistical significance was not achieved. Body weight gain when adjusted for the contribution of the gravid uterus was also slightly lower than controls. No such effects were detected in females treated with at 50 or 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day
Food Consumption
Food consumption for females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day was statistically significantly lower than controls to Day 8 of the study and generally remained lower than controls throughout the remainder of the treatment period. No such effects were detected in females treated with 50 or 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day.
Water Consumption
Daily visual inspection of water bottles did not reveal any overt intergroup differences.
Post Mortem Studies
No macroscopic abnormalities were detected in any female surviving to termination. - Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 120 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 120 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:yes
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Litter Data and Litter Placental and Fetal Weights
The mean male fetal weight for fetuses from females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day was statistically significantly lower than controls. The mean female fetal weight and mean fetal weight for both sexes were also slightly lower than controls, however, statistical significance was not achieved.
There were no obvious adverse effects of maternal treatment on litter data as assessed by the number of implantations, early and late embryonic/fetal deaths and live fetuses or sex ratio, as assessed by percentage male.
Fetal Examination
Increased incidence of fetuses showing incomplete ossification of the thoracic centrum or less than four ossified caudal vertebrae achieved statistical significance in comparison to controls for females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day. Increased incidence of incomplete ossification of the interparietal and occiptal (supra-occiptal), dumb-bell shaped thoracic centrum and unossified metacarpals were also apparent when compared to controls although the magnitude of these differences did not achieve statistical significance.
A lower incidence of the number of fetuses showing ossification of the 1st metatarsal attained statistical significance for females treated with 300/200 or 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day Visceral examination of the fetuses from females treated with 200 mg a.i./kg bw/day also revealed increased incidence of absent renal papilla with differences from control attaining statistical significance. Increased incidence of increased cavitation of the renal pelvis was also apparent, however, statistical significance was not achieved. - Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The oral administration of PETMP to pregnant rats by oral gavage during gestation at dose levels of 50, 120 and 300/200 mg/kg bw/day (incorporating a correction factor for 97.4 % purity), resulted in treatment-related effects for females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day with an associated effect on fetal growth.
The No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the pregnant females and the survival, growth and embryofetal development of the offspring was considered to be 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day. - Executive summary:
In a developmental toxicity study according to OECD Guideline 414 (22 January 2001) and EU method B.31 (30 May 2008) PETMP (97.4% a.i.) was administered was administered to 24 time mated femaleSprague-Dawley Crl:CD® (SD) IGS BR strain rats/dose in corn oilby gavageat dose levels of 0,50, 120, and 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day (incorporating a correction factor for 97.4% purity)from days 3 through 20 of gestation.
Adverse clinical signs were apparent in two animals treated with 300 mg a.i./kg bw/day following one dose therefore the dose level was reduced to 200 mg a.i./kg bw/day. Therefore, the first twelve animals of the high dose received the test item at 300 mg a.i./kg bw/day for one or two days prior to the reduction of the dose level; the remaining twelve animals were treated with 200 mg a.i./kg bw/day throughout dosing. Clinical signs, body weight change, food and water consumptions were monitored during the study.
All females were terminated on Day 20 of gestation and subjected to gross necropsy including examination of the uterine contents. The number of corpora lutea, number, position and type of implantation, placental weights, fetal weight, sex and external and internal macroscopic appearance were recorded. Half of each litter were examined for detailed skeletal development and the remaining half were subjected to detailed visceral examination.
One female treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day was killedin extremison Day 8 due to the persistence and severity of clinical observations. One female treated with 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day was found dead on Day 13. The death of this animal was considered to have been caused by a dosing trauma or aspiration of the test item when dosed.
Clinical observations of occasional body tremors, clonic convulsions, hunched posture, ataxia, lethargy, pilo-erection, splayed gait and, labored respiration and decreased respiratory rate were apparent transiently up to Day 11 in females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day. No such effects were detected in females surviving to necropsy at 50 or 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day.
At 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day group mean body weight losses were apparent on Day 4 with an associated reduction in cumulative body weight gain being seen to Day 5 of treatment. Initial recovery of body weight gain was apparent thereafter, however, body weight performance from Day 14 onwards appeared to be lower than controls. Gravid uterus weight and body weight gain, when adjusted for the contribution of the gravid uterus were also slightly lower than controls. No such effects were detected in females treated with 50 or 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day.
Food consumption for females treated with 300/200 mg a.i./kg bw/day was generally lower than controls throughout the treatment period with differences from control attaining statistical significance to Day 8. No such effects were detected in females treated with 50 or 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day.
Daily visual inspection of water bottles did not reveal any overt intergroup differences.
No macroscopic abnormalities were detected in any female surviving to termination.
The maternal LOAEL is 200 mg a.i./kg bw/day, based on clinical signs, reduced body weight, reduced body weight gain, reduced food consumption and slightly lower gravid uterus weight (though not statistically significant). The maternal NOEL is 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day.
The mean male fetal weight for fetuses from females treated with 200 mg a.i./kg bw/day was statistically significantly lower than controls. The mean female fetal weight and mean fetal weight for both sexes were also slightly lower than controls, however, statistical significance was not achieved.
Increased incidence of fetuses showing incomplete ossification of the thoracic centrum or less than four ossified caudal vertebrae achieved statistical significance in comparison to controls for females treated with 300/200 mg/kg bw/day. Increased incidence of incomplete ossification of the nasal, frontal, interparietal and occiptal (supra-occiptal), dumb-bell shaped thoracic centrum and unossified metacarpals were also apparent when compared to controls although the magnitude of these differences did not achieve statistical significance.
A lower incidence of the number of fetuses showing ossification of the 1st metatarsal attained statistical significance for females treated with 200 or 120 mg/kg bw/day A.I. In isolation and in the absence of any differences in a number of variants or a syndrome of variance, the intergroup difference at 120 mg a.i./kg bw/day was considered not to be toxicologically significant. Visceral examination of the fetuses from females treated with 200 mg a.i./kg bw/day also revealed increased incidence of absent renal papilla with differences from control attaining statistical significance. Increased incidence of increased cavitation of the renal pelvis was also apparent, however, statistical significance was not achieved.
The developmental LOAEL is 200 mg a.i./kg bw/day, based on lower mean male fetal weight, increased incidence of fetuses showing incomplete ossification of the thoracic centrum or less than four ossified caudal vertebrae, increased incidence of absent renal papilla. The developmental NOEL is 120 mg/kg bw/day.
Based on Classification and Labelling guidance it can be postulated that classification as a developmental toxicant at either Category 1B or 2 may not be warranted because of the effects seen in adults with consequential effects on offspring development.
The developmental toxicity study in the rat is classified acceptable and satisfies the guideline requirement for a developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) in rat.
Reference
Stability of the test item formulations
Measured concentrations of the test item formulations were within 100-107% of nominal. Formulations were stable when kept for 12 d at 4°C.
Group Mean Body Weight Values
Dose Level (mg a.i./kg bw/day) |
|
Body Weight (g) at Day of Gestation
|
|||||||
3 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
11 |
14 |
17 |
20 |
||
0 (Control) |
mean |
244.8 |
249.4 |
255.0 |
270.2 |
289.9 |
309.1 |
342.8 |
386.2 |
sd |
22.9 |
23.5 |
24.1 |
24.5 |
27.2 |
28.9 |
33.7 |
39.2 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
242.4 |
247.1 |
253.2 |
268.4 |
286.5 |
305.2 |
338.4 |
382.5 |
sd |
12.4 |
12.1 |
12.3 |
13.5 |
16.2 |
16.0 |
18.2 |
17.8 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
120 |
mean |
243.3 |
247.0 |
253.5 |
268.5 |
289.9 |
306.3 |
337.8 |
381.4 |
sd |
12.6 |
12.5 |
13.0 |
15.3 |
16.5 |
20.5 |
23.4 |
27.4 |
|
n |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
|
300/200 |
mean |
242.5 |
242.2 |
248.0 |
263.5 |
283.7 |
300.7 |
330.3 |
370.3 |
sd |
18.2 |
21.2 |
22.7 |
22.4 |
22.2 |
24.7 |
28.5 |
34.2 |
|
n |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
Group Mean Body Weight Change
Dose Level (mg a.i./kg bw/day) |
|
Cumulative Body Weight Change (g) from Day 3 of Gestation
|
||||||
4 |
5 |
8 |
11 |
14 |
17 |
20 |
||
0 (Control) |
mean |
4.7 |
10.3 |
25.4 |
45.2 |
64.4 |
98.0 |
141.5 |
sd |
3.6 |
3.9 |
5.5 |
8.0 |
9.6 |
14.6 |
21.8 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
4.7 |
10.8 |
26.0 |
44.0 |
62.8 |
96.0 |
140.1 |
sd |
2.5 |
3.3 |
4.1 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
11.0 |
12.4 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
120 |
mean |
3.7 |
10.1 |
25.1 |
46.5 |
63.0 |
94.5 |
138.0 |
sd |
2.7 |
2.7 |
5.0 |
7.1 |
11.9 |
15.2 |
21.1 |
|
n |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
|
300/200 |
mean |
-0.3** |
5.5* |
21.0 |
41.2 |
58.1 |
87.8 |
127.8 |
sd |
6.2 |
7.5 |
7.1 |
8.1 |
10.2 |
14.9 |
24.6 |
|
n |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
Group Mean Gravid Uterus Weight and Adjusted Body Weight and Body Weight Change Values
Dose Level (mg a.i./kg bw/day) |
|
Body Weight (g) on Days of Gestation |
Body Weight Change (g) during Days of Gestation 3 – 20 |
Gravid Uterus Weight (g) |
Adjusted to Body Weight (g) Day 20 |
Adjusted to Body Weight (g) Change 3 - 20 |
|
3 |
20 |
||||||
0 (Control) |
mean |
244.8 |
386.2 |
141.5 |
83.115 |
303.1 |
58.3 |
sd |
22.9 |
39.2 |
21.8 |
15.272 |
26.6 |
10.5 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
242.4 |
382.5 |
140.1 |
82.959 |
299.6 |
57.2 |
sd |
12.4 |
17.8 |
12.4 |
7.565 |
18.1 |
12.9 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
120 |
mean |
243.3 |
381.4 |
138.0 |
81.329 |
300.1 |
56.8 |
sd |
12.6 |
27.4 |
21.1 |
11.972 |
21.6 |
15.0 |
|
n |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
|
300/200 |
mean |
242.5 |
370.3 |
127.8 |
74.138 |
296.2 |
53.7 |
sd |
18.2 |
34.2 |
24.6 |
23.279 |
26.5 |
12.8 |
|
n |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
* Significantly different from control group p<0.05
** Significantly different from control group p<0.01
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Species:
- rat
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on Classification and Labelling guidance it can be postulated that classification as a developmental toxicant at either Category 1B or 2 may not be warranted because of the effects seen in the prenatal developmental toxicity study were observed in adults with consequential effects on offspring development. Classification will be reevaluated when data from reproduction/developmental screening assay are generated.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.