Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of Chromate(1-), [N-[7-hydroxy-8-[(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-1-naphthalenyl]acetamidato(2-)][1-[(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenolato(2-)]-, hydrogen, compd. with N-cyclohexylcyclohexanamine (1:1) and hydrogen bis[1-[(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-2-naphtholato(2-)]chromate(1-) , compound with dicyclohexylamine (1:1) and hydrogen bis[N-[7-hydroxy-8-[(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-1-naphthyl]acetamidato(2-)]chromate(1-) , compound with dicyclohexylamine (1:1)
EC number: 916-865-0 | CAS number: -
Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Adsorption to the solid soil phase would be expected.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The test item is a multiconstituent substance with dicyclohexylamine as counterion for the dye complex. To estimate the potential for adsorption QSAR calculations have been conducted (BASF SE 2018). The dye complex of the main components consist of two different organic structures complexed by Cr(3+)-ions. Since metal complexes cannot be calculated using QSAR models, the two organic parts where calculated using EPISuite KOCWIN program (v2.00) as a worst case consideration. The KOCWIN v2.00 model comprises two methodologies to estimate the logKoc: (1) Estimation using first-order Molecular Connectivity Index (MCI) and (2) estimation using logKow. KOCWIN requires only a chemical structure to make predictions. However, dicyclohexylamine (CAS 101-83-7) has a logPow of -0.4 (ECHA Homepage) and has, therefore, no potential for adsorption. Further estimation is not relevant.
The calculated logKoc values of both organic parts was determined to be 4.948 (estimate from MCI) and 4.798 (estimate from logKow) for the first part and 5.035 (estimate from MCI) and 5.2941 (estimate from logKow) for the second part, respectively. However, these values were determined for the uncharged molecules. Since the pKa-values (calculated with SPARC) are 4.29 and 4.71 for the first and the second part, respectively, it can be assumed, that both molecules would be almost entirely present in their charged form at the environmentally relevant pH range of 4 to 9. Therefore, the adsorption behaviour changes. The estimation method of Franco and Trapp (2008) can be used to correct the logKoc values for the charged molecules. For the first part the corrected logKoc values range from 3.88 (pH 4) to 2.12 (pH 9) and for the second part from 4.39 (pH 4) to 2.23 (pH 9). Therefore, a definite logKoc value cannot be determined since the value depends on the environmental conditions. However, the estimated logKoc values for the uncharged molecules can definitely be considered as absolute worst-case and the adsorption to the solid soil phase would be expected.
Franco A. , Trapp S., Estimate of the soil-water partition coefficient normalized to organic carbon for ionizable organic chemicals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 27, 2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
