Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test, OECD 471): negative with and without metabolic activation

In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test (cultured peripheral human lymphocytes, OECD 487): negative with and without metabolic activation

In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt gene (Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79), OECD 476): negative with and without metabolic activation

Conclusions based on data obtained with isotridecanol, ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS No. 69011-36-5, EC No. 500-241-6).

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
27 May - 10 Oct 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2016
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Target gene:
Not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
CELLS USED
For lymphocytes:
- Sex, age and number of blood donors: Female, 35 and 33 years, two (Main Assay I); female, 27 and 28 years, two (Main Assay II); male, 30 years, one (Main Assay III)
- Whether whole blood or separated lymphocytes were used: whole blood
- Whether blood from different donors were pooled or not: pooled (Main Assays I and II), not pooled (Main Assay III)
- Mitogen used for lymphocytes: phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)

MEDIA USED
- Type and composition of media:
Culture medium:
RPMI 1640 1x (Dutch modification): 500 mL
Foetal Calf Serum (FCS): 100 mL
L-Glutamine (200 mM): 6.25 mL
Antibiotic solution (not further specified): 1.25 mL

Treatment medium (3 h exposure):
+S9:
Test item solution or solvent/vehicle: 0.05 mL
S9 mix: 1.00 mL
Culture medium (without PHA): 3.95 mL
-S9:
Test item solution or solvent/vehicle: 0.05 mL
Culture medium (without PHA): 4.95 mL

Treatment medium (continous exposure):
Test item as supplied, test item solution or solvent/vehicle: 0.025 mL
Culture medium (without PHA): 4.975 mL
Cytokinesis block (if used):
Cytochalasin B (6 μg/mL)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone.
- Species: rat
- Strain: Sprague Dawley
- Sex: male
- Age: 5 - 6 weeks
- Weight: 175 - 199 g
- Tissue: liver
- Inducing Agents: phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Producer: TRINOVA BIOCHEM GmbH, Giessen, Germany
- Batch Number: 3971
- Quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): yes
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Main Assay I:
3 h exposure (with and without metabolic activation): 0.195, 0.293, 0.439, 0.658, 0.988, 1.48, 2.22, 3.33, 5.00 μL/mL
31 h exposure (without metabolic activation): 0.130, 0.195, 0.293, 0.439, 0.658, 0.988, 1.48, 2.22, 3.33, 5.00 μL/mL
Haemolysis was observed at all doses in all experiments.

Main Assay II:
3 h exposure (with and without metabolic activation): 0.00780, 0.0117, 0.0176, 0.0263, 0.0395, 0.0593, 0.0889, 0.133, 0.200 µL/mL
31 h exposure (without metabolic activation): 0.000520, 0.000780, 0.00117, 0.00176, 0.00263, 0.00395, 0.00593, 0.00889, 0.0133, 0.0200 µL/mL
Cytotoxicity was observed in the 3 h experiments in the presence of metabolic activation.

Main Assay III:
3 h exposure (with metabolic activation): 0.0654, 0.0752, 0.0865, 0.0994, 0.114, 0.132, 0.151, 0.174, 0.200 µL/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)

- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the limited solubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was selected as the vehicle. This vehicle was selected since it is compatible with the survival of cells and the S9 metabolic activation system.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
colchicine
cyclophosphamide
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: duplicate
- Number of independent experiments : three

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test material added in medium

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: 48 h
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 3 h (3 h exposure experiments) and 31 h (continous exposure experiments)
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): 32 h in 3 h exposure experiments and 31 h in continous exposure experiments

FOR CHROMOSOME ABERRATION AND MICRONUCLEUS:
- If cytokinesis blocked method was used for micronucleus assay: cytB 6 µL/mL medium, added 3 h after start of treatment
- Methods of slide preparation and staining technique used including the stain used: The lymphocyte cultures were centrifuged and the supernatant was removed. The cells were resuspended in hypotonic solution and fresh methanol/acetic acid fixative was added. The fixative was changed several times by centrifugation and resuspension. A few drops of the cell suspension were transfered to glass slides which were allowed to air dry before staining with acridine Orange in phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
- Number of cells spread and analysed per concentration (number of replicate cultures and total number of cells scored): 2000 binucleated cells per cell culture were scored
- Criteria for scoring micronucleated cells (selection of analysable cells and micronucleus identification):
1. The micronucleus diameter was less than 1/3 of the nucleus diameter
2. The micronucleus diameter was greater than 1/16 of the nucleus diameter
3. No overlapping with the nucleus was observed
4. The aspect was the same as the chromatin

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI), 1000 cells counted per concentration
Evaluation criteria:
EVALUATION CRITERIA
A test item is considered clearly positive if the following criteria are met:
1. Significant increases in the proportion of micronucleated cells over the concurrent controls occur at one or more concentrations.
2. The proportion of micronucleated cells at such data points exceeds the normal range based on historical control values (95% control limits).
3. There is a significant dose-effect relationship.

A item is considered clearly negative if the following criteria are met:
1. None of the dose levels shows a statistically significant increase in the incidence of micronucleated cells.
2. There is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with the Cochran-Armitage trend test.
3. All the results are inside the distribution of the historical control data (95% control limits).

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
The assay is considered valid if the following criteria are met:
1. The incidence of micronucleated cells of the negative control is within the distribution range of our historical control values.
2. Concurrent positive controls induce responses that are compatible with those generated in our historical positive control database and produce a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control.
3. Adequate cell proliferation is observed in solvent control cultures.
4. The appropriate number of doses and cells is analysed.
Statistics:
A modified χ2 test was used to compare the number of cells with micronuclei in control and treated cultures.
Cochran-Armitage Trend Test (one-sided) was performed for the assessment of the concentration-response relationship.
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Strong cytotoxicity was observed at and above 0.130 μL/mL in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: Treatment with the test item did not change the pH at any dose level in any experiment.
- Data on osmolality: Treatment with the test item did not increases the osmolality at any dose level in any experiment.
- Precipitation and time of the determination: Following treatment with the test item, no opacity or precipitation of the medium was observed at the beginning or by the end of treatment in any experiment.

STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data are reported in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- The incidence of micronucleated cells of the negative controls was within the distribution range of our historical control values, data are presented in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

Table 1: Proliferation index

Main Assay I
Treatment (µL/mL) Culture No. MonoN BiN PoliN Total cells CBPI Mean Value Cytotoxicity (%)
Treatment: 3 h, - S9
Test Item* 19 Only mononucleated cells
0.195 20
Treatment: 3 h, +S9
Solvent* 21 124 219 157 500 2.066 2.052 0
1% 22 123 235 142 500 2.038
Test Item* 39 378 122 0 500 1.244 1.235 78
0.195 40 388 111 1 500 1.226
Test Item* 37 Only mononucleated cells
0.293 38
Test Item* 35 Only mononucleated cells
0.439 36
Treatment: 31 h, - S9
Test Item* 65 Only mononucleated cells
0.130 66
Main Assay II
Treatment (µL/mL) Culture No. MonoN BiN PoliN Total cells CBPI Mean Value Cytotoxicity (%)
Treatment: 3 h, -S9
Solvent* 71 122 275 103 500 1.962 1.953 0
1% 72 138 252 110 500 1.944
Test Item* 85 121 256 123 500 2.004 1.983 -3
0.0176 86 143 233 124 500 1.962
Test Item* 83 123 274 103 500 1.960 1.925 3
0.0263 84 155 245 100 500 1.890
Test Item* 81 154 248 98 500 1.888 1.897 6
0.0395 82 139 269 92 500 1.906
Test Item* 79 120 294 86 500 1.932 1.878 8
0.0593 80 154 280 66 500 1.824
Test Item* 77 305 177 18 500 1.426 1.445 53
0.0889 78 289 190 21 500 1.464
Test Item* 75 Very few mononucleated cells recovered onto slides
0.133 76
Test Item* 73 No cells recovered onto slides
0.200 74
Treatment: 3 h, +S9
Solvent* 91 144 217 139 500 1.990 1.802 0
1% 92 243 207 50 500 1.614
Test Item* 103 165 211 124 500 1.918 1.911 -14
0.0263 104 166 216 118 500 1.904
Test Item* 101 162 249 89 500 1.854 1.857 -7
0.0395 102 169 232 99 500 1.860
Test Item* 99 154 242 104 500 1.900 1.832 -4
0.0593 100 204 210 86 500 1.764
Test Item* 97 179 237 84 500 1.810 1.861 -7
0.0889 98 134 276 90 500 1.912
Test Item* 95 276 209 15 500 1.478 1.469 42
0.133 96 290 190 20 500 1.460
Test Item* 93 Very few mononucleated cells recovered onto slides
0.200 94
Cyclophosphamide 111 310 182 8 500 1.396 1.394 51
20.0 µg/mL 112 311 182 7 500 1.392
Cyclophosphamide 113 316 176 8 500 1.384 1.392 51
15.0 µg/mL 114 306 188 6 500 1.400
Treatment: 31 h, - S9
Solvent* 115 118 273 109 500 1.982 1.951 0
0.5% 116 140 260 100 500 1.920
Test Item* 129 172 266 62 500 1.780 1.796 16
0.00176 130 164 266 70 500 1.812
Test Item* 127 147 293 60 500 1.826 1.782 18
0.00263 128 188 255 57 500 1.738
Test Item* 125 168 298 34 500 1.732 1.733 23
0.00395 126 170 293 37 500 1.734
Test Item* 123 187 289 24 500 1.674 1.656 31
0.00593 124 206 269 25 500 1.638
Test Item* 121 228 265 7 500 1.558 1.535 44
0.00889 122 251 242 7 500 1.512
Test Item* 119 316 183 1 500 1.370 1.393 59
0.0133 120 293 206 1 500 1.416
Test Item* 117 391 109 0 500 1.218 1.225 76
0.0200 118 384 116 0 500 1.232
Colchicine 137 495 5 0 500 1.010 1.007 99
0.0800 µg/mL 138 498 2 0 500 1.004
Colchicine 139 487 13 0 500 1.026 1.028 97
0.0400 µg/mL 140 485 15 0 500 1.030
Main Assay III
Treatment (µL/mL) Culture No. MonoN BiN PoliN Total cells CBPI Mean Value Cytotoxicity (%)
Treatment: 3 h, -S9
Solvent* 141 297 164 39 500 1.484 1.482 0
1% 142 308 144 48 500 1.480
Test Item* 159 344 110 46 500 1.404 1.484 0
0.0654 160 290 138 72 500 1.564
Test Item* 157 324 128 48 500 1.448 1.436 10
0.0752 158 325 138 37 500 1.424
Test Item* 155 319 140 41 500 1.444 1.441 9
0.0865 156 321 139 40 500 1.438
Test Item* 153 333 138 29 500 1.392 1.389 19
0.0994 154 335 137 28 500 1.386
Test Item* 151 380 103 17 500 1.274 1.266 45
0.114 152 379 113 8 500 1.258
Test Item* 149 805 190 5 1000 1.200 1.213 56
0.132 150 783 208 9 1000 1.226
Test Item* 147 428 72 0 500 1.144 1.134 72
0.151 148 438 62 0 500 1.124
Test item* 145 Few cells recovered onto slides
0.174 146
Test Item* 143 396 82 22 500 1.252    
0.200 144 Few cells recovered onto slides
Cyclophosphamide 161 356 142 2 500 1.292 1.280 42
20.0 µg/mL 162 366 134 0 500 1.268
Cyclophosphamide 163 343 150 7 500 1.328 1.310 36
15.0 µg/mL 164 358 138 4 500 1.292
*: 2 replicates
MonoN: Mononucleated cells
BiN: Binucleated cells
PoliN: Polinucleated cells
CBPI: Cytokinesis block proliferation index
% Cytotoxicity: Relative to vehicle/solvent control cultures
Mn: Micronucleus/micronuclei

Table 2: Scoring of micronuclei

Main Assay II
Dose level (μL/mL) Culture No. Cells
scored
(BiN cells)
BiN cells
with
1 Mn
BiN cells
with
2 Mn
BiN cells
with
>2 Mn
BiN cells
with
Mn
Treatment: 3 h, -S9
Solvent 1% 71 1000 1 0 0 1
72 1000 3 0 0 3
0.0395 81 1000 3 0 0 3
82 1000 2 0 0 2
0.0593 79 1000 3 0 0 3
80 1000 2 0 0 2
0.0889 77 1000 4 0 0 4
78 1000 1 0 0 1
Cyclophosphamide 15.0 µg/mL 113 1000 20 0 0 20
114 1000 45 1 0 46
Treatment: 31 h, -S9
Solvent 0.5% 115 1000 7 0 0 7
116 1000 2 0 0 2
0.00263 127 1000 3 0 0 3
128 1000 4 0 0 4
0.00593 123 1000 7 0 0 7
124 1000 1 0 0 1
0.0133 119 1000 3 0 0 3
120 1000 4 0 0 4
Colchicine
0.0400 µg/mL
139 1000 21 5 0 26
140 1000 16 6 0 22
Main Assay III
Dose level (μL/mL) Culture No. Cells
scored
(BiN cells)
BiN cells
with
1 Mn
BiN cells
with
2 Mn
BiN cells
with
>2 Mn
BiN cells
with
Mn
Treatment: 3 h, +S9
Solvent 1% 141 1000 9 1 0 10
142 1000 7 3 0 10
0.0752 157 1000 9 0 0 9
158 1000 9 0 0 9
0.0994 153 1000 5 0 0 5
154 1000 7 0 0 7
0.132 149 1000 8 2 0 10
150 1000 7 0 0 7
Cyclophosphamide 20.0 µg/mL 161 1000 28 4 0 32
162 1000 35 4 0 39
MonoN: Mononucleated cells
BiN: Binucleated cells
PoliN: Polinucleated cells
CBPI: Cytokinesis block proliferation index
% Cytotoxicity: Relative to vehicle/solvent control cultures
Mn: Micronucleus/micronuclei

Table 3: Historical control data

UNTREATED AND SOLVENT CONTROLS
  -S9 +S9
  Short treatment time (3 h) Long treatment time (31-32 h) Short treatment time (3 hours)
Mean 0.33 0.39 0.36
SD 0.21 0.30 0.24
n 64 61 64
UCL 0.75 0.96 0.85
LCL 0.00 0.00 0.00
POSITIVE CONTROL
  +S9 -S9
  Short treatment time (3 h) Long treatment time (31-32 h)
  Cyclophosphamide Colchicine
Mean 2.97 3.10
SD 1.40 1.30
n 51 46
Minimum 0.95 1.10
Maximum 7.65 8.50
SD: Standard deviation
UCL: Upper Confidence Limit (Mean value + 2SD) 
LCL: Lower Confidence Limit (Mean value - 2SD)
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
05 June - 11 Oct 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2016
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
Target gene:
HPRT locus
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Dr. J. Thacker, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, UK.
- Suitability of cells: Cell type selected is listed as one of the recommended cell types in OECD guideline 476.

For cell lines:
- Absence of Mycoplasma contamination: checked periodically
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically ‘cleansed’ of spontaneous mutants: yes

MEDIA USED
- Type and composition of media, CO2 concentration, humidity level, temperature:

Eagle’s Minimal Essential Medium (EMEM) Minimal medium:
EMEM (10X): 58.7 mL
L-glutamine (200 mM): 5.9 mL
Sodium bicarbonate (7.5%): 15.7 mL
Non-essential amino acids (100X): 5.9 mL
Streptomycin sulphate (50000 IU/mL) + Penicillin G (50000 IU/mL): 1.2 mL
Sterile distilled water: 500 mL

EMEM Complete medium:
EMEM Minimal medium: 900 mL
Foetal Calf Serum (FCS): 100 mL

- Incubation conditions: 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere (100% nominal relative humidity)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone.
- Species: rat
- Strain: Sprague Dawley
- Sex: male
- Age: 5 - 6 weeks
- Weight: 175 - 199 g
- Tissue: liver
- Inducing Agents: phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Producer: TRINOVA BIOCHEM GmbH, Giessen, Germany
- Batch Number: 3971
- Quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): yes
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Cytotoxicity test (+/-S9): 0.00328, 0.00819, 0.0205, 0.0512, 0.128, 0.320, 0.800, 2.00, 5.00 µL/mL
No cells survived at and above 0.0512 µL/mL in the absence of metabolic activation and at and above 0.320 µL/mL in the presence of metabolic activation.

Mutation assay (-S9): 0.00205, 0.00410, 0.00819, 0.0102, 0.0128, 0.0160, 0.0200 µL/mL
Mutation assay (+S9): 0.0307, 0.0614, 0.123, 0.154, 0.192, 0.240, 0.300 µL/mL
The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiments was based on data from the cytotoxicity test.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)

- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the limited solubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was selected as the vehicle. This vehicle was selected since it is compatible with the survival of cells and the S9 metabolic activation system.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
ethylmethanesulphonate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: duplicate
- Number of independent experiments : single

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding: 2 x 10E6
- Test material added in medium

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 3 h

FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium between treatment and selection): 8 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selective agent): 10 - 15 days
- Selective agent used: 6-thioguanine, 7.5 µg/mL
- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells: 1 x 10E5

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Relative survival (RS)

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
- Method: Mutant frequency (MF) per million surviving cells
Evaluation criteria:
EVALUATION CRITERIA
A test item is considered to be clearly positive if:
– At least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase, compared with the concurrent solvent/vehicle control.
– The increase is concentration-related.
– Any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative control data (95% confidence limits).

A test item is considered to be clearly negative if:
– None of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase, compared with the concurrent solvent/vehicle control.
– There is no concentration-related increase.
– All results are inside the distribution of the historical negative control data (95% confidence limits).

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
The assay was considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1. The mutant frequency of the solvent/vehicle control is within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the laboratory’s historical control database.
2. The positive controls induce responses that are compatible with those generated in the historical control database and produce a statistically significant increase in mutant frequency, compared with the concurrent solvent/vehicle control.
3. Two experimental conditions are tested (i.e. with and without metabolic activation), unless one gives positive results.
4. Adequate number of cells (i.e. at least 20 x 10E6 at treatment time and at least 2 x 10E6 during the expression period) and concentrations (at least 4 with appropriate cytotoxicity) are analysable.
5. The selection of dose levels is consistent with those indicated in § 4.3 of the Study Protocol.
Statistics:
Individual mutation frequencies were transformed to induce homogeneous variance and normal distribution. The mutant frequency in the solvent control and treated cultures was compared using the Dunnett’s test (one-tailed). For each experimental point, the corrected sum of squares of transformed mutation frequencies was calculated.For each experimental point, the t value was calculated. For each comparison of treatment with control, the calculated t value was compared with tabulated critical values for the one tailed Dunnett’s test. The results of the experiment were subjected to an Analysis of Variance in which the effect of replicate culture and dose level in explaining the observed variation were examined.
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Strong cytotoxicity was observed at and above a test substance concentration of 0.0205 µL/mL in cytotoxicity test (RS < 10%); concentrations in main assays were selected accordingly.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: Treatment with the test item did not change the pH at any dose level in any experiment.
- Data on osmolality: Treatment with the test item did not increases the osmolality at any dose level in any experiment.
- Precipitation and time of the determination: No precipitation of the test item was noted at any dose level.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES
A preliminary cytotoxicity assay was performed using a single culture at each test point both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. No positive controls were included. The test item was assayed at concentrations of 0.00328, 0.00819, 0.0205, 0.0512, 0.128, 0.320, 0.800, 2.00 and 5.00 µL/mL. In the absence of S9 mix, no cell survived treatment at and above concetrations of 0.0512 µL/mL while in the presence of S9 mix, no cell survived treatment at and above 0.320 μL/mL. Based on these findings the test item concentrations in the main assay were selected.

STUDY RESULTS
- Treatment with the positive control items gave marked responses that were compatible with those generated in the historical control database and produced a statistically significant increase in mutant frequency, compared with the concurrent solvent/vehicle control, indicating the correct functioning of the test system. An adequate number of cells and concentrations was analysed; concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data are reported in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- The mutant frequencies in the negative control cultures fell within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the laboratory’s historical control data; data are presented in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

Table 1: Summary
Without metabolic activation With metabolic activation
Dose level (µL/mL) %RS MF Sig Dose level (µL/mL) %RS MF Sig
0.00 100 4.26   0.00 100 14.5  
0.00205 82 15.3 * 0.0307 88 9.04 NS
0.00410 99 11.3 NS 0.0614 105 6.02 NS
0.00819 65 15.0 * 0.123 63 16.8 NS
0.0102 62 9.40 NS 0.154 91 13.9 NS
0.0128 23 9.66 NS 0.192 64 6.05 NS
0.0160 £ £   0.240 29 14.7 NS
0.0200 £ £   0.300 £ £  
EMS
10.0 mM
57 2681 ** DMBA
10.0 µg/mL
51 241 **

Table 2: Survival after treatment
SURVIVAL AFTER TREATMENT WITHOUT METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Treatment Dose Level (µL/mL)   106 cells post treatment Plate counts Mean CE Adjusted CE Mean RS (%)
Sovent control A 0.00 20.2 116 108 115 113 0.57 0.47 0.55 100
B 20.4 158 144 152 151 0.76 0.63
Test Item A 0.00205 19.6 89 93 93 92 0.46 0.37 0.45 82
B 16.2 164 160 157 160 0.80 0.53
Test Item A 0.00410 17.4 104 104 107 105 0.53 0.37 0.54 99
B 17.6 199 203 191 198 0.99 0.71
Test Item A 0.00819 11.4 131 138 137 135 0.68 0.32 0.36 65
B 12.1 155 160 163 159 0.80 0.40
Test Item A 0.0102 12.6 133 130 137 133 0.67 0.34 0.34 62
B 11.9 131 135 145 137 0.69 0.33
Test Item A 0.0128 7.4 89 89 90 89 0.45 0.14 0.13 23
B 7.7 76 76 78 77 0.38 0.12
Test Item A 0.0160 1.3                
B 1.3 £ £ £      
Test item A 0.0200 1.3                
B 1.7 £ £ £      
EMS   10.0 mM 17 88 90 90 89 0.45 0.31 0.31 57
Baseline count     24.4                
SURVIVAL AFTER TREATMENT WITH METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Treatment Dose Level (µL/mL)   106 cells post treatment Plate counts Mean CE Adjusted CE Mean RS (%)
Sovent control A 0.00 30 144 152 152 149 0.75 1.07 1.00 100
B 30.3 129 131 124 128 0.64 0.93
Test Item A 0.0307 24.9 160 150 152 154 0.77 0.92 0.88 88
B 26.7 136 136 125 132 0.66 0.85
Test Item A 0.0614 26.4 170 167 165 167 0.84 1.06 1.05 105
B 29.7 147 146 144 146 0.73 1.04
Test Item A 0.123 21 125 118 112 118 0.59 0.60 0.63 63
B 21.8 120 131 127 126 0.63 0.66
Test Item A 0.154 21.6 154 152 154 153 0.77 0.79 0.91 91
B 25.2 172 174 165 170 0.85 1.03
Test Item A 0.192 23.6 125 138 139 134 0.67 0.76 0.64 64
B 21.9 100 100 102 101 0.50 0.53
Test Item A 0.240 11 116 113 118 116 0.58 0.31 0.29 29
B 10 114 119 114 116 0.58 0.28
Test item A 0.300 0.5                
B 0.4 £ £ £      
DMBA   10.0 µg/mL 25.2 80 82 90 84 0.42 0.51 0.51 51
Baseline count     20.9                

Table 3: Cloning efficiency
CLONING EFFICIENCY WITHOUT METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Treatment   Dose Level (µL/mL ) Plate counts Mean %CE
Solvent control A 0.00 134 131 140 118 59
B 99 96 105
Test Item A 0.00205 86 80 86 88 44
B 92 95 90
Test Item A 0.00410 160 160 160 185 93
B 211 211 209
Test Item A 0.00819 140 142 140 120 60
B 103 100 97
Test Item A 0.0102 151 150 159 149 75
B 145 144 145
Test Item A 0.0128 197 200 200 166 83
B 131 134 132
EMS   10.0 mM 70 70 79 73 37
CLONING EFFICIENCY WITH METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Treatment   Dose Level (µL/mL) Plate counts Mean %CE
Solvent control A 0.00 108 112 101 111 55
B 110 122 110
Test Item A 0.0307 130 128 123 144 72
B 159 156 167
Test Item A 0.0614 113 111 108 108 54
B 101 106 109
Test Item A 0.123 104 101 93 98 49
B 96 97 99
Test Item A 0.154 104 96 97 101 50
B 105 104 97
Test Item A 0.192 98 98 102 108 54
B 112 113 122
Test Item A 0.240 122 120 112 136 68
B 151 146 165
DMBA   10.0 µg/mL 131 155 148 145 72

Table 4: Mutation frequency
MUTATION FREQUENCY WITHOUT METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Treatment   Dose Level (µL/mL) Plate counts Tot. Mean SD MF MF Pooled cultures t Sig.
Solvent control A 0.00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0.4 0.67 5.19 4.26    
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
B 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0.2 0.37 3.00
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test item A 0.00205 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 11 0.6 0.76 13.10 15.31 3.060 *
0 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
B 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 16 0.8 1.01 17.33
0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 2 1
Test item A 0.00410 4 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 21 1.05 1.00 13.13 11.34 2.335 NS
1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 1
B 0 2 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 21 1.05 0.89 9.98
3 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 0
Test item A 0.00819 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 11 0.55 0.69 7.82 14.96 2.976 *
0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 2
B 2 2 0 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 25 1.3 0.97 25.00
1 1 4 0 1 1 2 1 1 0
Test item A 0.0102 2 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 14 0.7 1.03 9.13 9.40 1.841 NS
3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
B 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 14 0.7 0.73 9.68
1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0
Test item A 0.0128 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 3 0 19 1.0 1.05 9.55 9.66 1.913 NS
2 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0
B 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 13 0.7 0.99 9.82
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2
EMS   10.0 mM 88 79 98 94 96 103 134 123 121 128 1957 97.9 18.39 2681   28.190 **
120 82 85 85 104 86 83 79 71 98
MUTATION FREQUENCY WITH METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Treatment   Dose Level (µL/mL) Plate counts Tot. Mean SD MF MF Pooled cultures t Sig.
Solvent control A 0.00 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 11 0.6 0.51 10.28 14.48    
0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0
B 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 21 1.1 1.10 18.42
1 0 2 3 1 1 0 2 2 0
Test item A 0.0307 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 9 0.5 0.60 7.09 9.04 -1.360 NS
0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
B 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 17 0.9 0.75 10.58
2 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2
Test item A 0.0614 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 8 0.4 0.50 7.23 6.02 -2.365 NS
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
B 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0.25 0.44 4.75
0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Test item A 0.123 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 15 0.75 0.79 15.10 16.78 0.583 NS
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0
B 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 18 0.9 0.97 18.49
1 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 0
Test item A 0.154 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 19 1.0 0.89 19.19 13.93 -0.144 NS
1 0 1 0 2 0 3 1 0 0
B 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 9 0.45 0.51 8.82
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Test item A 0.192 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0.2 0.41 4.03 6.05 -2.454 NS
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
B 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 0.5 0.60 7.78
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
Test item A 0.240 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 17 0.9 0.93 14.41 14.71 0.162 NS
3 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 2
B 3 1 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 23 1.2 1.09 14.94
3 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0
DMBA   10.0 µg/mL 15 17 16 19 16 15 20 16 17 15 348 17.4 2.01 240.6   10.909 **
20 12 16 20 18 18 16 20 21 18

CE = Cloning efficiency

RS = Relative survival

SD = Standard deviation

Tot = Total number of mutant colonies

MF = Mutant frequency per million survival cells

£ = Insufficient number of cells recovered after treatment period

Sig = Significance level

NS = Not statistically significant

* = Statistically significant at p < 0.05

** = Statistically significant at p < 0.01

*** = Statistically significant at p > 0.001

Table 5: Historical control data
HISTORICAL DATA OF NEGATIVE/SOLVENT CONTROL
mutation frequencies per million surviving cells (up to May 2019)
WITHOUT METABOLIC ACTIVATION WITH METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Day 8 / Day 9 Day 8 / Day 9
Mean value
9.49 11.19
Standard deviation
8.65 8.82
Number of experiments
72 73
Upper confidence limit (5%)
26.8 28.8
Observed range
1.45 - 65.14 1.48 - 59.72
HISTORICAL DATA OF POSITIVE CONTROL
mutation frequencies per million surviving cells (up to November 2018)
WITHOUT METABOLIC ACTIVATION WITH METABOLIC ACTIVATION
Day 8 / Day 9 Day 8 / Day 9
Mean value
1147.38 503.30
Standard deviation
401.15 282.27
Number of experiments
72 73
Observed range
391 - 2631 109.86 - 1670.18
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
17 May - 24 June 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
his operon (S. typhimurium strains) and trp operon (E. coli strain)
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone.
- Species: rat
- Strain: Sprague Dawley
- Sex: male
- Age: 5 - 6 weeks
- Weight: 175 - 199 g
- Tissue: liver
- Inducing Agents: phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Producer: TRINOVA BIOCHEM GmbH, Giessen, Germany
- Batch Number: 4009
- Quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): yes
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Main assay I (plate incorporation) and main assay II (pre-incubation):
TA1535, WP2 uvrA, TA98 (+/-S9): 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, 2.50, 5.00 µL/plate
TA1537 (+/-S9) and TA100 (+S9): 0.00977, 0.0195, 0.0391, 0.0781, 0.156, 0.313 µL/plate
TA100 (-S9): 0.00244, 0.00488, 0.00977, 0.0195, 0.0391, 0.0781 µL/plate

Main assay III (pre-incubation):
TA1535 (-S9): 0.00977, 0.0195, 0.0391, 0.0781, 0.156, 0.313 µL/plate
TA1537 (-S9): 0.000610, 0.00122, 0.00244, 0.00488, 0.00977, 0.0195 µL/plate
WP2 uvrA (-S9): 0.0391, 0.0781, 0.156, 0.313, 0.625, 1.25 µL/plate
TA100 (-S9): 0.000305, 0.000610, 0.00122, 0.0024, 0.00488, 0.00977 µL/plate

The test concentrations were selected based on the results of a toxicity test with all 5 strains in which no precipitation occured. However, severe cytotoxicity at most of the concentrations tested with TA1537 and TA100 strains (both in the absence and presence of S9) was observed up to and including the highest concentration of 5 µL/plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: DMSO was selected based on the solubility of the test substance and its compatibility with the survival of the bacteria and the S9 metabolic activity. The test item was found to be miscible at 100 μL/mL. This allowed a maximum concentration of 5.00 μL/plate.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 2-Aminoanthracene (2-AA), +S9
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments : three

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation, main assay I) and preincubation (main assays II and III)

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period: 30 min at 37 °C (main assays II and III)
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 72 h at 37 °C

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: decline in the number of spontaneous revertants, a thinning of the background lawn or a microcolony formation
Evaluation criteria:
The test material may be considered positive in this test system if the following criteria are met:
For the test item to be considered mutagenic, two-fold (or more) increases in mean revertant numbers must be observed at two consecutive dose levels or at the highest practicable dose level only. In addition, there must be evidence of a dose-response relationship showing increasing numbers of mutant colonies with increasing dose levels. All cultures must demonstrate the characteristic mean number of spontaneous revertants in the vehicle controls.
Statistics:
Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Plate incorporation method: no cytotoxicity +/- S9; preincubation method: at and above 0.156 µL/plate +S9, no cytotoxicity -S9.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Plate incorporation method: at and above 0.156 µL/plate +/- S9; preincubation method: at and above 0.00977 µL/plate -S9, at and above 0.156 µL/plate +S9.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Plate incorporation method: at and above 0.313 µL/plate +S9 and 0.0781 µg/plate -S9; preincubation method: at and above 0.313 µL/plate +S9 and 0.00488 µL/plate -S9.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Plate incorporation method: no cytotoxicity +/s S9; preincubation method: at and above 0.625 µL/plate -S9, no cytotoxicity +S9.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation and time of the determination: No precipitation of the test item was observed at the end of the incubation period at any concentration in any experiment.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDY:
Concentrations of 0.0500, 0.158, 0.500, 1.58 and 5.00 μL/plate of the test item in the presence and absence of S9 mix in S. typhimurium TA1935, TA1937, TA98, TA100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A were tested in an plate incorporation experiment. Severe toxicity, as indicated by thinning of the background lawn and/or reduction in revertant numbers, was observed at all or almost all concentrations with TA1537 and TA100 tester strains both in the absence and presence of S9 mix. The highest concentration analysed was selected based on the solubility of the test substance.

STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data are presented in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

Ames test:
- Individual plate counts are presented in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation are presented in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- Mean plate counts for untreated and positive control plates fell within the normal range based on historical control data. Data are presented in tabular form under 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.

Table 1: Detailed results of Main Assay I
MAIN ASSAY I Plate incorporation method
Strain: TA1535                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 14 20 14 16 2.0 16 14 18 16 1.2
0.00 15 17 14 15 0.9 18 20 17 18 0.9
0.313 14 16 19 16 1.5 18 17 18 18 0.3
0.625 17 14 15 15 0.9 17 20 17 18 1.0
1.25 17 17 16 17 0.3 18 14 13 15 1.5
2.50 17 16 21 18 1.5 14 14 16 15 0.7
5.00 15 20 19 18 1.5 15 16 14 15 0.6
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.  
Sodium Azide 1 µg/plate - 532 489 507 509 12.5
DMSO 100 µL/plate + 18 20 17 18 0.9
2-Aminoanthracene 1 µg/plate + 161 172 154 162 5.2
Strain: TA1537                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 17 17 18 17 0.3 24 20 17 20 2.0
0.00 19 22 16 19 1.7 20 20 21 20 0.3
0.00977 16 17 22 18 1.9 21 24 24 23 1.0
0.0195 17 22 18 19 1.5 23 25 20 23 1.5
0.0391 15 19 14 16 1.5 19 23 21 21 1.2
0.0781 12 14 16 14 1.2 25 23 22 23 0.9
0.156 14 16 16 15* 0.7 22 18 16 19* 1.8
0.313 12 12 10 11** 0.7 20 24 21 22** 1.2
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
DMSO 100 µL/plate - 19 22 16 19 1.7
9-Aminoacridine 50 µL/plate - 207 163 182 184 12.7
DMSO 100 µL/plate + 20 20 21 20 0.3
2-Aminoanthracene 1 µL/plate + 117 121 129 122 3.5
* : Slight thinning of the background lawn                
**: Moderate thinning of the background lawn                
Strain: WP2 uvrA                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 27 31 25 28 1.8 37 31 42 37 3.2
0.00 26 31 34 30 2.3 33 28 34 32 1.9
0.313 29 27 24 27 1.5 31 36 32 33 1.5
0.625 29 28 31 29 0.9 32 35 35 34 1.0
1.25 26 28 34 29 2.4 38 36 35 36 0.9
2.50 26 26 29 27 1.0 24 29 32 28 2.3
5.00 27 24 24 25 1.0 25 29 30 28 1.5
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
MMS 500 µg/pl - 144 152 153 150 2.8
DMSO 100 µL/pl + 33 28 34 32 1.9
2-Aminoanthracene 10 µg/pl + 130 127 131 129 1.2
Strain: TA98                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 28 30 26 28 1.2 39 32 39 37 2.3
0.00 27 30 26 28 1.2 40 37 41 39 1.2
0.313 24 27 21 24 1.7 34 43 37 38 2.6
0.625 24 21 28 24 2.0 38 33 39 37 1.9
1.25 26 31 25 27 1.9 30 32 33 32 0.9
2.50 26 27 25 26 0.6 38 34 37 36 1.2
5.00 28 26 26 27 0.7 38 37 37 37 0.3
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
DMSO 100 µL/plate - 27 30 26 28 1.2
2-Nitrofluorene 2 µL/plate - 140 166 152 153 7.5
DMSO 100 µL/plate + 40 37 41 39 1.2
2-Aminoanthracene 1 µL/plate + 317 356 406 360 25.8
Strain: TA100                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 117 113 113 114 1.3 114 127 127 123 4.3
0.00 126 127 121 125 1.9 115 108 102 108 3.8
0.00244 140 141 136 139 1.5 NT
0.00488 140 145 133 139 3.5 NT
0.00977 136 140 140 139 1.3 108 109 110 109 0.6
0.0195 133 133 120 129 4.3 102 106 113 107 3.2
0.0391 126 127 122 125 1.5 107 106 116 110 3.2
0.0781 90 91 83 88* 2.5 129 121 124 125 2.3
0.156 NT 109 109 108 109 0.3
0.313 NT 98 97 86 94* 3.8
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
Sodium Azide 1 µg/plate - 621 655 724 667 30.3
DMSO 100 µL/plate + 115 108 102 108 3.8
2-Aminoanthracene 1 µg/plate + 918 1020 1083 1007 48.1
* : Slight thinning of the background lawn                
NT: Not tested                    

Table 2: Detailed results of Main Assay II
MAIN ASSAY II Pre-incubation method
Strain: TA1535                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 21 20 17 19 1.2 13 14 14 14 0.3
0.00 18 18 21 19 1.0 14 16 13 14 0.9
0.313 13 15 17 15** 1.2 17 13 15 15 1.2
0.625 13 15 16 15** 0.9 15 14 14 14 0.3
1.25 14 16 15 15** 0.6 16 15 15 15 0.3
2.50 17 15 19 17** 1.2 12 15 16 14 1.2
5.00 12 12 11 12** 0.3 12 11 12 12 0.3
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
Sodium Azide 1 µg/plate - 382 416 384 28.1 11.0
DMSO 50 µg/plate + 14 16 13 14 0.9
2-Aminoanthracene 1 µg/plate + 113 113 110 21.4 1.0
**: Moderate thinning of the background lawn                
Strain: TA1537                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 20 16 15 17 1.5 23 22 21 22 0.6
0.00 18 18 21 19 1.0 21 20 20 20 0.3
0.00977 15 14 12 14* 0.9 25 20 23 23 1.5
0.0195 10 11 12 11** 0.6 23 20 20 21 1.0
0.0391 8 8 7 8** 0.3 18 23 15 19 2.3
0.0781 4 5 7 5** 0.9 17 18 21 19 1.2
0.156 8 6 9 8*** 0.9 17 17 15 16* 0.7
0.313 5 7 5 6*** 0.7 14 12 18 15** 1.8
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
DMSO 50 µL/plate - 18 18 21 19.1 1.0
9-Aminoacridine 50 µL/plate - 92 86 94 31.3 2.4
DMSO 50 µL/plate + 21 20 20 20.0 0.3
2-Aminoanthracene 1 µL/plate + 78 78 85 20.3 2.3
*: Slight thinning of the background lawn                  
** : Moderate thinning of the background lawn  
***: Severe thinning of the background lawn                
Strain: WP2 uvrA                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 30 31 32 31 0.6 37 35 38 37 0.9
0.00 29 29 29 29 0.0 35 33 39 36 1.8
0.313 30 30 30 30 0.0 32 41 41 38 3.0
0.625 28 28 26 27* 0.7 33 39 40 37 2.2
1.25 29 22 22 24** 2.3 39 35 32 35 2.0
2.50 20 25 24 23*** 1.5 35 32 37 35 1.5
5.00 25 29 25 26*** 1.3 28 26 26 27 0.7
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
MMS 500 µg/plate - 112 114 117 23.4 1.5
DMSO 50 µg/plate + 35 33 39 5.2 1.8
2-Aminoanthracene 20 µg/plate + 135 150 167 30.5 9.2
*: Slight thinning of the background lawn                  
** : Moderate thinning of the background lawn  
***: Severe thinning of the background lawn                
Strain: TA98                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 27 31 32 30 1.5 35 35 36 35 0.3
0.00 33 34 29 32 1.5 34 39 39 37 1.7
0.313 26 32 25 28 2.2 29 31 30 30 0.6
0.625 32 31 25 29 2.2 28 30 34 31 1.8
1.25 29 29 29 29 0.0 30 30 29 30 0.3
2.50 24 25 25 25 0.3 27 25 28 27 0.9
5.00 27 25 29 27 1.2 30 35 28 31 2.1
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
DMSO 50 µl/plate - 33 34 29 1.2 1.5
2-Nitrofluorene 2 µl/plate - 125 123 127 4.5 1.2
DMSO 50 µl/plate + 34 39 39 6.2 1.7
2-Aminoanthracene 2 µl/plate + 507 681 643 1.9 52.8
Strain: TA100                    
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E. With metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts Plate counts
Untreated 125 118 128 124 3.0 156 158 147 154 3.4
0.00 124 132 122 126 3.1 147 148 159 151 3.8
0.00244 128 123 132 128 2.6 NT
0.00488 120 122 120 121 0.7 NT
0.00977 78 79 78 78* 0.3 123 120 128 124 2.3
0.0195 98 97 91 95** 2.2 121 116 118 118 1.5
0.0391 89 86 85 87*** 1.2 115 128 124 122 3.8
0.0781 82 89 80 84*** 2.7 129 127 121 126 2.4
0.156 NT 137 134 126 132 3.3
0.313 NT 78 77 68 74* 3.2
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
Sodium Azide 1 µg/pl - 680 542 623 615 40.0
DMSO 50 µL/pl + 147 148 159 151 3.8
2-Aminoanthracene 2 µg/pl + 1316 1086 1218 1207 66.6
*: Slight thinning of the background lawn                  
** : Moderate thinning of the background lawn  
***: Severe thinning of the background lawn  
NT: Not tested                    

Table 3: Detailed results of Main Assay III
MAIN ASSAY III Pre-incubation method
Strain: TA1535              
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts
Untreated 14 14 14 14 0.0
0.00 15 15 14 15 0.3
0.00977 18 21 21 20 1.0
0.0195 15 14 15 15 0.3
0.0391 15 17 15 16 0.7
0.0781 16 13 13 14 1.0
0.156 12 12 13 12* 0.3
0.313 13 13 12 13** 0.3
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
Sodium Azide 1 µg/plate - 412 463 394 423 20.7
* : Slight thinning of the background lawn          
**: Moderate thinning of the background lawn          
Strain: TA1537              
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts
Untreated 13 15 14 14 0.6
0.00 14 17 16 16 0.9
0.000610 19 20 16 18 1.2
0.00122 15 16 13 15 0.9
0.00244 18 19 20 19 0.6
0.00488 17 15 16 16 0.6
0.00977 10 10 12 11** 0.7
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
DMSO 50 µL/pl - 14 17 16 16 0.9
9-Aminoacridine 50 µg/pl - 89 103 127 106 11.1
**: Moderate thinning of the background lawn          
Strain: WP2 uvrA              
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts
Untreated 30 26 27 28 1.2
0.00 34 31 27 31 2.0
0.0391 29 26 32 29 1.7
0.0781 25 30 29 28 1.5
0.156 27 26 34 29 2.5
0.313 27 29 30 29 0.9
0.625 26 22 22 23* 1.3
1.25 21 23 24 23** 0.9
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
MMS 500 µg/pl - 156 161 179 165 7.0
*:  Slight thinning of the background lawn          
**: Moderate thinning of the background lawn          
Strain: TA100              
Dose-level [µL/plate] Without metabolic activation Mean S. E.
Plate counts
Untreated 154 142 141 146 4.2
0.00 120 136 131 129 4.7
0.000305 131 134 139 135 2.3
0.000610 141 121 121 128 5.7
0.00122 156 138 159 151 6.6
0.00244 121 129 128 126 2.5
0.00488 92 100 90 94* 3.1
0.00977 88 76 78 81** 3.7
Controls   S9 Plate counts Mean S. E.
Sodium Azide 1 µg/plate - 715 883 779 792 49.0
*  : Slight thinning of the background lawn          
**: Moderate thinning of the background lawn          

Table 4: Historical control data
TA 1535 Plate incorporation TA 1535 Pre-incubation
  Negative Control Positive control   Negative Control Positive control
  -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9   -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
Mean 18 17 518 136 Mean 18 17 528 98
SD 2.6 2.2 81.7 27.9 SD 2.5 2.2 78.4 14.7
UCL 23.2 21.3 681.3 191.6 UCL 23.0 21.5 684.5 127.2
LCL 12.8 12.7 354.6 79.9 LCL 12.8 12.7 370.7 68.5
n 491 492 491 492 n 393 379 393 378
min 13 12 299 81 min 12 12 374 54
max 16 22 750 241 max 25 23 774 179
TA 1537 Plate incorporation TA 1537 Pre-incubation
  Negative Control Positive control   Negative Control Positive control
  -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9   -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
Mean 17 21 177 114 Mean 18 21 169 98
SD 2.3 2.9 40 21 SD 2.3 2.4 46.4 12.4
UCL 21.7 26.7 257.2 156.7 UCL 22.1 25.7 261.8 122.3
LCL 12.6 15.2 97.0 72 LCL 13.0 16.1 76.3 72.8
n 495 494 495 494 n 386 371 386 370
min 11 15 92 75 min 12 15 72 69
max 27 33 407 181 max 27 27 412 142
TA 98 Plate incorporation TA 98 Pre-incubation
  Negative Control Positive control   Negative Control Positive control
  -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9   -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
Mean 31 38 162 508 Mean 31 39 163 628
SD 3.3 3.9 29.3 157.8 SD 3.1 3.2 26.7 180
UCL 37.7 46.0 220.3 823.5 UCL 37.4 45.8 216.5 987.7
LCL 24.3 30.5 103.0 192.2 LCL 25.1 33.1 109.8 267.6
n 497 497 497 497 n 377 353 377 353
min 23 29 109 203 min 24 33 115 188
max 43 53 259 994 max 43 50 256 1377
TA 100 Plate incorporation TA 100 Pre-incubation
  Negative Control Positive control   Negative Control Positive control
  -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9   -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
Mean 141 151 633 1192 Mean 143 150 676 1118
SD 17.7 18.3 157.0 230.2 SD 16.7 15.5 154.3 201.8
UCL 176.1 188.0 947.3 1652.1 UCL 176.6 181.2 984.8 1521.5
LCL 105.4 114.3 319.3 731.4 LCL 109.7 119.2 367.5 714.2
n 499 498 499 498 n 386 366 386 365
min 109 86 144 607 min 112 119 325 745
max 182 196 1081 2257 max 192 197 1081 1701
WP2 uvrA Plate incorporation WP2 uvrA Pre-incubation
  Negative Control Positive control   Negative Control Positive control
  -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9   -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
Mean 28 34 178 194 Mean 28 33 189 198
SD 2.9 3.5 20.1 36.9 SD 3.0 3.2 41.6 33.8
UCL 34.0 40.5 218.7 268,3 UCL 33.7 39.5 272.0 265.5
LCL 22.4 26.7 138.1 120,6 LCL 21.7 26.5 105.5 130.3
n 430 430 430 430 n 315 302 315 301
min 21 26 127 117 min 20 24 113 129
max 38 47 240 333 max 38 44 351 322
SD: Standard Deviation
UCL: Upper Confidence Limit (mean value + 2 SD)
LCL: Lower Confidence Limit (mean value - 2 SD)
n: number of experiments
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Bacterial reverse mutation assay

Mutagenicity in bacteria was assessed in a study performed with the registered substance isotridecanol, ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS No. 69011-36-5, EC No. 500-241-6) according to OECD guideline 471 (adopted 1997) under GLP conditions (Sasol/BASF, 2019a). Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and E. coli strain WP2 uvrA were treated using the plate incorporation method and the preincubation method, both with and without the addition of a metabolic activation system (rat liver S9 mix). The dose levels selected for the different strains in the plate incorporation experiment (first assay) were the following: TA1535, WP2 uvrA, TA98 (±S9): 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, 2.50 and 5.00 µg/plate; TA1537 (±S9) and TA100 (+S9): 0.00977, 0.0195, 0.0391, 0.0781, 0.156 and 0.313 µg/plate; TA100 (-S9): 0.00244, 0.00488, 0.00977, 0.0195, 0.0391 and 0.0781 µg/plate. Cytotoxicity was observed with TA1537 and TA100 tester strains at the highest dose levels, both in the absence and presence of S9 mix. No cytotoxicity was observed with the remaining tester strains and, therefore, the same dose levels were applied in the pre-incubation assay (second assay). However, in this assay, severe cytotoxicity was observed with most tester strains in the absence of metabolic activation and a third experiment (pre-incubation method) was necessary in order to have a sufficiently high number of analysable concentrations. In this third assay the following dose levels were used: TA1535 (-S9): 0.00977, 0.0195, 0.0391, 0.0781, 0.156 and 0.313 µg/plate; TA1537 (-S9): 0.000610, 0.00122, 0.00244, 0.00488, 0.00977 and 0.0195 µg/plate; WP2 uvrA (-S9): 0.0391, 0.0781, 0.156, 0.313, 0.625 and 1.25 µg/plate; TA100 (-S9): 0.000305, 0.000610, 0.00122, 0.00244, 0.00488 and 0.00977 µg/plate. All tests were carried out in triplicates. The vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) control and untreated control produced counts of revertant colonies within an acceptable range. All positive controls used induced significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without the metabolising system. No mutagenic activity of the test substance to any of the tester strains was observed with and without metabolic activation at any dose level. Thus, under the conditions of this test, the test substance can be regarded as not mutagenic in bacteria.

In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test

The registered substance isotridecanol, ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS No. 69011-36-5, EC No. 500-241-6) was assayed for its ability to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes, following in vitro treatment in the presence and absence of an S9 metabolic activation system (rat liver S9 mix). Experiments were conducted according to OECD guideline 487 (adopted 2016) and observing GLP conditions (Sasol/BASF, 2020). A total of three experiments were performed: a short-term treatment, in which cells were treated for 3 h both in the absence and presence of S9 mix and harvested at 32 h, and a long-term (continuous) treatment where cells were treated in the absence of S9 mix, until harvest at 31 h. The dose levels applied were 0.195, 0.293, 0.439, 0.658, 0.988, 1.48, 2.22, 3.33 and 5.00 µL/mL. An additional dose of 0.130 µL/mL was included for the continuous treatment. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) served as vehicle. Since severe cytotoxicity was observed at all dose levels in all experiments, a second assay needed to be performed. The dose levels applied in the second assay were: ±S9 (3 h treatment, 31 h harvest): 0.00780, 0.0117, 0.0176, 0.0263, 0.0395, 0.0593, 0.0889, 0.133 and 0.200 µL/mL; -S9 (32 h treatment, 32 h harvest): 0.000520, 0.000780, 0.00117, 0.00176, 0.00263, 0.00395, 0.00593, 0.00889, 0.0133 and 0.0200 µL/mL. In the presence of S9 metabolic activation an adequate level of cytotoxicity to select dose levels for scoring was not achieved. Therefore, this treatment series was repeated by using a very narrowly spaced concentration interval. The following dose levels were selected: 0.0654, 0.0752, 0.0865, 0.0994, 0.114, 0.132, 0.151, 0.174 and 0.200 µL/mL. Each experiment included appropriate negative and positive controls. Two replicate cell cultures were prepared at each test point. The actin polymerisation inhibitor Cytochalasin B was added after 3 h treatment to allow the selective analysis of micronucleus frequency in binucleated cells. The cytokinesis block proliferation index (CBPI) was calculated in order to evaluate cytotoxicity. 2000 binucleated cells per culture were scored to assess the frequency of micronucleated cells as well as the number of micronuclei per cell, while 1000 cells in total per concentration were assessed for cytotoxicity. Adequate cell proliferation was observed in negative control cultures and an appropriate number of doses and cells was analysed. The negative and positive control treatments yielded the expected results. No statistically significant increase in the incidence of micronucleated cells over the concurrent solvent control value was observed at any dose level at any treatment condition for the test substance. It can therefore be concluded that the test substance does not induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes after in vitro treatment under the reported experimental conditions.

In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test

The mutagenic potential of the registered substance isotridecanol, ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS No. 69011-36-5, EC No. 500-241-6) in mammalian cells was assessed in a HPRT-assay according to OECD guideline 476 (adopted 2016) under GLP conditions (Sasol/BASF, 2019b). Following pre-tests with concentrations ranging from 0.00328 - 5.00 µL/mL, Chinese hamster V79 cells were exposed for 3 h to test substance concentrations of 0.00205, 0.00410, 0.00819, 0.0102, 0.0128, 0.0160 and 0.0200 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and at concentrations of 0.0307, 0.0614, 0.123, 0.154, 0.192, 0.240 and 0.300 µL/mL in the presence of metabolic activation by rat liver S9 mix. In both treatment series cytotoxic effects  were observed at one or several concentrations. No relevant increase in mutant numbers or mutant frequency was observed following treatment with the test substance at any dose level, in the absence or presence of S9 mix. Negative and positive control treatments were included in each mutation experiment. Significant increases in mutant numbers or mutant frequency were obtained with the positive control treatments, indicating the correct functioning of the assay system. It is concluded that the test substance does not induce gene mutation in Chinese hamster V79 cells after in vitro treatment in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation under the reported experimental conditions.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on genetic toxicity obtained with isotridecanol, ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS No. 69011-36-5, EC No. 500-241-6) do not meet the criteria for classification according to the CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.