Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Oral (OECD 401), rat: LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw (limit test)
Inhalation (OECD 436), rat: LC50 > 5.7 mg/L air
Dermal (OECD 402), rabbit: LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw (limit test)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Basic data given. Lack of detail on test material
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
lack of detail on test material
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Wistar-derived albino rats
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 156 - 232 g
- Fasting period before study: animals were fasted overnight prior to administration
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
no data
Doses:
5000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: animals were observed for mortality and signs of toxicity daily; the body weight was recorded on Day 0 prior to dosing and on Day 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: no data
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs and body weight.
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred during the study period.
Clinical signs:
other: other: No clinical signs of toxicity were observed up to the end of the 14-day observation period.
Gross pathology:
Necropsy and histopathological examination revealed no substance-related findings.

 Table 1: Summary of results

Dose (mg/kg bw)

Animal Number and Sex

Bodyweight (grams) (Day 0)

Clinical signs

Bodyweight (grams) (Day 14)

Hours:

Days:

1 - 24

2 - 14

 

 

 

 

5000

1M

204

N

N

322

2M

201

N

N

318

3M

192

N

N

302

4M

176

N

N

265

5M

156

N

N

240

6F

210

N

N

252

7F

214

N

N

267

8F

216

N

N

278

9F

232

N

N

296

10F

232

N

N

292

N – Normal

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
The available information comprises adequate, reliable (Klimisch score 2) and consistent study, and is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VII, 8.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
03 Jun - 17 Jun 2010
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
GLP - Guideline study. According to the ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (Dec 2012)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 436 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity: Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2009
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Crl:WI (Han)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: max. ± 20% of the sex mean
- Housing: Before exposure-Group housing of maximally 5 animals per sex per cage in labeled Makrolon cages (type IV; height 18cm.) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material (Litalabo, S.P.P.S., Argenteuil, France) and paper as cage-enrichment (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, UK). After exposure - Group housing as described above, maximally 3 animals per sex per cage.
- Diet: pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF Spezialdiäteb GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum except during exposure to the test substance.
- Water: tap-water, ad libitum except during exposure to the test substance.
- Acclimation period: 5 days before the start of treatment under laboratory conditions.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 40-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:
Route of administration:
inhalation: aerosol
Type of inhalation exposure:
nose only
Vehicle:
air
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION

- Exposure apparatus: The design of the exposure chamber is based on the flow past nose-pnly inhalation chamber (Am.Ind.Hyg Assoc.J. 44(12): 923-928, 1983). The chamber consists of animal sections with eight animal ports each. Each animal port has its own atmosphere inlet and exhaust outlet.

- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Animals are placed in restraining tubes, which is then connected to the exposure chamber.

- Source and rate of air: The theoretical air flow was at least 1L/min.

- System of generating aerosols: An aerosol was generated by nebulization of the test substance by means of a nebulizer (type 950,
Hospitak Inc., Lindenhurst, NY, USA). The primary aerosol was diluted with pressurized air before it entered the exposure chamber. The mean total airflow was 16 L/min. From the exposure chamber the test atmosphere was passed through a filter before it was released to the exhaust of the fume hood.

- Method of conditioning air: The direction of the flow of the test atmosphere guarantees a freshly generated atmosphere for each individual animal.

- Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber: The temperature of the atmosphere was between 20.0 and 20.7 °C and relative humidity was between 28 and 30%. These conditions were considered appropriate for the relatively short 4 hours exposure duration.


TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: Samples were drawn through a glass fiber filter (type APFC04700, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The collected amount of test substance in the air sample was measured gravimetrically. Sample volumes were measured by means of a dry gas meter (type G 1.6, Actaris Meterfabriek B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes


VEHICLE
- The test substance was used as delivered by the sponsor

TEST ATMOSPHERE (if not tabulated)
- MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) / GSD (Geometric st. dev.): The MMAD was 2.5 µm (GSD 2.4) and 2.6 µm (GSD 2.3).

CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting concentration: Target concentrations were based on the cut off concentration values specified in the UN and EC classification guidelines.
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Remarks:
gravimetrically
Duration of exposure:
4 h
Concentrations:
The mean actual concentration was 5.7 ± 0.4 mg/L. The nominal concentration was 15.4 mg/L. The generation efficiency (ratio of actual and nominal concentration) was 37%. Data obtained from the opacity monitor showed that the aerosol was sufficiently stable.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
Mortality/Viability: twice daily
Clinical signs: twice on the day of dosing (1 and 3 hours after exposure); daily thereafter until day 15
Body weight: recorded on day1 (pre-exposure), 2, 4, 8 and 15
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,organ weights, histopathology
All animals were sacrificed at the end of the observation period by an intraperitoneal injection with Euthasol® (AST Farma BV, Oudewater, The Netherlands).
Statistics:
No statistical analysis was performed (the method used was not intended to calculate a LC50 value).
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 5.7 mg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: No mortalities occured. Apart from hunched position observed in all on day2 after exposure, no further signs of adverse toxicity were observed until the end of the 14 day observation period.
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 15.4 mg/L air (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
4 h
Mortality:
No mortalities occured during the 14-day observation period.
Clinical signs:
other: Hunched posture was shown by all animals on Day 2 after exposure. No clinical signs were noted during exposure.
Body weight:
Body weight gain in males and females were within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study.

Gross pathology:
No abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals.
Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study (Klimisch score 2) from a reference substance with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common functional groups, common precursors/breakdown products and similarities in physicochemical and toxicological properties (refer to endpoint discussion for further details). The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.5, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
19 May - 2 Jun 2010
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-guideline study. The test substance was applied with an occlusive dressing.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
the test substance was applied with an occlusive dressing
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
the test substance was applied with an occlusive dressing
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1200 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
the test substance was applied with an occlusive dressing
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No. 8147, November 2000; including the most recent partial revisions
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
the test substance was applied with an occlusive dressing
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Wistar Crl:WI (Han)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: approximately 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 269-284 g (males), 181-194 g (females)
- Housing: animals were housed individually in labelled Makrolon cages (MIII type, height 18 cm) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material (Litalabo, S.P.P.S., Argenteuil, France) and paper as cage-enrichment (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd.), Surrey, UK). During the acclimation period the animals were housed in groups in Macrolon cages (MIV type).
- Diet: pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19.6-21.2
- Humidity (%): 39-62
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: the back of the animals; approximately 25 cm² for males and 18 cm² for females
- % coverage: 10
- Type of wrap if used: the test substance was held in contact with the skin with a dressing, consisting of a surgical gauze patch (Surgy 1D) covered with aluminium foil and Coben elastic bandage, respectively. A piece of Micropore tape was used to fix the bandage in females only.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): the skin was cleaned using tap water
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bw
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes, the dose volume was calculated as dose level (g/kg) / density (g/mL)
Duration of exposure:
24 h
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
other: an untreated, adjacent skin area served as the control
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: the animals were observed twice daily for mortality; the body weight was recorded on Day 1 (prior to dosing), 8 and 15.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes, on Day 15 the animals were subjected to necropsy and all gross macroscopical abnormalities were recorded
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs were observed at periodic intervals on the day of dosing (day 1) and once daily thereafter, until sacrifice. The time of onset, degree and duration were recorded and the symptoms graded:
Maximum grade 4: grading slight (1) to very severe (4)
Maximum grade 3: grading slight (1) to severe (3)
Maximum grade 1: presence is scored (1)
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
There was no mortality during the study period (see Table 1).
Clinical signs:
other: other: Piloerection was observed from 4 h - day 2 after dosing in 2/5 males (see Table 2). Chromodacryorrhoea (excessive secretion of a reddish-brown liquid from the eyes) (grade 1) was observed in 3/5 males 2-4 hours after dosing. No systemic clinical s
Gross pathology:
The necropsy and histopathological examination did not reveal substance-related findings.
Other findings:
- Other observations: On the treated skin area, erythema was observed for up to 4 days during Day 3-7 in 3/5 females. Scales or scabs (grade 1) were noted on the treated skin area in 5/5 females and 3/5 males for up to 9 days during Day 7-15 of the observation period.

Table 1: Mortality and clinical signs

Dose
[mg/kg bw]

Toxicological results*

Duration of clinical signs

Time of death

Mortality (%)

Males

2000

0/3/5

4 h – day 2 

Day 1-3

0

Females

2000

0/0/5

-

Day 1

0

LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw

* first number = number of dead animals                                 

second number = number of animals with systemic clinical signs         

  third number = number of animals used                 Table 2: Clinical signs, systemic/local

Effect*

Max grade

Male No./duration (hours or day after dosing)

Female No./duration (hours or day after dosing)

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Systemic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Piloerection

 1

4 h - 2 d

 

 

 

4 h - 2 d

 

 

 

 

 

Chromoda-cryorrhoea

 3

 

2 - 4 h

2 - 4 h

4 h

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Erythema, focal

 4

 

 

 

 

 

7 d

 

7 d

3 – 7 d

7 d

Scales

 3

 

 

8 – 10 d

7 – 15 d

 

7 – 8 d, 14 d

8 – 11 d

7 – 9 d

7 – 8 d

7 – 9 d

Scabs

 3

 

7 - 11 d

 

9 - 15 d

 

8 – 13 d

 

 

 

 

* all grade 1

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study (Klimisch score 2) from a reference substance with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common functional groups, common precursors/breakdown products and similarities in physicochemical and toxicological properties (refer to endpoint discussion for further details). The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.5, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

Additional information

Justification for read-across

There are no data available on the acute inhalation and dermal toxicity of fatty acids, C14-18, C14-18-alkyl esters (CAS 85566-24-1). In order to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.5, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, read-across from structurally related substances was conducted.

In accordance with Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, "information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests, provided that the conditions set out in Annex XI are met.” In particular for human toxicity, information shall be generated whenever possible by means other than vertebrate animal tests, which includes the use of information from structurally related substances (grouping or read-across to avoid the need to test every substance for every endpoint).

The target substance and all source substances are considered to be similar on the basis of the structural similar properties and/or activities. The available endpoint information on the source substances is used to predict comparable results for the target substance fatty acids, C14-18, C14-18-alkyl esters (CAS 85566-24-1).


The target substance is characterized as an UVCB substance comprised of esters of mainly C14 fatty acid/C14 alcohol, C16 fatty acid/C14 alcohol and C16 fatty acid/C16 alcohol substances. The three source substances are structurally similar to the target substance: 2-ethylhexyl oleate (CAS 26399-02-0) is a mono-constituent substance consisting of oleic acid esterified with 2-ethylhexylanol. Tetradecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester (CAS 3234-85-3) is a mono-constituent substance of a C14 fatty acid esterified with C14 alcohol. Decyl oleate (CAS 3687 -46 -5) is a mono-constituent substance consisting of C18:1 oleic acids esterified with decan-1-ol. Thus, target and source substance contain similar structural properties based on common functional groups. A detailed analogue approach justification is provided in the technical dossier (see IUCLID Section 13).

Discussion

Acute oral toxicity

CAS 85566-24-1

An acute oral toxicity study with fatty acids, C14-18, C14-18-alkyl esters (CAS 85566-24-1) was investigated in male and female, Wistar-derived albino rats equivalent to OECD TG 401 (Croda, 1976a). The neat test substance was administered by gavage to groups of 5 animals per sex at a limit dose of 5000 mg/kg bw. No mortalities and no clinical signs were observed up to the end of the 14-day observation period. Body weights were not affected by treatment with the test substance. The necropsy examination did not reveal substance-related findings. Based on the results, the oral LD50 value for male and female rats was determined to be greater than 5000 mg/kg bw.

  

Acute inhalation toxicity

CAS 26399-02-0

An acute inhalation study was performed with 2-ethylhexyl oleate (CAS 26399-02-0) according to OECD TG 436 and in compliance with GLP, in 3 male and 3 female Crl:WI(Han) rats (van Huygevoort, 2010). The animals were exposed to an analytical concentration of 5.7 mg/L of the test substance for 4 hours nose only in an exposure chamber based on the flow past nose-only inhalation chamber (Am. Ind. Hyg Assoc. J. 44(12): 923-928, 1983). An aerosol was generated by nebulization of the test substance by means of a nebulizer (type 950, Hospitak Inc.). No mortalities were reported during the exposure or within the 14-days observation period. Hunched posture was shown by all animals on Day 2 after exposure. No clinical signs were noted during exposure. Additionally body weight gain in males and females was within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study. No abnormalities were found at macroscopic post-mortem examination of the animals. The inhalatory 4 hour LC50 value of 2-ethylhexyl oleate aerosol in Wistar rats was found to exceed 5.7 mg/L.

Acute dermal toxicity

CAS 3687-46-5

 

An acute dermal toxicity study (limit test) was performed with decyl oleate (CAS 3687-46-5) according to GLP and OECD TG 402 (Beerens-Heijnen, 2010). 2000 mg/kg bw of the test substance was applied to the skin of 5 Wistar rats/sex/dose under an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. No mortality occurred. Piloerection and/or chromodacryorrhoea were noted in all males on Day 1 and/or 2. No clinical signs were noted in females. The body weight increases were within the range expected for rats used in this type of study and no treatment-related findings were reported during the necropsy and histopathological examination. Erythema was observed on the treated skin for up to 4 days during the first week in 3/5 females. Scales or scabs were noted on the treated skin area in 5/5 females and 3/5 males for up to 9 days during Day 7-15 of the observation period. The LD50 is considered to be > 2000 mg/kg bw.

 

CAS 3234-85-3

 

An acute dermal toxicity study was briefly summarised in a review publication by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review, (CIR Expert Panel, 1982). 2000 mg/kg bw tetradecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester (CAS 3234-85-3) was applied to the skin of 10 albino rabbits of unknown sex for 24 hours. The type of coverage was not specified. No mortality occurred and no clinical signs were reported. Some skin irritation was noted at the application site, with maximum skin irritation scores of well-defined erythema (grade 2 of 4) and very slight edema (grade 1 of 4).

 

 

Conclusions for acute toxicity

Based on read-across and substance-specific data, sufficient evidence is available to conclude that the substance fatty acids, C14-18, C14-18-alkyl esters (CAS 85566-24-1) has no hazard for acute toxicity.

 

 


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
There is only one study available.

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
Hazard assessment is conducted by means of read-across from a structural analogue. The selected study is an adequate and reliable study based on the identified similarities in structure and intrinsic properties between source and target substance and overall assessment (refer to the endpoint discussion for further details).

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Hazard assessment is conducted by means of read-across from a structural analogue. The selected study is the most adequate and reliable study based on the identified similarities in structure and intrinsic properties between source and target substance and overall assessment refer to the endpoint discussion for further details).

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on acute toxicity (oral, dermal and inhalation route) of the target and structural analogues do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and Directive 67/548/EEC, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification..