Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
02.11.-6.11.2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.17 (Oxidising Properties (Solids))
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Based on earlier studies the test substance was not dried. The reason is that the test substance contents high hydrophilic sulfonate salts that rapidly bind air humidity. This deviation has no negative impact on the study results.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on tets material:- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Reactive Orange 5- Physical state: solid, powder- Analytical purity: 90% (w/w)- Impurities (identity and concentrations): NaCl (CAS: 7647-14-5) 10% (w/w)- Composition of test material, percentage of components:- Lot/batch No.: 8001- Expiration date of the lot/batch: unlisted- Storage condition of test material: The test substance should be stored in dry room in dark in closed container at the room temperature.
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Duration of test (contact time):
< 47 s
Sample tested:
test mixture as specified
Remarks:
barium nitrate with cellusie
Parameter:
burning time of reaction over a distance of 200 mm
Result:
> 246 - < 415 mm/s
Key result
Sample tested:
test mixture as specified
Parameter:
burning time of reaction over a distance of 200 mm
Remarks on result:
other: On basis of the result obtained from trial test, it is obvious that none of the test substance mixtures with cellulose burned all distance of 200 mm of the pile.

Table No.1: Process of burning of mixtures of the test substance with cellulose

Test substance

 (w/w %)

Burning Time (s)

Distance from 200 mm (mm)

Note

10

47

7

-

20

*

-

without flame

30

*

-

without flame

40

*

-

without flame

50

*

-

without flame

60

*

-

without flame

70

*

-

without flame

80

*

-

without flame

90

*

-

without flame

Table No.2: Burning times of reference mixtures of barium nitrate with cellulose

% Ba(NO3)2 (w/w)

% Cellulose (w/w)

Burning time – distance 200 mm (s)

Burning Rate (mm/s)

Note

10

90

246

0.813

-

20

80

279

0.717

-

30

70

257

0.778

-

40

60

297

0.673

-

50

50

309

0.647

-

60

40

355

0.563

-

70

30

415

0.482

-

80

20

*

-

Without flame

90

10

*

-

Without flame

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
On basis of the result obtained from trial test, it is obvious that none of the test substance mixtures with cellulose burned all distance of 200 mm of the pile. Thus test substance, Reactive Orange 5, shouldn´t be considered as a substance with oxidizing properties.
Executive summary:

The oxidizing properties of test substance, Reactive Orange 5, were determined.

 

The procedure was performed according to the Method A.17 Oxidizing properties (Solids),Council Regulation (EC) No.440/2008, published in O.J. L 142, 2008.

 

On basis of the result obtained from trial test, it is obvious that none of the test substance mixtures with cellulose burned all distance of 200 mm of the pile. Thus test substance, Reactive Orange 5, shouldn´t be considered as a substance with oxidizing properties.

Description of key information

The procedure was performed according to the Method A.17 Oxidizing properties (Solids).

Only one study is available.

GLP study.

Klimish score 1.

On basis of the result obtained from trial test, it is obvious that none of the test substance mixtures with cellulose burned all distance of 200 mm of the pile.Thus test substance, Reactive Orange 5, shouldn´t be considered as a substance with oxidizing properties.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Base on the available information, the test substance Reactive Orange 5 is not classified.