Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 268-626-9 | CAS number: 68131-73-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study Reliably conducted. Missing some detail expected of a GLP report. Purity information and analytical certificate present.
- Guideline:
- other: EEC L133 1988 p 118-122
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Alternative reference compound used.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Instead of 3,5-dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol was used as a reference compound because 3,5 -dichlorophenol was not commercially
available. 2,4,5 Trichlorophenol was chosen for its structural resemblance and is expected to give the same resultas 3,5-dichlorophenol. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- No Sampling
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on test solutions:
- The stock solution of the. test compound (25.0 g/dm3) was titrated to a neutral pH. No further information on stock preparation
- Test organisms (species):
- other: See below
- Details on inoculum:
- Secondary activated sludge was collected from the RZWI Nieuwgraaf in Duiven (1989.04.19). This activated sludge plant predominantly treats
domestic waste-e water. 50 cm of synthetic sewage was added to 1 dm3 of the activated sludge. This was then aerated overnight at 20°C and was
kept aerated during the day of the test (1989.04.20). - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 30 min
- Post exposure observation period:
- No Data
- Hardness:
- No Data
- Test temperature:
- 20ºc
- pH:
- See Results Table Below
- Dissolved oxygen:
- See oxygen consumption in results table below
- Salinity:
- No Data
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 0, 20, 60, 180,540,1620 mg/dm3 (Nominal)
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2,4,5- trichlorophenol
- Duration:
- 30 min
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 400 other: mg/dm 3
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: Approx
- Duration:
- 30 min
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 3 000 other: mg/dm 3
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: APPROX
- Duration:
- 30 min
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: estimate from data
- Details on results:
- The validity of the test is shown by two criteria. Firstly, the start control respiration rates are within 2% of each other and secondly,
the EC50 of the reference compound is within the described range (5-30 mg/dm3) - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- See results table Below
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- EC 20 and EC 50 results could be estimated. However due to the fact that only the higher concentrations in the testing range had effect on the
resperation of the sludge not all of the EC concentrations could be calculated. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Study is missing some information in methods, reference substance used was not the recommended one, and study is not carried out to OECD
guidelines however this does not affect reliability. A well distributed dose response curve was also not achieved. However the critical validity criteria
(see above) were met and the reference substance did fall within the reccomended limits. The study can therefore be considered reliable with the
minor restrictions mentioned. - Executive summary:
Study was reliably conducted to EEC guidelines. Critical validity criteria were met.Substance ID was sufficient and the test was carried out to GLP.
Higher ethylene polyamines do not significantly inhibit the respiration rate at the concentrations tested and due to this result the log-normal distribution of the gffects cannot be used. However it can be concluded from the figure that the EC (the concentration with 20% inhibition of the respiration in comparison to the control) and EC50 of higher ethylene polyamine are about 400 and 3200 mg/dm3, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test conducted to GLP. Sufficient substance information was provided (without analysis certificate). No clear guideline was used, no quality criteria were reported and no reference substance was tested. Reliable with restrictions mentioned.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Test Principles,
In the nitrification inhibition test, the effect of a test substance on the respiration activity of nitrifying bacteria is determined. Nitrifying bacteria are
exposed to a range of concentrations of the test substance and the respiratation activity is compared to a control. Without test substance. From the
relation between the concentration and the inhibition, the concentration causing an inhibition of 50% (EC50) may be determined.
Standard procedure/ test method used : Internal SOP: T16, T33, 47 - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- A stock solution of 25 g/l was prepared by dissolving the test substance in demineralized water containing concentrkted HCL.
The presence of the test substance in the medium caused a change of the pH, which was outside the range that can be supported by
the test organism. Therefore, the pH was neutralized in the stock solution to a value between 7.0 and 7.3. The chosen test concentrations were
prepared by dilution of the stock solution with the suspension of bacteria. - Test organisms (species):
- other: Primarily nitrifying bacteria.
- Details on inoculum:
- Nitrifying bacteria were kept in a continuous culture, according to Blok (1981) and CRL Internal Standard Operation Procedure T 16. The bacteria werecultured in a wuppertaler tank with a total volume of approximately 120 liter. Nitrifying bacteria are chemo-autotroph; they may use CO2
HC03- as a carbon source.
The culture medium contained per liter 50 g (NH4)2S04, 714 mg Nap4. 12 H20 and 91.6 ml NaOH (50%). The C02 flow was 150ml/min .
The bacteria contained a high cell concentration of nitrifying bacteria and had a dry weight between 1.1 and 1.4 d.s./l. The maximum respiration
activity varied between 1.6 and 3.5 mg O/l.min or between 1.4 and 2.5 mg 0 /(g d.s).min in March and September, respectively.
The optimal pH for the reactions is 8.2, with limits of 7.5 and 8.5.
origin : ARLA
dry weight: 1.44 g d.s./l - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 2 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- No post exposure period.
- Hardness:
- Not Reported
- Test temperature:
- During the exposition period, the vessels were held at room temperature, around 20°C
- pH:
- Measured see results table below
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Measured to determine respiration activity see table below
- Salinity:
- Not Reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 140,250,450,810 mg/l (Nominal)
- Details on test conditions:
- Various concentrations of the test substance were added to nitrifying bacteria. The suspension was mixed (aerated) during 2
hours. After 2 hours the respiration activity was measured and compared to the activity in a control without test substance.
Next, the pH was measured. During the exposition period, the vessels were held at room temperature, around 20°C. The
respiration activity was measured at 20 ±l°C - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 2 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 319.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL
- Duration:
- 2 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 69 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of nitrification rate
- Details on results:
- At first glance EC50 value above appeared to low based on mg/02/l.min. However this data was re-calculated in Toxcalc 5.0 to check this. This check
gave a result of 317.5mg/l which is well within the confidence limits stated in the report. The EC50 was therfore calculated reliably. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- No reference substance tested.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- For each test concentration, the respiration activity and the inhibition as compared to the control were calculated. The inhibition percentages were
plotted against the test concentrations and the EC50 and its 95% confidence limits, if possible, were determined by Probit Analysis using a SAS
procedure.
(SAS, 1985). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with restrictions
- Conclusions:
- Although no official guideline was followed this study was carried out to laboratory specific SOP's and was given GLP accreditation. Lack of
reference substance and quality criteria do restrict the reliability of this data considerably as the microorganisms used are not validated. However the basic methodology for the study was sound and substance identification data was sufficient. This study can therefore be considered reliable
with the restrictions mentioned. - Executive summary:
Lacking guideline, Reference substance and clear quality criteria. However a standard method was followed from SOP's and the study was given GLP accreditation. Can be considered reliable with these restrictions.
The effect of higher ethylene polyamines (HEPA) on the respiration activity of nitrifying bacteria was determined. The respiratation activity of bacteria exposed to the test substance during three hours was compared to a control without test substance and the inhibition was calculated. From the relation between the concentration and the inhibition percentages, the EC50 was determined. The EC50 was 319 mg HEPA per liter, with 95% confidence limits of.80 and 559 mg/l. The respiration activity was inhibited-almost completely by a concentration of 810 mg HEPA per liter.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to microorganisms, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ISO/TC 147/SC5/WG 1
- Version / remarks:
- Inhibition of cell multiplication
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The test substance was dissolved in the growht medium using concentrated stock solutions (10 and 25 g/dm³). these solutions were titrated to a neutral pH using a 1 M H2SO4 solution. - Test organisms (species):
- Pseudomonas putida
- Details on inoculum:
- - Laboratory culture:
Pseudomonas putida strain was obtained from the Agricultural University Wageningen , Dept. of Microbiology. The strain was maintained on yeast/glucose slants which contained per dm³ demiwater: 15 g agar, 5 g glucose and 1 g yeast extract.
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 17 h
- Test temperature:
- 25°C
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test substance concentrations: control, 1.6, 3.1, 6.3, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: test medium: 1.55 g/L K2HPO4, 0.85 g/L NaH2PO4, 0.5 g/L NH4Cl, 0.1 g MgSO4(H2O)7, 0.1 cm² trace element solution, 2 g/L glucose, 0.1 g/L yeast extract
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
The turbidity was determined photometriclly (wavelenth 435 nm) after an incubation period of 17 h. - Duration:
- 17 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth inhibition
- Duration:
- 17 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth inhibition
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Probit analysis with a SAS procedure.
Referenceopen allclose all
General Commments
No clear guideline was used and no quality criteria were reported and no reference substance was tested. Internal SOPs were referred to and procedure appears to be standardised and reliably conducted. GLP accreditation was given and suitable substance information (without analysis certificate) was given.
Table 1: Percentage of inhibition of the growth of P. putida.
Test substance concentration [mg/L] |
Inhibition of multiplication (H) [%] |
1.6 |
0 |
3.1 |
23 |
6.3 |
94 |
12.5 |
97 |
25 |
92 |
50 |
96 |
100 | 94 |
Description of key information
An EC50(2 h) of 319.3 mg/L was determined in a study on the inhibition of the respiration of nitrifying bacteria.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for microorganisms:
- 319.3 mg/L
Additional information
The toxicity of the substance to STP microorganisms was tested in two different studies.
In the key study nitrifying bacteria were exposed to nominal substance concentrations of 140, 250, 450 and 810 mg/L. The respiration of the nitrifying bacteria in presence of the test substance during the two hour test period was compared to a control. An EC50(2 h) of 319.3 mg/L (nominal) based on the respiration rate was determined.
In a second available study the effect of the test substance on the respiration rate of activated sludge was tested according to EEC guideline L133 (1988). The tested substance concentrations were 20, 60, 180, 540, 1620 mg/dm3 (nominal). The respiration of activated sludge was followed for 30 minutes. The estimated EC50(30 min) value was 3000 mg/dm³ (nominal).
A study investigating the growth inhibition of Pseudomonas putida was conducted according to guideline ISO/TC 147/SC5/WG 1. The inhibition of bacterial growth was tested at following test concentrations: 1.6, 3.1, 6.3, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg/L. After an incubation period of 17 h the growth inhibition was tetermined by measruing the turbitity of the test solutions. An EC50(17 h) of 5 mg/L (nominal) was determined.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.