Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Two valid repeated-dose toxicity studies have been located, one for the target substance isopropylnaphthalene (28 d) and one for the supporting substance bis(isopropylnaphthalene (6 month). The more conservative NOAEL for bis(isopropyl)naphthalene has been selected for further use in the chemical safety assessment.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Meets national standard method, basic data given, acceptable for assessment (Engl. translation with key data, 6 data tables and 2 figures included)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: national standard (Japan)
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Tokyo Experimental Animals, Inc.
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation:
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: 1 / cage (steel cage)
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12


Route of administration:
oral: feed
Details on oral exposure:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food):
- Storage temperature of food:


Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
6 months
Frequency of treatment:
continuous
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0.25, 0.5, and 1 % in the diet = ca. 170, 340, and 670 mg/(kg bw*d)
Basis:
nominal in diet
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
yes, plain diet
Details on study design:
Post-exposure period: none
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule:

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes / No / No data
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes / No / No data

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes / No / No data

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
- Dose groups that were examined:

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: after 6 mon (termination)
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (ether)
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: after 6 mon (termination)
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.

URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine:
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes / No / No data
- Animals fasted: Yes / No / No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
- Dose groups that were examined:
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / other:

OTHER:
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (not documented)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see table 6)
Statistics:
done (Methods not stated)
Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Details on results:
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
No mortality occurred at any dose level. In the high dose group, reduced activity, diarrhea, and rough fur were observed.

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
Body weight gain was reduced in a dose-related manner at the 0.5- and 1-% dietary level in both male and female animals (Tab. 2),
with a mean weight gain of 90 and 80 % of control at 0.5 % and with 62 and 57 % of control at 1 % (males and females, resp.).

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study)
Significant depression in the 1%-group (p <0.05): approx. 22 % (m), approx. 19 % (f) vs. control (Report, Tab. 1 and Fig 2).
There is a dose-related declining trend in food consumption, but not statistically significant at the 0.25 and 0.5% dosage level.

HAEMATOLOGY
Significant decreases in erythrocyte count (EryC) (at 0.5- and 1-% level, male/female) and in white blood cells (at 1-% level, females), in haemoglobin and haematocrit (Ht) (>0.5-% level, males; and 1-% level, females).
The mean EryC was reduced at about 14 and 16 % in males and at 9 % in females, the leukoC at about 23 % in females; the mean Ht was reduced at 5.5 and 7 % in males and at about 8 % in females vs. respective controls (significance level p <0.05).

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Only the highest dose group of males showed significant changes in SGOT (mean increase: +45%) and sugar (mean decrease: -27%),
a negative trend was seen for the blood-glucose level noticeable in high-dose females (significance level: p <0.05%).

URINALYSIS
No differences were observed between control and treated groups for pH, protein, occult blood and glucose.

ORGAN WEIGHTS
At the high doses, hepatic and renal enlargement as well as spleen enlargement was seen (some 20 %, related to relative organ weights).

GROSS PATHOLOGY
Hypertrophy in the liver was observed for the males and females of the 0.5- and 1-% level group.
Effects in kidneys (at 0.5- and 1-% level, males and females) were specified as "cell infiltration into stroma" and "cylinder in renal tubule cavity". There was no evidence of nephropathy and degenerations.
In the spleen (1-% level, males and females), "congestions" were observed.
In the thymus, "abnormalities of the medulla" and "congestion or bleeding" are reported in the high-dosed groups (males and females), but these effects were also present in the controls (males) and low-dose group (females) and are considered not to be treatment related.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
Overall, histopathology revealed no morphological abnormalities but extremely slight changes at the highest dose level in both sexes
and in males at the 0.5-% level. Thus very slight anomalies in the liver at the two highest dose levels were assigned as " irregularity
of liver cells" and "congestion and bleeding". There was no evidence of fatty degeneration or necrosis in the liver.

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
(= 0.25% dietary level)
Effect level:
ca. 170 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: body weight; haematology; gross pathology; organ weights
Dose descriptor:
LOAEL
Remarks:
(= 0.5% dietary level)
Effect level:
ca. 340 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: body weight; haematology; gross pathology; organ weights
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
170 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subchronic
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
acceptable for assessment, SAR but chemical structure closely related to the target substance.

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral:

Target substance isopropylnaphthalene

An oral 28d-repeated-dose toxicity study has recently been located for MIPN, isomer mixture, in the Japanese database NITE. The study is comprehensive including a complete set of parameters according to OECD TG 407 (Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents). Four doses from 10 to 1000 mg/kg bw/day were applied. Report language is Japanese. Therefore, information extractable from the study is limited. But result tables are given in English. From the data presented, a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d, the highest dose tested, can be determined. No relevant adverse effects were observed at this dose level. In the study, a NOEL of 50 mg/kg bw/day is reported. But the sporadic observable minor effects at the highest dose level do not show a clear dose-response relationship and are considered not to be adverse and of toxicological relevance.

Supporting substance bis(isopropyl)naphthalene

Three study reports considered relevant to oral exposure to DIPN were identified, but only two are assessed to be valid.

In Kawai (1973), bis(isopropyl)naphthalene (DIPN) was orally administered in the diet for 6 months. Observations and evaluations correspond to test guideline requirements. In the study of Henwood (1999), 2,6-DIPN was used as test substance, which accounts for 15 - 16 % in DIPN, isomer mixture. Based on the close similarity of all isomers in DIPN, 2,6-DIPN is taken as supporting substance.

Kawai reports a NOAEL of 170 mg/kg bw/day for DIPN isomer mixture. In the study of Henwood, for the supporting substance 2,6-DIPN, NOAELs of 105 and 121 mg/kg bw/day are determined for male and female rats, respectively. Next higher doses (LOAEL) were 208 (males) and 245 (females) mg/kg bw /day. The NOAEL of 170 mg/kg bw/day derived by Kawai for DIPN is below the LOAEL observed by Henwood. Thus, this value is assessed to lie closer to the subchronic toxicity threshold of DIPN. TheNOAEL of DIPN isomer mixture (90 d)is specified to be170 mg/kg bw/day.

The oral 24 months study of Kawai (1977) is a combined carcinogenicity/chronic toxicity study. But there were only a few animals set up as satellites for treatment/observation periods shorter than 24 months. Thus the endpoint chronic toxicity (treatment period shorter than 24 months) is not adequately covered. Observations at 24 months are largely influenced by age involution. Furthermore, mortality was substantially increased at later time points (starting from month 18) due to high incidence of pneumonia in all animals. The derived NOAEL of 12 mg/kg bw/day is considered to be confounded by secondary parameters and, hence, not suitable to express the inherent chronic toxicity potential of the test substance.

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal

No valid information is available. The subacute study (Kureha 1974) provides a NOAEL(dermal, 28 d) of 385 mg/kg/d in rat. Although the value seems to be plausible, no firm conclusions can be drawn from this short summary report.

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

No information could be located. With respect to the low vapour pressure of diisopropylnaphthalene, inhalation is considered to be a potential exposure route of minor practical relevance. Moreover, given the low toxicity found after acute inhalation as well as after repeated oral exposure, it is concluded that adverse effects following prolonged inhalation exposure will be low grade, too.

Selection of a relevant starting point for DNEL derivation

There are two repeated-dose toxicity studies sufficiently reliable that results can be use as starting point for derivation of DNELs. The NOAEL from an oral 28d repeated-dose toxicity study (METI, 2007a) with the target substance isopropylnaphthalene is 1000 mg/kg bw/day. In a 6 month oral repeated-dose toxicity study (Kawai, 1973 / Kureha Chem. Ind. Co., 1974) with the structurally closely related supporting substance bis(isopropyl)naphthalene, a NOAEL of ca. 170 mg/kg bw/day (0.25% test substance in diet) was obtained. When results of the subacute (METI, 2007) and the subchronic (Kawai, 1973 / Kureha, 1974) study are related to chronic exposure duration applying the respective assessment factors used for derivation of DNELs (6 and 2, respectively), the toxicity value resulting from the Kawai study is about half of the value resulting from the METI study. At presence, for reasons of precaution, the more conservative NOAEL of 170 mg/kg bw/day has been selected for further use in the derivation of DNELs and in the chemical safety assessment.


Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects (target organ) digestive: liver

Justification for classification or non-classification

Read-across is made to diisopropylnaphthalene (DIPN), a closely structure-related substance: The NOAEL determined for repeated-dose toxicity of diisopropylnaphthalene exceeds guidance values for Danger of serious damage to health by prolonged exposure according to Directive 67/548/EEC and for specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Classification is not required.