Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
7 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
12.5
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
88 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Using bioavailability of 5 % for the oral and 100 % for the inhalation route and assuming that rat oral and inhalation absorptions are equal to human oral and inhalation absorption, a NOAECcorr of 1000 mg/kg/day / 20 / 0.38 m^3/kg * 6.7/10 = 88 mg/m^3 is used.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
not required, starting point is NOAEL
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
AF was reduced to 1 because no systemic effects were observed in either acute oral and dermal toxicity studies, or in the 90-day repeated oral or in the developmental toxicity studies and therefore, the real 90-day NOAEL is likely to be higher than 1000 mg/kg/day and there is no indication that toxicity increases with duration of exposure.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
not required due to route-to-route extrapolation
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default factor for remaining differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
for worker, a default AF of 5 is to be used
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
not required
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
not required
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
200 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
50
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
10 000 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Using bioavailability of 5 % for the oral and 0.5 % for the dermal route and assuming that rat oral and dermal absorptions are equal to human oral and dermal absorption, thus the corrected dermal NOAEL is 10000 mg/kg/day.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
not required, starting point is NOAEL
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
AF was reduced to 1 because no systemic effects were observed in either acute oral and dermal toxicity studies, or in the 90-day repeated oral or in the developmental toxicity studies and therefore, the real 90-day NOAEL is likely to be higher than 1000 mg/kg/day and there is no indication that toxicity increases with duration of exposure.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
allometric scaling factor rat-human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default factor for remaining differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
for worker, a default AF of 5 is to be used
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
not required
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
not required
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

A sub-chronic study (90-day test) following OECD guideline with application of gavage showed that there was no significant differences in Clinical chemistry, Blood sugar and cholesterol concentrations of rats, blood, urinalysis, clinico-chemical analyses, necropsies and histopathological investigations, gross pathology and histopathology compared with controls in the parameters investigated of the dose groups of 100 to 1000 mg/kg. All values were within normal range. Furthermore, NOAEL derived from a prenatal development study is 1000 mg/kg, which is a good agreement with that from the 90-day test. 

Therefore, it is concluded that a value of 1000 mg/kg can be used as the start point for DNEL derivation. 

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population