Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Data is from the exeprimental report followed standard gudeline.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Determination of the effect of Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex(CAS No12225-21-7) on the
growth of freshwater green alga Chlorella vulgaris (OECD Guideline No.201).
GLP compliance:
not specified
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (IUPAC name): aluminum tris(4-{[3-carboxy-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]diazenyl}benzenesulfonate)
- Common name: FD&C Yellow No. 5 Aluminum Lake
- Molecular formula: C48H33AlN12O27S6
- Molecular weight: 495.4038 g/mol
-InChl:1S/C16H12N4O9S2.Al/c21-15-13(18-17-9-1-5-11(6-2-9)30(24,25)26)14(16(22)23)19-20(15)10-3-7-12(8-4-10)31(27,28)29;/h1-8,13H,(H,22,23)(H,24,25,26)(H,27,28,29);/b18-17+;
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: solid
Analytical monitoring:
no
Details on test solutions:
The test solution was prepared in aseptic condition. The test item Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex was prepared by adding 50 mg of test item in 250 ml of BBM to get the final concentration of 200 mg/L. This stock solution was kept for stirring/sonication for 30 minutes to obtain a homogenous solution for the experiment. The test concentrations were chosen according to the available data of the test item.
The concentrations chosen were set up to the water solubility limit. The remaining test solutions were prepared by dilution from the above stock solution. To have a
better growth and visibility of cells, the initial of the culture was kept 1 X 104cells/ml. Care was taken to have a homogeneous solution for the experiment.
Test organisms (species):
Chlorella vulgaris
Details on test organisms:
The fresh water green alga Chlorella vulgaris, was used as the test organism. Sterile, unicellular, liquid cultures of algae.
The culture was examined under the microscope to confirm that it was unicellular, healthy and not contaminated.
The medium to be used for the growth of algae was Bold’s Basal Medium (BBM). It is a medium composed of macronutrients, micronutrients, alkaline EDTA solution and Iron solution. Stock solution of each of these was prepared separately and then a complete medium was prepared and sterilized. De-ionized water was used to prepare the BBM.
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Test temperature:
24 °C ±2°C.
pH:
6.7 to 7.4
Nominal and measured concentrations:
6.25 mg/L,12.5 mg/L,25 mg/L,50 mg/L,100 mg/L,200 mg/L.All the six concentration were in geometric series spaced by a factor of 2.
Details on test conditions:
Light Quality White Fluoroscent Light
Light Intensity:1500Lux
Photoperiod 16 Hour Light Period : 8 Hour Dark Period
RPM Speed 120 Revolutions per minute
Water Deionized Waer
Test vessel size 100ml
Test solution volume 60ml
Dilution water Bold’s Basal Medium
Test concentration Six test concentration were:
Replicates per concentration
Three replicates for Control
Two replicates for each test concentration
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 200 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: calculated from equation through probit analysis
Details on results:
The microscopic observations were also noted in each of the experimental flasks. All the cells appeared healthy, round and green throughout the test duration in the control and in the experimental flask also no significant changes were observed.

Table 1: Showing the average cell count using Haemocytometer of the test vessels at an

equal interval of 24hrs, 48hrs and 72hrs

Test vessels and test concentration

24 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

Control

Replicate1

12800

54400

70000

Replicate2

14800

55200

69200

Replicate3

12000

54800

67600

CAS No. 12225-21-7

6.25mg/l

Replicate1

10800

49600

57200

Replicate2

11600

49200

60400

12.5mg/l

Replicate1

11600

50400

57600

Replicate2

12800

52000

61600

25mg/l

Replicate1

14000

52400

61600

Replicate2

13200

50400

58000

50mg/l

Replicate1

12800

49600

58400

Replicate2

12400

52400

63600

100mg/l

Replicate1

12000

50400

66400

Replicate2

14400

50000

62800

200mg/l

Replicate1

11600

53200

64800

Replicate2

11600

44000

66000

  

Table 2: Showing the values of average specific growth rate and percentage inhibition

after an interval of 72 hours

 

CONTROL

6.25mg/l

12.5mg/l

25mg/l

50mg/l

100mg/l

200mg/l

Average

Specific

Growth rate (μ)

R1

0.648

R1

0.518

R1

0.583

R1

0.606

R1

0.588

R1

0.631

R1

0.622

R2

0.644

R2

 

0.599

 

R2

 

0.606

 

R2

 

0.585

 

R2

 

0.616

 

R2

 

0.612

 

R2

 

0.629

 

R3

0.637

 

Mean of Avg.

Specific

growth rate

0.643

0.590

0.594

0.595

0.602

0.621

0.625

Percentage

Inhibition (%I)

_

8.250

7.560

7.380

6.375

3.377

2.722

 
Table 3: Depicting pH values at 0 Hours and after 72 Hours of test item exposure to algae

Test vessels and

test concentration

0 Hours

72 Hours

CONTROL

Replicate1

6.84

6.68

Replicate2

6.75

6.64

Replicate3

6.75

6.4

Average

6.78

6.59

CAS No.12225-21-7

6.25mg/l

Replicate1

6.72

6.46

Replicate2

6.69

6.43

12.5mg/l

Replicate1

6.68

6.38

Replicate2

6.68

6.36

25mg/l

Replicate1

6.58

6.44

Replicate2

6.62

6.42

50mg/l

Replicate1

6.64

6.43

Replicate2

6.68

6.48

100mg/l

Replicate1

6.62

6.45

Replicate2

6.62

6.43

200mg/l

Replicate1

6.60

6.43

Replicate2

6.64

6.42

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
After 72 hours of exposure to Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex(CAS No12225-21-7) to various nominal test concentration, EC50 calculated from equation through probit analysis was found to be >200 mg/L.
Executive summary:

The effect of test item Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1Hpyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex, (CAS No. 12225-21-7) was studied on the growth of fresh water green alga Chlorella vulgaris. The study was conducted following OECD guideline 201- Alga, growth inhibition test. The test concentration chosen for the study were 6.25 mg/L,12.5 mg/L,25 mg/L,50 mg/L,100 mg/L,200 mg/L. The test concentrations were prepared using stock solution of the test item using mineral media. The green alga was exposed to the test concentration for a period of 72 hours to observe average specific growth rate and % growth inhibition under the effect of the test item. EC50 calculated graphically through probit analysis was observed to be >200 mg/L. It can be concluded from the value that the Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1Hpyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex, (CAS No. 12225-21-7) is not toxic to the aquatic algae and can be considered as "not classified" as per the classifiecation criteria for aquatic environment.

Description of key information

The effect of test item Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1Hpyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex, (CAS No. 12225-21-7) was studied on the growth of fresh water green alga Chlorella vulgaris. The study was conducted following OECD guideline 201- Alga, growth inhibition test. The test concentration chosen for the study were 6.25 mg/L,12.5 mg/L,25 mg/L,50 mg/L,100 mg/L,200 mg/L. The test concentrations were prepared using stock solution of the test item using mineral media. The green alga was exposed to the test concentration for a period of 72 hours to observe average specific growth rate and % growth inhibition under the effect of the test item. EC50 calculated graphically through probit analysis was observed to be >200 mg/L. It can be concluded from the value that the Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1Hpyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex, (CAS No. 12225-21-7) is not toxic to the aquatic algae and can be considered as "not classified" as per the classifiecation criteria for aquatic environment.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:
200 mg/L

Additional information

Various studies including experimental data following OECD guideline for toxicity to aquatic algae with the target substance Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex(CAS No12225-21-7) were summarized as follows:

Data is from UERL 2017, exeprimental report followed standard gudeline suggests that The effect of test item Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1Hpyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex, (CAS No. 12225-21-7) was studied on the growth of fresh water green alga Chlorella vulgaris. The study was conducted following OECD guideline 201- Alga, growth inhibition test. The test concentration chosen for the study were 6.25 mg/L,12.5 mg/L,25 mg/L,50 mg/L,100 mg/L,200 mg/L. The test concentrations were prepared using stock solution of the test item using mineral media. The green alga was exposed to the test concentration for a period of 72 hours to observe average specific growth rate and % growth inhibition under the effect of the test item. EC50 calculated graphically through probit analysis was observed to be >200 mg/L. It can be concluded from the value that the Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1Hpyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex, (CAS No. 12225-21-7) is not toxic to the aquatic algae and can be considered as "not classified" as per the classifiecation criteria for aquatic environment.

Based on another study report,whose aim of the study was to evaluate the nature of chemical test chemical when comes in contact with the test organism Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus). Test was conducted according to the OECD guideline 201. The stock solution 130.0 mg/l was prepared by dissolving dark yellow powder in OECD growth medium. The test solution was kept 30 min in ultrasonic bath. Test solutions of required concentrations were prepared by mixing the stock solution of the test sample with OECD growth medium and inoculum culture. 0,2.6,5.6,12,27,59,130 mg/l concentration were used.With the test substance one positive control Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) was also run simultaneously. After the exposure of chemical, effect concentration EC50 was calculated using nonlinear regression by the software Prism 4.0. Effect on the growth of algae was determine after an exposure period of 72 hrs.The median effective concentration (EC50) for the test substance Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex(CAS No12225-21-7), in algae was determined to be 74.2 mg/l (95% CI:64.0 - 86.0).on the basis of growth rate inhibition effects in a 72 hour study. Based on the EC50 value, which indicates that the substance is likely to be hazardous to aquatic algae and can be classified as aquatic chronic 3 as per the CLP classification criteria.

Even though varied results for short term toxicity of aquatic algae were available but, based on the maximum notifiers in ECHA and the effect concentration from first experimental study report,we can consider that the test chemical is not toxic and can be classified as not classified as per the classifiecation criteria for aquatic environment.