Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The primary irritation test (IFF, 1984) and the contact-sensitizing test (RIFM, 1975) both indicate no irritation. Therefore the substance is not classified for skin irritation under GHS guidance.

 

The primary irritation test (IFF, 1984) indicates eye irritation. The substance is classified for eye irritation under GHS guidance. Not fully reversible within 7 days, hence classified as Cat.2A.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
April 1975
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
documentation insufficient for assessment
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: Human Maximization Test
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
other: Humans
Type of coverage:
other: Closed patch test
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
5% Folrosia in aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate
Duration of treatment / exposure:
48h
Observation period:
48hr, 72hr
Number of animals:
25 human subjects completed the study.
Details on study design:
Human patch test.
Irritation parameter:
other: Observation of contact-sensitization
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48hr/72hr
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Executive summary:

There were no instances of contact-sensitization from Folrosia on the Maximization Test and no incidences of skin irritation.

Therefore it is concluded that it is unlikely that Folrosia would present a danger of contact-sensitizastion in normal, intended use.

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
30 August, 1983 - 02 September, 1983
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well described short report. Dose, number of animals (with details), experimental design and observation period are described in the study. Performed in compliance with the FDA's GLP.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Pine Acres Rabbitry, W. Brattleboro, VT
- Age at study initiation: 11 to 15 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.5 to 3.0 kg
- Housing: No data
- Diet: Agway Prolab Rabbit formula, lot # W1 32189
- Water: no data
- Acclimation period: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
No data
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated site on the left side of each animal
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
Dermal reactions were scored 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal
Number of animals:
6 males
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
Approximately 24 hours prior to treatment, the fur on the sides of each animal was closely clipped with care taken not to abrade the skin. The test substance was introduced under a 1"x1" gauze pad previously secured to the test site with surgical tape. Four pads were employed, each one for a separate sample. Two different test substance pads were placed on the left side, and two more different test sample pads were placed on the right side. A 1"x1" gauze pad was applied to an untreated site on the left side of each animal to serve as control. The animals were then wrapped with an impervious covering (plastic wrap) and then stockinette to prevent removal of the patches by the animal.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no

SCORING SYSTEM:
The irritation was assessed according to the numerical scoring system according to OECD 404.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal #1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal #1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No erythema or edema was observed.
Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
In an acute dermal irritation study with male rabbits performed equivalent to OECD 404 guideline and GLP principles, no erythema or edema was observed.
Executive summary:

Folrosia, sample 83 -223 -02, was tested in an acute dermal irritation study with male rabbits, performed equivalent to OECD 404 guideline and GLP principles. No erythema or edema was observed.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
December 1984
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In vivo eye irritation method. Dose selections made according to the EPA Health Effect Test Guideline.
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Albino New Zealand White
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
21 days
Observation period (in vivo):
21 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1hr
Score:
35.9
Max. score:
110
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Score:
25.5
Max. score:
110
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Score:
26.1
Max. score:
110
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Score:
36
Max. score:
110
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
7 d
Score:
19.2
Max. score:
110
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
14 d
Score:
2
Max. score:
110
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
21 d
Score:
14
Max. score:
110
Interpretation of results:
Category 2A (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Not fully reversible within 7 days, hence classified as Cat.2A.
Executive summary:

Based on the results of this study, Folrosia is classified as moderately irritating to the Rabbit Eye.

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification