Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to microorganisms

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Minor limitations in experimental design and reporting (no blank control, four concentrations tested only, experimental design and replication not reported, no statistical analysis of data).
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test
Version / remarks:
1993
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
ISO 8192 (Water quality - Test for inhibition of oxygen consumption by activated sludge for carbonaceous and ammonium oxidation)
Version / remarks:
1986 (E), Method B
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
ISO 8192 (Water quality - Test for inhibition of oxygen consumption by activated sludge for carbonaceous and ammonium oxidation)
Version / remarks:
1994
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Analytical monitoring:
no
Vehicle:
no
Test organisms (species):
activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
Details on inoculum:
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: washed, then aerated for 24 h
- Initial biomass concentration: 1 g/L dry matter
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
180 min
Test temperature:
20 +/- 2 deg C
pH:
7.7 (highest test concentration)
Dissolved oxygen:
During aeration: > 2.5 mg/L
At sampling time: > 6.5 mg/L
Nominal and measured concentrations:
20, 100, 500, 1000 mg/L
Details on test conditions:
Test medium: 8 mL of 100-fold dilution of OECD medium
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
3,5-dichlorphenol
Duration:
30 min
Dose descriptor:
other: EC20
Effect conc.:
75 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Remarks:
respiration rate
Key result
Duration:
180 min
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 1 000 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Remarks:
respiration rate
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- Relevant effect levels: EC50 is between 5 - 30 mg/L
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Not reported.
Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The 30-min EC20 was determined to be 75 mg/L and 180-min EC50 was > 1000 mg/L.
Executive summary:

Based on nominal concentrations, the 30 -minute EC20 was determined to be 75 mg/L and the EC50 was not reached after 180 -minute at the highest test concentration of 1000 mg/L. This study is considered reliable with restrictions (Klimisch 2) as it was conducted according to a guideline method and GLP, however there are minor limitations in experimental design and reporting.

Description of key information

The 30-min EC20 was determined to be 75 mg/L and 180-min EC50 was > 1000 mg/L.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for microorganisms:
1 000 mg/L

Additional information

In a respiration inhibition test with activated sludge, the 30-min EC20 was determined to be 75 mg/L and the EC50 was not reached after 180 minutes at the highest nominal test concentration of 1000 mg/L (1998). This study was conducted according to GLP and followed OECD guideline 209, however there are minor limitations in experimental design and reporting (no blank control, four concentrations tested only, experimental design and replication not reported, no statistical analysis of data). This study is considered to be reliable with restriction (Klimisch 2).