L-menthyl acetate

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

No studies are available for L-menthyl acetate. Reliable data are available with the structural analogue menthyl acetate (CAS 89-48-5).

Skin: The test substance was shown to be not irritating to skin.

Eyes: The test substance was found to be non-irritating to the eyes.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Reference 1

Endpoint:

skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

from 2012-05-14 to 2012-08-07

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: GLP study according to OECD TG 439

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)

Version / remarks:

2010

Deviations:

no

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)

Version / remarks:

2009

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Justification for test system used:

Because systemic reactions play a minor role in modulating local skin toxicity potential of chemicals, skin irritation potential may be predicted by in vitro systems, provided they are sufficiently complex to mimic human skin barrier and cell reactivity. In an international prevalidation study performed by ECVAM, the in vitro skin irritation test using the human skin model EpiDerm™ and EpiSkin™ and measurement of cell viability by dehydrogenase conversion of MTT into a blue formazan salt have turned out as a sufficiently promising predictor for skin irritancy potential.

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

not relevant

Controls:

no

Amount / concentration applied:

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 10 µL
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted

Duration of treatment / exposure:

15 min treatment + 42 h incubation

Number of animals:

not relevant

Details on study design:

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes, with PBS
- Time after start of exposure: 15 min

SCORING SYSTEM:
In vitro result: In vivo prediction:
mean tissue viability ≤ 50 % → irritant (I), H315 (category 2)
mean tissue viability > 50 % → non-irritant (NI)

Irritation / corrosion parameter:

other: other: Relative Absorbance

Value:

105.3

Remarks on result:

other:

Remarks:

Basis: other: Test item on EpiSkin. Max. score: 100.0. Reversibility: no data. Remarks: % of negative control. (migrated information)

Results after treatment with menthyl acetate racemic and controls

Dose group	Treat-ment interval	Absor-bance 540 nm Tissue 1*	Absor-bance 540 nm Tissue 2*	Absor-bance 540 nm Tissue 3*	Mean Absorbance of 3 Tissue	Relative absor-bance [%] Tissue 1, 2+3**	Stan-dard De-viation [%]	Rel. Absor-bance [% of negative control]***
Negative Control	15 min	1.154	1.047	1.032	1.077	107.1 97.2 95.8	6.2	100.0
Positive Control	15 min	0.175	0.142	0.154	0.157	16.3 13.2 14.3	1.6	14.6
Test Item	15 min	1.175	1.050	1.178	1.134	109.0 97.5 109.4	6.8	105.3

*Mean of two replicate after blank correction

**Relative absorbance per tissue [rounded values]: 100xabsorbance (tissue)/mean absorbance (negative control)

***Relative absorbance per treatment group [rounded values]: 100xmean absorbance (test item)/mean anbsorbance (negative control)

Interpretation of results:

not irritating

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU

Conclusions:

The mean relative absorbance value of the test item, corresponding to the cell viability, did not decrease (105.3%; threshold for irritancy: ≤ 50%), consequently the test item was non irritant to skin.

Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritation potential of Menthyl Acetate racemic by means of the Human Skin Model Test according to OECD TG 439. Three tissues of the human skin model EpiSkin™ were treated with the test item, the negative or the positive control for 15 minutes. 10 μL of the liquid test item were applied to each tissue, spread to match the tissue size. 10 μL of either the negative control (deionised water) or the positive control (5% Sodium lauryl sulfate) were applied to each tissue. After treatment with the negative control the absorbance values were well within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD  0.6 till ≤ 1.5 for the 15 minutes treatment interval thus showing the quality of the tissues. Treatment with the positive control induced a sufficient decrease in the relative absorbance as compared to the negative control for the 15 minutes treatment interval thus ensuring the validity of the test system. Compared to the value of the negative control, after exposure of the test item Menthyl Acetate racemic the mean relative absorbance value did not decrease (105.3%; threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%). Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential. In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Menthyl Acetate racemic is non irritant to skin according to UN GHS and EU CLP regulation.

Reference 2

Endpoint:

skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo

Type of information:

read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

key study

Justification for type of information:

REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

Please refer to the attached read across justification in section 13.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Irritation / corrosion parameter:

other: Relative Absorbance

Value:

105.3

Remarks on result:

other: Basis: other: Test item on EpiSkin. Max. score: 100.0. Reversibility: no data. Remarks: % of negative control. (migrated information)

Interpretation of results:

GHS criteria not met

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU

Conclusions:

L-menthyl acetate is estimated to be not irritant to skin.

Executive summary:

One study is available from structural analogue menthyl acetate CAS 89-48-5. This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritation potential by means of the Human Skin Model Test according to OECD TG 439. Compared to the value of the negative control, after exposure of the test item the mean relative absorbance value did not decrease (105.3%; threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%). Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Reference 1

Endpoint:

eye irritation: in vivo

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)

Version / remarks:

from February 1987

Deviations:

no

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)

Version / remarks:

from January 1997

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes

Species:

rabbit

Strain:

New Zealand White

Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: not reported
- Weight at study initiation: 2.8 - 3.2 kg bw
- Housing: caged individually in PPO cages (floor area: 2576 cm2) with perforated floor
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted complete rabbit diet Altromin 2123 from Altromin, D-32791 Lage/Lippe, Germany, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): free access to domestic quality drinking watet acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH 2.5
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Vehicle:

unchanged (no vehicle)

Controls:

other: The right eye remained untreated and served as control.

Amount / concentration applied:

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL

Duration of treatment / exposure:

single administration; after 24 hour reading Fluorescein was instilled and treated eye was washed with 20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride solution

Observation period (in vivo):

The eyes were examined on the day before testing and 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the treatment.

Number of animals or in vitro replicates:

4

Details on study design:

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- substance was not removed from the treated eye

SCORING SYSTEM:
see section "Any other information on materilas and methods incl. tables"

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
Fluorescein was instilled after 24 hours, eyes were rinsed with 20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride solution and were examined using UV light

Irritation parameter:

cornea opacity score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0

Max. score:

4

Irritation parameter:

iris score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0

Max. score:

2

Irritation parameter:

conjunctivae score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0.3

Max. score:

3

Reversibility:

fully reversible within: 48 hours

Irritation parameter:

chemosis score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0

Max. score:

4

Irritant / corrosive response data:

One hour after application of the test article all animals showed a diffuse crimson red conjunctiva with individual vessels not easily discernible and some swelling above normal. After 24 hours all animals showed some conjunctival vessels definitely injected. After 48 and 72 hours all animals were free of any signs of eye irritation.

Other effects:

No other effects were reported.

Interpretation of results:

GHS criteria not met

Conclusions:

The substance is non irritating to the rabbit eye.

Executive summary:

The potential for eye irritation was tested for methyl acetate in a GLP study according to OECD guideline No. 405. Four female albino rabbits weighing 2.8 to 3.2 kg were used in the study. The day before testing both eyes of the animals were examined before and after the instillation of Fluorescein to ensure there were no defects or irritation. The next day an aliquot of 0.1 mL of the neat substance was placed in the left eyes of the animals by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently hold together for one second. The right eye remained untreated and served as control. The eyes were examined and the grade of ocular reaction was recorded 1 and 24 hours later. After a first reading at 24 hours, Fluorescein was instilled and the treated eye was rinsed with 20 mL 0.9 % sodium chloride solution. Then the eye was examined again using UV-light to detect possible corneal damage. Further gradings were done after 48 and 72 hours after treatment. One hour after application of the test article all animals showed a diffuse crimson red conjunctiva with individual vessels not easily discernible and some swelling above normal. After 24 hours all animals showed some conjunctival vessels definitely injected. After 48 and 72 hours all animals were free of any signs of eye irritation. On the basis of these observations it was concluded that the substance is non-irritating to the rabbit eye.

Reference 2

Endpoint:

eye irritation: in vivo

Type of information:

read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

key study

Justification for type of information:

REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

Please refer to the attached read across justification in section 13.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

GLP compliance:

yes

Irritation parameter:

cornea opacity score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0

Max. score:

4

Irritation parameter:

iris score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0

Max. score:

2

Irritation parameter:

conjunctivae score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0.3

Max. score:

3

Reversibility:

fully reversible within: 48 hours

Irritation parameter:

chemosis score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours

Score:

0

Max. score:

4

Irritant / corrosive response data:

One hour after application of the test article all animals showed a diffuse crimson red conjunctiva with individual vessels not easily discernible and some swelling above normal. After 24 hours all animals showed some conjunctival vessels definitely injected. After 48 and 72 hours all animals were free of any signs of eye irritation.

Other effects:

No other effects were reported.

Interpretation of results:

GHS criteria not met

Conclusions:

The substance is estimated to be non irritating to the rabbit eye.

Executive summary:

One study is available from structural analogue menthyl acetate CAS 89 -48 -5. It is concluded that L-menthyl acetate is not irritating to eyes.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Additional information

Skin:

An in vitro study was performed to assess the irritation potential of Menthyl Acetate racemic by means of the Human Skin Model Test according to OECD TG 439. Three tissues of the human skin model EpiSkin™ were treated with the test item, the negative or the positive control for 15 minutes. 10 μL of the liquid test item were applied to each tissue, spread to match the tissue size. 10 μL of either the negative control (deionised water) or the positive control (5% Sodium lauryl sulfate) were applied to each tissue. After treatment with the negative control the absorbance values were well within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD  0.6 till ≤ 1.5 for the 15 minutes treatment interval thus showing the quality of the tissues. Treatment with the positive control induced a sufficient decrease in the relative absorbance as compared to the negative control for the 15 minutes treatment interval thus ensuring the validity of the test system. Compared to the value of the negative control, after exposure of the test item Menthyl Acetate racemic the mean relative absorbance value did not decrease (105.3%; threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%). Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential. In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Menthyl Acetate racemic is non irritant to skin according to UN GHS and EU CLP regulation.

Eyes:

The potential for eye irritation was tested for methyl acetate racemic in a GLP study according to OECD guideline No. 405. Four female albino rabbits weighing 2.8 to 3.2 kg were used in the study. The day before testing both eyes of the animals were examined before and after the instillation of Fluorescein to ensure there were no defects or irritation. The next day an aliquot of 0.1 mL of the neat substance was placed in the left eyes of the animals by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently hold together for one second. The right eye remained untreated and served as control. The eyes were examined and the grade of ocular reaction was recorded 1 and 24 hours later. After a first reading at 24 hours, Fluorescein was instilled and the treated eye was rinsed with 20 mL 0.9 % sodium chloride solution. Then the eye was examined again using UV-light to detect possible corneal damage. Further gradings were done after 48 and 72 hours after treatment. One hour after application of the test article all animals showed a diffuse crimson red conjunctiva with individual vessels not easily discernible and some swelling above normal. After 24 hours all animals showed some conjunctival vessels definitely injected. After 48 and 72 hours all animals were free of any signs of eye irritation. On the basis of these observations it was concluded that the substance is non-irritating to the rabbit eye.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on available data on skin and eye irritationthe test item is not classifiedaccording to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the eighth time in Regulation (EU) No 2016/918.