Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In a guinea pig maximisation study conducted according to current OECD Test Guideline 406 with acceptable restrictions and in compliance with GLP, [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]triethoxysilane was not sensitising to the skin of guinea pigs.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
10.10.2005 to 18.11.2005
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to an appropriate OECD test guideline, with acceptable restrictions. The restriction was that sodium lauryl sulfate was not used in the topical induction phase; the guideline recommends that this substance be applied before the test substance, for non-irritating substances.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
No sodium lauryl sulfate applied during induction phase.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
An LLNA study was not performed because there is an existing reliable study for skin sensitisation using the Buehler/Guinea Pig Maximisation test method. Furthermore, the LLNA test method is not considered to be suitable for substances that contain silicon. Please refer to the attached document for further details.
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Winkelmann GmbH, D-33178 Borchen
- Age at study initiation: No data
- Weight at study initiation: 300-500 g
- Housing: Groups in Terluran cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Described as 'adequate'

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ±3
- Humidity (%): 55 ±10
- Air changes (per hr): At least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 17.10.2005 To: 18.11.2005
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
cotton seed oil
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal induction: 10% in cottonseed oil
Topical induction and challenge: 100% (neat)
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
cotton seed oil
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal induction: 10% in cottonseed oil
Topical induction and challenge: 100% (neat)
No. of animals per dose:
Test: 10
Negative ontrol: 5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: Two animals were intradermally treated with 10, 25, 50 and 100% test substance in cottonseed oil. For the 100 and 50% concentration grade 2 erythema at 24 and 48 hours, and grade 1 erythema at 72 hours were recorded. Both concentrations showed grade 1 oedema at 24 and 72 hours. For the 100 and 50% concentrations necrosis was recorded at all observation points.
For the 25% concentration grade 1 erythema and oedema were recorded at all observation times.
For the 10% concentration grade 1 erythema was observed at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Grade 1 oedema was recorded at 48 hours.

Therefore the concentration of 10% was chosen for the intradermal induction.

Two animals were topically treated with 50 as well as 100% concentration for 24 and 48 hours, respectively. There were no signs of irritation, therefore the 100% concentration was used for the topical induction as well as the challenge.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Exposure period: Topical application was for 48 hours
- Test groups: Three injections as follows:
Injection 1: Freund's Complete Adjuvant, 1+1 (v/v) diluted with isotonic saline.
Injection 2: Prepared test substance
Injection 3: Prepared test substance at a concentration of 50% (v/v) in Freund's Complete Adjuvant, 1+1 (v/v) diluted with isotonic saline.

For topical induction: 0.5 ml of test substance applied for 48 hours under an occlusive dressing.

- Control group: Three injections as follows:
Injection 1: Freund's Complete Adjuvant, 1+1 (v/v) diluted with isotonic saline.
Injection 2: Vehicle at a concentration of 100%
Injection 3: Vehicle at a concentration of 50% (v/v) in Freund's Complete Adjuvant, 1+1 (v/v) diluted with isotonic saline.

For topical induction 0.5 ml vehicle applied for 48 hours under an occlusive dressing.
- Site: Shoulder region
- Frequency of applications: Intradermal injection on Day 0; Topical induction on Day 7.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: One
- Day(s) of challenge: Day 20
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups: 0.5 ml test substance applied under occlusive dressing
- Control group: 0.5 ml test substance applied under occlusive dressing
- Site: Flank
- Concentrations: 100%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patches

OTHER: All animals were observed for signs of toxicity daily during the test period.
Challenge controls:
Negative control: 0.5 ml neat test substance applied as for the test group.
Positive control substance(s):
no
Remarks:
but sensitising substance (mercaptobenzothiazole results presented) have been tested at the laboratory and have proven the sensitivity of the test.
Positive control results:
Historical controls confirmed the sensitivity of the test.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No clinical signs of toxicity.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
No clinical signs of toxicity.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
Mercaptobenzothiazole 15%
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
Mercaptobenzothiazole 15%
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Conclusions:
In a guinea pig maximisation study conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD 406 (sodium lauryl sulfate not used in topical induction for this non-irritating substance) and in compliance with GLP (reliability score 2) [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]triethoxysilane was not sensitising to skin of guinea pigs.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

A key skin sensitisation study conducted according to current OECD Test Guideline 406 and in compliance with GLP (BSL, 2005) found the registered substance [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]triethoxysilane not sensitising to the skin of guinea pigs.


Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
The selected study is the only skin sensitisation study available for the registered substance. It was conducted in accordance with an appropriate OECD Test Guideline 406 and in compliance with GLP.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available in vivo data, [3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]triethoxysilane is not classified for skin sensitisation according to Regulation (EC) No1272/2008.