Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Non genotoxic

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Justification for type of information:
The read across approach is detailed in section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Bacteria were grown overnight in nutrient broth (25 g oxid Nurrient Broth No 2/ litre) at 37 °C. The suitable amount of bacteria in the cell suspension was checked by nephelometry. For incubation, stock cultures which were stored at - 80 °C were used.
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Bacteria were grown overnight in nutrient broth (25 g oxid Nurrient Broth No 2/ litre) at 37 °C. The suitable amount of bacteria in the cell suspension was checked by nephelometry. For incubation, stock cultures which were stored at - 80 °C were used.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat Iiver homogenate fraction (S9)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Main experiment: 4, 20, 100, 500, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
Toxicity experiment and dose range finding: 4, 20, 100, 500, 2500 and 10000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent: DMSO
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
other: N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine // 2-Aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION
Top Agar was prepared for the salmonella strains by mixing 100 ml agar (0.6 % NaCl) with 5 ml of a 1.0 mM histidine and 5 ml of 1.0 mM biotin solution.
In the case of E. coli histidine was replaced by tryptophan (5 ml, 0.5 mM).
The following ingredients were added (in order) to 2 ml of molten top agar at 45 °C: 0.1 ml test compound solution; 0.1 ml of an overnight broth culture of the bacterial tester strain; 0.5 ml S9 Mix (if required) or buffer.
After mixing, the liquid was poured into a petri dish with minimal agar (1.5 % agar, Vogel-Bonner E medium with 2 % glucose).

INCUBATION
Incubation for 48 to 72 hours at 30 °C in the dark.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS
3 plates per dose.

METABOLIC ACTIVATION
The requirement for metabolic activation was investigated by incorporating into the test an activation system by nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotia phosphate (NADP+)-cytochrome P450 dependent mixed function oxidase enzymes of the liver. The 9000 g supernatant of rat liver homogenate has been shown to be very useful in metabolic activation of foreign compounds. The animals were pretreaied with Aroclor 1254 as an inducer of several drug metabolizing enzymes.

Preparation and storage of Iiver homogenate fraction (S9)
Male Sprague Dawley rats (200 - 300 g) received a single intraperitoneal injection of Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw) 5 days before sacrifice. Preparation was performed at 0 to 4 °C using cold sterile solutions and glassware. The liver from at least 5 - 6 animals were removed and pooled, washed in 150 mM KCl (approximately 1 ml/g wet livers). The washed livers were cut into small pieces and homogenised in three volumes of KCl. The homogenate was centrifuged at 9000 g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was the S-9 fraction. It was divided into small portions, rapidly frozen and stored at -80 °C for not longer than 3 months.

Preparation of S9 mix and concentration of cofactors
Sufficient S9 fraction was thawed immediately before each test at room temperature. One volume of the S9 fraction were miixed with 9 volumes of the S9 co-factor solution and kept on ice until used. The concentrations of the different compounds in the S9 Mix were:
8 mM MgCl
33 mM KCl
5 mM glucose-6-phosphate
4 mM NADP+
100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7 ,4

TOXICITY EXPERIMENT
- Preparation: 0.1 ml of the different dilutions of the test compound were thoroughtly mixed with 0.1 ml 10^-6 dilutions of the overnight culture of TA 100 and plated with histidine and biotin rich top agar.
- Replicates: 3 plates per dose.

DOSE RANGE FINDING
- Stratins: preliminary toxicity tests were performed with all tester strains.
- Indication of toxicity: a reduced rate of spontaneously occurring colonies as well as visible thinning of the bacterial lawn were used as indicator for toxicity. Thinning of the bacterial lawn was controlled microscopicaly.
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
The test compound did not cause a significant increase in the number of colonies with any of the tester strains in the absense or presence of S9 mix. No dose dependent effect was obtained.

TOXICITY TEST
The test compound was tested at doses of 4 to 10000 µg/plate and proved to be not toxic. Visible precipitation on the plates has been observed at 500 µg/plate. Thinning of the bacterial lawn or a reduction in the number of colonies have not been observed.
For mutagenicity test, 5000 µg/plate was chosen as the highest dose.

STERILITY CHECKS AND CONTROL PLATES
Sterility of S9 mix and the test compound was indicated by the absence of contamination on test material and S9 mix sterility check plates. Control plates (background control and positive controls) gave the expected number of colonies.
Conclusions:
The substance resulted to be not mutagenic in bacterial test systems neither with nor without exogenous metabolic activation.
Executive summary:

The substance was tested for mutagenicity with strains TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli WP2uvrA.

The mutagenicity studied were conducted in the absence and in the presence of a metabolizing system derived from rat liver homogenate. A dose ränge of 6 different doses from 4 µg/plate to 5000 µg/plate was used.

Control plates without mutagen showed that the number of spontaneous revertant colonies was similiar to that described in the literature. All the positive control compounds gave the expected increase in the number of revertant colonies.

The test compound proved to be not toxic to the bacteria. 5000 µg/plate was chosen -as top dose level for the mutagenicity study.

In the absence of the metabolic activation system the test compound did not show a dose dependent influence on the number of revertants in any of the bacterial strains. Also in the presence of metabolic activation system, treatment of the cells with test item did not result in relevant increases in the number of revertant colonies.

Conclusion

The substance resulted to be not mutagenic in bacterial test systems neither with nor without exogenous metabolic activation at the dose levels investigated.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

There are no experimental studies on the genetic toxicity potential of the Fluorescent Brightener 002, thus available information on a structural analogue, i.e. Similar Substance 01, have been taken into consideration. The read across approach can be considered as suitable and appropriate to investigate the genetic toxicity potential of Fluorescent Brightener 002 (the read across approach is detailed in section 13).

Similar Substance 01 was tested for mutagenicity with strains TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli WP2uvrA.

The mutagenicity studied were conducted in the absence and in the presence of a metabolizing system derived from rat liver homogenate. The test compound proved to be not toxic to the bacteria. 5000 µg/plate was chosen as top dose level for the mutagenicity study.

In the absence of the metabolic activation system the test compound did not show a dose dependent influence on the number of revertants in any of the bacterial strains. Also in the presence of metabolic activation system, treatnent of the cells with test item did not result in relevant increases in the number of revertant colonies.

The substance resulted to be not mutagenic in bacterial test systems neither with nor without exogenous metabolic activation at the dose levels investigated.

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to the CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008), for the purpose of classification for germ cell mutagenicity, substances are allocated in one of two categories in consideration of the fact that they are:

- substances known to induce heritable mutations or to be regarded as if they induce heritable mutations in the germ cells of humans or substances known to induce heritable mutations in the germ cells of humans or

- substances which cause concern for humans owing to the possibility that they may induce heritable mutations in the germ cells of humans.

The available information suggest that test substance did not show any reasons of concern from a genotoxicity point of view.

 

In conclusion, the substance does not meet the criteria to be classified for genetic toxicity according to the CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008).