Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
mouse
Sex:
not specified
Route of administration:
other: Intraperitoneal
Vehicle:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
>= 2 350 mg/kg bw
Interpretation of results:
Category 5 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
TBUT has shown intraperitoneal LD50 as >2350mg/kg bw.
Executive summary:

Intraperitoneal route of administration is seen as a very worse case scenario for toxicity testing. There is anecdotal evidence that the lethal dosage for oral administration is considered double compared to intraperitoneal administration. Therefore, the overall conclusion is that the substance can be considered for classification as non-hazardous for acute oral toxicity.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 350 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification