Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Ethanedinitrile

Dermal exposure of rabbits to ethanedinitrile gas in an acute toxicity study indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin irritant no skin sensitisation was reported. Dermal exposure of rabbits to 10,000 ppm (~21 g/m3) of ethanedinitrile for eight hours, did not result in any clinical observations or macroscopic effects (McNerney and Schrenk 1960).

Skin sensitation or any other effect to skin was not observed in six-month exposure of monkeys and rats to sublethal doses (11 and 25 ppm) of ethanedinitrile (Lewis et al. 1984).

 

Cyanides

Relevant literature does not include any information relating to sensitising effects, neither dermal nor respiratory, of hydrogen cyanide and cyanides (WHO 2004). Hydrogen cyanide does not present any structural alert for skin sensitization; standard skin sensitization test is not feasible and sensitizing properties of cyanides or nitriles have not been suggested by the experience in humans over a period of many years of production and use.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin sensitisation study does not need to be conducted because the available in vitro test methods are not applicable for the substance and therefore an in vivo skin sensitisation study was conducted
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Available studies provide sufficient evidence that ethanedinitrile does not have skin sensitisation properties. Therefore LLNA study was not conducted
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
not specified
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Available studies provide sufficient evidence that ethanedinitrile does not have skin sensitisation properties. Therefore LLNA study was not conducted
Specific details on test material used for the study:
ethanedinitrile 99.5 %
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Remarks:
albino rabbits
Sex:
male
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration:
10000 ppm
No. of animals per dose:
4
Parameter:
SI
Value:
10 000
Test group / Remarks:
4
Parameter:
SI
Remarks:
Dermal exposure of rabbits to 10,000 ppm (~21 g/m3) of ethanedinitrile for eight hours, did not result in any clinical observations or macroscopic effects.
Value:
10 000
Test group / Remarks:
4

Available studies provide sufficient evidence that ethanedinitrile does not have skin sensitisation properties.

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP criteria not met
Conclusions:
Dermal exposure of rabbits to ethanedinitrile gas in an acute toxicity study indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin sensitiser. Dermal exposure of rabbits to 10,000 ppm (~21 g/m3) of ethanedinitrile for eight hours, did not result in any clinical observations or macroscopic effects.
Executive summary:

Dermal exposure of rabbits to ethanedinitrile gas in an acute toxicity study indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin sensitiser. Dermal exposure of rabbits to 10,000 ppm (~21 g/m3) of ethanedinitrile for eight hours, did not result in any clinical observations or macroscopic effects.

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Whole body exposure
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
not specified
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Available studies provide sufficient evidence that ethanedinitrile does not have skin sensitisation properties. Therefore LLNA study was not conducted
Specific details on test material used for the study:
ethanedinitrile 99%
Species:
other: albino rat and Rhesus monkey
Strain:
other: Charles River Sprague-Dawley COBS and Maccaca mulatta
Sex:
male
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
0 ppm; 11 ppm; 25 ppm
Day(s)/duration:
180
No. of animals per dose:
5 monkeys per treatment group
30 rats per treatment group
Positive control substance(s):
no
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
4 320
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
11 ppm
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
Dermal exposure to ethanedinitrile gas indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin sensitiser. Skin sensitation or any other effect to skin was not observed in six-month exposure of monkeys and rats to sublethal doses (11 and 25 ppm) of ethanedinitrile.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
4 320
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
11 ppm
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
Dermal exposure to ethanedinitrile gas indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin sensitiser. Skin sensitation or any other effect to skin was not observed in six-month exposure of monkeys and rats to sublethal doses (11 and 25 ppm) of ethanedinitrile.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
4 320
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
11 ppm
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
Dermal exposure to ethanedinitrile gas indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin sensitiser. Skin sensitation or any other effect to skin was not observed in six-month exposure of monkeys and rats to sublethal doses (11 and 25 ppm) of ethanedinitrile.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
other: CLP criteria not met
Conclusions:
Dermal exposure to ethanedinitrile gas indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin sensitiser. Skin sensitation or any other effect to skin was not observed in six-month exposure of monkeys and rats to sublethal doses (11 and 25 ppm) of ethanedinitrile.
Executive summary:

Dermal exposure to ethanedinitrile gas indicates that ethanedinitrile is not a skin sensitiser. Skin sensitation or any other effect to skin was not observed in six-month exposure of monkeys and rats to sublethal doses (11 and 25 ppm) of ethanedinitrile.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Justification for classification or non-classification

CLP criteria not met