Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Guidelined in vitro studies for eye and skin irritation. Both studies revealed no adverse effects.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
other: epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multi-layered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
The test system is a commercially available EpiDermTM-Kit, procured by MatTek. The EpiDermTM tissue consists of human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multi-layered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis. It consists of organized basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum containing intercellular lamellar lipid layers representing main lipid classes analogous to those found in vivo. The EpiDermTM tissues are cultured on specially prepared cell culture inserts.
Origin .
EpiDermTM tissues were procured from MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories, Bratislava.
Designation of the kit: EPI-200-SIT
Day of delivery: 15. Jan. 2019
Batch no.: 28679
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
1: 24.9 mg
2: 26.0 mg
3: 25.3 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1 hour
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
23 hours and 30 minutes
Number of replicates:
3 replicates
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
86.7
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
2
Value:
93.1
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
3
Value:
97.9
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
All validity criterias are met. Positive and negative controls are within the range of historical data of the test facility. Therefore, the experiment is considered valid.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
All validity criterias are fulfilled. The study can be considered as valid. Under the conditions of the test, Bisamid is considered as non-irritant to skin.
Executive summary:

One valid experiment was performed. Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTM were treated with the test item for 60 minutes. The test item was applied directly to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size (0.63 cm2; as indicated by the supplier). DPBS-buffer was used as negative control and 5% SDS solution was used as positive control. After treatment with the negative control, the mean absorbance value was within the required acceptability criterion of 0.8 ≤ mean OD ≤ 2.8, OD was 1.6. The positive control showed clear irritating effects. The mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 2.6% (required: ≤ 20%). The variation within the tissue replicates of negative control, positive control and test item was acceptable (required: ≤ 18%). After the treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 92.6%. This value is above the threshold for skin irritation potential (50%). Test items that induce values above the threshold of 50% are considered non-irritant to skin. Therefore, the test item Bisamid is considered non-irritant to skin in the Reconstructed human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
11 . Jan. 2019 - 21. Feb. 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
Tissue 1: 52.8 mg
Tissue 2: 50.0 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
6 hours
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
18 hours and 15 minutes
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2 replicates
Details on study design:
On the day of the start of the experiment, the MTT concentrate was thawed. The MTT concentrate was diluted with assay medium directly before use. The assay medium was warmed in the water bath to 37 ± 1°C. 6-well-plates were labelled with test item, negative control and positive control and filled with 1 mL assay medium in the appropriate wells. All inserts were inspected for viability and the presence of air bubbles between agarose gel and insert. Viable tissues were transferred in the prepared 6-well-plate and incubated at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity for 1 hour. After the pre-incubation, the medium was replaced and the wells were filled with 1 mL fresh assay medium. All 6-well-plates were incubated at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity for 16 hours and 29 minutes. 7.2.2 Exposure and Post-Treatment After overnight incubation, the tissues were pre-wetted with 20 μL DPBS buffer and the tissues were incubated at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity for 29 minutes. After that, 50 μL of the controls and a defined amount of the test item were applied in duplicate in one- minute- intervals. At the beginning of each experiment (application of negative controls), a stop watch was started. After dosing the last tissue, all plates were transferred into the incubator for 6 hours at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity. At the end of exposure time, the inserts were removed from the plates in one-minute-intervals using sterile forceps and rinsed immediately. The inserts were thoroughly rinsed with DPBS. Then, the tissues were immediately transferred into 5 mL of assay medium in prelabelled 12-well plate for 24 minutes post soak at room temperature. After that, each insert was blotted on absorbent material and transferred into a pre-labelled 6-well plate, containing 1 mL assay medium. For post-treatment incubation, the tissues were incubated for 18 hours and 15 minutes at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity. After the post-treatment incubation, the MTT assay was performed.
Irritation parameter:
other: Tissue Viability
Remarks:
in % of the negative control
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
104.9
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
other: Tissue Viability
Remarks:
in % of the negative control
Run / experiment:
2
Value:
105
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
All validity criterias are met. Positive and negative controls are within the range of historical data of the test facility. Therefore, the experiment is considered valid.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
All validity criterias are fulfilled. The study can be considered as valid. Under the conditions of the test, Bisamid is considered non-eye irritant in the EpiOcularTM Eye Irritation Test.
Executive summary:

One valid experiment was performed. The test item Bisamid was applied to a three-dimensional human cornea tissue model in duplicate for an exposure time of 6 hours. After treatment, the respective substance was rinsed from the tissue; then, cell viability of the tissues was evaluated by addition of MTT, which can be reduced to formazan. The formazan production was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) of the resulting solution. Demineralised water was used as negative control and methyl acetate was used as positive control. The controls showed the following results: After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD > 0.8 and < 2.5, OD was 1.7. The positive control showed clear eye irritating effects, the mean value of the relative tissue viability was 30.1% (< 50%). The variation within tissue replicates of the controls and the test item was acceptable (< 20%). After treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was 104.9 %. This value is well above the threshold for eye irritation potential (≤ 60%). Test items that induce values above the threshold are considered non-eye irritant. Under the conditions of the test, Bisamid is considered non-eye irritant in the Epi-OcularTM Eye Irritation Test.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

CLP ((EG) Nr. 1272/2008) criteria for eye and skin irritation are not met. A classification is not necessary.