Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
carcinogenicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1985

Materials and methods

GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Chloroacetonitrile
EC Number:
203-467-0
EC Name:
Chloroacetonitrile
Cas Number:
107-14-2
Molecular formula:
C2H2ClN
IUPAC Name:
2-chloroacetonitrile
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
greater than 99% pure

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
Sencar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Female Sencar mice were obtained from Dr. T. Slaga of Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
dermal
Vehicle:
acetone
Details on exposure:
Chloroacetonitrile was applied in acetone to the shaved back. Six doses were applied over a 2-week period for total doses of 1200, 2400, and 4800 mg/kg (or 24, 48, and 96 mg/mouse).
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
2 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
6 doses
Post exposure period:
Animals from the initiation/promotion experiments were maintained for one year to determine the incidence of squamous cell carcinomas resulting from the exposure to haloacetonitrile compounds.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
200 other: mg/kg
Remarks:
equivalent to 4 mg/mouse, total dose of 1200 mg/kg or 24 mg/mouse (6 doses)
Dose / conc.:
400 other: mg/kg
Remarks:
equivalent to 8 mg/mouse, total dose of 2400 mg/kg or 48 mg/mouse (6 doses)
Dose / conc.:
800 other: mg/kg
Remarks:
equivalent to 16 mg/mouse, total dose of 4800 mg/kg or 96 mg/mouse (6 doses)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
40 animals in each exposure group
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
Two weeks after the last dose of the haloacetonitriles a promotion schedule involving the application of 1.0 μg of TPA in 0.2 ml acetone 3 times weekly was begun and continued for 20 weeks.
Complete carcinogenic activity of the haloacetonitriles was assessed in a separate experiment where 800 mg/kg of chloroacetonitrile was applied three times weekly for 24 weeks and animals observed for papilloma development.
Experiments were also conducted utilizing the oral route of exposure. In this case, doses were limited to a maximum dose of 50 mg/kg administered six times over a 2-week period to avoid the acute toxic effects of these chemicals. Further conduct of these experiments was identical to the initiation/promotion experiments.
Positive control:
no

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
The appearance and regression of tumors were charted weekly. Papillomas were included in the tumor count only if they were observed for three consecutive weeks at the same location.
Sacrifice and pathology:
At necropsy all gross lesions were recorded and tissues with lesions were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for subsequent histopathological evaluation. The data for each dose group were analyzed for a significant increase over the respective control response using Fisher's Exact Test.
Statistics:
The count of the total tumors and data on time to first tumor occurrence were analyzed for dose-response with a trend test based on Cox's regression model (Cox, 1972; Tarone, 1975).

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
not specified
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
not specified
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not specified
Food efficiency:
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
not specified
Neuropathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not specified
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Although there was a tendency in individual experiments involving oral exposures for increased papilloma yields with treatments by individual haloacetonitriles, there were no statistically significant differences in the total number of tumors or in the time to first tumor when all experiments were combined for statistical analysis. The response to an oral dose of urethane (300 mg/kg), as a positive control, did produce an increase in papilloma yield consistent with past experience in our laboratory with the Sencar mouse.
The haloacetonitriles were active as tumor initiators when applied topically to the shaved back of the Sencar mouse. All of the haloacetonitriles produced increases in the average cumulative number of tumors per animal. Clearly dose-related increases in cumulative papilloma count were observed with chloroacetonitrile (p = 0.02). In the case of chloroacetonitrile the incidence of squamous cell carcinomas was increased significantly (p < 0.05) over that observed in the control groups. The only exception to this was that the high dose of chloroacetonitrile produced a larger proportion of squamous cell carcinomas than would have been predicted from the papilloma yield.
Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
Chloroacetonitrile initiated tumors in the mouse skin with topical applications followed by a 20-week promotion schedule of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) applications (p < 0.02).

Applicant's summary and conclusion