Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Using a weight-of-evidence approach, isoprene appears to have a low potential for eye, skin and respiratory tract irritation. 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation
Remarks:
no data
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Insufficient experimental detail to assess quality.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
No specific information on methodology
Remarks on result:
other: isoprene caused eye irritation, no further data given
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Skin Irritation

Non-human information

Details are only available for the study conducted by Bayer (1972) (cited in SIAR, 2005).  In this skin irritation study, the skin of two New Zealand White rabbits was painted twice per day for 5 consecutive days with 100% isoprene.  Reversible erythema was observed.  Using a weight-of-evidence approach, the data suggest that isoprene has a low potential for skin irritation. The results from QSAR Toolbox show that skin irritation/corrosion inclusion rules by BfR are not met and skin irritation/corrosion exclusion rules by BfR are undefined. The QSAR results suggest that isoprene should be "not classified" for skin irritation and corrosion.

Human information

No relevant human information available.

Eye Irritation

Non-human information

Isoprene was reported to cause eye irritation in rats in a non-GLP study conducted by Mamedov (1979) (reliability unassignable due to lack of experimental details). The results from QSAR Toolbox show that eye irritation/corrosion inclusion rules by BfR are not met and eye irritation/corrosion exclusion rules by BfR are undefined. The QSAR results suggest that isoprene should be "not classified" for eye irritation and corrosion.

Human information

No relevant human information available.

Respiratory Tract Irritation

Non-human information

No indication of respiratory irritation was noted in male and female rats and female mice exposed to up to 7000 ppm (19,503mg/m3) isoprene for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 13 weeks (Melnick et al., 1994).  In male mice, however, degeneration of the olfactory epithelium was observed at 7000 ppm, but not at lower concentrations.  The NOAEC in this study was 2200 ppm (6129 mg/m3).  Olfactory degeneration is not necessarily a result of respiratory irritation.

Human information

Slight irritation of the upper respiratory tract was reported in human volunteers exposed to 57 ppm or 160 mg/m3 (Gostinskii, 1965)


Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: slightly irritating

Effects on eye irritation: irritating

Justification for classification or non-classification

Isoprene is not classified for skin, eye or respiratory tract irritancy under CLP and considering the weight of evidence, no classification is warranted under CLP.