Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-972-6 | CAS number: 112-44-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018-12-19 to 2018-12-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 2010
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- specific inhibitor of nitrification used was 1-Octyne instead of ATU, because of chemical reaction of ATU with test item
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- The test item was directly added into test media.
- Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- Test System Activated sludge
Origin Municipal sewage treatment plant of 31137 Hildesheim, Germany
Reason for the selection Non-adapted activated sludge from the sewage plant at Hildesheim is well suited as it receives predominantly municipal sewage and hardly any industrial chemical waste.
Pre-treatment The sludge was washed twice and was used within 24 h after sampling.
Date of receipt 2018-12-20
Dry sludge concentration 3.29 g/L, corresponding to 1.65 g/L in the test vessel for replicates without OCT and 3.30 g/L, corresponding to 1.65 g/L in the test vessel for replicates with OCT. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- no
- Hardness:
- See IUCLID section "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables" below.
- Test temperature:
- 18 - 22 °C, actual: 20.8 °C
- pH:
- The pH value of the activated sludge was determined prior to test start (7.38-7.43). The pH value of the synthetic waste water was determined
prior to use (pH 7.26). Adjustment to 7.5 ± 0.5 was not necessary. - Dissolved oxygen:
- See IUCLID section "Any other information on results incl. tables" below.
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Conductivity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test item concentrations:
1.7, 8.4, 41, 200, 600, 1000 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- See IUCLID section "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables" below.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate for total respiration; N-Methylaniline (with and without OCT) for inhibition of nitrification
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 24.7 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of nitrification rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 19.9 - 30.2 mg/L
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 51.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 44.9 – 58.7
- Remarks:
- mg/L
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 93.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of heterotrophic respiration
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 75.2 – 121 mg/L
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 85.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of nitrification rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 74.3 – 99.2 mg/L
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 128 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 117 – 140 mg/L
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 193 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of heterotrophic respiration
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 148 – 233 mg/L
- Details on results:
- For details on results, please see IUCLID section "Any other information on results incl. tables".
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- In the reference test the EC50-value for copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate was determined by linear regression with:
EC50 = 100 mg/L
95% Confidence Interval = 96.0 – 105 mg/L
This is in the recommended range of validity of 53 - 155 mg/L.
In the reference test on inhibition of nitrification, the EC50-value for N- Methylaniline was determined by linear regression with:
EC50 = 1.70 mg/L
95% Confidence Interval = 1.23 – 2.35 mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- For details on statistical evaluation, please see IUCLID section "Overall remarks, attachments".
For statistical evaluation, the following software was used:
Software Excel, MICROSOFT CORPORATION
GraphPadPrism, GRAPHPAD SOFTWARE, INC.
SigmaPlot (windows), SPSS INCORPORATION
PreSens Measurement Studio 2, PRESENS GMBH - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For details, see IUCLID section "Overall remarks, attachments".
- Conclusions:
- In a reliable and valid Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation) performed compliant with GLP according to OECD 209 (2010), the test item n-undecanal was observed to moderately stimulate heterotrophic respiration up to a concentration of 41 mg/L (21% stimulation), but to inhibit nitrification (23% inhibition at 41 mg/L), resulting in a NOEC for total respiration of 41 mg/L.
Overall, the following (no)effect concentrations for inhibition of respiration were determined for the test item after an exposure period of 3 hours:
NOEC (3h) [mg/L]
total respiration: 41
heterotrophic respiration: 41
nitrification: 8.4
EC10 (3h) [mg/L]
total respiration: 51.1 (95% CI: 44.9 – 58.7)
heterotrophic respiration: 93.1 (95% CI: 75.2 – 121)
nitrification: 24.7 (95% CI: 19.9 – 30.2)
EC50 (3h) [mg/L]
total respiration: 128 (95% CI: 117 – 140)
heterotrophic respiration: 193 (95% CI: 148 – 233)
nitrification: 85.3 (95% CI: 74.3 – 99.2) - Executive summary:
A Respiration Inhibition Test with activated sludge according to OECD Guideline No. 209 was carried out with the test item n-Undecanal from 2018-12-19 to 2018-12-21, with the definitive exposure phase on 2018-12-21 at the test facility. The test system was activated sludge of the municipal treatment plant of 31137 Hildesheim, Germany. The test was carried out under static conditions with the test item concentrations 1.7 - 8.4 - 41 - 200 - 600 - 1000 mg/L with and without 1 -Octyne, a specific inhibitor of nitrification. The respiration rates of the control, reference and test item replicates were measured after a contact time of three hours, and the inhibitory effects of the test and reference item were determined in comparison to the control respiration rates. The mean inhibition of total respiration for the test item replicates ranged from -7 % to 82 %. The mean inhibition of the heterotrophic respiration for the test item replicates ranged from -21 % to 69 %. The mean inhibition of nitrification for the test item replicates ranged from -8 % to 93 %. The test item n-undecanal was observed to moderately stimulate heterotrophic respiration up to a concentration of 41 mg/L (21% stimulation), but to inhibit nitrification (23% inhibition at 41 mg/L), resulting in a NOEC for total respiration of 41 mg/L.
In order to check the activity of the test system and the test conditions, a reference test was carried out with copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (without OCT) for total respiration and N-Methylaniline (with and without OCT) for inhibition of nitrification as reference items and the reference toxicity was determined. The EC50-value for the reference item copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate was 100 mg/L. The EC50-value for the reference item N-Methylaniline for inhibition of nitrification was 1.70 mg/L.
The following (no)effect concentrations for inhibition of respiration were determined for the test item after an exposure period of 3 hours:
Total Respiration
(without OCT)
Heterotrophic Respiration
(with OCT)
Nitrification
EC-values
[mg/L]Confidence interval
P = 95 [%]
[mg/L]EC-values
[mg/L]Confidence interval
P = 95 [%]
[mg/L]EC-values
[mg./L]Confidence interval
P = 95 [%]
[mg/L]NOEC*
41
–
41
–
8.4
–
EC10
51.1
44.9 – 58.7
93.1
75.2 – 121
24.7
19.9 – 30.2
EC20
68.3
60.8 – 76.5
113
90.8 – 142
36.8
31.1 – 42.9
EC50
128
117 – 140
193
148 – 233
85.3
74.3 – 99.2
EC80
456
361 – 946
˃ 1000
–
236
188 – 293
*) No statistically significant inhibition (P < 0.001), ANOVA, Dunnett`s Method
Reference
Biotic and Abiotic Factors in the Definitive Study
The pH-values of the activated sludge and synthetic waste water, the dry sludge concentration and the test temperature are documented in the following table:
Biotic and Abiotic Factors
pH-value of the activated sludge for test without OCT |
7.43 |
pH-value of the activated sludge for test with OCT |
7.38 |
pH-value of the synthetic waste water |
7.26 |
Dry solids concentration [g/L] of sludge for test without OCT |
3.29 |
Dry solid concentration [g/L] in test solution for test without OCT |
1.65 |
Dry solids concentration [g/L] of sludge for test with OCT |
3.30 |
Dry solid concentration [g/L] in test solution for test with OCT |
1.65 |
Test temperature [°C] |
20.8 |
Oxygen Uptake Rates, Specific Respiration Rates and Inhibition of the Respiration
From the oxygen depletion the oxygen uptake rates were calculated in mg O2/L×h, additionally the specific respiration rates based on the dry sludge concentration were calculated in mg O2/g×h. The inhibition of the oxygen uptake rates of the test and reference item concentrations in % was calculated in comparison to the oxygen uptake rates of the control. The results are listed in the following tables:
Oxygen Uptake Rates and Specific Respiration Rates of the total Respiration of the Control (without OCT)
|
Repl. |
Oxygen |
Oxygen Uptake Rate R |
Specific Respiration Rate Rs |
|
|
[mg O2/L] |
[mg O2/(L×h)] |
[mg O2/g×h] |
Control |
1 |
6.64 |
35.0 |
21.3 |
2 |
6.25 |
31.2 |
18.9 |
|
3 |
5.78 |
31.3 |
19.0 |
|
4 |
5.44 |
30.1 |
18.3 |
|
5 |
5.84 |
29.4 |
17.9 |
|
6 |
5.84 |
28.9 |
17.5 |
|
|
Mean value |
31.0 |
18.8 |
|
Standard deviation |
2.0 |
|
||
CV [%] |
6.4 |
*) determined at start of the measurement
Repl. = Replicate ; CV = Coefficient of variation
Oxygen Uptake Rates and Inhibition of the total Respiration of the Test Item Concentrations (without OCT)
Test Item Concentration |
Repl. |
Oxygen |
Oxygen Uptake Rate R |
Inhibition |
Mean Inhibition |
[mg/L] |
|
[mg O2/L] |
[mg O2/(L×h)] |
[%] |
[%] |
1.7 |
1 |
6.53 |
33.2 |
-7 |
-7 |
2 |
6.41 |
31.5 |
-2 |
||
3 |
6.89 |
32.7 |
-5 |
||
4 |
6.85 |
34.7 |
-12 |
||
5 |
7.03 |
33.4 |
-8 |
||
8.4 |
1 |
5.08 |
31.7 |
-2 |
-3 |
2 |
5.34 |
31.5 |
-2 |
||
3 |
5.58 |
30.7 |
1 |
||
4 |
5.90 |
32.8 |
-6 |
||
5 |
6.06 |
32.6 |
-5 |
||
41 |
1 |
5.40 |
29.3 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
5.53 |
27.4 |
12 |
||
3 |
5.99 |
28.1 |
9 |
||
4 |
5.98 |
32.2 |
-4 |
||
5 |
5.75 |
30.8 |
1 |
||
200 |
1 |
6.87 |
10.1 |
67 |
67 |
2 |
6.92 |
9.9 |
68 |
||
3 |
7.16 |
10.1 |
67 |
||
4 |
7.13 |
10.3 |
67 |
||
5 |
7.22 |
10.2 |
67 |
||
600 |
1 |
7.30 |
5.5 |
82 |
81 |
2 |
7.21 |
5.6 |
82 |
||
3 |
7.55 |
5.8 |
81 |
||
4 |
7.37 |
5.8 |
81 |
||
5 |
8.02 |
5.8 |
81 |
||
1000 |
1 |
7.51 |
5.6 |
82 |
82 |
2 |
7.36 |
5.5 |
82 |
||
3 |
7.40 |
5.4 |
83 |
||
4 |
7.53 |
5.6 |
82 |
||
5 |
7.54 |
5.5 |
82 |
*) determined at start of the measurement
Oxygen Uptake Rates of the heterotrophic Respiration of the Control Replicates (with OCT)
|
Repl. |
Oxygen |
Oxygen Uptake Rate R |
|
|
[mg O2/L] |
[mg O2/(L×h)] |
Control |
1 |
7.74 |
13.1 |
2 |
7.32 |
12.6 |
|
3 |
7.50 |
12.5 |
|
4 |
7.41 |
13.2 |
|
5 |
7.32 |
12.6 |
|
6 |
7.34 |
13.2 |
|
|
Mean value |
12.9 |
|
Standard deviation |
0.3 |
||
CV [%] |
2.4 |
*) determined at start of the measurement
Repl. = Replicate
CV = Coefficient of variation
Oxygen Uptake Rates and Inhibition of the heterotrophic Respiration of the Test Item Concentrations (with OCT)
Test Item |
Repl. |
Oxygen [mg O2/L] |
Oxygen Uptake Rate R |
Inhibition |
Mean Inhibition |
1.7 + OCT |
1 |
7.45 |
13.0 |
-1 |
-6 |
2 |
7.17 |
12.7 |
2 |
||
3 |
7.51 |
12.5 |
3 |
||
4 |
7.18 |
16.0 |
-24 |
||
5 |
7.22 |
14.0 |
-9 |
||
8.4 + OCT |
1 |
7.30 |
13.5 |
-5 |
-5 |
2 |
7.13 |
13.4 |
-4 |
||
3 |
7.29 |
13.3 |
-3 |
||
4 |
7.33 |
14.0 |
-9 |
||
5 |
7.36 |
13.7 |
-6 |
||
41 + OCT |
1 |
7.88 |
15.8 |
-22 |
-21 |
2 |
7.67 |
15.3 |
-19 |
||
3 |
7.84 |
14.5 |
-12 |
||
4 |
7.97 |
16.7 |
-29 |
||
5 |
7.35 |
15.7 |
-22 |
||
200 + OCT |
1 |
7.64 |
6.4 |
50 |
54 |
2 |
7.56 |
6.1 |
53 |
||
3 |
7.67 |
5.6 |
57 |
||
4 |
7.68 |
5.4 |
58 |
||
5 |
7.44 |
6.5 |
50 |
||
600+ OCT |
1 |
7.64 |
4.0 |
69 |
69 |
2 |
7.70 |
3.7 |
71 |
||
3 |
7.95 |
3.5 |
73 |
||
4 |
7.68 |
4.5 |
65 |
||
5 |
7.65 |
4.1 |
68 |
||
1000+ OCT |
1 |
7.75 |
3.6 |
72 |
67 |
2 |
7.67 |
3.5 |
73 |
||
3 |
7.85 |
3.8 |
71 |
||
4 |
6.81 |
2.5 |
81 |
||
5 |
7.30 |
7.7 |
40 |
*) determined at start of the measurement
CalculatedOxygen Uptake Rates of the Nitrification of the Control
|
Repl. |
Oxygen Uptake Rate R |
Control |
1 |
21.9 |
2 |
18.6 |
|
3 |
18.8 |
|
4 |
16.9 |
|
5 |
16.8 |
|
6 |
15.7 |
|
Mean value |
18.1 |
|
Standard deviation |
2.0 |
|
CV [%] |
11.1 |
*) determined at start of the measurement
Repl. = Replicate
CV = Coefficient of variation
Calculated Oxygen Uptake Rates and Inhibition of theNitrificationof the Test Item Concentrations
Test Item |
Repl. |
Oxygen Uptake Rate R |
Inhibition |
Mean Inhibition |
1.7 |
1 |
19.6 |
-8 |
-8 |
2 |
17.9 |
1 |
||
3 |
19.1 |
-5 |
||
4 |
21.1 |
-16 |
||
5 |
19.8 |
-9 |
||
8.4 |
1 |
18.1 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
17.9 |
1 |
||
3 |
17.1 |
5 |
||
4 |
19.2 |
-6 |
||
5 |
19.0 |
-5 |
||
41 |
1 |
13.7 |
24 |
23 |
2 |
11.8 |
35 |
||
3 |
12.5 |
31 |
||
4 |
16.6 |
8 |
||
5 |
15.2 |
16 |
||
200 |
1 |
4.1 |
77 |
77 |
2 |
3.9 |
78 |
||
3 |
4.1 |
77 |
||
4 |
4.3 |
76 |
||
5 |
4.2 |
77 |
||
600 |
1 |
1.5 |
91 |
90 |
2 |
1.6 |
91 |
||
3 |
1.8 |
90 |
||
4 |
1.8 |
90 |
||
5 |
1.8 |
90 |
||
1000 |
1 |
1.4 |
92 |
93 |
2 |
1.3 |
93 |
||
3 |
1.2 |
93 |
||
4 |
1.4 |
92 |
||
5 |
1.3 |
93 |
Repl. = Replicate
Preliminary testing (non-GLP)
From preliminary testing (range-finding tests) it became obvious that acid formation from aldehyde during stirring overnight as well as reaction of the test item or its product(s) with ATU was the reason for contradictory results.
Therefore, stirring overnight was omitted and 1-Octyne, which specifically and irreversibly inhibits ammonia monooxygenases, was used as an alternative to ATU.
To validate inhibition of nitrification, inhibition of nitrate formation as well as dose-dependent inhibition of total respiration was assessed. Results are given in the following tables:
Inhibition of Nitrate formation (mg/L NO3 -nitrogen) in the third Preliminary Test (with / without 1-Octyne)
|
Start |
3 h |
Control |
2.97 |
10.2 |
1-Octyne (4.2 mg/L) |
3.03 |
3.56 |
Nitrate formation of the control replicates is very well inhibited by 1-Octyne at 4.2 mg/L.
Inhibition of total respiration by 1-Octyne (dose-response relationship)
Concentration |
% Inhibition total respiration |
2.1 mg/L |
0 |
4.2 mg/L |
45 |
8.4 mg/L |
43 |
At the concentration of 4.2 mg/L, the plateau was reached. To be sure, a test concentration of 5 mg/L 1-Octyne was chosen for the final test.
Description of key information
In a reliable and valid Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation) performed compliant with GLP according to OECD 209 (2010), the test item n-undecanal was observed to moderately stimulate heterotrophic respiration up to a concentration of 41 mg/L (21% stimulation), but to inhibit nitrification (23% inhibition at 41 mg/L), resulting in a NOEC for total respiration of 41 mg/L.
Overall, the following (no)effect concentrations for inhibition of respiration were determined for the test item after an exposure period of 3 hours:
NOEC (3h) [mg/L]
total respiration: 41
heterotrophic respiration: 41
nitrification: 8.4
EC10 (3h) [mg/L]
total respiration: 51.1 (95% CI: 44.9 – 58.7)
heterotrophic respiration: 93.1 (95% CI: 75.2 – 121)
nitrification: 24.7 (95% CI: 19.9 – 30.2)
EC50 (3h) [mg/L]
total respiration: 128 (95% CI: 117 – 140)
heterotrophic respiration: 193 (95% CI: 148 – 233)
nitrification: 85.3 (95% CI: 74.3 – 99.2)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 24.7 mg/L
Additional information
A Respiration Inhibition Test with activated sludge according to OECD Guideline No. 209 was carried out with the test itemn-Undecanal from 2018-12-19 to 2018-12-21, with the definitive exposure phase on 2018-12-21at the test facility. The test system was activated sludge of the municipal treatment plant of 31137 Hildesheim, Germany. The test was carried out under static conditions with the test item concentrations1.7 - 8.4 - 41 - 200 - 600 - 1000 mg/L with and without 1 -Octyne, a specific inhibitor of nitrification. The respiration rates of the control, reference and test item replicates were measured after a contact time of three hours, and the inhibitory effects of the test and reference item were determined in comparison to the control respiration rates. The mean inhibition of total respiration for the test item replicates ranged from -7 % to 82 %. The mean inhibition of the heterotrophic respiration for the test item replicates ranged from-21 % to 69 %. The mean inhibition of nitrification for the test item replicates ranged from -8 % to 93 %. The test item n-undecanal was observed to moderately stimulate heterotrophic respiration up to a concentration of 41 mg/L (21% stimulation), but to inhibit nitrification (23% inhibition at 41 mg/L), resulting in a NOEC for total respiration of 41 mg/L.
In order to check the activity of the test system and the test conditions, a reference test was carried out with copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate (without OCT) for total respiration and N-Methylaniline (with and without OCT) for inhibition of nitrification as reference items and the reference toxicity was determined. The EC50-value for the reference item copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate was 100 mg/L. The EC50-value for the reference item N-Methylaniline for inhibition of nitrification was 1.70 mg/L.
The following (no)effect concentrations for inhibition of respiration were determined for the test item after an exposure period of 3 hours:
|
Total Respiration (without OCT) |
Heterotrophic Respiration (with OCT) |
Nitrification |
|||
EC-values |
Confidence interval |
EC-values |
Confidence interval |
EC-values |
Confidence interval |
|
NOEC* |
41 |
– |
41 |
– |
8.4 |
– |
EC10 |
51.1 |
44.9 – 58.7 |
93.1 |
75.2 – 121 |
24.7 |
19.9 – 30.2 |
EC20 |
68.3 |
60.8 – 76.5 |
113 |
90.8 – 142 |
36.8 |
31.1 – 42.9 |
EC50 |
128 |
117 – 140 |
193 |
148 – 233 |
85.3 |
74.3 – 99.2 |
EC80 |
456 |
361 – 946 |
˃ 1000 |
– |
236 |
188 – 293 |
*) No statistically significant inhibition (P < 0.001), ANOVA, Dunnett`s Method
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.