Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-201-9 | CAS number: 135-57-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The test was based on OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals: (No. 474 Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test, July 1997). This final report and the original raw data were reviewed for adherence to ISO/IEC17025: 2005 General Requirements for the competence of Testing Calibration Laboratories. OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals: (No. 474 Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test, July 1997); State Environmental Protection Administration: The Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals ; Ministry of Health, 2005: Technical standards for testing of chemicals.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- transgenic rodent mutagenicity assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N,N'-dithiodi-o-phenylenedibenzamide
- EC Number:
- 205-201-9
- EC Name:
- N,N'-dithiodi-o-phenylenedibenzamide
- Cas Number:
- 135-57-9
- Molecular formula:
- C26H20N2O2S2
- IUPAC Name:
- N-{2-[(2-benzamidophenyl)disulfanyl]phenyl}benzamide
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: NIH
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Animals used: SPF NIH mice were provided by Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center, certified animal No.: SCXK (guangdong) 2008-0002, 5 males and 5 females per group.
Environmental conditions
Test Room: In the Center
Animal house conditions: The test facility was an air-conditioned room with 12h artificial fluorescent light and 12h dark.
Temperature range: 20~25oC.
Humidity range: 40~70%.
Husbandry Practices
Caging: Stainless steel cages were used. Autoclaved clean dry corncob was used as the bedding material. Animals were housed in one group according to sex in cages.
Water bottle: Each cage was supplied with a polypropylene water bottle with a stainless steel nozzle.
Sanitation: Bedding material was changed daily.
Food and water: Standard pellet feed supplied by Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center and ultra-pure filtered sterilized water were provided to the animals freely.
Frequency of providing feed and drinking water: Both drinking water and feed were provided ad libitum.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- material dissovled in distilled water.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Date of testing: 30 June 2010 - 20 August 2010
108 days - Frequency of treatment:
- doses administered at 210, 665, 2100 mg/kg at a volume of 10 ml/kg twice in 24 hours
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
210 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
665 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2100 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males and 5 females
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- Animals of positive control group were given 40mg/kg cyclophosphamide dissolved in normal saline, by intraperitoneal injection and the volume was 10ml/kg. Samples were collected once between 18 and 24 hours following the final treatment for the bone marrow.
Negative control group were given distilled water instead of tested compounds.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone Marrow Tissue
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS
Toxicity signs: In the dose levels of 210, 665 and 2100 mg/kg, none of the animals displayed abnormalitied during the observation period.
Micronucleated immature erythrocytes: Compared with negative control group, the micronucleus rates and the micronucleus cell frequencies of the test substance group showed no obvious increase (P<0.05). On the other hand, the micronucleus rates and the micronucleus cell frequencies of positive group were higher than negative groups (P<0.01). The detailed data showed in table 1-6.
Proportion of immature erythrocytes among total erythrocytes: The proportion of immature among total erythrocytes of each group had no difference.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Micronucleus rates and Proportion of immature among total erythrocytes
Table 1
Group (mg/kg) |
Number of animal |
Number of cells analysed |
Number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes |
Proportion of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (‰) |
Number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (x±s) |
Proportion of immature among total erythrocytes |
P |
||||||
Negative control group |
10 |
20000 |
3 |
0.3 |
0.3±0.67 |
|
210 |
10 |
20000 |
8 |
0.8 |
0.8±0.82 |
0.353 |
665 |
10 |
20000 |
10 |
1.0 |
1.0±1.15 |
0.684 |
2100 |
10 |
20000 |
10 |
1.0 |
1.0±1.25 |
0.143 |
Positive group |
10 |
20000 |
352 |
17.6** |
35.2±19.50 |
0.353 |
** Compared with negative control group,P<0.01
The detailed data of each animal ( negative control group )
Table 2
Gender |
No. of animal |
Number of cells analysed |
Number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes |
Proportion of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (‰) |
Proportion of immature erythrocytes among total erythrocytes (%) |
♀ |
4 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
52.0 |
♀ |
17 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
67.0 |
♀ |
18 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
56.0 |
♀ |
23 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
54.8 |
♀ |
28 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
70.0 |
♂ |
1 |
2000 |
1 |
0.5 |
64.0 |
♂ |
19 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
69.0 |
♂ |
20 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
50.0 |
♂ |
26 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
76.0 |
♂ |
28 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
64.0 |
The detailed data of each animal (210mg/kg )
Table 3
Gender |
No. of animal(动物号) |
Number of cells analysed |
Number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes |
Proportion of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (‰) |
Proportion of immature erythrocytes among total erythrocytes(%) |
♀ |
8 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
81.0 |
♀ |
14 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
57.0 |
♀ |
24 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
54.0 |
♀ |
25 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
69.0 |
♀ |
26 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
51.5 |
♂ |
7 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
70.0 |
♂ |
8 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
60.5 |
♂ |
18 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
71.0 |
♂ |
23 |
2000 |
1 |
0.5 |
71.9 |
♂ |
24 |
2000 |
1 |
0.5 |
69.5 |
The detailed data of each animal (665mg/kg )
Table 4
Gender |
No. of animal |
Number of cells analysed |
Number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes |
Proportion of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (‰) |
Proportion of immature erythrocytes among total erythrocytes(%) |
♀ |
6 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
51.0 |
♀ |
16 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
61.5 |
♀ |
12 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
66.5 |
♀ |
13 |
2000 |
3 |
1.5 |
60.0 |
♀ |
57 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
68.0 |
♂ |
3 |
2000 |
1 |
0.5 |
53.0 |
♂ |
4 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
71.0 |
♂ |
12 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
84.0 |
♂ |
15 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
70.0 |
♂ |
16 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
59.5 |
The detailed data of each animal (2100mg/kg )
Table 5
Gender |
No. of animal |
Number of cells analysed |
Number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes |
Proportion of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (‰) |
Proportion of immature erythrocytes among total erythrocytes (%) |
♀ |
1 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
70.0 |
♀ |
9 |
2000 |
3 |
1.5 |
75.6 |
♀ |
10 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
73.0 |
♀ |
19 |
2000 |
3 |
1.5 |
75.6 |
♀ |
20 |
2000 |
2 |
1 |
62.0 |
♂ |
5 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
49.5 |
♂ |
6 |
2000 |
1 |
0.5 |
73.0 |
♂ |
10 |
2000 |
1 |
0.5 |
81.0 |
♂ |
13 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
62.5 |
♂ |
17 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
67.5 |
The detailed data of each animal (positive group )
Table 6
Gender |
No. of animal |
Number of cells analysed |
Number of micronucleated immature erythrocytes |
Proportion of micronucleated immature erythrocytes (‰) |
Proportion of immature erythrocytes among total erythrocytes(%) |
♀ |
3 |
2000 |
56 |
28 |
58.0 |
♀ |
5 |
2000 |
65 |
32.5 |
62.0 |
♀ |
7 |
2000 |
44 |
22 |
63.5 |
♀ |
15 |
2000 |
29 |
14.5 |
60.3 |
♀ |
27 |
2000 |
27 |
13.5 |
60.0 |
♂ |
2 |
2000 |
8 |
4 |
45.0 |
♂ |
9 |
2000 |
11 |
5.5 |
50.5 |
♂ |
14 |
2000 |
50 |
25 |
79.5 |
♂ |
25 |
2000 |
18 |
9 |
32.5 |
♂ |
27 |
2000 |
44 |
22 |
65.0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Pepton 22 has been show to be not mutagenic
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.