Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 817-766-4 | CAS number: 91891-42-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- 2013
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoro-3-(heptafluoropropoxy)prop-1-ene
- EC Number:
- 817-766-4
- Cas Number:
- 91891-42-8
- Molecular formula:
- C6F12O
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoro-3-(heptafluoropropoxy)prop-1-ene
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material:
3M Company
- Expiration date of the lot/batch:
No data
- Purity test date:
05 Feb, 2018
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material:
Room temperature and humidity, protected from light and stored under enert gas
- Stability under test conditions:
Stable
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
: None, dosed unchanged
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: No data
- Number of animals: No data
- Characteristics of donor animals (e.g. age, sex, weight): Greater than 35 weeks of age
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue (e.g. transport time, transport media and temperature, and other conditions): In a refrigerated container containing Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) with penicillin-streptomycin
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: Within 24 hours
- indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: Only eyes without defects were used.
- Indication of any antibiotics used: penicillin-streptomycin
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL
VEHICLE: None - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 minutes
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 3.5 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
: The eyes were examined after receipt from the abattoir. Any cornea with visible evidence of neovascularization, pigmentation, opacity or scratches was discarded. Corneas free of visible defects were dissected from the surrounding tissues. A 2-3 mm rim of sclera was left attached to each cornea. The excised corneas were then placed in a container of fresh HBSS. The dissected corneas were mounted in specially designed holders (MC2, formerly Electro-Design – the manufacturer of the Op-KIT opacitometer) that were separated into anterior and posterior chambers and
filled separately. Each cornea was mounted allowing the epithelium of the cornea to project into the anterior chamber. The posterior chamber was filled with MEM solution ensuring contact with the endothelium. The anterior chamber was filled with MEM solution, ensuring contact with the epithelium. Each cornea was visually inspected again to ensure there were no defects.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS : The eyes were examined after receipt from the abattoir. Any cornea with visible evidence of neovascularization, pigmentation, opacity or scratches was discarded.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 3
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED : Yes, MEM Solution
SOLVENT CONTROL USED: None, no vehicle used
POSITIVE CONTROL USED : Yes, ethanol
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME : 0.75 mL, 10 minutes
TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber
POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: yes, 3.5 hours
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: At least two
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: 2 hours at 32 C
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: All corneas were incubated at 32 (±1)°C for an additional two hours at which time the MEM solution in the anterior and posterior chambers was removed and the holders refilled with fresh MEM solution. A measurement of opacity was taken with each treated cornea compared to the blank supplied with the OP-KIT. This reading was used in the final IVIS calculations.
- Corneal permeability: The Spectronic 20-D Colorimeter Spectrophotometer (Milton/Roy, model: 333172) was calibrated prior to use on the same day of dosing. Calibration entailed first adjusting the wavelength to 490nm and the transmittance to 0.0%. The transmittance for a sample of fresh distilled water (in a cuvette, inserted into the sample compartment) was adjusted to 100.0% on the spectrophotometer. The mode was then switched to absorbance before collecting optical density study data. After 90 (±5) minutes, the fluid from the posterior chamber of each corneal holder was removed and the amount of dye that passed through the cornea (permeability) was measured as the optical density at 490nm (i.e., the OD490nm) by spectrophotometer.
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA:Based on the IVIS, the test article will be classified according to the prediction model described in the EURL ECVAM DB-ALM Protocol No. 1272, a modification of the prediction model suggested by Gautheron, et al. (1994).
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Mean
- Value:
- 0.91
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of the study (mean IVIS=0.91), the test article is not irritating to the eye in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test (BCOP).
- Executive summary:
The eye irritation potential of the test article was evaluated in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test (BCOP). The study was conducted according to OECD 439 in compliance with OECD GLP principles. The test article, positive (ethanol) or negative (MEM) control was applied (0.75 mL) to three bovine corneas per test substance and incubated at 32 C using the closed-chamber method for 10 minutes. Following exposure, all corneas were washed in MEM containing phenol red. A final rinse was made with MEM without phenol red. The anterior and posterior chambers of the cornea holders were then refilled with fresh MEM solution. Opacity measurement were made following the 10 -minute exposure and MEM refill. All corneas were incubated for an additional two hour period at 32 C. A measurement of opacity was taken with each treated cornea compared to the OP-KIT blank. Immediately following the 2 hour opacity measurement, the MEM solution was removed from the anterior chamber and replaced with 1.0 mL of 0.4% sodium fluorescein solution in Dulbecco's Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Each cornea was then returned to the 32 C incubator. After 90 minutes, the fluid from the posterior chamber of each corneal holder was removed and the amount of dye that passed through the cornea (permeability) was measured as the optical density at 490 nm by spectrophotometer. The In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS) for MTDID 50667 was 0.91, negative control was 0.53, and the positive control was 34.1. Based on the results of the study (mean IVIS=0.91), the test article is not irritating to the eye in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test (BCOP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.