Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 603-080-0 | CAS number: 125572-93-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- The rationale for the read-across approach is attached in section 13. See the link in the 'Cross-reference' table.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 4.53 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 0.881-8.51 mg/L / based on read-across
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.23 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: based on read-across
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24 April 2006 - 19 May 2006
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 7 June 1984
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In the controls and the 2 lowest test concentrations the pH increased by >1 unit during the course of the test. An explanation for this deviation was not provided.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: control, and all test concentrations
- Sampling method: At 0 hours, samples (20 mL) of each test media were taken for chemical analysis from the test media preparation flasks. At 72 hours, inoculated replicate test vessels at each treatment level were pooled and samples of each were taken (20 mL) for chemical analysis.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: not reported. - Vehicle:
- no
- Remarks:
- Trials were performed to check if a solvent vehicle would improve solubility of the substance in test media. It was concluded that there was no advantage of using a solvent, and therefore test media were prepared by direct addition of the substance.
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: Each test media was prepared individually by direct addition of the test substance (0.411, 1.23, 3.7, 11.1, 33.3 and 100.04 mg) to a 1 litre volumetric flask and made up to volume with alga media (according to EC C.3, but with slightly higher MgCl2*6H20 concnetration). The contents of each flask were treated with 30 minutes ultrasound and stirred overnight in the dark. Following stirring, each test media was filtered through a 0.45 μm pore size filter.
- Controls: The control treatment was prepared by adding EC medium only to control test vessels. - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): obtained from the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), SAMS Research Services Ltd., Oban, UK (On receipt from the CCAP, the slope culture was stored in the fridge at 1-10°C. A typical shelf life for each slope was 8 months.)
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): approx. 72 h
- Method of cultivation: Prior to each test, a sub-sample (ca 200 μL) of a current concentrated liquid slope culture was added to two starter cultures (conical flasks) containing 100 mL of alga nutrient media (EC). Each culture was incubated (under the same conditions as used in the test) for approximately 72 hours prior to the start of each test. The second (unused) starter culture (incubated as a contingency) was discarded after the test was started.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: none reported
- Culturing media and conditions: same as test
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: not reported - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 24.3-24.6°C
- pH:
- t=0: 7.9-8.3 (measured in bulk flasks, with and without algal cells)
t=72: 8.0 (measured in individual vessles without algal cells)
t=72: 8.0-10.2 (measured in individual vessels with algal cells) - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- - Nominal: 0.411, 1.23, 3.70, 11.1, 33.3 and 100 mg/L (direct addition of the test substance to algal medium)
- Measured: 0.313, 1.00, 2.85, 8.43, 14.4 and 8.83 mg/L (mean values of 0-hour (without algae) and 72-hour (with algae))
- Recovery: 76, 81, 77, 76, 43 and 8.8 % of the nominal concentrations - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: sterile (autoclaved) 250 mL Erlenmeyer (conical) flasks, loosely-capped
- Fill volume: 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: 1 x 10^4 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 178 x 10^4 cells/mL (mean, n=6)
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3 (+1 vessel/concentration without algae to establish background counts on each sampling occasion)
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6 (+1 vessel without algae to establish background counts on each sampling occasion)
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: according to OECD 201; stock solutions containing the various nutrients were prepared with reverse osmosis (RO) water. Aliquots of each of the stock solutions were then added to RO water. The alga culture medium was autoclaved. Once cooled, an aliquot of a stock solution of NaHCO3 was added to the alga culture medium through a sterile filter (0.2 μm filter pore size).
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement:
* At the start of the test, the pH of freshly prepared test media, before and after alga cell inoculation was determined.
* The incubator temperature (minimum and maximum) was recorded continuously using a digital temperature logger with the probe maintained in the incubator in an additional vessel.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: continuously
- Light intensity and quality: t=0: 7060 lux, t=72 h: 7200 lux (cooled white fluorescent tube lights, emitting white light across the visible portion of the spectrum (400 - 700 nm))
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Determination of cell concentrations: particle counter (C2 Coulter Counter)
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: ca. 3
- Range finding study: yes
- Range finding test concentrations: 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 mg/L (nominal)
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 4.53 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 0.881-8.51 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.23 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): none specifically reported
- Other: In the control and the two lowest test concentrations (with algal cells) the pH values were 10.0-10.2 after 72 hours. This is >2 pH units higher than the pH values measured at test start (7.9-8.0). An explanation for this finding has not been provided in the report. It should be noted that the corresponding treatment groups without algal cells did not show increased pH.
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: no
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: none reported
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: no - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see 'Overall remarks'.
- Conclusions:
- The 72-h ErC50 and 72-h NOErC values are 4.53 mg/L, and 1.23 mg/L, respectively, in freshwater algae (P. subcapitata).
- Executive summary:
The toxicity to freshwater algae (P. subcapitata) was examined in a study according to OECD TG 201, and in compliance with GLP criteria. Fresh cultures of algae at a starting cell concentration of 1E+04 cells/mL, were exposed to nominal test concentrations of 0 (control), 0.411, 1.23, 3.70, 11.1, 33.3 and 100 mg/L for 72 hours. Test substance analysis was performed and arithmetic mean measured concentrations determined to be 0.313, 1.00, 2.85, 8.43, 14.4 and 8.83 mg/L (mean values of analysis at 0-hour (without algae) and 72-hour (with algae)). As measured concentrations were not within ±20% of nominal, effect values are expressed as measured concentrations. In the control and the two lowest test concentrations (with algal cells) the pH values were >2 pH units higher than the pH values measured at test start. An explanation for this finding has not been provided in the report. It should be noted that the corresponding treatment groups without algal cells did not show increased pH. As, however, increase in cell density in controls was at least a factor 16, this is not considered to have significantly affected the outcome of the test. Algal cell concentrations were measured at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the start of the test, and inhibition of algal specific growth rates calculated.
A concentration dependent reduction of growth rate was observed throughout the test. The 72 -h ErC50 and 72 -h NOErC values were determined to be 4.53 mg/L and 1.23 mg/L, respectively.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table: Growth of algae cultures exposed to test material during the definitive test
Nominal concentration |
Cell concentration (cells x 10000/mL) |
Mean area under growth curve (A x 1000000) |
Average specific growth rate (µ x 0.01) |
||||||
24-h |
48-h |
72-h |
0-24-h |
0-48-h |
0-72-h |
0-24-h |
0-48-h |
0-72-h |
|
control |
7.34 |
41.1 |
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.30 |
34.1 |
169 |
|||||||
6.77 |
40.0 |
203 |
|||||||
6.82 |
36.7 |
165 |
|||||||
6.77 |
36.9 |
181 |
|||||||
6.00 |
32.2 |
156 |
|||||||
Mean |
6.67 |
36.833 |
179 |
0.68 |
5.66 |
31.2 |
7.9 |
7.505 |
7.194 |
0.41 |
6.10 |
39.2 |
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.13 |
35.4 |
178 |
|||||||
7.46 |
42.2 |
174 |
|||||||
Mean |
6.56 |
39.0 |
183 |
0.667 |
5.89 |
32.3 |
7.82 |
7.625 |
7.233 |
1.23 |
7.00 |
39.3 |
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.03 |
31.1 |
162 |
|||||||
5.88 |
35.1 |
166 |
|||||||
Mean |
6.30 |
35.2 |
175 |
0.636 |
5.37 |
30.3 |
7.66 |
7.407 |
7.166 |
3.70 |
3.67 |
13.0 |
58.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.78 |
9.47 |
21.1 |
|||||||
5.30 |
16.4 |
49.9 |
|||||||
Mean |
4.25 |
12.9 |
43.2 |
0.39 |
2.21 |
8.72 |
5.97 |
5.283 |
5.108 |
11.10 |
2.39 |
4.90 |
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.31 |
5.13 |
5.66 |
|||||||
2.15 |
3.9 |
7.28 |
|||||||
Mean |
2.28 |
4.63 |
8.32 |
0.154 |
0.743 |
2.06 |
3.43 |
3.178 |
2.873 |
33.30 |
0.80 |
0.802 |
0.122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.08 |
0.666 |
0.246 |
|||||||
1.14 |
1.08 |
0.064 |
|||||||
Mean |
1.00 |
0.849 |
0.144 |
0.00032 |
-0.0174 |
-0.138 |
-0.037 |
-0.382 |
-2.896 |
100.00 |
0.93 |
-0.006 |
0.012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.89 |
-0.040 |
0.002 |
|||||||
1.14 |
0.078 |
0.042 |
|||||||
Mean |
0.99 |
0.011 |
0.019 |
-0.00132 |
-0.121 |
-0.358 |
-0.071 |
0.000 |
-6.392 |
Table: Inhibition (%) in growth of algae exposed to test material relative to the Control treatment
Nominal concentration |
Reduction in average area under the growth curve relative to the control (%) |
Reduction in average specific growth rates relative to the control (%) |
||||
0-24-h |
0-48-h |
0-72-h |
0-24-h |
0-48-h |
0-72-h |
|
Control |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.411 |
1.85 |
-4.11 |
-3.28 |
0.96 |
-1.60 |
-0.540 |
1.23 |
6.43 |
5.06 |
2.97 |
3.01 |
1.31 |
0.390 |
3.70 |
42.7 |
60.9 |
72.1 |
24.4 |
29.6 |
29.0 |
11.1 |
77.4 |
86.9 |
93.4 |
56.5 |
57.7 |
60.1 |
33.3 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
105 |
140 |
100 |
100 |
102 |
101 |
101 |
100 |
189 |
TEST MEDIA DESCRIPTIONS
- At the start of the exposure period, the control and test media at all nominal concentrations appeared as clear, colourless solutions.
- At the end of the exposure period (72 hours), the control and test media at all nominal concentrations not inoculated with algae appeared as clear, colourless solutions.
- At the end of the exposure period (72 hours), the control and test media at all nominal concentrations inoculated with algae appeared as green to colourless (low to high concentration) with a hazy dispersion of algal cells.
Description of key information
The acute toxicity of the substance to freshwater algae (P. subcapitata) was derived by read-across from an analogue with the same chemical core structure, which was examined for algae toxicity in a study performed in accordance with OECD TG 201, and in compliance with GLP criteria.
Fresh cultures of algae at a starting cell concentration of 1E+04 cells/mL, were exposed to nominal test concentrations of 0 (control), 0.411, 1.23, 3.70, 11.1, 33.3 and 100 mg/L for 72 hours.
Test substance analysis was performed at the start (t = 0 h) and at the end of exposure (t = 72 h), by means of a sufficiently validated HPLC-UV method. Since measured concentrations were not within ±20% of nominal, results are expressed as arithmetic mean measured concentrations, which were determined as 0.313, 1.00, 2.85, 8.43, 14.4 and 8.83 mg/L (mean values of analysis at 0-hour (without algae) and 72-hour (with algae)).
In the control and the two lowest test concentrations (with algal cells) the pH values were >2 pH units higher than the pH values measured at test start. An explanation for this finding has not been provided in the report. It should be noted that the corresponding treatment groups without algal cells did not show increased pH. As, however, increase in cell density in controls was at least a factor 16, this is not considered to have significantly affected the outcome of the test. Algal cell concentrations were measured at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the start of the test, and inhibition of algal specific growth rates calculated.
A concentration dependent reduction of growth rate was observed throughout the test. The 72 -h ErC50 and 72 -h NOErC values were determined to be 4.53 mg/L and 1.23 mg/L, respectively.
All study validity criteria were met.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 4.53 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 1.23 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.