Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
22-jun-2015 to 23-jun-2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study has been performed according to OECD and/or EC guidelines and according to GLP principles.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
other: study amendment
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD guideline 437 “Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage”
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU Method B.47 “Bovine corneal opacity and permeability method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
5-[(S)-4-Carboxy-4-(1,3-dioxo-1,3-dihydro-isoindol-2-yl)-butyrylamino]-2-nitro-benzoic acid
EC Number:
926-197-1
Cas Number:
2561176-48-3
Molecular formula:
C20 H15 N3 O9
IUPAC Name:
5-[(S)-4-Carboxy-4-(1,3-dioxo-1,3-dihydro-isoindol-2-yl)-butyrylamino]-2-nitro-benzoic acid
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): P-Glupa-C
- Substance type: Yellow powder
- Physical state: solid
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 357.1 to 374.1 mg per cornea

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µl of physiological saline per cornea

POSITIVE CONTROL
Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µl per cornea
Concentration (if solution): 20% (w/v) Imidazole


Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Isolated bovine cornea

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes
- Time after start of exposure: 240 minutes

SCORING SYSTEM:
- After exposure the cornea is thoroughly rinsed to remove the test substance followed by immediate opacity measurement and permeability evaluation of the cornea.

- The mean opacity and mean permeability values (OD490) were used for each treatment group to calculate an in vitro score:

In vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD490 value).


TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
- opacitymeter and microplate reader

DATA EVALUATION:
In vitro score range UN GHS
= 3 No Category
> 3; = 55 No prediction can be made
>55 Category 1

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
58.5
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category I
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Since P-Glupa-C induced an IVIS = 55, it is concluded that P-Glupa-C induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described in this report and should be classified category 1 according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations.

Executive summary:

The negative control responses of physiological saline for opacity and permeability (0.0 and 0.000, respectively) were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range (2 and 0.050, respectively) indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas.The meanin vitroirritancy score of the positive control (20% (w/v) Imidazole) was 154 just above the current historical positive control mean plus two standard deviations.It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly.

P-Glupa-C induced serious eye damage through both endpoints, resulting in a meanin vitroirritancy score of 59 after 240 minutes of treatment.