Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-846-3 | CAS number: 127-51-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Genetic toxicity in vitro:
Ames test:
A gene toxicityin vitroexperiment was performed for the test material usingSalmonella typhimuriumstrains TA100, TA98, TA1535, and TA1537. The bacteria was exposed to the test chemical up to a dosage level of 3600 ug/plate. Plate incorporation study was conducted for 48 hrs and after the incubation period, a negative test result was observed. As seen by the results, test substance was considered as negative for gene toxicityin vitrosince no evidence of mutagenicity was observed in S. typhimurium strains TA100, TA98, TA1535, and TA1537.
Mammalian cell gene mutation assay:
The test chemical in the concentration of 0, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mM did not show any evidence of gene toxicity when CHO cells were exposed to the test chemical.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: see Principles below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Mutagenicity testing of test substance in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100, TA98, TA1535, and TA1537.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Vogel Bonnet medium
- Properly maintained: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 liver fractions were prepared from Aroclor-pretreated rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Up to 3600 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- sodium azide, at 0.5ug/plate 430-760 in TA1535, 400-700 in TA100; with benzo[a]pyrene, at 5 ug/plate, 865-1210 in TAI00, 235-350 in TA1537. 410-590 in TA1538, 660-1000 in TA98.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: In agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: No data available
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data available
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data available
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data available
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data available
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: All chemicals were tested at least twice.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data available
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data available
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data available
- Determination of endoreplication: No data available
- Other:
OTHER: No data available - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data available
- Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible, dose-related and at least two-fold elevation of the spontaneous revertant frequency was regarded as positive result(+). Agents producing reproducible, dose-related and significant (P≤0.01) but less than two-fold elevations were classified as marginally mutagenic under the experimental conditions
- Statistics:
- Method of Kastenbaum and Bowman (1970).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No data available
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic effect were observed.
- Conclusions:
- The given test material was negative for gene toxicity in vitro up to a dose concentration of 3600 µg/plate since no evidence of mutagenicity was observed.
- Executive summary:
A gene toxicity in vitro experiment was performed for the test material using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100, TA98, TA1535, and TA1537. The bacteria was exposed to the test chemical up to a dosage level of 3600 ug/plate. Plate incorporation study was conducted for 48 hrs and after the incubation period, a negative test result was observed. As seen by the results, test substance was considered as negative for gene toxicity in vitro since no evidence of mutagenicity was observed in S. typhimurium strains TA100, TA98, TA1535, and TA1537.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Data for the various publication were observed for test chemical. Test chemical was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of 3-methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-buten-2-one (CAS no 127-51-5). The studies are as mentioned below:
Ames assay
A gene toxicity in vitro experiment was performed for the test material using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100, TA98, TA1535, and TA1537. The bacteria was exposed to the test chemical up to a dosage level of 3600 ug/plate. Plate incorporation study was conducted for 48 hrs and after the incubation period, a negative test result was observed. As seen by the results, test substance was considered as negative for gene toxicity in vitro since no evidence of mutagenicity was observed in S. typhimurium strains TA100, TA98, TA1535, and TA1537.
Supported by other study.In a gene toxicity test, Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to the test chemical in the concentration of 0, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mM and S9-induced metabolic activation for 3 hours. The results showed that there was a strong cytotoxicity after treatment, however, S9-induced metabolic activation decreased the level of cytotoxicity to a certain extent. Independently of tested concentration, the results showed no evidence of gene toxicity. Therefore, it is considered that the test chemical in the concentration of 0, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mM does not cause genetic mutation(s) when CHO cells are exposed to the test chemical in the presence of metabolic activation.
The genotoxicity of the flavoring agent widely used in everyday foods was studied by a bacterial mutation test in the Salmonella/microsome system. In the mutation test, the test material did not exhibit significant induction of his+revertants in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 or TA100, either with or without rat liver microsome as the metabolic activation system. Gene toxicity in vitro profile for the test material α- Ionone is negative with and without rat liver microsome fraction S9 and hence the test chemical is not likely to classify for gene mutation in vitro.
In vitro Mammalian gene mutation study
In a gene toxicity test, Chinese Hamster Ovary(CHO) cells were exposed to test substance in the concentration of 0, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mM and S9-induced metabolic activation for 3 hours. The results showed that there was a strong cytotoxicity after treatment, however, S9-induced metabolic activation decreased the level of cytotoxicity to a certain extent. Independently of tested Ionone concentration, the results showed no evidence of gene toxicity. Therefore, it is considered that test substance in the concentration of 0, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mM does not cause genetic mutation(s) when CHO cells are exposed to the test chemical in the presence of metabolic activation.
In a gene toxicity test, Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to the test chemical in the concentration of 0, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mM and S9-induced metabolic activation for 3 hours. The results showed that there was a strong cytotoxicity after treatment, however, S9-induced metabolic activation decreased the level of cytotoxicity to a certain extent. Independently of tested concentration, the results showed no evidence of gene toxicity. Therefore, it is considered that the test chemical in the concentration of 0, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mM does not cause genetic mutation(s) when CHO cells are exposed to the test chemical in the presence of metabolic activation.
Based on the data summarized, 3-methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-buten-2-one (CAS no 127-51-5) did not induce gene mutation .Hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the studies summarized and as per CLP classification criteria the test chemical is not likely to classify for gene mutation in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.