Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 214-787-5 | CAS number: 1194-65-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 March 1995 to 13 December 1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 995
- Report date:
- 1995
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 410 (Repeated Dose Dermal Toxicity: 21/28-Day Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 82-2 (Repeated Dose Dermal Toxicity -21/28 Days)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dichlobenil
- EC Number:
- 214-787-5
- EC Name:
- Dichlobenil
- Cas Number:
- 1194-65-6
- Molecular formula:
- C7H3Cl2N
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: solid
- Storage condition of test material: in the dark at ambient room temperature
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Froxfield Farms (UK) Limited,
- Age at study initiation: 13 to 15 weeks
- Housing: individually in metal cages
- Diet: SDS Rabbit Diet SQC ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 21 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 16.5-22 °C
- Humidity: 40-68 %
- Air changes: approximately 19 per hours
- Photoperiod: 12 hours light/12 hours dark
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 15th March 1995 To: 20th June 1995
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 12 x 8 cm
- % coverage: approximately 10%
- Type of wrap if used: impervious bandage consisting of gauze covered with 'Elastoplast' elastic adhesive dressing backed with impervious 'Sleek' plaster.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes
- Time after start of exposure: 6 hours on each day - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 hours per day
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily for 21 consecutive days
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Five
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: three times daily
DERMAL IRRITATION (if dermal study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: prior to dosing on day 1 and then weekly intervals
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Food consumption for each animal determined: Yes
FOOD EFFICIENCY: No
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: prior to termination
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked: packed cell volume, haemoglobin, red blood cell count, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume, platelet counts, total white blood cell count, thrombotest, differential white blood cell count
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: prior to termination
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked: glucose, total protein, albumin, globulin, albumin/globulin ratio, urea nitrogen, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, gutamic-oxalaxetic transaminase, total bilirubin, sodium, potassium calcium, chloride, inorganic phosphorus, cholesterol
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
- The following organs were weighed: adrenals, brain, kidneys, liver, ovaries, spleen, testes.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
- The appearance of the following tissues was recorded: adrenals, aorta, brain, caecum, colon, duodenum, eyes, gall bladder, heart, ileum, jejunum, kidneys, larynx, liver, lungs, cervical and mesenteric lymph nodes, mammary glands, oesophagus, ovaries, pancreas, pharynx, pituitary, prostate, salivary gland, sciatic nerve, skeletal muscle, skin, spleen, sternum, stomach, testes and epididymides, thymus, thyroid/parathyroid, tongue, trachea, urinary bladder, uterus, vagina and any macroscopically abnormal tissue. - Statistics:
- Where appropriate, the following sequence of statistical tests was used:
- if the data consisted predominantly of one particular value, the proportion of values different from the mode was analysed by Fisher's exact test followed by Mantel's test for a trend in proportions. Otherwise:
- Bartlett's test was applied to test for heterogeneity of variance between treatments.
- If no significant heterogeneity was detected, one way ANOVA was performed followed by Williams' test
- If significant heterogeneity was detected and could not be removed by log transformation, Kruskal-Wallis analysis of ranks was used followed by non-parametric equivalent of Williams' test (Shirley's test).
Covariate of analysis of organ weight data was performed using adjusted organ weights where a correlation between organ weight and body weight was established at the 10% level of significance.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment related clinical signs.
- Dermal irritation:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no dermal reactions that were considered to be treatment related. In two animals from the control group, spots were observed during the last few days of the study.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- There were no treatment related mortalities.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no statistically significant differences from the control group noted for body weight gains in any of the treatment groups.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The food consumption for low and high dose group females was slightly higher than control; these differences were however not considered to be treatment related.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no differences from the controls in the haematological parameters measured that were related to treatment.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Group mean values of significantly different biochemistry values were recorded. Cholesterol levels were higher than control for females of the high dose group. However, individual values were within the expected background range and in the absence of any related biochemical or pathological changes in the liver, this finding was not considered to be of toxicological importance.
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no differences from controls in organ weights that were considered to be related to treatment.
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The macroscopic examination performed at termination revealed no changes attributable to treatment.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All of the lesions observed by microscopic pathology were minor in nature and not considered to be related to treatment.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 100 other: mg/kg/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Elevated cholesterol levels in high dose females (considered to be equivocal)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 300 other: mg/kg/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Elevated cholesterol levels in high dose females (considered to be equivocal)
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Group mean values body weights (g)
Dose group (mg/kg/day) | |||||
Time (weeks) | Sex | Control | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
0 | M | 2823 | 2929 | 2954 | 3029 |
F | 3144 | 3206 | 3083 | 3189 | |
1 | M | 2911 | 3067 | 3102 | 3146 |
F | 3212 | 3319 | 3186 | 3370 | |
2 | M | 3060 | 3230 | 3261 | 3326 |
F | 3363 | 3474 | 3352 | 3564 | |
3 | M | 3200 | 3341 | 3337 | 3489 |
F | 3475 | 3631 | 3485 | 3631 | |
Weight gain | M | 377 | 412 | 383 | 460 |
F | 331 | 425 | 402 | 442 |
Table 2: Group mean values of food consumption (g/animal/week)
Dose group (mg/kg/day) | |||||
Time (weeks) | Sex | Control | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
1 | M | 1289 | 1339 | 1257 | 1237 |
F | 1240 | 1358 | 1208 | 1409 | |
2 | M | 1277 | 1364 | 1357 | 1355 |
F | 1228 | 1416 | 1376 | 1397 | |
3 | M | 1210 | 1289 | 1217 | 1262 |
F | 1258 | 1357 | 1321 | 1313 | |
Cumulative value | M | 3776 | 3992 | 3931 | 3855 |
F | 3725 | 4131 | 3905 | 4119 |
Table 3: Significantly different biochemistry values
Dose group (mg/kg/day) | |||||
Parameter | Sex | Control | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Glucose (mg/dL) | M | 128 | 139 | 140 | 147* |
Protein (g/dL), total | F | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 6.2* |
Glob | F | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5* |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | F | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0* |
GPT (mU/mL) | M | 42 | 34 | 31* | 31* |
GOT (mU/mL) | F | 10 | 16*** | 16*** | 9 |
Cholesterol (mg/dL) | F | 43 | 50 | 47 | 64** |
*significantly different from control (P<0.05), Williams' test
**significantly different from control (P<0.01), Williams' test
***significantly different from control (P<0.05), Student's t test
Table 4: Significantly different organ weights
Dose group (mg/kg/day) | |||||
Organ | Sex | Control | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Adrenals | M | 252 | 195*** | 237 | 232 |
Brain | F | 9.42 | 8.85*** | 8.77*** | 9.18 |
Ovaries | F | 0.223 | 0.350 | 0.267 | 0.365* |
*significantly different from control (P<0.05), Williams' test
***significantly different from control (P<0.05), Student's t test
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, the test material had no toxic effect at any of the doses tested. The NOAEL was determined to be 1000 mg/kg/day and the NOEL was determined to be 300 mg/kg/day.
- Executive summary:
In a GLP compliant repeat dose (dermal) study conducted in line with standardised guidelines OECD 401 and EPA OPP 82-2, the effects of the repeat dose of the test material in rats was determined.
Under the conditions of the test, no toxic effect was seen at any of the doses tested. The NOAEL was determined to be 1000 mg/kg/day and the NOEL was determined to be 300 mg/kg/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.