Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
24 February to 25 February 2021
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE
iSafeRat® – in Silico Algorithms For Environmental Risk And Toxicity

2. MODEL (incl. version number)
iSafeRat® VAP v1.5

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See attached Study Report for further details.

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached QMRF for further details.

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached QMRF/Study Report for further details.

6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See attached Study Report for further details.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
Deviations:
not applicable
Remarks:
QSAR model
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The VAPOUR PRESSURE was determined using the iSafeRat® VP, a validated QSPR model. The model uses a linear relationship in which validated boiling point values are plotted against the log of vapour pressure values, where the pressure is in Pascals. The comparison was made with other members of the same chemical group. The results are considered to be as accurate as those from a good quality OECD guideline 104 study.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
QSAR model
Type of method:
other: QSAR model
Remarks:
In the majority of cases data for vapour pressure were obtained from the following methods described in the OECD Guideline No. 104: isoteniscope, dynamic, static, effusion (vapour pressure balance or loss of weight) and gas saturation methods (OECD, 2006)
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
1.03 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const1
Remarks:
95CI: 8.43E-01 – 1.27E00 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
7.88 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const2
Remarks:
95CI: 6.95E+00 – 8.93E+00 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
1.25 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const3
Remarks:
95CI: 1.03+00 – 1.53E+00 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
5 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const4
Remarks:
95CI: 4.25E+00 – 5.88E+00 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
5 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const5
Remarks:
95CI: 4.25E+00 – 5.88E+00 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
17.6 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const6
Remarks:
95CI: 1.41E-01 – 2.19E-01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
13.5 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const7
Remarks:
95CI: 1.20E+01 – 1.51E+01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
1.03 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const8
Remarks:
95CI: 8.43E-01 – 1.27E+00 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.224 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const9
Remarks:
95CI: 1.81E-01 – 2.77E-01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
10.6 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const10
Remarks:
95CI: 9.15E+00 – 1.22E+01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
7.54 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const11
Remarks:
95CI: 9.15E+00 – 1.22E+01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
7.18 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const12
Remarks:
95CI: 6.16E+00 – 8.38E+00 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
18.8 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const13
Remarks:
95CI: 1.65E+01 – 2.14E+01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.302 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const14
Remarks:
95CI: 2.47E-01 – 3.70E-01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
16.7 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const15
Remarks:
95CI: 1.50E+01 – 1.86E+01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
11.3 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const16
Remarks:
95CI: 1.00E+01 – 1.27E+01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.455 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const17
Remarks:
95CI: 3.64E-01 – 5.70E-01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.045 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const18
Remarks:
95CI: 3.45E-02 – 5.84E-02 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
16 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const19
Remarks:
95CI: 1.43E+01 – 1.79E+01 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
129 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const20
Remarks:
95CI: 1.18E+02 – 1.42E+02 Pa
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
339 Pa
Remarks on result:
other: const21
Remarks:
95CI: 3.20E+02 – 3.60E+02 Pa

Applicability domain


 


Descriptor domain


The descriptor domain has been reported for each constituent of the test item. The results are as follows:




















































































































Constituents



descriptor domain


(BP in °C)



status


const1

[30.7 ; 256]



extrapolation


const2

[26 ; 243.5]



extrapolation


const3

[30.7 ; 256]



extrapolation


const4

[30.7 ; 256]



extrapolation


const5

[30.7 ; 256]



extrapolation


const6

[82.3 ; 303]



inside domain


const7

[26 ; 243.5]



extrapolation


const8

[30.7 ; 256]



extrapolation


const9

[82.3 ; 303]



inside domain


const10

[30.7 ; 256]



inside domain


const11

[26 ; 243.5]



extrapolation


const12

[30.7 ; 256]



inside domain


const13

[30.7 ; 256]



inside domain


const14

[82.3 ; 303]



inside domain


const15

[82.3 ; 303]



inside domain


const16

[26 ; 243.5]



extrapolation


const17

[30.7 ; 256]



extrapolation


const18

[82.3 ; 303]



extrapolation


const19

[26 ; 243.5]



extrapolation


const20

[30.7 ; 256]



inside domain


const21

[26 ; 243.5]



inside domain



 


Structural fragment domain                                                                                                                                          


All chemical groups within the molecular structure of each constituent are taken into account by the model.


 


Mechanism domain


The model is based on different Simple Linear Regression equations (i.e. local models), selected on the basis of an initial classification about the capability of the substance to participate in intermolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonding. iSafeRat® VP includes the following local models, ranked by increasing intermolecular attractive interactions:



  • Vapour pressure local model for Non-Polar Organic compounds: for compounds which can only participate in weak Van der Waals attractive forces (g. alkanes, halides, alkenes, thiols… etc.).

  • Vapour pressure local model for Oxygenated, Non-Hydroxylated compounds: for compounds which can participate in strong Van der Waals attractive forces (g. ethers, esters, ketones, aldehydes, epoxides, lactones, carbonates, (meth)acrylates).

  • Vapour pressure local model for Nitrogenated compounds, which can participate in hydrogen bonds and/or strong Van der Waals attractive forces (g. amines, anilines, pyridines, pyrroles, nitriles, lactames, azoles, etc.).

  • Vapour pressure local model for Oxygenated, Hydroxylated compounds (Secondary and Tertiary Alcohols and phenols), which can participate in hydrogen bonds.

  • Vapour pressure local model for Oxygenated, Hydroxylated compounds (Primary Alcohols), which can participate in hydrogen bonds.

  • Vapour pressure local model for Carboxylic Acids, which can participate in hydrogen bonds.


The descriptor domain has been reported for each constituent of the test item. All the constituents fell inside the mechanism domain and could be predicted using one of these local models.

Conclusions:
This QSPR model has been validated as a QSAR model to be compliant with the OECD recommendations for QSAR modeling (OECD, 2004). The constituents of the test item fall within the applicability domain of the model and were therefore reliably predicted for the VAPOUR PRESSURE, except for 12 constituents which fall inside mechanistic domain but outside descriptor domain. For these constituents, the extrapolated prediction is considered reliable with restrictions within the confidence interval. Therefore, this endpoint values can be considered valid and fit for purpose.
Executive summary:

A Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) model was used to calculate the VAPOUR PRESSURE of the consituents of the test item. This QSPR model has been validated as a QSAR model to be compliant with the OECD recommendations for QSAR modeling (OECD, 2004) and predicts the endpoint value which would be expected when testing the substance under experimental conditions in a laboratory following the Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 104, "Vapour Pressure" (OECD, 2006). The criterion predicted was the vapour pressure at 25°C in Pascals.


 


The VAPOUR PRESSURE was determined using the iSafeRat® VP, a validated QSPR model. The model uses a linear relationship in which validated boiling point values are plotted against the log of vapour pressure values, where the pressure is in Pascals. The comparison was made with other members of the same chemical group. The results are considered to be as accurate as those from a good quality OECD guideline 104 study.


 


This QSPR model has been validated as a QSAR model to be compliant with the OECD recommendations for QSAR modeling (OECD, 2004). The constituents of the test item fall within the applicability domain of the model and were therefore reliably predicted for the VAPOUR PRESSURE, except for 12 constituents which fall inside mechanistic domain but outside descriptor domain. For these constituents, the extrapolated prediction is considered reliable with restrictions within the confidence interval. Therefore, this endpoint values can be considered valid and fit for purpose.


 


The VAPOUR PRESSURE of the constituents of the test item were determined as follows:




















































































































Constituents 



vapour pressure (Pa) at 25 °C



95% confidence limits (Pa)


const1

1.03E+00



8.43E-01 – 1.27E+00


const2

7.88E+00



6.95E+00 – 8.93E+00


const3

1.25E+00



1.03+00 – 1.53E+00


const4

5.00E+00



4.25E+00 – 5.88E+00


const5

5.00E+00



4.25E+00 – 5.88E+00


const6

1.76E-01



1.41E-01 – 2.19E-01


const7

1.35E+01



1.20E+01 – 1.51E+01


const8

1.03E+00



8.43E-01 – 1.27E+00


const9

2.24E-01



1.81E-01 – 2.77E-01


const10

1.06E+01



9.15E+00 – 1.22E+01


const11

7.54E+00



6.65E+00 – 8.56E+00


const12

7.18E+00



6.16E+00 – 8.38E+00


const13

1.88E+01



1.65E+01 – 2.14E+01


const14

3.02E-01



2.47E-01 – 3.70E-01


const15

1.67E+01



1.50E+01 – 1.86E+01


const16

1.13E+01



1.00E+01 – 1.27E+01


const17

4.55E-01



3.64E-01 – 5.70E-01


const18

4.49E-02



3.45E-02 – 5.84E-02


const19

1.60E+01



1.43E+01 – 1.79E+01


const20

1.29E+02



1.18E+02 – 1.42E+02


const21

3.39E+02



3.20E+02 – 3.60E+02



 

Description of key information

The vapour pressure of the constituents of the substance (21 components of the substance covering more than 81% of the composition) are in the range between 0.0449 and 399 Pa at 25°C (valid QSAR estimations).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

No study was conducted on the test item itself.


The test item is a natural complex substance (NCS). It is a mixture of several constituents, but 21 of them represent more than 81% of that mixture.


This calculation method predicts the endpoint value which would be expected when testing a pure substance under experimental conditions in a laboratory following Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 104. The criterion predicted was the vapour pressure in Pa at 25°C.


 


The vapour pressures of the constituents of the substance were estimated at 25°C as follows:




















































































































Constituents 



vapour pressure (Pa) at 25 °C



95% confidence limits (Pa)


const1

1.03E+00



8.43E-01 – 1.27E+00


const2

7.88E+00



6.95E+00 – 8.93E+00


const3

1.25E+00



1.03+00 – 1.53E+00


const4

5.00E+00



4.25E+00 – 5.88E+00


const5

5.00E+00



4.25E+00 – 5.88E+00


const6

1.76E-01



1.41E-01 – 2.19E-01


const7

1.35E+01



1.20E+01 – 1.51E+01


const8

1.03E+00



8.43E-01 – 1.27E+00


const9

2.24E-01



1.81E-01 – 2.77E-01


const10

1.06E+01



9.15E+00 – 1.22E+01


const11

7.54E+00



6.65E+00 – 8.56E+00


const12

7.18E+00



6.16E+00 – 8.38E+00


const13

1.88E+01



1.65E+01 – 2.14E+01


const14

3.02E-01



2.47E-01 – 3.70E-01


const15

1.67E+01



1.50E+01 – 1.86E+01


const16

1.13E+01



1.00E+01 – 1.27E+01


const17

4.55E-01



3.64E-01 – 5.70E-01


const18

4.49E-02



3.45E-02 – 5.84E-02


const19

1.60E+01



1.43E+01 – 1.79E+01


const20

1.29E+02



1.18E+02 – 1.42E+02


const21

3.39E+02



3.20E+02 – 3.60E+02



 

 


The substance is an UVCB with constituents having different vapour pressures. In addition we can not anticipate the impact of the interactions between the constituents and the influence of the physical state of the substance on the whole substance vapour pressure.


Therefore we considered the vapour pressure of the 21 constituents of the substance and no single key value was retained (nor calculated weighted Vapour pressure nor worst-case).