Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 855-228-0 | CAS number: 4497-59-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22 Feb - 08 Mar 2013
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- - As the outcome of this Ames Test is negative, a second confirmatory experiment is recommended (OECD 471). The preliminary test conducted here does not entirely fulfill this requirement, as it was performed according to the same protocol as the main experiment, and as other test concentrations were used. - Duplicates instead of triplicates were used in both experiments without provision of a scientific justification.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- - 2-Aminoanthracene was used as the sole indicator for the efficacy of the S9-mix
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-(2,2,4-trimethyl-3,4-dihydroquinolin-l (2H)-yl)ethanone
- EC Number:
- 855-228-0
- Cas Number:
- 4497-59-0
- Molecular formula:
- C14 H19 N O
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-(2,2,4-trimethyl-3,4-dihydroquinolin-l (2H)-yl)ethanone
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his operon (for S. typhimurium strains)
trp operon (for the E.coli strain)
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: tested for the presence / absence of amino acid requirements, sensitivity to UV radiation, membrane mutation rfa and the drug resistance factor R-factor
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: tested for the presence / absence of amino acid requirements, sensitivity to UV radiation, membrane mutation rfa and the drug resistance factor R-factor
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd. (Cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of male SD rats treated with Phenobarbital and 5,6-Benzoflavone)
- method of preparation of S9 mix: S9 Mix was prepared at the time of use, and stored by ice cooling during use. Composition: S9: 0.1 mL; MgCl2: 8 µmol; KCl: 33 µmol; Glucose-6-phospate: 5 µmol; NADPH: 4 µmol; NADH: 4 µmol; Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4): 100 µmol
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: 0.5 mL S9 mix added to 0.1 mL of test substance solution; 0.1 mL S9 in 1 mL S9 mix preparation - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The doses were chosen based on the results of a dose-setting study carried out using each of the bacterial strains, with a maximum dose of 5000 µg/plate as specified in the guidelines, and serial dilution by a factor of 4 to give a total of 8 doses. Based on the effects in inhibiting growth of each bacterial strain, the doses below were set in the main study:
- TA100, TA1535 under conditions of S9(-): 4.9, 9.8, 20, 39, 78, 156, 313 µg/plate
- WP2 uvrA, TA98, TA1537 under conditions of S9(-): 9.8, 20, 39, 78, 156, 313 µg/plate
- TA100, TA1535, WP2 uvrA, TA98, TA1537 under conditions of S9(+): 9.8, 20, 39, 78, 156, 313 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solubility of the test substance in water is < 50 mg/mL, but solubility in DMSO is ≥ 50 mg/mL and it was stable for 21 hours in a 5% solution at room temperature.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- other:
- Remarks:
- 1) TA 100 0.01 µg/plate, WP2 uvrA 0.01 µg/plate, TA98 0.1 µg/plate (-S9)
2) TA 1537 1.0 µg/plate (-S9)
3) TA 100 1.0 µg/plate, TA 1535 2.0 µg/plate, WP2 uvrA 10.0 µg/plate, TA98 0.5 µg/plate, TA 1537 2.0 µg/plate (+S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration (single, duplicate, triplicate): 2 plates per dose for treated groups and pos. control; 3 plates for neg. control
- Number of independent experiments: 1 (Experiment was repeated due to contamination in +S9 conditions)
METHOD OF TREATMENT / EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding: The bacterial concentrations were measured using as an indicator the absorbance of the culture solutions of each of the strains after 10-fold dilution with physiological saline using a spectrophotometer (measurement wavelength 660 nm, light path length 10 mm):
Strain TA100 TA1535 WP2 uvrA TA98 TA1537
Dose-setting study 3.2 4.4 6.5 3.4 2.7
Main study S9(-) 3.6 4.6 7.3 3.5 2.8
Main study (retest) S9(+) 3.7 4.8 6.7 3.5 2.6
[Figures indicating viable bacterial count (×10^9/mL)]
Test substance added: 0.1 mL/plate; preincubation method
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period: 20 min at 37 °C
- Exposure duration: 48 h at 37 °C
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: decrease in the number of revertant colonies per plate
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICITY
- Colony counting carried out using an automatic colony counter (CA-11 Automatic Colony Analyzer, System Science KK) with surface area correction and correction for counting errors by computer. When the number of colonies as the result of counting with the automatic colony counter is ≥ 1500, the precision of the automatic colony counter falls and so manual counting was carried out with a manual colony counter (manual colony counter No.3833, ANDERMAN & Co., Ltd.). Manual counting was also carried out when counting with the automatic counter was not possible because the colonies were very small due to strong growth inhibition. When the number of colonies was less than 300 with manual counting, all of these were counted and no correction was applied. When the number of colonies was ≥ 300, the plate was divided radially into 8 equal segments; 2 segments were counted and this number, corrected for surface area, was used. - Rationale for test conditions:
- According to guideline ("Standards for Mutagenicity Testing Using Microorganisms"; Ordinance No. 77 (partially amended by MOL Ordinance No. 67 of 1997))
- Evaluation criteria:
- Based on the results of the dose-setting study, main study (S9(-)) and main study (retest) (S9(+)), an increase of ≥ 2 times in the revertant colony count in the groups treated with the test substance compared with the negative control group was assessed as a positive result when dose-dependence and reproducibility were observed. All other cases were assessed as negative. When a positive result was obtained, a specific activity value was calculated.
- Statistics:
- Statistical analysis was not used in evaluating the results of the study.
Mean values were calculated.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- S9(-/+): 313 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- S9(-): 156, 313 µg/plate S9(+): 313 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- S9(-/+): 313 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- S9(-/+): 313 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- S9(-): 156, 313 µg/plate S9(+): 313 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: The test substance does not dissolve in water at 50 mg/mL or higher.
- Precipitation: Precipitation of the test substance did not occur.
- Other confounding effects: Growth of contaminating microorganisms was observed in S9 Mix in the test without bacteria in the main study, and therefore, colony counting under S9(+) conditions was not carried out, the plates were discarded, and the test was carried out again.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
A dose-setting study was carried out using each of the bacterial strains, with maximum dose of 5000 µg/plate as specified in the guidelines, and serial dilutions by a factor of 4, to give a total of 8 doses (0.31; 1.2; 4.9; 20; 78; 313; 1250 and 5000 µg/plate). As a result, no increase of 2-fold or greater in revertant colonies was observed compared with the negative control, irrespective of the presence or absence of metabolic activation, for any of the strains. It should be noted that growth inhibition of each of the strains by this test substance was noted at the doses 313 - 5000 µg/plate for all strains with and without metabolic activation. Precipitation of the test substance did not occur.
STUDY RESULTS
No increase of 2-fold or greater in revertant colonies compared with the negative
control was noted, irrespective of the presence or absence of metabolic activation for any of the strains, and no dose-dependent increase was seen. It should be noted that, growth inhibition of each of the strains by this test substance was noted (see *-indicated results in table 2), irrespective of the presence or absence of metabolic activation; precipitation of the test substance was not observed.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Positive historical control data: given in table 3; the positive controls induced revertant colonies more than twice the negative control for each strain, confirming validity of the response.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: In all of the tests, in the dose-setting study, the main study (S9(-)) and the main study (retest) (S9(+)), the negative control was within the permitted range of the background data for this institution (mean ± 2.5 SD).
The historical control data is provided under section "Any other information on results incl. tables, table 4"
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Test results of the dose-setting study
Study Period | February 22, 2013 to February 25, 2013 | ||||||
Metabolic activation Y/N | Test substance (µg/plate) | Revertant colonies/plate | |||||
Base-pair substitution | Frame-shift | ||||||
TA100 | TA1535 | WP2 uvrA | TA98 | TA1537 | |||
-S9Mix | Negative control | 113 116 112 (114) | 11 11 13 (12) | 18 19 24 (20) | 19 20 17 (19) | 7 7 6 (7) | |
0.31 | 101 118 (110) | 12 14 (13) | 23 17 (20) | 14 14 (14) | 3 4 (4) | ||
1.2 | 117 104 (111) | 13 13 (13) | 27 27 (27) | 15 10 (13) | 3 3 (3) | ||
4.9 | 126 108 (117) | 8 10 (9) | 23 19 (21) | 11 14 (13) | 4 4 (4) | ||
20 | 120 120 (120) | 7 7 (7) | 27 22 (25) | 10 17 (14) | 5 4 (5) | ||
78 | 117 112 (115) | 6 6 (6) | 18 23 (21) | 17 23 (20) | 5 4 (5) | ||
313 | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 11* 14* (13) | 13* 17* (15) | 3* 4* (4) | ||
1250† | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | ||
5000† | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | ||
+S9Mix | Negative control | 136 131 135 (134) | 7 7 8 (7) | 27 25 24 (25) | 22 20 27 (23) | 14 15 17 (15) | |
0.31 | 148 154 (151) | 10 13 (12) | 20 21 (21) | 20 29 (25) | 13 12 (13) | ||
1.2 | 149 132 (141) | 6 6 (6) | 24 21 (23) | 30 33 (32) | 12 13 (13) | ||
4.9 | 152 152 (152) | 8 10 (9) | 21 22 (22) | 25 24 (25) | 14 20 (17) | ||
20 | 127 150 (139) | 12 8 (10) | 27 24 (26) | 26 23 (25) | 15 14 (15) | ||
78 | 133 141 (137) | 6 7 (7) | 29 25 (27) | 28 34 (31) | 14 13 (14) | ||
313 | 69* 63* (66) | 4* 5* (5) | 22* 23* (23) | 21* 18* (20) | 13* 12* (13) | ||
1250 | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | ||
5000† | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | 0* 0* (0) | ||
Positive controls | No need for S9Mix | Name | AF-2 | NaN3 | AF-2 | AF-2 | ICR-191 |
Dose µg/plate | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1.0 | ||
Colony count/plate | 483 487 (485) | 518 428 (473) | 100 111 (106) | 391 394 ( 393) | 1748 1880 (1814) | ||
Need for S9 mix | Name | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | |
Dose µg/plate | 1.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | ||
Colony count/plate | 1017 1034 (1026) | 318 280 ( 299) | 612 688 ( 650) | 351 323 ( 337) | 133 154 ( 144) |
Positive control substances: AF-2: 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide; NaN3: sodium azide; ICR-191: 6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethylamino)propylamino]-2-methoxyacridine dihydrochloride; 2AA: 2-aminoanthracene
*: concentrations inhibiting bacterial growth
†: Doses followed by † showed precipitation.
Numbers in brackets denote plate averages
Table 2: Test results of the main experiment (-S9)
Metabolic activation Y/N | Dose of test substance (μg/plate) | Revertant colonies/plate | |||||
Base pair substitution | Frame shift | ||||||
TA 100 | TA 1535 | WP2 uvrA | TA 98 | TA 1537 | |||
S9 mix (–) | Negative control | 108 95 108 (104) | 7 11 10 (9) | 31 21 30 (27) | 18 19 18 (18) | 10 7 8 (8) | |
4.9 | 116 100 (108) | 7 7 (7) | - | - | - | ||
9.8 | 92 96 (94) | 6 8 (7) | 23 18 (21) | 13 14 (14) | 5 3 (4) | ||
20 | 98 112 (105) | 10 8 (9) | 21 24 (23) | 17 21 (19) | 3 4 (4) | ||
39 | 95 112 (104) | 10 7 (9) | 21 18 (20) | 18 21 (20) | 7 8 (8) | ||
78 | 87 93 (90) | 11 12 (12) | 23 25 (24) | 19 16 (18) | 5 6 (6) | ||
156 | 85* 100* (93) | 10* 6* (8) | 23 27 (25) | 20 24 (22) | 3 4 (4) | ||
313 | 55* 66* (61) | 6* 4* (5) | 15* 14* (15) | 7* 8* (8) | 3* 0* (2) | ||
Positive controls | No need for S9 mix | Name | AF-2 | NaN3 | AF-2 | AF-2 | ICR-191 |
Dose (µg/plate) | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1.0 | ||
Colony count / plate | 426 435 (431) | 452 440 (446) | 88 83 (86) | 368 361 (365) | 1928 2012 (1970) |
Positive control substances: AF-2: 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide; NaN3: sodium azide; ICR-191: 6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethylamino)propylamino]-2-methoxyacridine dihydrochloride; 2AA: 2-aminoanthracene
*: are concentrations inhibiting bacterial growth
Numbers in brackets indicate plate averages
Table 3: Test results of the main study (retest; +S9)
Metabolic activation Y/N | Dose of test substance (μg/plate) | Revertant colonies/plate | |||||
Base pair substitution | Frame shift | ||||||
TA 100 | TA 1535 | WP2 uvrA | TA 98 | TA 1537 | |||
S9 mix (-) | Negative control | 103 87 99 (96) | 11 16 14 (14) | 29 25 27 (27) | 16 12 16 (15) | 6 7 7 (7) | |
S9 mix (+) | Negative control | 129 111 112 (117) | 8 8 13 (10) | 26 29 35 (30) | 29 28 25 (27) | 15 18 15 (16) | |
9.8 | 128 114 (121) | 13 11 (12) | 28 34 (31) | 20 24 (22) | 16 15 (16) | ||
20 | 96 99 (98) | 10 15 (13) | 30 39 (35) | 25 23 (24) | 4 3 (4) | ||
39 | 115 136 (126) | 8 10 (9) | 34 29 (32) | 23 27 (25) | 15 13 (14) | ||
78 | 101 114 (108) | 16 12 (14) | 31 35 (33) | 31 27 (29) | 12 14 (13) | ||
156 | 97 93 (95) | 13 9 (11) | 35 42 (39) | 28 25 (27) | 14 12 (13) | ||
313 | 78* 0* (39) | 0* 11* (6) | 17* 18* (18) | 14* 11* (13) | 7* 8* (8) | ||
Positive controls | No need for S9 mix | Name | AF-2 | NaN3 | AF-2 | AF-2 | ICR-191 |
Dose (µg/plate) | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1.0 | ||
Colony count / plate | 467 474 (471) | 477 412 (445) | 97 90 (94) | 425 433 (429) | 1315 1343 (1329) | ||
Need for S9 mix | Name | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | |
| Dose (µg/plate) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | |
| Colony count / plate | 852 955 (904) | 271 246 (259) | 767 800 (784) | 314 296 (305) | 117 96 (107) |
Positive control substances: AF-2: 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide; NaN3: sodium azide; ICR-191: 6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethylamino)propylamino]-2-methoxyacridine dihydrochloride; 2AA: 2-aminoanthracene
* concentrations inhibiting bacterial growth
Numbers in brackets indicate plate averages
Table 4: Background data (Historical control data: September 7, 2012 to February 1, 2013)
TA100 | ||||
Strain | Neg. ctrl. (S9-) | Neg. ctrl. (S9+) | Pos. ctrl (S9-) AF-2 (0.01 µg/plate) | Pos. ctrl (S9+) 2AA (1.0 µg/plate) |
|
|
|
|
|
No. of data | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 |
Average | 97 | 105 | 566 | 835 |
SD | 10.1 | 12.8 | 60.8 | 80.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA1535 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Strain | Neg. ctrl. (S9-) | Neg. ctrl. (S9+) | Pos. ctrl (S9-) NaN3 (0.5 µg/plate) | Pos. ctrl (S9+) 2AA (2.0 µg/plate) |
|
|
|
|
|
No. of data | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
Average | 12 | 11 | 491 | 257 |
SD | 3.1 | 2.9 | 72.9 | 27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
WP2 uvrA | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Strain | Neg. ctrl. (S9-) | Neg. ctrl. (S9+) | Pos. ctrl (S9-) AF-2 (0.01 µg/plate) | Pos. ctrl (S9+) 2AA (10.0 µg/plate) |
|
|
|
|
|
No. of data | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
Average | 26 | 28 | 117 | 685 |
SD | 5.3 | 6.0 | 15.4 | 101.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA98 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Strain | Neg. ctrl. (S9-) | Neg. ctrl. (S9+) | Pos. ctrl (S9-) AF-2 (0.1 µg/plate) | Pos. ctrl (S9+) 2AA (0.5 µg/plate) |
|
|
|
|
|
No. of data | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 |
Average | 17 | 26 | 457 | 323 |
SD | 2.9 | 4.3 | 40.7 | 39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA1537 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Strain | Neg. ctrl. (S9-) | Neg. ctrl. (S9+) | Pos. ctrl (S9-) ICR-191 (1.0 µg/plate) | Pos. ctrl (S9+) 2AA (2.0 µg/plate) |
|
|
|
|
|
No. of data | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
Average | 7 | 19 | 2588 | 118 |
SD | 1.8 | 2.9 | 830.5 | 16.0 |
Positive control substances: AF-2: 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide; NaN3: sodium azide; ICR-191: 6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethylamino)propylamino]-2-methoxyacridine dihydrochloride; 2AA: 2-aminoanthracene
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- From the results in this study and under these test conditions, 1-(2,2,4-trimethyl-3,4-dihydroquinolin-l (2H)-yl)ethanone was assessed not to be mutagenic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.