Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 295-184-4 | CAS number: 91845-13-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20 September 2017 to 20 October 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- March 2003
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Appendix to Director General Notification, No. 12-Nousan-8147. Agricultural Production Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (JMAFF)
- Version / remarks:
- November 2000, including the most recent revisions
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- See attached justification. In short, based on the current data-set, it cannot be concluded if the outcome of the LLNA performed with Additiv 309 is a true or a false positive response. This implies that no conclusion can be drawn on classification for skin sensitizing properties. It is noted that classification for skin sensitizing properties at this point can be considered over-classification. Therefore further data are needed for a final conclusion on this endpoint. Since Additiv 309 is a UVCB with estimated low water solubility and high partition coefficient, the available in vitro/in chemico tests to address skin sensitizing properties are either technically not feasible to perform or are expected to yield a result that might not be reliable (false negative outcome). In order to allow final conclusion on skin sensitizing properties of Additiv 309, it was therefore concluded that performance of a GPMT study was necessary.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Additiv 309
- IUPAC Name:
- Additiv 309
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's Identification: Optimol Additiv 309
Appearance: Pasty dark brown liquid
Batch: 0000769695
Expiry date: 27 June 2021
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Specific gravity / density: <1g/cm3 at 20 degrees C
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France, L’Arbresle, France
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Microbiological status of animals, when known: SPF
- Age at study initiation: approx. 4 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 301-353 g
- Housing: Group housing of maximally 5 animals per labeled Noryl cage containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material and shelters as cage enrichment.
- Diet: Complete maintenance diet for guinea pigs (MS-H, SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum. In addition, hay was provided at least twice a week.
- Water: free access to tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
- Indication of any skin lesions: Before experimental start it was ensured that the animals were healthy and that the skin to be treated was intact and free from any abnormality.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21-22
- Humidity (%): 46 - 65
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
-IN-LIFE DATES: From: 20 September 2017 To: 20 October 2017
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 1%
- Day(s)/duration:
- Day1
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
- Route:
- other: provocation mild inflammatory reaction
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 10% SDS
- Day(s)/duration:
- Day 7, 24 hours before epidermal induction,
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 100%
- Day(s)/duration:
- Day 8, 48 hours
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: 100% was well-tolerated systemically and did not cause skin irritation. Hence SDS was used to provoke a mild inflammatory reaction.
Challenge
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- 100%
- Day(s)/duration:
- Day 21, 24 hours
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- 10 (experimental group), 5 (control group)
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TEST:
A preliminary irritation study was conducted in order to select test item concentrations to be used in the main study. The starting- and subsequent concentrations were taken from the series: 100% (undiluted), 50%, 20%, 10%, 5%, 2%, 1%. The test system and procedures we re identical to those used during the main study. The four animals selected were between 4 and 9 we eks old. No body weights were determined.
Intradermal injections: A series of four test item concentrations was tested, the highest concentratio n being the maximum concentration that could technically be injected. Two animals received two dif ferent concentrations in duplicate (0.1 mL/site) in the clipped scapular region. The injection sites were assessed for irritation 24 and 48 hours after treatment.
Epidermal application: A series of four test item concentrations was tested, the highest concentration being the maximum concentration that could technically be applied. Two different concentrations were applied (0.5 mL each) per animal to the clipped flank, using Metalline patches (2x3 cm) mounted on Medical tape which were held in place with Micropore tape and subsequently Coban elastic bandage. The animals receiving intradermal injections were treated with the lowest concentrations and two other animals with the highest concentrations.
After 24 hours, the dressing was removed and the skin cleaned of residual test item using water. The treated skin areas were assessed for irritation 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressings.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2 (injection day 1, epidermal exposure day 8)
- Dermal observations: The dermal reactions caused by the intradermal injections were assessed for irritation on day 3
- Groups: One test substance group and one control group
- Site: Scapular region (clipped)
- Concentrations: 1% for intradermal, 100% for epicutaneous
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1 (day 21)
- Exposure period: 24 hours (after removal of the dressing, the skin was cleaned of residual test item and vehicle using water)
- Groups: One test substance group and one control group
- Site: flank (clipped)
- Concentrations: 100%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing
Throughout the study, animals were observed for general health/mortality and moribundity twice daily, in the morning and at the end of the working day. Animals were weighed individually on day 1 (predose) and at termination of the study. - Challenge controls:
- Results of a reliability study are included.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Results of a reliability check performed with alpha-hexylcinnemaldehyde are included in the report.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Reliability check performed in July 2017: all experimental animals gave a positive response to the 50% test item concentration in the challenge phase at 24 hours after the challenge exposure (8/10: score 2; 2/10: score 1). This was considered indicative of sensitisation, based on the absence of any response in the control animals. These results lead to a sensitisation rate of 100 percent to the 50% concentration.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1% intradermal, 100% epidermal, 100% challenge
- No. with + reactions:
- 8
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Any other information on results incl. tables
At 24 hours after challenge, 8 out of 10 test animals showed discrete or patch erythema (grade 1). After 48 hours, discrete or patch erythema were still visible in 3/10 guinea pigs in the test substance group. Scaliness was observed in 7/10 animals in the test substance group (all of these showed positive signs of skin sensitization).The reactions noted in the experimental animals after the epidermal induction exposure were considered to be enhanced by the SDS treatment. No skin reactions were evident in the control animals.
No mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study. Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1A (indication of significant skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Based on a Guinea Pig Maximization Test conducted according to OECD/EC guidelines and GLP principles, Optimol Additiv 309 is considered to have skin sensitising properties (Cat. 1A according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures).
- Executive summary:
A Guinea Pig Maximization Test was conducted according to OECD/EC guidelines and GLP principles. Ten experimental animals were intradermally injected with a 1% concentration and epidermally exposed to a 100% concentration. Five control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (corn oil). Doses were established based on the outcome of a preliminary irritation study. Approximately 24
hours before the epidermal induction exposure all animals were treated with 10% SDS. Two weeks after the epidermal application all animals were epidermally challenged with a 100% test item concentration and the vehicle. No mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study. Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period. Discrete or patchy erythema in 80% (8 out of 10) of the animals was observed at 24 hours after challenge which was still present in 33% (3 out of 10) of the animals at 48 hours after exposure. Scaliness was seen on some treated skin sites. No skin effects were seen in the controls. Based on the positive response in 80% of the animals at 24 hours after exposure, Optimol Additiv 309 is considered to have skin sensitising properties and is classified Cat. 1A according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.