Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 287-837-7 | CAS number: 85586-35-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
- Ames test (OECD 471): negative with and without metabolic activation (40M0114/12M063)
- HPRT (OECD 476): negative with and without metabolic activation (Harlan CCR1483309)
- In-vitro MN (OECD 487): negative with and without metabolic activation (Harlan CCR1483303)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- BASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine and tryptophan.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- The Salmonella strains are checked for the following characteristics at regular intervals: deep rough character (rfa); UV sensitivity (Ä uvrB); ampicillin resistance (R factor plasmid). Histidine and tryptophan auxotrophy is checked in each experiment via the spontaneous rate.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- E. coli WP2 uvrA is checked for UV sensitivity. Histidine and tryptophan auxotrophy is checked in each experiment via the spontaneous rate.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat livers
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2750 and 5500 μg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO. Which had been demonstrated to be suitable in bacterial reverse mutation tests and for which historical control data are available
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- No metabolic activation, Strains: TA 1535 and TA 100
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine
- Remarks:
- No metabolic activation, Strains: TA 98
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- No metabolic activation, Strains: TA 1537
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- No metabolic activation, Strains: E. coli WP2 uvrA
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene.
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation and for all strains
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
DURATION
Standard plate test
- Exposure duration: 48 - 72 hours at 37°C in the dark
Preincubation test
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes at 37°C
- Exposure duration: 48 - 72 hours at 37°C in the dark
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 test plates per dose or per control
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: number of revertants, background lawn, determination of titer - Evaluation criteria:
- ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:
Generally, the experiment is considered valid if the following criteria are met: The number of revertant colonies in the negative controls was within the range of the historical negative control data for each tester strain; The sterility controls revealed no indication of bacterial contamination; The positive control substances both with and without S9 mix induced a distinct increase in the number of revertant colonies within the range of the historical positive control data or above; Fresh bacterial culture containing approximately 10^9 cells per mL were used. For approval the titer of viable bacteria was ≥ 10^8 colonies per mL.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
The test substance is considered positive in this assay if the following criteria are met: A dose-related and reproducible increase in the number of revertant colonies, i.e. about doubling of the spontaneous mutation rate in at least one tester strain either without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system.
A test substance is generally considered non-mutagenic in this test if: The number of revertants for all tester strains were within the historical negative control range under all experimental conditions in at least two experiments carried out independently of each other. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain and test conditions at 2750 μg/plate only without S9 mix (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants, slight reduction in the titer)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain and test conditions at 2750 μg/plate only without S9 mix (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants, slight reduction in the titer)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain and test conditions at 2750 μg/plate only without S9 mix (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants, slight reduction in the titer)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- depending on the strain and test conditions at 2750 μg/plate only without S9 mix (slight decrease in the number of his+ revertants, slight reduction in the titer)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Thus, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The test substance was tested for its mutagenic potential based on the ability to induce point mutations in selected loci of several bacterial strains, i.e. Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, in a reverse mutation assay.
STRAINS: TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and E. coli WP2 uvrA
DOSE RANGE: 33 μg - 5 500 μg/plate (SPT); 33 μg - 5 500 μg/plate (PIT)
TEST CONDITIONS: Standard plate test (SPT) and preincubation test (PIT) both with and without metabolic activation (liver S9 mix from induced rats).
SOLUBILITY: No precipitation of the testsubstance was found with and
without S9 mix.TOXICITY: A weak bacteriotoxic effect was occasionally observed
depending on the strain and test conditions at 2 750 μg/plateMUTAGENICITY:
A relevant increase in the number of his+ or trp+ revertants was not observed in the standard plate test or in the preincubation test either without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system.- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant guideline study, available as unpublished report, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, July 22, 2010, Guideline No. 487 “In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test".
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH (Harlan CCR), In den Leppsteinswiesen 19, 64380 Rossdorf, Germany
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Stocks of the V79 cells (obtained from LMP; Technical University Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany) are stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank. Before freezing each batch is screened for mycoplasm contamination and checked for karyotype stability.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- See "any other information on materials and methods"
- Vehicle / solvent:
- The final concentration of DMSO in the culture medium was 0.5 % (v/v). The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Griseofulvin
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DOSE-SELECTION:
With respect to the solubility of the test item, 4000.0 µg/mL of Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with methanol was applied as top concentration for treatment of the cultures in the pre-test. Test item concentrations between 7.8 and 4000.0 µg/mL (with and without S9 mix) were chosen for the evaluation of cytotoxicity. No precipitation of the test item was observed. Since the cultures fulfilled the requirements for cytogenetic evaluation in the presence of S9 mix, this preliminary test was designated Experiment IA. The experimental part without S9 mix was repeated with the same top concentration due to the low response of the positive control MMC and designated Experiment IB. Since no clear cytotoxicity and test item precipitation was observed in Experiment IA and IB, the same concentrations were applied in Experiment II.
EXPERIMENTAL PERFORMANCE:
- Culture Medium and Conditions: For seeding and treatment of the cell cultures the culture medium was MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts, glutamine, Hepes (25 mM) and 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS). Additionally, the medium was supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 µg/mL). All cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % CO2 (98.5 % air).
- Seeding of the Cultures: Exponentially growing stock cultures more than 50 % confluent were rinsed with Ca-Mg-free salt solution containing 8000 mg/L NaCl, 200 mg/L KCl, 200 mg/L KH2PO4 and 150 mg/L Na2HPO4. Afterwards the cells were treated with trypsin-EDTA-solution at 37°C for approx. 5 minutes. Then, by adding complete culture medium including 10 % (v/v) FBS the enzymatic treatment was stopped and a single cell suspension was prepared. The trypsin concentration for all subculturing steps was 0.25 % (w/v) in Ca-Mg-free salt solution. The cells were seeded into Quadriperm dishes, which contained microscopic slides. The cells were seeded into Quadriperm dishes, which contained microscopic slides. Into each chamber 1.0 x 10^5 – 1.5 x 10^5 cells were seeded with regard to the preparation time.
TREATMENT:
- Exposure period 4 hours: The culture medium of exponentially growing cell cultures was replaced with serum-free medium containing the test item. For the treatment with metabolic activation 50 µL S9 mix per mL medium was added. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were performed. After 4 hours the cultures were washed twice with "Saline G" (pH 7.2) containing 8000 mg/L NaCl, 400 mg/L KCl, 1100 mg/L glucose • H2O, 192 mg/L Na2HPO4 • 2 H2O and 150 mg/L KH2PO4. Then the cells were cultured in complete medium containing 10 % (v/v) FBS for the remaining culture time of 20 hours.
- Exposure period 24 hours: The culture medium of exponentially growing cell cultures was replaced with complete medium containing 10 % (v/v) FBS including the test item without S9 mix. The medium was not changed until preparation of the cells. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were performed.
PREPARATION OF THE CULTURES:
For the micronucleus analysis, 24 hours after the start of the exposure, the cells were treated on the slides in the chambers of the quadriperm dishes with deionised water for 1 to 1.5 min at 37°C. Afterwards the cells were fixed twice with a solution containing 3 parts ethanol, 1 part acetic acid and 1.25 % (v/v) formaldehyde. After preparation the cells were stained with Giemsa and labelled with a computer-generated random code to prevent scorer bias.
ANALYSIS OF MICRONUCLEI AND CYTOTOXICITY:
Evaluation of the cultures was performed manually using NIKON microscopes with 40x objectives. The micronuclei were counted in cells showing a clearly visible cytoplasm area. The criteria for the evaluation of micronuclei are described in the publication of Countryman and Heddle (1976). Briefly the micronuclei were stained in the same way as the main nucleus. The area of the micronucleus did not extend the third part of the area of the main nucleus. 1000 cells in two parallel cultures were scored for micronuclei, so that at least 2000 cells from clones with 2-8 cells were analysed per test group. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells. Cytotoxicity was assessed via counting the number of clones consisting of 1 cell (c1), 2 cells (c2), 3-4 cells (c4), and 5-8 cells (c8) among the cells that were scored for the presence of micronuclei. These clusters represented the cells that have divided 1, 2, or 3 times within the experiment. From these data, a proliferation index (PI) was calculated. Only those cultures were evaluated which showed a PI > 1.3, in order to guarantee for a sufficient cell proliferation during treatment and recovery. - Evaluation criteria:
- ACCEPTABILITY OF THE ASSAY:
The micronucleus assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The number of micronucleated cells carrying one or more micronuclei found in the solvent controls falls within the range of the historical laboratory control data range.
b) The positive control substances produce a significant increase (at least two-fold the respective control value) in the number of micronucleated cells exceeding the historical laboratory solvent control data range.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS:
A test item can be classified as mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical control data and
- either a statistically significant concentration-related increase in three test groups or a significant increase of micronucleated cells in at least one test group is observed.
A test item can be classified as non-mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated test groups is in the range of the historical control data and
- no statistically significant concentration-related increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Chi square test
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed. Phase separation was observed in Experiment IA, IB and II in the presence of S9 mix at 125.0 µL/mL and above. In Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix phase separation was observed at 250.0 µg/mL and above. No relevant influence on pH value was observed. The osmolarity was slightly increased at the highest applied concentration in Experiment II. In the absence and presence of metabolic activation no clear cytotoxicity measured as reduced proliferation index was observed. No mutagenicity was observed at the concentrations evaluated. In Experiment IA and IB in the absence and presence of S9 mix two statistically significant increases were observed after treatment with 1000 µg/mL (1.20 and 1.30 %). The values are in the range of the laboratory historical control data (0.15-1.50 % and 0.05-1.70 % micronucleated cells, respectively) and therefore biologically irrelevant. In Experiment II in the presence of S9 mix two statistically significant increases were observed after treatment with 62.5 and 2000.0 µg/mL (1.55 and 1.45 %). The values are in the range of the laboratory historical control data (0.05 - 1.70 % micronucleated cells) and therefore biologically irrelevant. In the presence of S9 mix one single value (1.60 %) exceeded the range of the laboratory historical control data (0.05-1.50 % micronucleated cells) after treatment with 1000.0 µg/mL. The value is not statistically significant and therefore biologically irrelevant. Mitomycin C (0.1 µg/mL), Griseofulvin (8.0 µg/mL) or CPA (15.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant guideline study, available as unpublished report, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, In den Leppsteinswiesen 19, 64380 Rossdorf, Germany
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Large stocks of the V79 cell line (supplied by Laboratory for Mutagenicity Testing; Techni-cal University, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany) are stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank of Harlan CCR allowing the repeated use of the same cell culture batch in experiments. Before freezing, the level of spontaneous mutants was depressed by treatment with HAT-medium as described in. Each batch is screened for mycoplasm contamination and checked for karyotype stability and spontaneous mutant frequency.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- See "any other information on materials and methods"
- Vehicle / solvent:
- On the day of the experiment (immediately before treatment), the test item was dissolved in DMSO. The final concentration of DMSO in the culture medium was 0.5% v/v.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- PRE-TEST:
A pre-test was performed in order to determine the concentration range for the mutagenicity experiments. The general culture conditions and experimental conditions in this pre-test were the same as described for the mutagenicity experiment. In this pre-test the colony forming ability of approximately 500 single cells (duplicate cultures per concentration level) after treatment with the test item was observed and compared to the controls. Toxicity of the test item is indicated by a reduction of the cloning efficiency (CE).
DOSE SELECTION:
The highest concentration used in the pre-test was 4000 µg/mL limited by the solubility of the test item in DMSO and aqueous medium. Test item concentrations between 31.3 µg/mL and 4000 µg/mL were used to evaluate toxicity in the presence (4 hours treatment) and absence (4 hours and 24 hours treatment) of metabolic activation. Based on cytotoxicity and phase separation noted in the pre-experiment, the individual concentrations of the main experiments were selected. The individual concentrations were spaced by a factor of 3 at the low doses (until 500 µg/mL) and 2 at the higher doses in the experiments with S9. In the experiments without S9 the individual concentrations were spaced by a factor of 2. Narrower spacing at high concentrations was used in the absence of metabolic activation to cover the cytotoxic range more closely.
EXPERIMENTAL PERFORMANCE:
- Culture Medium: For seeding and treatment of the cell cultures the complete culture medium was MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts, neomycin (5 µg/mL) and amphotericin B (1%). For the selection of mutant cells the complete medium was supplemented with 11 µg/mL 6-thioguanine. All cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5% CO2.
- Seeding: Two to three days after sub-cultivation stock cultures were trypsinized at 37 °C for 5 minutes. Then the enzymatic digestion was stopped by adding complete culture medium with 10% FBS and a single cell suspension was prepared. The trypsin concentration for all sub-culturing steps was 0.2% in PBS. The PBS is composed as follows (per litre): NaCl: 8000 mg, KCl: 200 mg, KH2PO4: 200 mg, Na2HPO4: 150 mg. Prior to the trypsin treatment the cells were rinsed with Ca-Mg-free salt solution containing 200 mg/L EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid). Approximately 1.5x10^6 (single culture) and 5x10^2 cells (in duplicate) were seeded in plastic culture flasks. The cells were grown for 24 hours prior to treatment.
- Treatment: After 24 hours the medium was replaced with serum-free medium containing the test item, either without S9 mix or with 50 µL/mL S9 mix. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were treated in parallel. After 4 hours this medium was replaced with complete medium following two washing steps with "saline G". In the second experiment the cells were exposed to the test item for 24 hours in complete medium, supplemented with 10% FBS, in the absence of metabolic activation. The "saline G" solution had the following constituents (per litre): NaCl: 8000 mg, KCl: 400 mg, Glucose: 1100 mg, Na2HPO4.2H2O: 192 mg, KH2PO4: 150 mg. The pH was adjusted to 7.2. The colonies used to determine the cloning efficiency (survival) were fixed and stained approx. 7 days after treatment. Three or four days after treatment 1.5x10^6 cells per experimental point were sub-cultivated in 175 cm^2 flasks containing 30 mL medium. Following the expression time of 7 days five 80 cm^2 cell culture flasks were seeded with about 3 – 5x10^5 cells each in medium containing 6-TG. Two additional 25 cm^2 flasks were seeded with approx. 500 cells each in non-selective medium to determine the viability. The cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5% CO2 for about 8 days. The colonies were stained with 10% methylene blue in 0.01% KOH solution. The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. In doubt the colony size was checked with a preparation microscope. - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability of the Assay:
The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
- The numbers of mutant colonies per 10^6 cells found in the solvent controls falls within the laboratory historical control data.
- The positive control substances should produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies.
- The cloning efficiency II (absolute value) of the solvent controls should exceed 50%.
- The data of this study comply with the above mentioned criteria and the historical data.
Evaluation of Results:
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points. A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system. A positive response is described as follows: A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment. The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed. However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory´s historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological relevance and statistical significance was considered together.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 62.5 µg/mL and above in the first experiment (4 hrs), and at 250 µg/mL in the second experiment (24h hrs)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- PRELIMINARY TEST:
Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative suspension growth below 50 were noted at 250.0 µg/mL and above without metabolic activation following 4 and 24 hours treatment. The test medium was checked for precipitation or phase separation at the end of each treatment period (4 or 24 hours) prior to removal of the test item. Turbidity was observed at 31.3 - 500 µg/mL after 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation. Phase separation was noted from 1000 µg/mL up to the maximum concentration. After 24 hours treatment without metabolic activation turbidity was observed at 62.5 µg/mL and above. There was no relevant shift of the osmolarity and pH value even at the maximum concentration of the test item.
MAIN EXPERIMENTS:
Phase separation was noted in both experiments at 166.5 µg/mL and above with and at 31.3 µg/mL and above without metabolic activation. Turbidity at the end of treatment was observed at 15.6 µg/mL without metabolic activation. No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/10^6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The induction factor reached or exceeded the threshold of three times the corresponding solvent control in both cultures of the second experiment with metabolic activation at 55.6 and 1000.0 µg/mL. These effects however, are based on the rather low solvent control of 6.5 and 8.5 mutant colonies/10^6 cells. The actual values of the mutation frequency did not exceed the historical range of solvent controls. There was no dose dependent trend as indicated by the lacking statistical significance. A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of <0.05 was determined in any of the experimental groups.
Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I or cell density below 50% in both parallel cultures solely occurred without metabolic activation at 62.5 µg/mL and above in the first experiment and at 250 µg/mL in the second experiment. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A GLP-compliant Ames test according to OECD guideline 471 was conducted (BASF SE, 2013). The test substance Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with methanol was tested for its mutagenic potential based on the ability to induce point mutations in selected loci of several bacterial strains, i.e. Salmonella typhimurium (TA 1535, 1537, 100 and 98) and Escherichia coli (WP2 uvrA) in a reverse mutation assay at the following doses: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2750 and 5500 μg/plate. A standard plate test and pre-incubation test both with and without metabolic activation (liver S9 mix from phenobarbital/ β-naphthoflavone induced rats) were performed. A weak bacteriotoxic effect was occasionally observed depending on the strain and test conditions at 2750 μg/plate. A relevant increase in the number of his+ or trp+ revertants was not observed in the standard plate test or in the pre-incubation test either without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system. No precipitation of the test substance was found with and without S9 mix. Thus, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test substance Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with methanol is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
In a GLP-compliant micronucleus test, tested according to OECD guideline 487 Chinese hamster V79 cells were exposed to the test substance, Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with methanol, with and without metabolic activation (Harlan CCR, 2013). Three independent experiments were performed. In Experiment IA the exposure period was 4 hours with metabolic activation. In Experiment IB the exposure period was 4 hours without metabolic activation. In Experiment II the exposure period was 24 hours without S9 mix and 4 hours with metabolic activation. Doses up to 4000 µg/mL were chosen. No precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed. Phase separation was observed in Experiment IA, IB and II in the presence of S9 mix at 125.0 µL/mL and above. In Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix phase separation was observed at 250.0 µg/mL and above. No relevant influence on pH value was observed. The osmolarity was slightly increased at the highest applied concentration in Experiment II. In the absence and presence of metabolic activation no clear cytotoxicity measured as reduced proliferation index was observed. No mutagenicity was observed at the concentrations evaluated. In Experiment IA and IB in the absence and presence of S9 mix two statistically significant increases were observed after treatment with 1000 µg/mL (1.20 and 1.30 %). The values are in the range of the laboratory historical control data (0.15-1.50 % and 0.05-1.70 % micronucleated cells, respectively) and therefore biologically irrelevant. In Experiment II in the presence of S9 mix two statistically significant increases were observed after treatment with 62.5 and 2000.0 µg/mL (1.55 and 1.45 %). The values are in the range of the laboratory historical control data (0.05-1.70 % micronucleated cells) and therefore biologically irrelevant. In the presence of S9 mix one single value (1.60 %) exceeded the range of the laboratory historical control data (0.05-1.50 % micronucleated cells) after treatment with 1000.0 µg/mL. The value is not statistically significant and therefore biologically irrelevant. Mitomycin C (0.1 µg/mL), Griseofulvin (8.0 µg/mL) or CPA (15.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells. In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with methanol did not induce micronuclei in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
In a GLP-compliant gene mutation assay tested according to OECD guideline 476, Chinese hamster V79 cells were exposed to the test substance, Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with methanol, with and without metabolic activation (Harlan CCR, 2013). The highest concentration used in the range finding pre-experiment was 4000 µg/mL of the test item based on the solubility properties of the test item. The concentration range of the main experiments was limited by phase separation of the test item and cytotoxic effects observed in the preliminary test. The test item was dissolved in DMSO. The following doses were tested in the main experiments; Experiment I and II without S9: 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125.0, 250.0 and 375.0 µg/mL and in experiment I and II with S9 these doses were tested: 18.5, 55.6, 166.5, 500.0, 1000.0 and 2000.0 µg/mL. The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours. The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation. Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I or cell density below 50% in both parallel cultures solely occurred without metabolic activation at 62.5 µg/mL and above in the first experiment and at 250 µg/mL in the second experiment. No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/10^6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. Therefore, Soybean oil, epoxidized, reaction products with methanol is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
This conclusion is further supported by results of in-vitro studies with two other category members (CAS 188831-96-1, 211450-54-3).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available genotoxicity tests,the test substancedoes not need to be classified for genotoxicity according to the Directive 67/548/EEC and according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)