Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
18-07-2011 to 04-08-2011
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Version / remarks:
Guideline stipulated by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ministry of the Environment (revised November, 2006)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(2E)-2-methyl-3-(4-methylphenyl)prop-2-en-1-ol
EC Number:
700-548-7
Cas Number:
56138-10-4
Molecular formula:
C11H14O
IUPAC Name:
(2E)-2-methyl-3-(4-methylphenyl)prop-2-en-1-ol
Details on test material:
- Physical state: Waxy solid at temperature < 23°C and liquid at temperature > 23°C
- Storage condition of test material: In refrigerator (2-8°C) in the dark under nitrogen
- Other: white waxy solid at temperature < 23°C and clear colourless liquid at temperature > 23°C

Method

Target gene:
histidine or tryptophan locus
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 homogenate)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1: 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 5000 ug/plate
Experiment 2: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2000, 3330 ug/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: A solubility test was performed. The test substance could not be dissolved in water. The test substance was soluble at 50 mg/mL in dimethyl sulfoxide. Dimethyl sulfoxide was used in the assay. The test formulations were used within 4 hours for the assay.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
methylmethanesulfonate
other: ICR-191; 2-nitrofluorene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: The plates were inverted and incubated in the dark at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C for 48 ± 4 h. After this period revertant colonies (histidine independent (His+) for Salmonella typhimurium bacteria and tryptophan independent (Trp+) for Escherichia coli were counted. The revertant colonies were counted automatically with a Colony Counter.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Relative total growth (bacterial background lawn) and reduction in the number of revertants
Evaluation criteria:
See 'Any other information on materials and methods' for details on evaluation of the assay and positive criteria.
Statistics:
No formal hypothesis testing was done. See 'Any other information on materials and methods' for details on the acceptability and evaluation criteria of the assay.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at > 3330 μg/plate in all strains/cell types tested
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at > 3330 μg/plate in all strains/cell types tested
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Precipitation of test substance on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at 3330 and 5000 µg/plate in the first mutation experiment. Precipitation was not observed at the end of the incubation period nor in the second incubation period.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: None.

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The negative control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges.

The positive control values were mostly but not all within the laboratory historical control data ranges, specifically TA1537 (first experiment, absence of S9-mix). However, this was more than three (3) times the concurrent control values and this deviation I the mean plate count had no effect on the results of the study. Indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. Historical control data from experiments was presented within the study report.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results:
negative
Under the conditions of this study the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation.
Executive summary:

The study was performed to OECD TG 471, EU Method B.13/14, EPA OPPTS 870.5100 and the Japan Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity of Chemicals in accordance with GLP; to evaluate the mutagenic activity of the test substance in the Salmonella typhimurium and the Escherichia coli in a reverse mutation assay (with independent repeat). In the first mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 μg/plate in the absence and presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Toxicity was observed in all tester strains. Cytotoxicity was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix. In the second mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 3330 μg/plate in the absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix. Cytotoxicity was observed in all tester strains.The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly, except the response for TA1537 in the absence of S9-mix (first experiment; positive control). The value of TA1537 was above the limit of the range. However, since more than a three-fold increase was observed compared to the solvent control, the validity of the test was considered to be not affected. The test item did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment. Under the conditions of this study, it is concluded that that the test item was not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.