Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
other: extrapolation from results obtained by the oral route
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Extrapolation based on available guidelines on route-to-route extrapolation of toxicity data when assessing health risks of chemicals.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: extrapolation
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Extrapolation based on available guidelines on route-to-route extrapolation of toxicity data when assessing health risks of chemicals.

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Test material form:
solid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: Ultramarine Violet (C.I. 77007 P igment Violet 15), Sodium Aluminosilicate Violet
- Molecular formula: |Na+6-x+y+z (S2•-)y (S3•-)z (S4)t|[Al6-x Si6+x O24] – SOD
Where:
6 ≤ 6-x+ y+z ≤ 8
0 ≤ x ≤ 1.2
0 < y+z +t ≤ 2
t > 0
SOD = Sodalite framework structure

- Molecular weight: 918 -1025

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 1 000 mg/kg bw
Key result
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 000 mg/kg bw

Any other information on results incl. tables

Based on available guidelines on route-to-route extrapolation of toxicity data when assessing health risks of chemicals, an extrapolation based on the acute oral toxicity data is calculated for the dermal route.

From the available data on two acute oral toxicity studies, it is concluded that the oral LD50 for the substance is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (study 1: no mortality was observed) and greater from 10000 mg/kg bw (study 2: mortality was observed). As recommended in the corresponding guidelines, where data from the oral route is being used as the starting point, if no data are available on oral bioavailability, it is appropriate to assume that 50% of an orally administered dose is systemically available. Since no data is available on skin absorption, the most precautionary default would be to assume 100% absorption by this route although in reality very few substances will cross the skin to this extent. Therefore, based on these assumptions, the dermal LD50 would be greater than 1000 mg/kg bw (study 1) and greater than 5000 mg/kg bw (study 2).

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the assumptions for the extrapolation from the acute oral toxicity data, the dermal LD50 would be greater than 1000 mg/kg bw (study 1) and greater than 5000 mg/kg bw (study 2).
Executive summary:

From the available data on two acute oral toxicity studies, it is concluded that the oral LD50 for the substance is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (study 1: no mortality was observed) and greater from 10000 mg/kg bw (study 2: mortality was observed). As recommended in the corresponding guidelines, where data from the oral route is being used as the starting point, if no data are available on oral bioavailability, it is appropriate to assume that 50% of an orally administered dose is systemically available. Since no data is available on skin absorption, the most precautionary default would be to assume 100% absorption by this route although in reality very few substances will cross the skin to this extent. Therefore, based on these assumptions, the dermal LD50 would be greater than 1000 mg/kg bw (study 1) and greater than 5000 mg/kg bw (study 2).