Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-090-3 | CAS number: 51-34-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In an in vitro gene mutation test (key in vitro Ames test, NTP 1997) conducted with the read-across substance Scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate, no adverse effects were observed (negative). This result will be supported by a Klimisch scored 4 Ames test (supporting in vitro Ames test, Pares 2003) conducted with the target substance Scopolamine.
In an in vitro cytogenicity test in mammalian cells (key in vitro chromosome aberration test, NTP 1997), adverse effects were observed at the highest concentration tested (5000 mg/L) with metabolic activation. This result will be supported by a Klimisch scored 4 in vitro chromosome abberation and sister chromatid exchange test (supporting, Yu 1988). However, no adverse effects were observed for the read-across substance in an in vivo micronucleus assay in mice (key in vivo micronucleus test, NTP 1997). In addition the carcinogenic potential of scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate was investigated in two-year gavage studies in mice and rats(section 5.8 of the CSR). There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate in male or female B6C3F1 mice or F344/N rats administered at doses of 1, 5, or 25 mg/kg/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 01 March 1997
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- The read-across justification is included as attachmant to Iuclid section 13.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- -S9: 1000, 1600, 3000 µg/mL
+S9: 1600, 3000, 5000 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION
- Exposure duration:
- without S9: treatment time 10.5 hr; when after the addition of Colcemid: incubation time 2 hr
- with S9: treatment time 2 hr; when change of medium; incubation time 11 to 11.5 hr with Colcemid present in the final 2 hr
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): GiemsaIn the aberration test without S9, cells were incubated in McCoy's 5A medium with scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate for 10.5 hours; Colcemid was added and incubation continued for 2 hours. The cells were then harvested by mitotic shake-off, fixed, and stained with Giemsa. For the Aberration with S9, cells were treated with scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate and S9 for 2 hours, after which the treatment medium was removed and the cells were incubated for 11 to 11.5 hours in fresh medium, with Colcemid present for the final 2 hours. Cells were harvested in the same manner as for the treatment without S9. As an alteration in pH was observed in the first trial conducted with S9 and the second trial with S9 was conducted with HEPES buffer present in the medium to stabilize pH.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 first-division metaphase cells were scored at each dose level - Statistics:
- To arrive at a statistical call for a trial, analyses were conducted on both the dose response curve and individual dose points. For a single trial, a statistically significant (P<=0.05) difference for one dose point and a significant trend (P<=0.015) were considered weak evidence for a positive response; significant differences for two or more doses indicated the trial was positive. A positive trend test in the absence of a statistically significant increase at any one dose resulted in an equivocal call.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- the high dose was limited by toxicity in the trials conducted without S9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- with S9, no toxicity was noted and 5 mg/mL was selected as the high dose
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Positive with metabolic activation. Induction of chromosome aberration was observed in cultured CHO cells in the presence of S9 metabolic activation in each of two trials at the highest dose tested (5000 µg/mL).
- Executive summary:
The present study determined the mutagenicity of Scopolamine hydrobomide trihydrate according to a well-described method which is similar to a current internationally established guidelines (OECD 473). The effects were analysed using the Chinese hamster ovary cells with or without S9 mix (from Sprague Dawley rat liver). The study was part of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and reviewed and showed that the test item has mutagenic properties under conditions of metabolic activation.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 01 March 1997
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- The read-across justification is included as attachmant to Iuclid section 13.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Strain; allele; DNA targetTA1535; hisG46; GGGTA1537; hisC3076; +1 frameshift and CCCTA98; hisD3052; CGCGCGCGTA100; hisG46; GGGTA97; hisD6610; CCCCCC
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 10000 µg test substance/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine; 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation: sodium azide (TA1535 and TA100), 9-aminoacridine (TA97 and TA1537), 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA98) with metabolic activation: 2-aminoanthracene (all strains)
- Evaluation criteria:
- A positive response is defined as a reproducible, dose related increase in histidine-independent (revertant) colonies in any one strain/activation combination. An equivocal response is defined as an increase in revertants that is not dose related, is not reproducible, or is of insufficient magnitude to support a determination of mutagenicity. A negative response is obtained when no increase in revertant colonies is observed following chemical treatment. There was no minimum percentage of fold increase required for a chemical to be judged positive or weakly positive.
- Statistics:
- Not regarded as necessary according to the OECD guidelines.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate (100 to 10000 µg/plate) did not induce mutations in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535 or TA1537 with or without S9 mix (from Sprague Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver).
- Executive summary:
The present study determined the mutagenicity of Scopolamine hydrobomide trihydrate according to a well-described method which is similar to a current internationally established guideline (OECD 471). The effects were analysed using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535 or TA1537 with or without S9 mix (from Sprague Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver). However, a bacterial strain for the analysis of oxidizing mutagens, cross-linking agents and hydrazines was not included in testing. The study was part of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and reviewed and showed that the test item is devoid of mutagenic properties.
Referenceopen allclose all
Induction of Chromosomal Aberration in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells by Scopolaminehydrobromide Trihydrate
Dose (µg/mL) | Total Cells | No. of Abs | Abs/Cell | Cells with Abs (%) | Dose (µg/mL) | Total Cells | No. of Abs | Abs/Cell | Cell with Abs (%) | ||
-S9 | +S9 | ||||||||||
DMSO | 200 | 2 | 0.01 | 1.0 | DMSO | 200 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.5 | ||
Mitomycin C | 0.0625 | 200 | 40 | 0.20 | 16.0 | Cyclo- phosphamide | 2.5 | 200 | 35 | 0.18 | 15.0 |
0.2500 | 50 | 17 | 0.34 | 30.0 | 7.5 | 50 | 23 | 0.46 | 36.0 | ||
Scopolamine-hydrobromidetrihydrate | 1000 | 200 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.5 | Scopolamine-hydrobromidetrihydrate(Trial 1) | 1600 | 200 | 3 | 0.02 | 1.5 |
1600 | 200 | 2 | 0.01 | 1.0 | 3000 | 200 | 2 | 0.01 | 1.0 | ||
3000 | 200 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 5000 | 200 | 12 | 0.06 | 6.0 | ||
P=0.655 | P<0.001 | ||||||||||
(Trial 2) DMSO | 200 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.5 | |||||||
Cyclophosphamide | 2.5 | 200 | 28 | 0.14 | 12.0 | ||||||
7.5 | 50 | 17 | 0.34 | 34 | |||||||
Scopolamine-hydrobromide trihydrate (Trial 2) | 1600 | 200 | 3 | 0.02 | 1.5 | ||||||
3000 | 200 | 2 | 0.01 | 1.0 | |||||||
5000 | 200 | 28 | 0.14 | 11.0 | |||||||
P<0.001 |
Mutagenicity of Scopolamine Hydrobromide Trihydrate in Salmonella typhimurium. Revertants are presented as mean +- standard error from three plates
Strain | Dose (µg/plate) | -S9 | +hamster S9 | +rat S9 | |||
Trial 1 | Trial 2 | 10% | 30% | 10% | 30% | ||
TA100 | 0 | 102 +-6.4 | 102 +-7.8 | 87 +-8.1 | 101 +-4.8 | 101 +-9.0 | 108 +-8.4 |
100 | 117 +-17.5 | 95 +-8.8 | 90 +-2.6 | 106 +-5.8 | 90 +-3.2 | 106 +-4.7 | |
333 | 100 +-4.6 | 94 +-2.3 | 101 +-7.5 | 105 +-4.6 | 91 +-3.6 | 105 +-3.3 | |
1000 | 87 +-6.1 | 108 +-2.4 | 90 +-7.4 | 107 +-7.2 | 88c | 86 +-2.7 | |
3333 | 90 +-10.0 | 96 +-4.3 | 98 +-7.3 | 122 +-6.7 | 94 +-8.5 | 113 +-4.4 | |
10000 | 98 +-34.0 | 94 +-8.0 | 85 +-5.1 | 97 +-2.3 | 83 +-2.6 | 107 +-4.7 | |
Trial summary | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | |
positive control | 281 +-11.8 | 569 +-21.2 | 283 +-11.6 | 426 +-4.7 | 309 +-1.5 | 294 +-9.1 | |
TA 1535 | 0 | 21 +-1.3 | 27 +-0.3 | 11 +-0.7 | 17 +-2.1 | 9 +-3.5 | 15 +-2.3 |
100 | 19 +-2.6 | 35 +-4.2 | 13 +-3.5 | 12 +-2.0 | 9 +-1.2 | 13 +-1.5 | |
333 | 21 +-4.8 | 33 +-2.3 | 12 +-2.3 | 11 +-0.9 | 11 +-0.9 | 12 +-1.9 | |
1000 | 21 +-5.2 | 30 +-1.5 | 10 +-1.7 | 8 +-0.7 | 10 +-0.9 | 12 +-1.5 | |
3333 | 28 +-1.5 | 29 +-6.0 | 13 +-1.3 | 13 +-0.7 | 14 +-2.2 | 12 +-1.9 | |
10000 | 23 +-1.9 | 36 +-6.0 | 9 +-0.7 | 9 +-1.5 | 12 +-1.3 | 12 +-0.3 | |
Trial summary | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | |
positive control | 307 +-8.2 | 369 +-6.7 | 68 +-4.5 | 96 +-12.4 | 202 +-9.5 | 69 +-0.5 | |
TA1537 | 0 | 6 +-1.2 | 19 +-2.7 | 21 +-2.3 | 11 +-1.5 | 21 +-2.8 | 8 +-1.0 |
100 | 8 +-2.0 | 20 +-4.2 | 18 +-1.7 | 9 +-1.7 | 19 +-1.3 | 5 +-2.2 | |
333 | 5 +-0.3 | 18 +-0.9 | 23 +-2.0 | 11 +-2.1 | 25 +-0.7 | 6 +-1.5 | |
1000 | 4 +-1.8 | 21 +-2.7 | 20 +-1.9 | 10 +-0.7 | 20 +-2.0 | 8 +-1.5 | |
3333 | 7 +-1.0 | 20 +-2.9 | 20 +-2.4 | 10 +-1.2 | 21 +-1.2 | 7 +-1.7 | |
10000 | 6 +-2.7 | 12 +-1.5 | 21 +-4.4 | 8 +-2.2e | 25 +-2.2 | 5 +-1.5 | |
Trial summary | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | |
positive control | 825 +-65.6 | 38 +-5.2 | 465 +-15.7 | 72 +-2.9 | 60 +-11.1 | 28 +-1.5 | |
TA98 | 0 | 14 +-3.0 | 21 +-2.8 | 37 +-1.5 | 31 +-2.2 | 29 +-3.8 | 23 +-1.7 |
100 | 11 +-1.0 | 17 +-3.7 | 33 +-1.2 | 33 +-3.5 | 33 +-1.3 | 23 +-2.4 | |
333 | 18 +-1.7 | 14 +-0.9 | 23 +-3.1 | 28 +-5.2 | 31 +-4.4 | 29 +-4.5 | |
1000 | 16 +-6.0 | 12 +-1.5 | 27 +-0.9 | 30 +-5.6 | 30 +-3.8 | 26 +-3.5 | |
3333 | 15 +-10.0 | 18 +-1.9 | 30 +-2.5 | 30 +-2.3 | 33 +-2.5 | 29 +-1.7 | |
10000 | 14 +-3.5 | 20 +-3.6 | 27 +-1.0 | 28 +-3.6 | 25 +-5.2 | 25 +-2.6 | |
Trial summary | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | |
positive control | 114 +-5.2 | 224 +-13.6 | 85 +-3.2 | 74 +-9.7 | 70 +-4.7 | 109 +-9.0 | |
TA97 | 0 | 79 +-2.6 | 72 +-5.8 | 106 +-5.6 | 200 +-16.6 | 122 +-11.7 | 133 +-13.0 |
100 | 79 +-3.0 | 74 +-7.1 | 118 +-8.3 | 211 +-22.3 | 120 +-7.4 | 168 +-7.6 | |
333 | 74 +-3.4 | 70 +-8.1 | 117 +-8.1 | 172 +-10.7 | 123 +-5.2 | 178 +-6.1 | |
1000 | 79 +-5.9 | 71 +-1.5 | 115 +-6.6 | 186 +-12.0 | 114 +-7.8 | 164 +-11.3 | |
3333 | 83 +-3.3 | 59 +-1.2 | 106 +-4.0 | 286 +-21.1 | 118 +-2.5 | 133 +-15.0 | |
10000 | 84 +-7.8 | 55 +-2.7 | 106 +-4.2 | 266 +-11.3 | 101 +-2.0 | 117 +-113 | |
Trial summary | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | negative | |
Positive control | 1302 +-75.0 | 198 +-16.3 | 600 +-43.4 | 952 +-93.1 | 761 +-42.0 | 309 +-9.9 |
C No standard error calculated due to loss of replicate cultures
D The positive controls in the absence of metabolic activation were sodium azide (TA1535 and TA100), 9 -aminoacridine (TA97 and TA1537), and 4-nitrophenylenediamine (TA98). The positive control for metabolic activation with all strains was 2-aminoanthracene.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
One in vivo micronucleus assay in mice (key in vivo micronucleus test, NTP 1997) for the read-across substance Scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate is available. No adverse effects (negative) were observed in this test for the read-across substance.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 01 March 1997
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The read-across justification is included as attachmant to Iuclid section 13.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - repeated exposure over 14 weeks
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Simonsen Laboratories, Inc. (Gilroy, CA)- Age at study initiation: 6 or 7 weeks
- Housing: mouse were housed individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 to 24.9°C- Humidity: 45% to 71%
- Air changes (per hr): min. 10 changes per hour- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 dark/light - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:0, 15, 45, 135, 400 or 1200 mg scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate/kg body weight in distilled water by gavage for 14 weeks
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- repeated exposure 14 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- repeated exposure 14 weeks
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:0, 15, 45, 135, 400 or 1200 mg/kg bwBasis:nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 male and 10 female mice
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- none
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Blood
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): Peripheral blood samples were obtained from male and female B6C3F1 mice at the end of the 14 week toxicity study.DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Smears were immediately prepared and fixed in absolute methanol, stained with a chromatin- specific fluorescent dye mixture of Hoechst 33258/pyronin Y (MacGregor et al., 1983).METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Slides were scanned at 630 or 1000x magnification with a semi-automated image analysis system to determine the frequency of micronuclei in 10000 normochromatic erythrocytes (NCEs) in each of 10 animals per dose group.
- Evaluation criteria:
- In the micronucleus test an individual trial was considered positive if the trend test P value was less than or equal to 0.025 or the P value for any single exposure group was less than or equal to 0.025 divided by the number of exposure groups.
- Statistics:
- Testing for increasing trend over exposure groups: one-tailed Cochran-Armitage trend test, followed by pairwise comparisons between each exposure group and the control group
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- No increase in the frequency of micronucleated NCEs was noted in peripheral blood samples obtained from male and female mice at the termination of the 14-week toxicity studies with scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate up to a concentration of 1200 µg/kg bw.
Reference
Frequency of Micronuclei in Mouse Peripheral Blood Erythrocytes Following Treatment with Scopolamine Hydrobromide Trihydrate by Gavage for 14 weeksa
Dose (mg/kg) | Micronucleated NCEs/1000 Cellsb | Number of Mice | |
Male | |||
0 | 1.95 +-0.14 | 10 | |
15 | 2.12 +-0.06 | 10 | |
45 | 2.18 +-0.20 | 10 | |
135 | 2.22 +-0.12 | 10 | |
400 | 1.91 +-0.21 | 10 | |
1200 | 2.24 +-0.21 | 10 | |
Trend test | P=0.714c | ||
Female | |||
0 | 1.59 +-0.09 | 10 | |
15 | 1.43 +-0.11 | 10 | |
45 | 1.64 +-0.14 | 10 | |
135 | 1.43 +-0.09 | 10 | |
400 | 1.40 +-0.12 | 10 | |
1200 | 1.38 +-0.12 | 10 | |
Trend test | P=0.1219 |
a The detailed scoring protocol is presented by Mac Gregor et al. (1990); 10000 NCEs scored per animal
b Data presented as mean +- standard error of the mean. NCE = normochromatic erythrocyte
c Significance of micronucleated NCEs determined by a one-tailed Cochran-Armitage trend test
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In-vitro studies
For the both Ames tests, one according to OECD TG 471 (supporting in vitro Ames test, Pares, 2003) using the test target substance and one similar to OECD TG 471 using the read-across substance (key, in vitro Ames test, NTP 1997), no mutagenic effects were determined for the bacterial strains S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 with and without metabolic activation up to 0.025 ml/plaque and 10000 µg/plate, respectively.
However, mutagenic effects were determined for the read-across substance in a reliable chromosomen aberration Test (key in vitro chromosome aberration test, NTP1997) . In this in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test conducted similar to OECD 473, Chinese hamster ovary cells were analysed. The cells were treated with 1000 to 3000 µg /ml for 10.5 h of exposure time without metabolic activation, and with 1600 to 5000 µg/ml for 2 h exposure time and additional 9 h incubation time with fresh medium with metabolic activation. A biologically, statistically significant and verified (repetition of experiment) increase in the percentage of cells with aberrations was observed at the highest dose with metabolic activation. It was concluded that Scopolamine hydrobomide trihydrate was positive for the induction of structural aberrations in the presence of metabolic activation under this in vitro test conditions.
In-vivo study
In an in vivo micronucleus test using B6C3F1 mice, which was conducted similar to OECD TG 474, ten animals per sex and dose were treated by gavage with 15, 45, 135, 400 and 1200 mg Scopolamine hydrobomide trihydrate per kg bw in a 14 weeks toxicity study. No significant increase in the incident of micronucleated NCE's (normochromatic erythrocytes) was observed in the peripheral blood samples of male or female mice at the end of the 14 weeks toxicity study up to 1200 mg/kg bw. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of micronuclei under this in vivo conditions of the study.
According to the integrated testing strategy for mutagenicity as described in the ECHA Guidance (Chapter R.7a, 2016, Table R.7.7-5) no further testing or information are required. The decision based on the negative results of the bacterial gene mutation tests (OECD TG 471) for Scopolamine and the read-across substance Scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate and the negative result in a cytogenetic assay in experimental animals (in vivo) according to OECD TG 474 for the read-across substance Scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available information on the read-across substance Scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate indicates when tested in vitro that the substance does not induce mutations in bacterial cells but causes chromosomal aberrations in-vitro in the presence of metabolic activation. In an in vivo mouse micronucleus study with the read-across substance the clastogenic properties were not confirmed and the substance is concluded to be non clastogenic.
The available data on genotoxicity do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification of the registered substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.