Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
dermal absorption in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1987
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The data concern a literature study; GLP conditions or Guidelines for testing are not mentioned, but the study is well performed and documented.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1987
Report date:
1987

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Radiolabelled 4,4'-Thiobis(6-tert-butyl-3-cresol) was administered to rats or mice by means of oral gavage, i.v. injection, or dermal application. After 72 hours, all animals were killed and the amount of radiolabel in the carcass, faeces and urine was determined.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): TBBC
- Analytical purity: > 96%
Radiolabelling:
yes
Remarks:
14C

Test animals

Species:
other: rat and mice
Strain:
other: femal sencar mice and male fischer rats

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
other: metal perforated tissue capsule
Vehicle:
other: ethanol/aceton mixture
Duration of exposure:
72 hours
Doses:
See results section table 1.
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Preparation of test site: clipped
- Area of exposure: 4.2 cm2
- % coverage:
- Type of cover / wrap if used:
- Time intervals for shavings or clipplings:

SITE PROTECTION / USE OF RESTRAINERS FOR PREVENTING INGESTION: yes

Results and discussion

Signs and symptoms of toxicity:
not examined
Dermal irritation:
not examined
Absorption in different matrices:
-See Table 1 below
Total recovery:
- Total recovery: averaged 93% of applied dose

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1 Effect of route of exposure on faecal elimination and skin retention of 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-4,4’-thiodi-m-cresol-derived radioactivity in Sencar mice and Fischer rats.

species

exposure route (dose in mg/kg bw)

% IBBain daily faecal excretions

day 1           day 2              day 3

% IBB in total faecal excretions

% IBB on treated skin site

mouse

 

 

rat

intravenous (5)

oral (5)

dermal (5)

intravenous (5)

oral (5)

dermal (5)

dermal (50)

dermal (200)

59                18                    17

89*              6.5                   2*

5**              9                      8

-                    -                       -

-                    -                       -

-                    -                       -

-                    -                       -

-                    -                       -

94

96

22**

77b

103b

1.7***

0.3

0.4

 

 

76

 

 

98

100

100

* p<0.05 vs. intravenous treatment; ** p<0.01 vs. oral or intravenous treatment; *** p<0.05 vs. doses of 50 or 200 mg/kg bw.

a    IBB = internal body burden, i.e., the total accountable radioactivity representing the sum of the radioactivity in the excreta, skin site, and carcass. It averaged 93% of the applied dose.

b    Data from Birnbaum 1983

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The dermal absorption of 14C-labelled 4,4'-thiobis(6-tert-butyl-m-cresol) (TBBC) was studied in female Sencar mice and male Fischer rats. Dermal application resulted in about 20% absorption in mice with more than 70% of the initial body burden (IBB) remaining on the treated skin site 3 days after treatment.
In rats, less than 20% of a dermal dose was absorbed. Absorption did not increase linearly as the dose increased. Oral and i.v. exposures were conducted in the Sencar mice and compared to previously published rat oral and i.v. data. The disposition was similar between rats and mice after these routes of exposures, and the major route of elimination of absorbed TBBC was the feces in both species.