Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
28 Apr - 19 May 2003
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2003
Report date:
2003

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Behörde für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales, Hamburg, Germany

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,3,5-triallyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione
EC Number:
213-834-7
EC Name:
1,3,5-triallyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione
Cas Number:
1025-15-6
Molecular formula:
C12H15N3O3
IUPAC Name:
tris(prop-2-en-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazinane-2,4,6-trione

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Himalayan
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: approx. 4 months
- Weight at study initiation: 2.1-2.5 kg
- Housing: during the acclimatisation period and after the 4-hour period in restrainers (allowed free movement of the head but prevented a complete body turn), the animals were kept singly in cages (425 mm x 600 mm x 380 mm)
- Diet: ssniff® K-H V2333 (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany); available ad libitum before and after the exposure period
- Water: drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 20 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
-according to guideline

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 28 Apr 2003 To: 19 May 2003

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated sites of the same animal served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL


Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
up to 5 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h, 4 and 5 days
Number of animals:
3 males
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm² on the dorsal area of the trunk
- Type of wrap if used: The treated skin was covered with a gauze patch, which was held in contact with the skin by means of a semi-occlusive dressing for the duration of the exposure period.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- no residual test substance had to be removed

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 5 days
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Erythema of grade 1 was observed in one animal at the reading time points 24, 48 and 72 h and 4 days after patch removal. No further signs of skin irritation were noted in any of the animals.
Other effects:
There were no systemic intolerance reactions.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this skin irritation study in the rabbit, the test item did not cause any irritant effect to the skin.