Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-743-4 | CAS number: 13472-45-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to birds
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to birds, other
- Remarks:
- Dietary toxicity test
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Remarks:
- Insufficient information provided on materials methods and results to adequately evaluate the data. Lacking detail on husbandry, housing, dosing accuracy, and statistical analysis.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Hens were fed the test substance, and xanthine dehydrogenase levels were monitored in the tissues. Chicks from eggs laid by these birds were then used in growth tests where they were fed additional test substance or not. These chicks were compared to chicks whose hens had not been fed the test substance. Xanthine dehydrogenase levels were monitored in the tissues of the chicks as well.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Dose method:
- feed
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on preparation and analysis of diet:
- Breeder ration supplement with 250 ppm tungsten, as sodium tungstate.
- Test organisms (species):
- other: Breeder hens, (WPC)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Breeder hens
- Sexes used: Females, with adequate males to ensure maximum fertility - Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration (if not single dose):
- 4 wk
- Remarks:
- Hens fed tungsten for 30 days prior to setting and hatching eggs.
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- No. of animals per sex per dose and/or stage:
- Experiment 1- Controls-65 hens, Treated-95 hens
Experiment 2, Trial 1- 40 chicks treated, (20 from treated hens, 20 from control); 40 chicks not treated (20 from treated hens, 20 from control)
Experiment 2, Trial 2- 52 chicks treated (26 from treated hens, 26 from control) 40 chicks not treated (26 from treated hens, 26 from control) - Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Nominal and measured doses / concentrations:
- Experiment 1-Hens-First 10 days, 250 ppm test substance, the next 20 days, 500 ppm test substance.
Experiment 2, Trial 1 -Chicks, 500 ppm test substance, 4 weeks (breeder ration)
Experiment 2, Trial 2-Chicks, 500 ppm test substance, 24 days (broiler ration) - Details on test conditions:
- -No information on adult hen conditions.
-Chicks were reared in starter-type battery brooders equipped with wire screen floors.
-Chicks were fed food and water ad libitum.
-Weekly chick weights and individual gain and feed conversion data were collected. - Details on examinations and observations:
- N/A
- Details on reproductive parameters:
- N/A
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration (if not single dose):
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg diet
- Conc. / dose based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: decline in xanthine dehydrogenase activity
- Remarks on result:
- other: Experiment 1
- Duration (if not single dose):
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg diet
- Conc. / dose based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: decline in xanthine dehydrogenase activity
- Remarks on result:
- other: Experiment 1
- Duration (if not single dose):
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg diet
- Conc. / dose based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: egg production and hatchability
- Remarks on result:
- other: experiment 1
- Duration (if not single dose):
- 4 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg diet
- Conc. / dose based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: feed conversion and growth depression
- Remarks on result:
- other: Experiment 2; only one concentration tested
- Mortality and sub-lethal effects:
- No mortality was reported
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Analysis of variance was used to compare results within the same experiment.
- Conclusions:
- Chicks from hens fed a sodium tungstate supplemented ration grew at a significantly slower rate than controls. Chicks fed sodium tungstate grew at a slower rate than chicks who were not fed the test substance. 500 ppm test substance did not appear to effect egg production or hatchability.
Reference
Test Results:
Experiment 1
- The addition of 250 ppm sodium tungstate had little or no effect on the xanthine dehydrogenase activity of the hen tissues tested.
- 500 ppm tungsten caused a steady decline in xanthine dehydrogenase activity, which appeared to stabilize around 30 days.
- Neither level of sodium tungstate had an apparent effect on the rate of egg production or hatchability.
Experiment 2, Trial 1 and Trial 2
-Day old chicks from hens fed tungstate had significantly higher amounts of xanthine dehydrogenase in the liver and intestine than did chicks from hens receiving no tungstate.
- Chicks from hens fed the tungsten-supplemented ration grew at a significantly slower rate than did the control chicks on both the breeder ration and the broiler ration.
- When the chick ration was supplemented with 500 ppm tungsten, a slower rate of gain was observed when compared to rations containing no supplementation.
- At four weeks of age, there appeared to be no difference in the xanthine dehydrogenase activities between the chicks, regardless of the ration fed or the hen treatment
-The variation that occurred in the enzyme determinations was large, and the sample size relatively small. This may have accounted for there being no statistical differences.
Description of key information
Several older studies on chicken species were identified in which the birds were fed varying amounts of tungsten, in the form of sodium tungstate in their diets. The NOAELs identified from these studies ranged from approximately 45-500 mg tungsten/kg, depending on which endpoints were examined in each study. However, none of these studies were conducted with standard methodology and they were deemed to be less than reliable
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Short-term EC50 or LC50 for birds:
- 45 mg/kg food
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.