Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-304-8 | CAS number: 80-73-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.1 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 26.45 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Oral to inhalation: Inhalatory N(L)OAEC= oral N(L)OAEL*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*(ABSoral/ABSinh.) = 30*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*(1/1) = 26.45 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor is a NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- AF of 2 due to the fact that it is a spermatogenesis effect so AF of 1 for exposure duration but AF of 2 to cover for group size between 28d study and chronic study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable as inhalation DNEL
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis a default factor of 2.5 to account for other species differences will also be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to the substance in the human population. The default factor of 5 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies differences.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 21.2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 264.5 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Oral to Inhalation (Inhalatory N(L)OAEC= oral N(L)OAEL*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*(ABSoral/ABSinh.)) = 300 * (1/0.38)*0.67*(1/2) = 264.5 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor is a NOAEL
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable as inhalation DNEL
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis a default factor of 2.5 to account for other species differences will also be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to the substance in the human population. The default factor of 5 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies differences.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.15 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 7.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
In the teratogenicity study, the rats were treated for 6h. Workers are exposed for a 8h working day therefore the corrected NOAEL = 10*6/8=7.5 mg/kg/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor starting point is a NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor was obtained from a developmental study in the rat. AF for exposure duration is not necessary since the experimental exposure covers adequately the pregnancy of the rat.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling factor for the rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis a default factor of 2.5 to account for other species differences will also be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to the substance in the human population. The default factor of 5 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies differences.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.55 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 26.45 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Oral to inhalation: Inhalatory N(L)OAEC= oral N(L)OAEL*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*(ABSoral/ABSinh.) = 30*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*(1/1) = 26.45 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor starting point is a NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- AF of 2 due to the fact that it is a spermatogenesis effect so AF of 1 for exposure duration but AF of 2 to cover for group size between 28d study and chronic study
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable as inhalation DNEL
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis a default factor of 2.5 to account for other species differences will also be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to DEGDEE in the human population. The default factor of 10 for the general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies differences.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 10.6 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 264.5 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Oral to Inhalation (Inhalatory N(L)OAEC= oral N(L)OAEL*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*0.67*(ABSoral/ABSinh.)) = 300 * (1/0.38)*0.67*(1/2) = 264.5 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor starting point is a NOAEL
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Not applicable as inhalation DNEL
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis a default factor of 2.5 to account for other species differences will also be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to DEGDEE in the human population. The default factor of 10 for the general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies differences.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.75 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 7.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
In the teratogenicity study, the rats were treated for 6h. Workers are exposed for a 8h working day therefore the corrected NOAEL = 10*6/8=7.5 mg/kg/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor starting point is a NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor was obtained from a developmental study in the rat. AF for exposure duration is not necessary since the experimental exposure covers adequately the pregnancy of the rat.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling factor for the rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis a default factor of 2.5 to account for other species differences will also be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to DEGDEE in the human population. The default factor of 10 for the general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies differences.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.15 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
no extrapolation
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor starting point is a NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- AF of 2 due to the fact that it is a spermatogenesis effect so AF of 1 for exposure du
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling factor for the rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect interspecies extrapolation. On this basis a default factor of 2.5 to account for other species differences will also be applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to DEGDEE in the human population. The default factor of 10 for the general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies differences.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key study was part of a series of animal studies conducted to methods equivalent to modern regulatory standards. On this basis the quality of the database is not considered to contribute uncertainty and it is therefore not necessary to apply an additional factor.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No other uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
In an in vivo eye irritation study in rabbits, DMI caused serious eye damage and was classified as category 1 for eye effects. Therefore the substance is considered a medium hazard. No information on which to derive a threshold or minimal effect level is available.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2