Hyppää sisältöön
Hyppää sisältöön

Asiat, joissa ECHA on vastaajana tai väliintulijana

Asiat, joissa ECHA on vastaajana tai väliintulijana

Taulukko sisältää kaikki loppuun saatetut oikeustapaukset, joissa on annettu päätös ja joissa kemikaalivirasto on ollut osapuolena. Asianosaiset voivat helposti hakea heidän kannaltaan tärkeitä päätöksiä kemikaaliviraston keskeisten toimintojen puitteissa (mm. REACH, CLP). Joissakin tapauksissa valitus on ehkä vireillä tai käsittely on siirretty, mikä käy myös ilmi taulukosta. Taulukossa ei mainita tapauksia, jotka koskevat henkilöstöä tai hankintoja.

Loppuun saatetut oikeustapaukset on jaoteltu seitsemään luokkaan:

  1. REACH-ehdokasluettelo: erityistä huolta aiheuttavien aineiden tunnistamiseen liittyvät tapaukset
  2. REACH -lupamenettely: aineen sisällyttämistä luvanvaraisten aineiden luetteloon (liite XIV) ja lupahakemuksia koskevat tapaukset
  3. REACH-arviointi: tapaukset, joissa ECHA on pyytänyt rekisteröijältä tietoja arviointimenettelyssä (REACH-asetuksen 40, 41 tai 46 artikla)
  4. Luokituksen ja merkintöjen yhdenmukaistaminen (CLH): aineen luokituksen yhdenmukaistamista koskevat tapaukset
  5. Biosidit: biosidejä koskevat tapaukset
  6. Asiakirjojen saatavuus: asiakirjoihin tutustumista koskeviin pyyntöihin liittyvät tapaukset
  7. Yrityksen koko: yritysten koon tarkastamista ja siihen liittyviä maksuja koskevat tapaukset. 

 

Linkkejä

Kuva


Kaikki saatavilla olevat oikeustapausten kieliversiot,mukaan lukien vireillä olevat tapaukset, on unionin tuomioistuimen verkkosivustolla.

 

  • bg
  • cs
  • da
  • de
  • el
  • en
  • es
  • et
  • fi
  • fr
  • hr
  • hu
  • it
  • lt
  • lv
  • mt
  • nl
  • pl
  • pt
  • ro
  • sk
  • sl
  • sv

ECHA Cases Candidate List

 

Case number Parties Keywords Main Legal Provisions Procedurally linked cases Date of the ruling
T-115/15 Deza v ECHA REACH - Establishing a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of regulation (EC) n° 1907/2006 – Supplement to the entry of the chemical substance bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list – Articles 57 and 59 of regulation n° 1907/2006 Art. 59 and 57 REACH; Art 17 and 47 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU T-115/15 R 11/05/2017
Joined cases: C-323/15 P and C-324/15 P Polynt and Sitre v ECHA, Hitachi Chemical Europe and Others v ECHA Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 57(f) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Equivalent level of concern — Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride, cis-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride and trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride Art 57 REACH T-134/13 T-135/13 15/03/2017
T-268/10 RENV PPG and SNF v ECHA REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Intermediates — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Proportionality — Equal treatment Art.263 TFEU, Art.2(8)(b), 31(1)(a), 31(9)(a) and 59 of REACH
  1. Prior cases
    Initial case: T-268/10
    Subsequent appeal:
    C-625/11 P
  2. Pending appeal
    C-650/15 P
25/09/2015
T-115/15 R Deza v ECHA Interim measures — REACH — Entry of the chemical substance di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency Art. 104 (2) of the Rules of Procedure Pending case:
T-115/15
06/05/2015

Joined cases:
T-134/13 and
T-135/13

Polynt and Sitre v ECHA, Hitachi Chemical Europe and Others v ECHA REACH - Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern - Equivalent level of concern - Action for annulment - Whether directly concerned - Admissibility - Rights of the defence - Proportionality Art. 57 REACH; Arts. 44-48 REACH;
Art. 14 REACH

C-323/15 P
C-324/15 P

30/04/2015

T-1/10 RENV

PPG and SNF SAS v ECHA Action for annulment — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Action for annulment — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility Art. 44 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 263 TFEU; Art. 59 REACH T-1/10
T-1/10 R
C-626-11 P
24/06/2014

Joined cases:
C-287/13 P,
C-288/13 P,
C-289/13 P and
C-290/13 P

Bilbaína de Alquitranes and Others v ECHA, Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA, Cindu Chemicals and Others v ECHA, Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Article 59 and Annex XIII - Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure (C-287/13 P)- Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure (C-288/13 P, C-289/13 P, C-290/13 P) - Equal treatment

Art. 104 (2) of the Rules of Procedure

T-93/10
T-94/10
T-95/10
T-96/10

04/09/2014; 22/05/2014

C-625/11 P

PPG and SNF SAS v ECHA Appeal – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Articles 57 and 59 – Substances subject to authorisation – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Inclusion on the candidate list of substances – Publication – Time-limit for instituting proceedings – Article 102(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Date from which that time‑limit must be calculated in the case of an action brought against a decision published only on the internet – Legal certainty – Effective judicial protection

Art. 102 (1) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 REACH

T-268/10
T-268/10 RENV
Pending appeal:
C-650/15 P

26/09/2013

C-626/11 P

PPG and SNF SAS v ECHA Appeal – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Articles 57 and 59 – Substances subject to authorisation – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Inclusion on the candidate list of substances – Publication – Time-limit for instituting proceedings – Article 102(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Date from which that time‑limit must be calculated in the case of an action brought against a decision published only on the internet – Legal certainty – Effective judicial protection

Art. 102 (1) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 REACH

T-1/10 RENV
T-1/10
T-1/10 R

26/09/2013

Joined cases:
T-93/10,
T-94/10,
T-95/10 and
T-96/10

Bilbaína de Alquitranes and Others v ECHA, Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA, Cindu Chemicals and Others v ECHA, Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA REACH - Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern (T-93/10)- Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern (T-94/10, T-95/10, T-96/10) - Actions for annulment - Actionable measure - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Proportionality Art. 263 TFEU; Art. 59 REACH C-287/13 P
C-288/13 P
C-289/13 P
C-290/13 P
07/03/2013
T-1/10 PPG and SNF SAS v ECHA Actions for annulment – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility Art. 44 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 263 TFEU; Art. 59 REACH T-1/10 RENV
T-1/10 R
C-626-11 P
21/09/2011

T-268/10

PPG and SNF SAS v ECHA Actions for annulment - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Time-limit for bringing an action - Inadmissibility

Art. 263 TFEU; Art. 102 of the Rules of Proceure

C-625/11 P
T-268/10 RENV
Pending appeal:
C-650/15 P

21/09/2011

T-343/10
T-346/10 

Etimine SA and AB Etiproducts Oy v ECHA, Borax Europe Ltd v ECHA Action for annulment – REACH – Identification of boric acid and disodium tetraborate, anhydrous as substances of very high concern – No direct concern – Inadmissibility

Art. 263 TFEU;
Art. 31 REACH;
Art. 59 REACH

21/09/2011

T-1/10 R

SNF SAS v ECHA Proceedings for interim measures – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief – No urgency

Art. 104 (2) of the Rules of Procedure

T-1/10

26/03/2010

 


Route: .live1

Tällä verkkosivustolla käytetään evästeitä parhaan mahdollisen käyttäjäkokemuksen varmistamiseksi.

Lue lisää evästeiden käytöstä.