Hyppää sisältöön
Hyppää sisältöön

Asiat, joissa ECHA on vastaajana tai väliintulijana

Asiat, joissa ECHA on vastaajana tai väliintulijana

Taulukko sisältää kaikki loppuun saatetut oikeustapaukset, joissa on annettu päätös ja joissa kemikaalivirasto on ollut osapuolena. Asianosaiset voivat helposti hakea heidän kannaltaan tärkeitä päätöksiä kemikaaliviraston keskeisten toimintojen puitteissa (mm. REACH, CLP). Joissakin tapauksissa valitus on ehkä vireillä tai käsittely on siirretty, mikä käy myös ilmi taulukosta. Taulukossa ei mainita tapauksia, jotka koskevat henkilöstöä tai hankintoja.

Loppuun saatetut oikeustapaukset on jaoteltu seitsemään luokkaan:

  1. REACH-ehdokasluettelo: erityistä huolta aiheuttavien aineiden tunnistamiseen liittyvät tapaukset
  2. REACH -lupamenettely: aineen sisällyttämistä luvanvaraisten aineiden luetteloon (liite XIV) ja lupahakemuksia koskevat tapaukset
  3. REACH-arviointi: tapaukset, joissa ECHA on pyytänyt rekisteröijältä tietoja arviointimenettelyssä (REACH-asetuksen 40, 41 tai 46 artikla)
  4. Luokituksen ja merkintöjen yhdenmukaistaminen (CLH): aineen luokituksen yhdenmukaistamista koskevat tapaukset
  5. Biosidit: biosidejä koskevat tapaukset
  6. Asiakirjojen saatavuus: asiakirjoihin tutustumista koskeviin pyyntöihin liittyvät tapaukset
  7. Yrityksen koko: yritysten koon tarkastamista ja siihen liittyviä maksuja koskevat tapaukset. 

ECHA Cases Candidate List

 

Case number Parties Keywords Main Legal Provisions Procedurally linked cases Date of the ruling
C-650/15 P PPG and SNF v ECHA Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 57 — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Article 2(8)(b) — Exemption — Article 3(15) — Definition of ‘intermediate’ — Acrylamide Art. 57, 2(8)(b) and 3(15) of REACH T-268/10 RENV 25/10/2017
T-115/15 Deza v ECHA REACH - Establishing a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of regulation (EC) n° 1907/2006 – Supplement to the entry of the chemical substance bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list – Articles 57 and 59 of regulation n° 1907/2006 Art. 59 and 57 of REACH; Art. 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
  1. Prior case
    T-115/15 R
  2. Pending Appeal
    C-419/17 P
11/05/2017
C-323/15 P Polynt v ECHA Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 57(f) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Equivalent level of concern — Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride, cis-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride and trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride Art. 57(f) of REACH T-134/13 15/03/2017
C-324/15 P Hitachi Chemical Europe and Polynt v ECHA Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 57(f) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Equivalent level of concern — Hexahydromethylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-4-methylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-1-methylphthalic Art. 57(f) of REACH T-135/13 15/03/2017
T-268/10 RENV PPG and SNF v ECHA REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Intermediates — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Proportionality — Equal treatment Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 2(8)(b), 31(1)(a), 31(9)(a), 57 and 59 of REACH
  1. Prior cases
    Initial case: 
    T-268/10
    Subsequent appeal:

    C-625/11 P
  2. Appeal
    C-650/15 P
25/09/2015
T-115/15 R Deza v ECHA Interim measures — REACH — Entry of the chemical substance di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency Art. 104 (2) of the Rules of Procedure T-115/15 06/05/2015
T-134/13 Polynt and Sitre v ECHA REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality Art. 14, 57 and 59 of REACH C-323/15 P 30/04/2015
T-135/13 Hitachi Chemical Europe and Others v ECHA REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality Art. 14, 44-48, 57 of REACH C-324/15 P 30/04/2015
C-290/13 P Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil (anthracene paste) as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH
  1. Prior case
    T-96/10
  2. Other cases
    C-287/13 P, C-288/13 P and C-289/13 P
04/09/2014
C-289/13 P Cindu Chemicals and Others v ECHA Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH
  1. Prior case
    T-95/10
  2. Other cases
    C-287/13 P
    C-288/13 P
    C-290/13 P
04/09/2014
C-288/13 P Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH
  1. Prior case
    T-94/10
  2. Other cases
    C-287/13 P, C-289/13 P and C-290/13 P
04/09/2014
T-1/10 RENV PPG and SNF v ECHA Action for annulment — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Action for annulment — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility Art. 44 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 59 of REACH

Prior cases
Initial case: 

T-1/10

Proceedings for interim measures:

T-1/10 R

Subsequent appeal:
C-626/11 P
24/06/2014
C-287/13 P Bilbaína de Alquitranes and Others v ECHA Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH
  1. Prior case
    T-93/10
  2. Other cases
    C-288/13 P
    C-289/13 P
    C-290/13 P
22/05/2014
C-625/11 P PPG and SNF v ECHA Appeal – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Articles 57 and 59 – Substances subject to authorisation – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Inclusion on the candidate list of substances – Publication – Time-limit for instituting proceedings – Article 102(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Date from which that time‑limit must be calculated in the case of an action brought against a decision published only on the internet – Legal certainty – Effective judicial protection Art. 102(1) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH
  1. Prior case
    T-268/10
     
  2. Other cases
    Initial case:
    T-268/10 RENV
    Subsequent appeal:
    C-650/15 P
26/09/2013
C-626/11 P PPG and SNF v ECHA Appeal – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Articles 57 and 59 – Substances subject to authorisation – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Inclusion on the candidate list of substances – Publication of the list on the ECHA website – Action for annulment brought prior to that publication – Admissibility Art. 57 and 59 of REACH
  1. Prior cases
    Initial case: 
    T-1/10
    Proceedings for interim measures:
    T-1/10 R
  2. Other cases
    T-1/10 RENV
26/09/2013
T-96/10 Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA REACH – Identification of anthracene oil (anthracene paste) as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH
  1. Appeal
    C-290/13 P
  2. Other cases
    C-287/13 P
    C-288/13 P
    C-289/13 P
    T-93/10
    T-94/10
    T-95/10
07/03/2013
T-95/10 Cindu Chemicals and Others v ECHA REACH – Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH
  1. Appeal
    C-289/13 P
  2. Other cases
    C-287/13 P
    C-288/13 P
    C-290/13 P
    T-93/10
    T-94/10
    T-96/10
07/03/2013
T-94/10 Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA REACH – Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH
  1. Appeal
    C-288/13 P
  2. Other cases
    C-287/13 P
    C-289/13 P
    C-290/13 P
    T-93/10
    T-95/10
    T-96/10
07/03/2013
T-93/10 Bilbaína de Alquitranes and Others v ECHA REACH – Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH
  1. Appeal
    C-287/13 P
  2. Other cases
    C-288/13 P
    C-289/13 P
    C-290/13 P
    T-94/10
    T-95/10
    T-96/10
07/03/2013
T-1/10 PPG and SNF v ECHA Actions for annulment – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility Actions for annulment – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility
  1. Appeal
    C-626/11 P
  2. Proceedings for interim measures
    T-1/10 R
  3. Other cases
    T-1/10 RENV
21/09/2011
T-268/10 PPG and SNF v ECHA Actions for annulment - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Time-limit for bringing an action - Inadmissibility Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 102 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 57 of REACH
  1. Appeal
    C-625/11 P
  2. Other cases
    T-268/10 RENV
    Appeal:
    C-650/15 P
21/09/2011
T-346/10  Borax Europe v ECHA Action for annulment – REACH – Identification of boric acid and disodium tetraborate, anhydrous as substances of very high concern – No direct concern – Inadmissibility Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 31, 33, 57 and 59 of REACH T-343/10 21/09/2011
T-343/10 Etimine and Etiproducts v ECHA Action for annulment – REACH – Identification of boric acid and disodium tetraborate, anhydrous as substances of very high concern – No direct concern – Inadmissibility Art. 31, 33 and 59 of REACH T-346/10 21/09/2011
T-1/10 R SNF SAS v ECHA Proceedings for interim measures – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief – No urgency Art. 104(2) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 34, 57 and 59 of REACH -1/10 26/03/2010

 

Categories Display

Avainsana:

(klikkaa avainsanaa päästäksesi sitä koskevaan sisältöön)


Route: .live2