Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 241-010-7 | CAS number: 16941-12-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25 November 2002 - 14 March 2003
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: OECD guideline study, to GLP
- Remarks:
- The nature of the reactions in the test group are difficult to interpret
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Study conducted in 2003
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexachloroplatinic acid
- EC Number:
- 241-010-7
- EC Name:
- Hexachloroplatinic acid
- Cas Number:
- 16941-12-1
- Molecular formula:
- Cl6Pt.2H
- IUPAC Name:
- platinum(4+) dihydrogen hexachloride
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV)-solution
- Substance type:
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: 99.95%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not stated
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 70.8 weight % (of H2[PtCl6] in the solution)
- Purity test date: not stated
- Lot/batch No.: 4513936306
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 12 September 2003
- Stability under test conditions: at least 96 hr
- Storage condition of test material: at room temp in the dark
- Other:
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Kisslegg, germany
- Age at study initiation: young adult animals (approx 4 weeks old)
- Weight at study initiation: 328-329 g
- Housing: max 5 animals per cage, purified sawdust bedding
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard guinea-pig diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 +/-3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): approx. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 5%
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 5%
- No. of animals per dose:
- Experimental group: 10 animals
Control group: 5 animals - Details on study design:
- Induction
Day 1.
Experimental animals:
Three pairs of intradermal injections
(0.1 ml/site) were made to the clipped back (scapular region) of ten nulliparous non-pregnant female guinea-pigs with:
A) A 1:1 w/w mixture of Freunds’ Complete Adjuvant with water,
B) The test substance at a concentration of 0.02%,
C) A 1:1 w/w mixture of the test substance at 0.04% and Freunds’ Complete Adjuvant.
One of each pair was on either side of the midline and from cranial (A) to caudal (C).
Day 3.
The dermal reactions caused by the injections were assessed for irritation.
Day 8.
The scapular region between the injection sites was clipped and subsequently treated with 0.5 ml of a 5% test substance concentration under occlusion using a Metaline patch (2x3 cm) mounted on medical tape which was held in place with micropore tape and subsequently Coban elastic tape.
The dressing was removed after 48 hours,
the skin cleaned of residual test substance using water, and the dermal reactions were again assessed for signs of irritation.
Control animals:
The five control animals were treated as described for the experimental animals except that, instead of the test substance, vehicle (water) alone was administered. Water was selected as the vehicle for induction and challenge applications based on trial formulations performed at NOTOX.
Challenge
Day 22
Following a 14-day rest period, one flank of all animals was clipped and treated by epidermal application of a 5% test substance concentration and the vehicle (water) at 0.1 ml each, using Patch Test Plasters (Curatest®). The patches were held in place with Micropore tape and subsequently Coban elastic bandage.
The patch was removed after 24 hrs covered contact and the skin cleaned with water to remove any residual test substance or vehicle. The treated sites were assessed for sensitization reactions 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing.
Skin reactions were graded according
to the following numerical scoring systems.
Furthermore, a description of all other
(local) effects was recorded. All skin reactions will be considered signs of sensitisation provided that such reactions are less severe or are less persistent in the control group.
Grading Challenge Reactions:
No visible change.........................................0
Discrete or patchy erythema......................1
Moderate and confluent erythema............2
Moderate erythema and swelling...............3
Intense erythema and swelling...................4 - Challenge controls:
- Yes - vehicle (water - Milli-U)
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- alpha - hexylcinnamicaldehyde tech. 85%
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Sensitization rate of 50% (5/10 animals) to a 20% solution of positive control in a reliability check conducted October/November 2002. From these results the investigators conclude that these animals are an appropriate model.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 9
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- scaliness
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: scaliness.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 0.0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Yellow staining was observed at the test substance treated skin sites, 24 and 48 hours after challenge. This staining did not hamper the scoring of the skin reactions.
No reactions were seen with the vehicle challenge controls in both (5) control and (10) test animals.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV) solution was sensitising to the skin of guinea-pigs.
- Executive summary:
In a guideline study conducted to GLP, the sensitization potential of dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV) solution was assessed using the guinea-pig maximisation test. Groups of 10 animals were induced by intradermal injection with a 0.02% concentration followed by epidermal exposure to a 5% concentration. Five control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle (water) alone. Two weeks following the epidermal application, all animals were challenged with a 5% test substance concentration or vehicle.
Skin reactions of grade 1 were observed in three test animals and scaliness was observed in nine test animals in response to the 5% test substance concentration challenege. No skin reactions were evident in the control aniamls. These skin reactions were considered indicative of sensitization. These results indicate a sensitization rate of 90%. However, the nature of the reactions in the test group are difficult to interpret since erythema was not seen in all responding animals, rather there was the presence of dermal scaliness, which was not seen in control animals.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.