Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 230-603-6 | CAS number: 7216-56-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 27 October to 07 November 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted according to OECD test Guideline No. 471 without any deviation.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 28 October 2016
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (E,Z)-2,6-dimethylocta-2,4,6-triene
- EC Number:
- 230-603-6
- EC Name:
- (E,Z)-2,6-dimethylocta-2,4,6-triene
- Cas Number:
- 7216-56-0
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16
- IUPAC Name:
- (E,Z)-2,6-dimethylocta-2,4,6-triene
- Reference substance name:
- (E,E)-2,6-dimethylocta-2,4,6-triene
- EC Number:
- 221-153-1
- EC Name:
- (E,E)-2,6-dimethylocta-2,4,6-triene
- Cas Number:
- 3016-19-1
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,6-dimethylocta-2,4,6-triene
- Reference substance name:
- (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene
- EC Number:
- 227-813-5
- EC Name:
- (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene
- Cas Number:
- 5989-27-5
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16
- IUPAC Name:
- (4R)-isopropenyl-1-methylcyclohexene
- Reference substance name:
- (S)-p-mentha-1,8-diene
- EC Number:
- 227-815-6
- EC Name:
- (S)-p-mentha-1,8-diene
- Cas Number:
- 5989-54-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16
- IUPAC Name:
- (4S)-isopropenyl-1-methylcyclohexene
- Reference substance name:
- Non identified impurities
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable
- IUPAC Name:
- Non identified impurities
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Batch No.: 182596
Purity: 89.8%
Name of test material (as cited in study report): (E,Z)-2,6-DIMETHYLOCTA-2,4,6-TRIENE
Physical state: colourless liquid
Storage conditions: +2°C to +8°C, under nitrogen and protected from light
Expiry date: 29 December 2016
Constituent 1
impurity 1
impurity 2
impurity 3
impurity 4
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine and tryptophan for Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, respectively
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix (10% v/v S9 fraction): S9 microsomal fraction was prepared from male rats induced with phenobarbital/β-naphthaflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 – Plate Incorporation Method:
S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and E. coli WP2uvrA (with and without S9 mix): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate
Experiment 2 – Pre-Incubation Method:
S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 (with and without S9 mix): 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 and 1500 μg/plate. E.coli WP2uvrA (with and without S9 mix): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate.
The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: In solubility checks performed in-house, the test item was noted to have formed an emulsion in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL and was only partially miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration but was fully miscible in acetone at 100 mg/mL. Therefore, acetone was selected as the vehicle.
- Preparation of test item formulation: The test item was accurately weighed and approximate half-log dilutions were prepared in acetone by mixing on a vortex mixer on the day of each experiment. Formulated concentrations were adjusted to allow for the stated water/impurity content (10.2%) of the test item. Acetone is toxic to the bacterial cells at 0.1 mL (100 μL) after employing the pre-incubation modification; therefore all of the formulations for Experiment 2 were prepared at concentrations two times greater than required on Vogel-Bonner agar plates. To compensate, each formulation was dosed using 0.05 mL (50 μL) aliquots (Maron et al., 1981). Prior to use, the solvent was dried to remove water using molecular sieves i.e. 2 mm sodium alumino-silicate pellets with a nominal pore diameter of 4 x 10^-4 microns. All formulations were used within four hours of preparation and were assumed to be stable for this period.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- without S9-mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9-mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- SOURCE OF TEST SYSTEM
- Bacteria used in the test were obtained from the University of California, Berkeley, on culture discs, on 04 August 1995 and from the British Industrial Biological Research Association, on a nutrient agar plate, on 17 August 1987. All of the strains were stored at approximately -196 °C in a Statebourne liquid nitrogen freezer, model SXR 34.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); pre-incubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 37 °C ± 3 °C for 20 minutes (with shaking)
- Exposure duration: Plates were incubated at 37 °C ± 3 °C for approximately 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate plates per dose level.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Method: The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity).
OTHERS:
All of the plates were incubated at 37 ± 3 °C for approximately 48 h and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. Several manual counts were required due to revertant colonies spreading slightly, thus distorting the actual plate count. - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
5. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out-of-historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit making a definite judgment about test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (* = p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- bacteria, other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: A test item precipitate (globular in appearance) was observed under a low power microscope at 5000 μg/plate after the first mutation test (plate incorporation method). However, there was no evidence of a precipitate in the second mutation test after employing the pre-incubation modification.
MUTAGENICITY TEST
- In the first mutation test (plate incorporation method) the test item induced a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella strains in both the absence and presence of S9-mix from 500 μg/plate. No toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA. Consequently, the same maximum dose level (5000 μg/plate) or the toxic limit was employed in the second mutation test depending on bacterial strain type. The test item induced a stronger toxic response in the second mutation test, after implementation of the pre-incubation method, with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of S9-mix from 15 μg/plate (all Salmonella strains) and 150 μg/plate (WP2uvrA). In the presence of S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were noted to all of the Salmonella strains, initially from 150 μg/plate (TA1535 and TA100) and 1500 μg/plate (TA98 and TA1537). No toxic response was noted for Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA dosed in the presence of S9-mix. The sensitivity of the bacterial tester strains to the toxicity of the test item varied slightly between strain type, exposures with or without S9-mix and experimental methodology. A test item precipitate (globular in appearance) was observed under a low power microscope at 5000 μg/plate after the first mutation test (plate incorporation method). However, there was no evidence of a precipitate in the second mutation test after employing the pre-incubation modification.
- There were no toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method). Similarly, no toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method). Statistically significant increases in revertant colony frequency were observed in both the first and second mutation tests to TA1535, however these increases were considered to have no biological relevance because weakened bacterial background lawns were also noted. Therefore the responses are considered false and due to additional histidine being available to His- bacteria allowing these cells to undergo several additional cell divisions and presenting as non-revertant colonies.
OTHERS
- Prior to use, the master strains were checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate (all were found to be satisfactory). The amino acid supplemented top agar and the S9-mix used in both experiments was shown to be sterile. The test item formulation was also shown to be sterile.
Any other information on results incl. tables
None
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item is not mutagenic with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium (strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and E.coli WP2 uvrA.
- Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, performed according to Guideline OECD 471 and in compliance with GLP, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA were exposed to the test item diluted in acetone at the concentrations below.
Experiment 1 – Plate Incorporation Method
S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537.
E. coli WP2uvrA (with and without S9 mix): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate.
Experiment 2 – Pre-Incubation Method
S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 (with and without S9 mix): 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 and 1500 μg/plate.
E.coli WP2uvrA (with and without S9 mix): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate.
Metabolic activation system used in this test S9 mix (10% v/v S9 fraction): S9 microsomal fraction was pre-prepared from male rats induced with phenobarbital/β-naphthaflavone. Negative control, vehicle and positive control groups were also included in mutagenicity tests.
In the first mutation test (plate incorporation method) the test item induced a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella strains in both the absence and presence of S9-mix from 500 μg/plate. No toxicity was noted to E. coli strain WP2uvrA. Consequently, the same maximum dose level (5000 μg/plate) or the toxic limit was employed in the second mutation test depending on bacterial strain type. The test item induced a stronger toxic response in the second mutation test, after implementation of the pre-incubation method, with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of S9-mix from 15 μg/plate (all Salmonella strains) and 150 μg/plate (WP2uvrA). In the presence of S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were noted to all of the Salmonella strains, initially from 150 μg/plate (TA1535 and TA100) and 1500 μg/plate (TA98 and TA1537). No toxic response was noted for E. coli strain WP2uvrA dosed in the presence of S9-mix. The sensitivity of the bacterial tester strains to the toxicity of the test item varied slightly between strain type, exposures with or without S9-mix and experimental methodology. A test item precipitate (globular in appearance) was observed under a low power microscope at 5000 μg/plate after the first mutation test (plate incorporation method). However, there was no evidence of a precipitate in the second mutation test after employing the pre-incubation modification.
There were no toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method). Similarly, no toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method). Statistically significant increases in revertant colony frequency were observed in both the first and second mutation tests to TA1535, however these increases were considered to have no biological relevance because weakened bacterial background lawns were also noted. Therefore the responses are considered false and due to additional histidine being available to His- bacteria allowing these cells to undergo several additional cell divisions and presenting as non-revertant colonies.
The vehicle control plates (acetone) gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
Therefore, the test item is not considered as mutagenic in these bacterial systems.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.