Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-424-4 | CAS number: 3089-17-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation/Corrosion:
Pigment red 202 (not specified form): not irritating (OECD 404)
Structure analogue: Pigment red 122 (nano form): not irritating (OECD 404)
Structure analogue: Pigment violet 19 (not specified form): not irritating
Eye irritation:
Pigment red 202 (not specified form): not irritating (EPA-TSCA 40 CFR 798)
Structure analogue: Pigment red 122 (nano form): not irritating (OECD 405)
Structure analogue: Pigment violet 19 (nano form): not irritating (OECD 405)
Structure analogue: Pigment red 209 (nano form): not irritating
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 28 JUL 1992 to 31 JUL 1992
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA-TSCA 40 CFR 798
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- 4 male /2 female animals tested
- Source: Ace animals
- Weight at study initiation: 2 to 2.6 kg
- Housing: 1/ cage in suspended
- Diet: Fresh purina rabbit chow (Diet #5321) was provided daily
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least one week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12 /12
4 male /2 female animals tested - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):0.5 g was pasted with distilled water - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 72 h
- Number of animals:
- 6 (4 male/ 2 female)
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm² covered with gauze patch
- Type of wrap if used: semiocclusive elastic bandage
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): gently washung with distilled water
- Time after start of exposure: 4 h
SCORING SYSTEM: according to OECD TG 404 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - there were no edema or erythema detectable (score 0) at any time point in any animal
- Other effects:
- During the whole testing period the skin at the dose site remained purple coloured. One animal showed systemic effects (diarrhea and soiled anogenital region) at the 24 and 48 hour reading which disapeared until the 72 hour reading.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone is not irritating to skin under these test conditions. The test material contains relevant amounts of the submission substance. Therefore the test results are considered adequate to fulfil the endpoint requirements.
- Executive summary:
Test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone was subject to an acute dermal irritation/corrosion test in 6 New Zealand white rabbits similar to OECD TG 404. Beside the purple staining of the dose site, no relevant skin reactions occurred during the 4 h exposure to 500 mg of test item (pasted with distilled water) as well as during the following 72 h observation period. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28 June 2005 to 10 August 2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study meets or exceeds the requirements of OECD Guideline 404 and EU Method B.4
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- A gauze patch of approximately 4 cm x 4 cm (instead of 6 cm2) was used to guarantee good contact and uniform distribution of the test substance on the skin
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- as above
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Study in compliance with Swiss Ordinance relating to GLP, which is based on OECD Principles of GLP
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Animal specifics: SPF
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, L'Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: 12 weeks (male), 12-13 weeks (females)
- Weight at study initiation: 2741 g for the male, 2873 g and 2674 g for the two females, all within the normal range of variability
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers and drinking water bowls
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard laboratory diet ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): community tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C (air-condition)
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml of purified water were used to moisten the test item - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 14 days
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: approximately 4 cm x 4 cm
- Type of wrap if used: surgical gauze patch
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): flushed with lukewarm tap water
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours
SCORING SYSTEM:
as in EU Method B.4, assessed approximately 1, 24, 48, and 72 h after the romoval of the test item as well as after 7, 10 and 14 d - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h after treatment
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Apart from animal #2 at 24 h, all other scores (oedema or erythema) were 0 at all time points in all animals (see below for individual data).
- Other effects:
- No clinical signs or effects on body weight were observed. Erythema scores could not be assessed in all animals at 1 h due to marked staining produced by the test item
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test item is not irritating to skin under these test conditions.
- Executive summary:
The primary skin irritation potential of the test item was investigated according to OECD test guideline no. 404. The test item was applied by topical semi-occlusive application of 0.5 g to the intact left flank of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. The duration of treatment was four hours. The scoring of skin reactions was performed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, as well as 7, 10 and 14 days after removal of the dressing.
The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal) for each animal for erythema/eschar grades and for oedema grades, separately. The mean erythema/eschar score of the three animals was 0.00, 0.33 and 0.00, respectively and the mean oedema score was 0.00 for all three animals.
The application of the test item to the skin resulted in mild, early-onset and transient signs of irritation such as redness. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 48 hours after treatment for all animals. However, staining by the red test item prevented the assessment of a possible erythema in all animals one hour after treatment. The slight to marked staining of the treated skin was noted in all animals throughout the whole study, effectively. No corrosive effects were noted on the treated skin of any animal at any of the measuring intervals and no clinical signs were observed.
Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the skin.
Therefore, the test item has not to be classified for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
[Please provide information for all of the points below. Indicate if further information is included as attachment to the same record, or elsewhere in the dataset (insert links in 'Cross-reference' table)]
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Please refer to attached read across document (Chapter 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13). - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - there were no edema or erythema detectable (score 0) at any time point in any animal
- Other effects:
- During the whole testing period the skin at the dose site remained purple coloured. One animal showed systemic effects (diarrhea and soiled anogenital region) at the 24 and 48 hour reading which disapeared until the 72 hour reading.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity profile of Pigment Red 202 is assessed based on analogue approaches:
According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone is not irritating to skin under these test conditions. The test material contains relevant amounts of the submission substance. Therefore the test results are considered adequate to fulfil the endpoint requirements. - Executive summary:
Test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone was subject to an acute dermal irritation/corrosion test in 6 New Zealand white rabbits similar to OECD TG 404. Beside the purple staining of the dose site, no relevant skin reactions occurred during the 4 h exposure to 500 mg of test item (pasted with distilled water) as well as during the following 72 h observation period. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
[Please provide information for all of the points below. Indicate if further information is included as attachment to the same record, or elsewhere in the dataset (insert links in 'Cross-reference' table)]
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Please refer to attached read across document (Chapter 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13). - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h after treatment
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Apart from animal #2 at 24 h, all other scores (oedema or erythema) were 0 at all time points in all animals (see below for individual data).
- Other effects:
- No clinical signs or effects on body weight were observed. Erythema scores could not be assessed in all animals at 1 h due to marked staining produced by the test item
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity profile of Pigment Red 202 is assessed based on analogue approaches:
According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test item is not irritating to skin under these test conditions. - Executive summary:
The primary skin irritation potential of the test item was investigated according to OECD test guideline no. 404. The test item was applied by topical semi-occlusive application of 0.5 g to the intact left flank of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. The duration of treatment was four hours. The scoring of skin reactions was performed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, as well as 7, 10 and 14 days after removal of the dressing.
The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal) for each animal for erythema/eschar grades and for oedema grades, separately. The mean erythema/eschar score of the three animals was 0.00, 0.33 and 0.00, respectively and the mean oedema score was 0.00 for all three animals.
The application of the test item to the skin resulted in mild, early-onset and transient signs of irritation such as redness. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 48 hours after treatment for all animals. However, staining by the red test item prevented the assessment of a possible erythema in all animals one hour after treatment. The slight to marked staining of the treated skin was noted in all animals throughout the whole study, effectively. No corrosive effects were noted on the treated skin of any animal at any of the measuring intervals and no clinical signs were observed.
Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the skin.
Therefore, the test item has not to be classified for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Referenceopen allclose all
Animal number |
Sex |
Evaluation interval (after removal of dressing ) |
Erythema score |
Oedema score |
#1 |
M |
1 hour |
not assessible due to staining |
0 |
#2 |
F |
0 |
||
#3 |
F |
0 |
||
#1 |
M |
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
#2 |
F |
1 |
0 |
|
#3 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#1 |
M |
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
#2 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#3 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#1 |
M |
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
#2 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#3 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#1 |
M |
7 days |
0 |
0 |
#2 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#3 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#1 |
M |
10 days |
0 |
0 |
#2 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#3 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#1 |
M |
14 days |
0 |
0 |
#2 |
F |
0 |
0 |
|
#3 |
F |
0 |
0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 6 October 1998 to 13 November 1998
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline 405 and EU Method B.5
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH, Kißlegg, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: 3.51-3.91 kg
- Housing: separate cages arranged in a battery in fully air-conditioned rooms
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week under study conditions
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 100 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- One administration (for times of removal of the test substance see below)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- - Application of the substance to the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each animal
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: Washing with isotonic saline at approx. 37 °C 24 h after administration and at all other designated examination times at which the treated eyes still showed discharge or at which a corneal examination with fluorescein sodium solution (24 and 72 h after administration) took place
- Time after start of exposure: see above
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein-sodium, under UV light - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: effects observed at 1 hour, but reversible by 24 hour observation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material is not irritating to eyes under these test conditions.
- Executive summary:
A study according to OECD Guideline 405 and EU Method B.5 was performed to investigate the irritation potential to the rabbit eye.
One and 24 hours after treatment the conjunctivae of the animals showed definitely injected blood vessels up to a diffuse crimson red colour. Additionally, a very slight swelling and slight from substance coloured eye discharge were observed in one animal one hour after treatment. Fourty-eight hours after treatment all signs of irritation were reversible.
As the mean values of the observed eye responses fall below the critical values for classification according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the test material is not irritating to eyes and has not to be classified for eye irritation.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2 AUG 1988 to 5 AUG 1988
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (OECD TG 405)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst Ag, Kastengrund, conventional breeding
- Age at study initiation: approx. 3 to 5 months
- Weight at study initiation: 3.2 to 3.7 kg
- Housing: single caged in fully conditioned rooms
- Diet: Altromin 2123 rabbit diet (Altromin GmbH, Lage/Lippe, Germany), ad libitum; hay, approx. 15 g/d
- Water: deionised, chlorinated water, ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20+/-3
- Humidity (%): 50 +/-20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 100 mg
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: with physiological solution of sodium chloride (37 °C)
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h (and at every reading when discharge of the eyes occurred or sodium-fluorescein was used for scoring)
SCORING SYSTEM: according to OECD TG 405
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: at 48 and 72 h reading 1 drop of sodium-fluorescein (0.1%) added for scoring - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - Conjunctival redness was observed in 3/3 animals at one hour after instillation of the test item (score (redness): 1) as well as in 2/3 animals at the 24 h reading. This effect was fully reversible by 48 hours after application.
- No effects on cornea, iris, or chemosis occurred (score 0 at every time point) - Other effects:
- There was discharge observed in all animals one hour after instillation of the test material.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material is not irritating to eyes under these test conditions. Test material contains relevant amounts of the submission substance. Therefore the test results are considered adequate to fulfil the endpoint requirements.
- Executive summary:
Test material was subject to an acute eye irritation/corrosion test in 3 rabbits according to OECD TG 405. No corneal or iridial effects were observed. Chemosis was not found likewise. Conjunctival redness was observed in 3/3 animals at one hour after instillation of the test item (score (redness): 1) as well as in 2/3 animals at the 24 h reading. This effect was fully reversible by 48 hours after application. As the mean values of the observed eye responses fall below the critical values for classification according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the test material is not irritating to eyes and has not to be classified for eye irritation.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 28 JUL 1992 to 31 JUL 1992
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA-TSCA 40 CFR 798
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - test for acute irritation of the eye in rabbits (0.1 mL of the test item was instilled into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each rabbit (6 animals in total). The eyes remained unwashed. Ocular responses were assessed at 1 hour post dose and on days 1, 2 and 3.)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- 3 male /3 female animals tested
- Source: Ace animals
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4 to 2.9 kg
- Housing: 1/ cage in suspended
- Diet: Fresh purina rabbit chow (Diet #5321) was provided daily
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least one week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12 /12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 h (eyes remained unwashed)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 (3 males/3 females)
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: basically in accordance to OECD TG 405
- evaluation was performed 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application of the test item
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: The eyes of all rabbits were examined with sodium fluorescein after the 24 hour reading. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1/#2/#3/#4/#6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - there were no corneal or iridial effects, as well as no chemosis visible at any time
- in 1/6 animals there was a conjunctival effect visible (score (redness):1) at the 24 hour reading. At any other time as well as in the remaining animals no conjunctival effects were observed. - Other effects:
- For up to one hour after the instillation of the test item into one eye it remained in the conjunctiva in all animals as well as the area around the eyes were stained magenta for the whole duration of the test.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone is not irritating to eyes under these test conditions. Test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone contains relevant amounts of the submission substance. Therefore the test results are considered adequate to fulfil the endpoint requirements.
- Executive summary:
Test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone was subject to an acute eye irritation/corrosion test in 6 New Zealand white rabbits according to FDA guideline. The test item (0.1 mL) was instilled into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each rabbit and the eyes remained unwashed. Ocular responses were assessed at 1 hour post dose and on days 1, 2 and 3. Under these conditions no corneal or iridial effects were observed. Chemosis was not found likewise. Conjunctival redness was observed in 1/6 animals at 24 hours after instillation of the test item (score (redness): 1). This effect was fully reversible by 48 hours after application. As the mean values of the observed eye responses fall below the critical values for classification according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the test material 2, 9 -Dichloroquinacridone is not irritating to eyes and has not to be classified for eye irritation.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
[Please provide information for all of the points below. Indicate if further information is included as attachment to the same record, or elsewhere in the dataset (insert links in 'Cross-reference' table)]
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Please refer to attached read across document (Chapter 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13). - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1/#2/#3/#4/#6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - there were no corneal or iridial effects, as well as no chemosis visible at any time
- in 1/6 animals there was a conjunctival effect visible (score (redness):1) at the 24 hour reading. At any other time as well as in the remaining animals no conjunctival effects were observed. - Other effects:
- For up to one hour after the instillation of the test item into one eye it remained in the conjunctiva in all animals as well as the area around the eyes were stained magenta for the whole duration of the test.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity profile of Pigment Red 202 is assessed based on analogue approaches:
According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone is not irritating to eyes under these test conditions. Test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone contains relevant amounts of the submission substance. Therefore the test results are considered adequate to fulfil the endpoint requirements. - Executive summary:
Test material 2, 9-Dichloroquinacridone was subject to an acute eye irritation/corrosion test in 6 New Zealand white rabbits according to FDA guideline. The test item (0.1 mL) was instilled into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each rabbit and the eyes remained unwashed. Ocular responses were assessed at 1 hour post dose and on days 1, 2 and 3. Under these conditions no corneal or iridial effects were observed. Chemosis was not found likewise. Conjunctival redness was observed in 1/6 animals at 24 hours after instillation of the test item (score (redness): 1). This effect was fully reversible by 48 hours after application. As the mean values of the observed eye responses fall below the critical values for classification according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the test material 2, 9 -Dichloroquinacridone is not irritating to eyes and has not to be classified for eye irritation.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
[Please provide information for all of the points below. Indicate if further information is included as attachment to the same record, or elsewhere in the dataset (insert links in 'Cross-reference' table)]
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Please refer to attached read across document (Chapter 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13). - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - Conjunctival redness was observed in 3/3 animals at one hour after instillation of the test item (score (redness): 1) as well as in 2/3 animals at the 24 h reading. This effect was fully reversible by 48 hours after application.
- No effects on cornea, iris, or chemosis occurred (score 0 at every time point) - Other effects:
- There was discharge observed in all animals one hour after instillation of the test material.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity profile of Pigment Red 202 is assessed based on analogue approaches:
According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material is not irritating to eyes under these test conditions. Test material contains relevant amounts of the submission substance. Therefore the test results are considered adequate to fulfil the endpoint requirements. - Executive summary:
Test material was subject to an acute eye irritation/corrosion test in 3 rabbits according to OECD TG 405. No corneal or iridial effects were observed. Chemosis was not found likewise. Conjunctival redness was observed in 3/3 animals at one hour after instillation of the test item (score (redness): 1) as well as in 2/3 animals at the 24 h reading. This effect was fully reversible by 48 hours after application. As the mean values of the observed eye responses fall below the critical values for classification according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the test material is not irritating to eyes and has not to be classified for eye irritation.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
[Please provide information for all of the points below. Indicate if further information is included as attachment to the same record, or elsewhere in the dataset (insert links in 'Cross-reference' table)]
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Please refer to attached read across document (Chapter 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13). - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: effects observed at 1 hour, but reversible by 24 hour observation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant since no effects
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity profile of Pigment Red 202 is assessed based on analogue approaches:
According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material is not irritating to eyes under these test conditions. - Executive summary:
A study according to OECD Guideline 405 and EU Method B.5 was performed to investigate the irritation potential to the rabbit eye.
One and 24 hours after treatment the conjunctivae of the animals showed definitely injected blood vessels up to a diffuse crimson red colour. Additionally, a very slight swelling and slight from substance coloured eye discharge were observed in one animal one hour after treatment. Fourty-eight hours after treatment all signs of irritation were reversible.
As the mean values of the observed eye responses fall below the critical values for classification according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the test material is not irritating to eyes and has not to be classified for eye irritation.
Referenceopen allclose all
Animal no. -- observation time -- cornea opacity -- cornea area -- iris -- conjunctiva redness -- conjunctiva chemosis -- conjunctiva discharge
311 -- 1 hour ---- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 2 -- 1 -- 1
311 -- 24 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 -- 0 -- 0
311 -- 48 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0
311 -- 72 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0
314 -- 1 hour -- --0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 -- 0 -- 0
314 -- 24 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 -- 0 -- 0
314 -- 48 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0
314 -- 72 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0
315 -- 1 hour ---- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 -- 0 -- 0
315 -- 24 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 1 -- 0 -- 0
315 -- 48 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0
315 -- 72 hours -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0
Mean individual scores after 24, 48 and 72 hours for animal no. -- corneal opacity -- iris -- conjunctivae redness -- conjunctivae chemosis
311 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.3 -- 0.0
314 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.3 -- 0.0
315 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.3 -- 0.0
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification
The test material was not irritant to skin and eyes in in vivo assays in rabbits.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.