Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 239-622-4 | CAS number: 15571-58-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with restrictions. Restrictions : Test was not conducted using an E. coli strain. Positive controls for strains TA98, TA100, and TA1537 were not included in the test with metabolic activation.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 979
- Report date:
- 1979
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Missing TA102 strain and E.coli strains
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Study conducts prior to implementation of corresponding guideline. Study performed in accordance to the publications od Ames. The later implemented guideline based to a great extent on these publications.
-Ames, B.N., W.E. Durston, E. Yamasaki, and F.D. Lee. 1973. Carcinogens are mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70:2281-2285.
-Ames, B.N., F.D. Lee, and W.E. Durston. 1973b. An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70:782-786.
-Ames, B.N., J. McCann, and E. Yamasaki. 1975. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 31:347-364. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Study predates GLP.
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dioctyltin bis(2-EHMA) [CAS No. 15571-58-1]:Octyltin tris(2-EHMA) [CAS No. 27107-89-7] (70:30% mixture)
- IUPAC Name:
- Dioctyltin bis(2-EHMA) [CAS No. 15571-58-1]:Octyltin tris(2-EHMA) [CAS No. 27107-89-7] (70:30% mixture)
- Details on test material:
- Dioctyltin bis(2-EHMA) [CAS No. 15571-58-1]:Octyltin tris(2-EHMA) [CAS No. 27107-89-7] (70:30% mixture)
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- TiF:RAIF (SPF) rat liver induced with Aroclor 1254. One ml of the activation mixture contained 0.3 ml S9 fraction and 0.7 ml of the co-factor solution.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 15, 45, 135, 405, and 1215 µg/0.1 ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- The test substance was dissolved in acetone.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: see Details on test system and conditions
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The test was conducted with triplicate replications. Positive and negative controls were tested concurrently.
Positive controls (without metabolic activation): Daunorubicin-HCl at 5 and 10 ug/0.1 ml phosphate buffer for TA98. 4-Nitroquinoline-n-oxide at 0.125 and 0.25 ug/0.1 ml phosphate buffer for TA100. n-Methyl-n'-nitro-n-nitrosoguanidine at 3 and 5 ug/0.1 ml phosphate buffer for TA1535. 9(5)aminoacridine hydrochloride monohydrate at 50 and 100 ug/0.1 ml DMSO for TA1537.
Positive control (with metabolic activation): Cyclophosphamide at 250 ug/0.1 ml phosphate buffer for TA1535.
Negative (vehicle) control (with and without activation): Acetone
The plates were incubated at 37 +/- 1.5 deg. C in the absence of light for 48 hours. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control was not doubled in any
concentration. - Statistics:
- The colonies were counted and the arithmetic mean was calculated.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The test substance precipitated in the soft agar at 1215 ug/0.1 ml. Solvent and positive controls produced the expected mutant colony counts. Under the experimental conditions, a mixture of 70% dioctyltin bis(2-ethylhexylmercaptoacetate) and 30% mono-octyltin tris(2-ethylhexylmercaptoacetate) displayed no mutagenic activity.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the experimental conditions, a mixture of 70% dioctyltin bis(2-ethylhexylmercaptoacetate) and 30% mono-octyltin tris(2-ethylhexylmercaptoacetate) displayed no mutagenic activity. - Executive summary:
An Ames test was carried out with a mixture of 70% dioctyltin bis(2-ethylhexylmercaptoacetate) and 30% mono-octyltin tris(2-ethylhexylmercaptoacetate). The relatively old test was considered less reliable, because the test was not conducted using an E. coli strain and no positive controls for strains TA98, TA100, and TA1537 were included in the test with metabolic activation. No mutagenic activity was observed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.