Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-607-8 | CAS number: 97-77-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 Mar - 29 Sep 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Samples, in triplicate, were also taken on Days 20 (fresh media) and 21 (old media). The initial analysis of these samples failed due to high or low analytical quality control (QC) results. A set of the ‘back-up’ samples were analysed but again failed the analytical QC acceptance criteria. Given that the QC failures were generally at either the 0.2 and/or 150 µg/L levels, a further two QC levels at 0.5 and 50 µg/L were included in the analysis of the final set of ‘back-up’ samples. However, this batch again failed the QC acceptance criteria. The results from days 20 and 21 have therefore been presented for information only, to indicate that concentrations remained relatively consistent throughout the test, and have not been included in the calculation of the time-weighted mean measured concentrations.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted October 2012
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See section "Any other information on material and methods incl tables"
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Samples (8 mL) of test media from the control, solvent control and each test substance concentration were taken for analysis
- Sampling method: On Days 0, 1, 7, 14 and 20 samplles were taken from freshly prepared bulk test media. The corresponding old media Days 1, 2, 8, 15 and 21 were taken from pooled replicates. Triplicate samples were taken
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Where analysis of ‘back-up’ samples was required, the samples were not stored beyond the proven frozen storage stability period of 8 days. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethlyformamid
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: At the start of the test and at each media renewal, an initial solvent stock solution was prepared by dissolving ca 8 mg of test substance in a final volume of 10 mL of DMF to give a 0.8 mg/mL solvent stock solution. Serial dilutions were prepared in DMF to give further solvent stock solutions of 0.25, 0.0781, 0.0244 and 0.00763 mg/mL. An aliquot (100 µL) of the 0.00763, 0.0244, 0.0781, 0.25 and 0.8 mg/mL solvent stock solutions were separately spiked into 1000 mL of Elendt M4 medium to give the 0.763, 2.44, 7.81, 25 and 80 µg/L test concentrations, respectively.
Remark: During the range-finding test it was observed that the test item was not stable in the media following the same test item application as in the algae study (no usage of a solvent). The addition of a solvent stabilized the results without any effects on the Daphnia and do not bring the observed effects above the limit of water solubility. The detailed results of these solubility pre-test are summarized in an extra chapter within the study report.
- Controls: Yes , The control treatment was prepared with Elendt M4 medium only.
- Chemical name of vehicle: DMF (Dimethlyformamid)
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) or suspension(s) including control(s)): 100 µL of DMF into 1000 mL of Elendt M4 medium (0.1 mL/L)
- Test concentration separation factor: 3.2 - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water Flea
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): < 24 h
- Method of breeding: The Daphnia magna are cultured in 1000 mL glass beakers containing 1000 mL of Elendt M4 medium. Each vessel and its contents are referred to as a 'culture'. New cultures are initiated with juvenile Daphnia magna (less than 24 hours old), at a density of 15-20 daphnids per vessel. The cultures are fed daily with a concentrated suspension of Chlorella vulgaris prepared in accordance with standard operating procedures.
- Source: Strain was originally obtained from MicroBio Tests Inc., Belgium
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): Juveniles for use in toxicity tests were collected from the second brood onwards
- Feeding during test
- Food type: Suspension of Chlorella vulgaris
- Amount: 0.1 to 0.2 mg carbon/daphnid/day (typically between 1 and 5 x 10^E05 alga cells per mL, per day).
- Frequency: Fed daily
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES, INCLUDING CULTURING CONDITIONS: At the start of the test, a single juvenile Daphnia magna (<24 hours old) was randomly allocated to each test vessel and added using a wide bore pipette/glass tube. The internal bore of the pipette/glass tube was sufficiently wide to avoid damage of the animal during transfer. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 233 - 274 mg CaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 19.0 - 20.1 °C
- pH:
- 7.50 - 8.01 (Control)
7.72 - 8.13 (Solvent Control)
7.70 - 8.16 (Test item concentrations) - Dissolved oxygen:
- 98.2 - 103.6 % air saturation (Control)
91.4 - 103.1 % air saturation (Solvent Control)
84.4 - 104.2 % air saturation (Test item concentrations) - Conductivity:
- 621 - 701 µS/cm
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Control, Solvent Control, 0.763, 2.44, 7.81, 25 and 80 µg/L (nominal concentrations)
0,0, 0.273, 0.721, 1.87, 5.53 and 37 µg/L (based on time weighted average concentrations) - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
Test vessel:
- Type: open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Covered tall form glass beakers, 100 mL (nominal volume), containing ca 50 mL of test medium
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): daily
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): 10
- Biomass loading rate: 5 mL per Daphnia
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Separate stock solutions of individual trace elements are first prepared in reverse-osmosis water. From these separate stock solutions, a single second stock solution is prepared which contains all trace elements as a combined solution.
- Alkalinity: 43 - 72 CaCO3/L
- Culture medium different from test medium: No, the same medium was used
- Intervals of water quality measurement: The pH, temperature and concentration of dissolved oxygen were determined in the freshly prepared test medium on Days 0, 7, 14 and 20. On Days 1, 8, 15 and 21 water quality measurements were determined using pooled replicate samples of test media at each of the nominal test concentrations.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: 16-hour light:8-hour dark cycle with an approximate 30 minute dawn/dusk transition period
- Light intensity: 1005, 1124 and 1008 lux at test start and 1011, 1136 and 1005 lux at test end
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: The adult Daphnia magna were observed for immobility, the presence or absence of eggs developing in the brood pouch (gravid or non-gravid) and mortality daily throughout the duration of the test. In addition, the number of juveniles present (alive or dead) were recorded, removed from the vessels and then discarded.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3.2
Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 10 and 100 µg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: 100% mortality at 100 µg/L; mortality and reproduction results from the remaining test concentrations were similar to the control and solvent control groups - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium Dichromate
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.87 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks:
- Based on the total number of juveniles produced by surviving adults by Day 21. Juveniles produced by any daphnid which did not survive to Day 21 were not included in the analysis
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 5.53 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks:
- Based on the total number of juveniles produced by surviving adults by Day 21. Juveniles produced by any daphnid which did not survive to Day 21 were not included in the analysis
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 2.64 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks:
- Based on the total number of juveniles produced by surviving adults by Day 21. Juveniles produced by any daphnid which did not survive to Day 21 were not included in the analysis
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence limits
- Remarks:
- 1.44 - 3.08 µg/L
- Details on results:
- - Observations on body length and weight:
On comparison to the combined control groups, there were no statistically significant effects on the length of the adult daphnids surviving to Day 21 at any of the test substance concentrations remaining. The mean body length within the control and solvent conntrol was 3.5 mm
- Mortality of control: 10% parental mortality was observed in the control and 20% parental mortality in the solvent control
- Day of first brood: the first brood appeared after 9-10 days for the control, after 8-11 days for the solvent control, and after 8 -12 days for the nominal test item concentrations of 0.763, 2.44 and 7.81 µg/L; for the nominal test item concentration of 25 µg/L the first brood was observed at day 11-15. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical evaluation:
Statistical analysis was conducted on the data using the CETIS program v 1.8.6.8.
Data from the control and solvent control groups were compared using an Equal Variance t Two-Sample Test (reproduction and adult growth), Unequal Variance t Two-Sample Test (time to first brood) or a Fisher Exact Test (adult survival). The analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the control and solvent control groups therefore the results from the test group were analysed against the pooled control data.
To determine the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) and Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC), the total number of juveniles produced by surviving adults by Day 21 and final adult lengths were analysed using the Dunnett Multiple Comparison Test. The day to first brood was analysed using the Dunn/Bonferroni-Holm Test and the number of adults surviving to Day 21 was analysed using the Cochran-Armitage Step-Down Test. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See section:"Any other information on results incl. tables"
Reference
Chemical analysis:
Chemical analysis of the freshly prepared test media on Days 0, 1, 7 and 14 showed measured concentrations to range from 81% to 116% of nominal value with the exception of the 0.763 and 2.44 µg/L test concentrations on Day 0 were <80% of nominal. Given that these concentrations were below the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC), the results were not considered to affect the outcome of the test.
Analysis of the 24-hour old media on Days 1, 2, 8 and 15 showed measured concentrations to range from <LOQ to 23% of nominal value. The results from the media trial indicated that the test substance was stable in the test media over a 24-hour period. However, during the test, a significant decrease in measured concentrations was observed over each 24-hour period. This was considered to be possibly due to interaction of the test substance with the organic matter in the test vessels (test organisms, algal feed etc).
Samples, in triplicate, were also taken on Days 20 (fresh media) and 21 (old media). The initial analysis of these samples failed due to high or low analytical quality control (QC) results. A set of the ‘back-up’ samples were analysed but again failed the analytical QC acceptance criteria. Given that the QC failures were generally at either the 0.2 and/or 150 µg/L levels, a further two QC levels at 0.5 and 50 µg/L were included in the analysis of the final set of ‘back-up’ samples. However, this batch again failed the QC acceptance criteria. The results from days 20 and 21 have therefore been presented for information only, to indicate that concentrations remained relatively consistent throughout the test, and have not been included in the calculation of the time-weighted mean measured concentrations.
Given that a decline in measured concentrations was observed over each 24-hour period, the results are based on time-weighted mean measured test concentration. Where chemical analysis resulted in values of <LOQ, a value of half LOQ (0.1 µg/L) was used to calculate the time-weighted mean measured concentrations. The time-weighted mean measured concentrations were calculated to be 0.273, 0.721, 1.87, 5.53 and 37 µg/L, equivalent to 36, 30, 24, 22 and 46% of nominal, respectively.
Biological Results
The NOEC and LOEC values in terms of adult survival, day to first brood, juveniles produced per surviving parental Daphnia magna and adult growth, along with the ECx values for reproduction
Parameter |
Toxicity value based on time-weighted mean measured concentrations (µg/L) |
|||
Adult survival* |
Day to first brood |
Juvenile production** |
Growth |
|
NOEC |
5.53 |
5.53 |
1.87 |
5.53 |
LOEC |
37 |
>5.53 |
5.53 |
>5.53 |
EC10 |
<0.273 |
- |
2.64 (1.44 – 3.08) |
- |
EC20 |
5.87 (<0.273 – 8.29) |
- |
3.89 (2.68 – 4.84) |
- |
EC50 |
12.0 (4.89 – 14.8) |
- |
>5.53 |
- |
* Based on observed mortality during the test
** Based on the total number of juveniles produced by surviving adults
by Day 21. Juveniles produced by any daphnid which did not survive to
Day 21 were not included in the analysis; - = Not applicable; Values in
parentheses = 95% confidence limits
The mean number of live juveniles produced per treatment by Day 21, from surviving parental Daphnia magna
Nominal concentration |
Time-weighted mean measured concentration (µg/L) |
Mean cumulative live juvenile production at Day 21 |
% Inhibition compared to the combined controls |
Control |
Control |
64 |
0 |
Solvent control |
Solvent control |
88 |
0 |
0.763 |
0.273 |
85 |
-13 |
2.44 |
0.721 |
87 |
-16 |
7.81 |
1.87 |
81 |
-7 |
25 |
5.53 |
58 |
23 |
Validity criteria
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The mortality of the parent animals in the control (female Daphnia) does not exceed 20% at the end of the test. |
10% parental mortality in the control 20% parental mortality in the solvent control
|
|
The mean number of living offspring produced per parent animal surviving at the end of the test is ≥ 60 in the control. |
64 in the control 88 in the solvent control |
Yes |
Note: The same validity criterion (20%) can be used for accidental and inadvertent parental mortality for the controls as well as for each of the test concentrations.
Description of key information
EC10 (21 d-reproduction): 2.64 µg/L (Daphnia magna, based on the time weighted average concentration)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
One experimental study was available investigating the long-term toxicity of the substance to aquatic invertebrates. The reproduction test was conducted according to the OECD 211 (GLP) using the freshwater species Daphnia magna (Goodband, 2021). The Daphnids were exposed to the substance for 21 days in a semi-static design. The test solutions were renewed daily.
Due to the instability of the test item in the media, DMF was added. The nominal concentrations were performed with 0.763, 2.44, 7.81, 25 and 80 µg/L,based on the time-weighted average the test item concentrations were 0.273, 0.721, 1.87, 5.53 and 37 µg/L.
Chemical analysis of the freshly prepared test media on Days 0, 1, 7 and 14 showed measured concentrations to range from 81% to 116% of nominal value with the exception of the 0.763 and 2.44 µg/L test concentrations on Day 0 were <80% of nominal. Analysis of the 24-hour old media on Days 1, 2, 8 and 15 showed measured concentrations to range from <LOQ to 23% of nominal value. The results from the media trial indicated that the test substance was stable in the test media over a 24-hour period. However, during the test, a significant decrease in measured concentrations was observed over each 24-hour period. Given that a decline in measured concentrations was observed over each 24-hour period, the results are based on time-weighted mean measured test concentration.
The results from the test concentrations were compared to the combined controls because no difference were observed between control and solvent control. The EC10 for reproduction was calculated to be at 2.64 µg/L.
The validity criteria were satisfied, and therefore the results of the reproduction test are considered to be valid.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
Sellel veebilehel kasutatakse küpsiseid, et tagada lehe parim kasutus.