Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 919-489-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2004-01-08 to 2004-02-13
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: mammalian cell micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction mass of (2E)-Tridec-2-enenitrile and (2Z)-Tridec-2-enenitrile and (3E)-Tridec-3-enenitrile and (3Z)-Tridec-3-enenitrile
- EC Number:
- 919-489-5
- Molecular formula:
- C13H23N
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction mass of (2E)-Tridec-2-enenitrile and (2Z)-Tridec-2-enenitrile and (3E)-Tridec-3-enenitrile and (3Z)-Tridec-3-enenitrile
1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 5-8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 21-30 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Housing: in groups
- Diet: ad libitum certified rat and mouse diet 5LF2, BCM, IPS, UK
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): appr. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: arachis oil
- Details on exposure:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 10 mL/kg bw
- Concentration: Dose level 1000 mg/kg bw: 100 mg/mL, dose level 500 mg/kg bw: 50 mg/mL, dose level 250 mg/kg bw: 25 mg/mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The animals were treated once with the test material, one group of each dose level was killed after 24 hours, the other animals were killed after 48 hours.
- Frequency of treatment:
- single treatment
- Post exposure period:
- The animals were observed for signs of toxicity and death one hour after dosing and once daily and immediately before termination.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7 male mice per dose group were used.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: oral
- Doses / concentrations: 50 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow smears from the femurs were examined.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: Doses were selected based on the results of a range-finding toxicity test.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: The smears were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol, stained in May-Grünwald/Giemsa, allowed to air-dry and coverslipped using mounting medium.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: light microscopy at 1000 x magnification - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive mutagenic response was considered when a statistically significant, dose-responsive, toxicologically relevant increase in the number of microucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed for either the 24 or 48-hour kill times when compared to their corresponding control group.
A positive response for bone marrow toxicity was demonstrated when the dose group mean polychromatic to normochromatic ratio was shown to be statistically significantly lower than the vehicle control group. - Statistics:
- The data were statistically analysed using appropriate statistical methods as recommended by the UKEMS Sub-committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing Report, Part III (1989). The data was analysed following a (x+1)^(1/2) transformation using student's t-test (two tailed) and any significant results were confirmed using the one way analysis of variance.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 2000 (i.p. and oral), 1500 (i.p.), 1000 (i.p.) mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: In animals dosed with the test material via the intraperitoneal route premature deaths occurred at and above 1500 mg/kg bw, though in most instances the animals were killed in extremis due to the severity of the clinical signs they exhibited. Clinical signs were observed at and above 1500 mg/kg bw as follows: hunched posture, prostration, ptosis, decreased respiratory rate, laboured respiration, elevated tail, pallor of the extremities, splayed gait, hypothermia, lethargy and ataxia.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei: There were no statistically significant increases in the frequency of micronucleated PCEs in any of the test material dose groups when compared to their concurrent vehicle control groups.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE: There were no statistically significant decreases in the PCE/NCE ratio in the 24 or 48-hour test material groups when compared to their concurrent vehicle control groups.
- Other observations: There were no premature deaths or clinical signs in any of the dose groups.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Treatment Group |
Number of PCE with Micronuclei per 2000 PCE |
PCE/NCE Ratio |
||
Group Mean |
SD |
Group Mean |
SD |
|
Vehicle Control 48 hour sampling time |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.21 |
0.45 |
Vehicle Control 24 hour sampling time |
1.4 |
1.9 |
1.19 |
0.42 |
Positive Control 24 hour sampling time |
53.8* |
26 |
1.07 |
0.44 |
Test substance 1000 mg/kg bw 48 hour sampling time |
1.1 |
1.5 |
1.22 |
0.54 |
Test substance 1000 mg/kg bw 24 hour sampling time |
2.9 |
2.7 |
1.12 |
0.50 |
Test substance 500 mg/kg bw 24 hour sampling time |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.01 |
0.23 |
Test substance 250 mg/kg bw 24 hour sampling time |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.01 |
0.25 |
*P<0.001
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test material was considered to be non-genotoxic in this in vivo micronucleus test.
- Executive summary:
The study, according to OECD Guideline 474, was performed to assess the potential of the test material to produce, damage to chromosomes or aneuploidy when administered to mice. A range-finding toxicity test was performed to find suitable dose levels of the test material, route of administration and to investigate if there was a marked difference in toxic response between the sexes. There was no marked difference in toxicity of the test material between the sexes; therefore the main test was performed using only male mice. The micronucleus test was conducted using the intraperitoneal route in groups of seven mice (males) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) 1000 mg/kg bw and with 250 and 500 mg/kg bw as the two lower dose levels. Animals were killed 24 or 48 hours later, the bone marrow was extracted, and smear preparations were made and stained. Polychromatic (PCE) and normochromatic (NCE) erythrocytes were scored for the presence of micronuclei. Further groups of mice were given a single intraperitoneal dose of arachis oil (7 mice) or dosed orally with cyclophosphamide (5 mice), to serve as vehicle and positive controls respectively. Vehicle control animals were killed 24 or 48 hours later, and positive control animals were killed after 24 hours. There were no statistically significant decreases in the PCE/NCE ratio in the 24 or 48-hour test material groups when compared to their concurrent vehicle control groups. There were no statistically significant increases in the frequency of nucronucleated PCEs in any of the test material dose groups when compared to their concurrent vehicle control groups. The elevated value seen in the 24-hour 1000 mg/kg bw test material dose group was the result of two animals having individual scores that were at the high end of the acceptable range for vehicle control animals. It is possible that they were most likely due to the chance scoring of clusters of micronuclei, and with the other animals in the group having low individual scores, with no evidence of a response in the 48-hour group and with the value being within the historical range for vehicle controls it was, therefore, considered to have no toxicological significance. The positive control group showed a marked increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes hence confirming the sensitivity of the system to the known mutagenic activity of cyclophosphamide under the conditions of the test. Based on these results, the test material was considered to be non-genotoxic in the in vivo micronucleus assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.