Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 309-916-8 | CAS number: 101357-19-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
skin irritation, OECD 404, WoE, not skin irritant
eye irritation, OECD 405, H318, Eye Damage 1
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- January - March 2006
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 2002
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 2004
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Kisslegg, Germany
- Age at study initiation: at least 6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: at least 1.0 kg
- Housing: Individually in labelled cages with perforated floors (Scanbur, Denmark, dimensions 56x44x37.5 cm).
- Diet: Standard laboratory rabbit diet (Charles River Breeding and Maintenance Diet for Rabbits, Altromin, Lage, Germany) approx. 100 g. per day.
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.4 -21.7°C
- Humidity (%): 32 - 57%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL
CONTROL
Adjacent areas of the untreated skin of each animal served as controls. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2x3 cm
- Type of wrap if used: Micropore tape, secured with Coban elastic bandage
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: with tab water
- Time after start of exposure: 4h
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
1, 24, 48 and 72 hours
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: Draize scheme - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- There was no evidence of a corrosive or irritation effect on the skin.
- Other effects:
- Purple staining of the treated skin by the test substance was observed throughout the study period, which did not hamper the scoring of the skin reactions.
No symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1974
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: BASF-Test
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF-TEST: Before OECD guideline 404 was established, skin irritation was tested using an internal method. White Vienna rabbits were used. Usually, 2 animals were treated for 1, 5, 15 min and/or 20 h using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5 x 2.5 cm was covered with the liquid or powdered and moistened test substance. In addition, skin tissue from the ear was tested by wrapping the ear. These results from the ear, however, would not be taken into account for evaluation as they do not represent testing of the dorsal/lateral flank of the back. After the application time, the skin was washed with water which sometimes contained a mild detergent. The animals were observed 7 to 8 days and skin changes were recorded on working days.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler
- Age at study initiation: not specified
- Weight at study initiation: 2.94 and 3.51 kg
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
not specified - Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Preparation of test site:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: not specified
- Concentration: 50% aqueous preparation (solid paste)
VEHICLE
water - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 20 h
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- Site: at the back of the test animal, not further specified
- Application: on intact skin
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: yes, with water
- Time after start of exposure: 20 h
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 6 days, 8 days
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: Draize Test - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- only purple substance residues were observed
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No irritation or corrosion was determined.
- Other effects:
- Purple-coloured staining of the skin and substance residues.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1979
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler
- Age at study initiation: not specified
- Weight at study initiation: mean 2.92 kg
- Diet: Ssniff
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
not specified - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: not specified
- Concentration: 50% aqueous preparation (solid paste)
VEHICLE
water - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- ca. 24 h
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- Site: Front, middle or at the back of the test animal, not further specified
- Application: on intact and on scarified skin, scarification only on the left side
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: yes, with water
- Time after start of exposure: ca. 24 h
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
24, 48, 72h, 8 days
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: Draize Test - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- on intact skin: Purple-coloured staining was noted, exact calculation of the score was not possible
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: After 8 days, scarified: low to high scurfs or lentil-sized necrosis
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- on scarified skin: Purple-coloured staining was noted, exact calculation of the score was not possible
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: on intact skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.9
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: on scarified skin
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- For erythema, no score could be calculated due to purple-coloured staining of the skin.
An irritant response was only observed on scarified skin: On scarified skin, after 8 days lentil-sized necrosis could be detected in 4 animals, as well as low to high scurfs in 2 animals. Edema were only detected on scarified skin with a maxiumum value of 1. After 8 days a tendency towards reversibility was observed. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1993
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- old scoring system
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study is disregarded due to the old and non-standard scoring system.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd., Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire, U.K.
- Age at study initiation: approximately twelve to sixteen weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.54 - 2.84 kg
- Housing: individually housed in suspended metal cages
- Diet: ad libitum, (RABMA Rabbit Diet, Special Diet Services Ltd., Witham, Essex, U.K.)
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 18 - 24°C
- Humidity: 56 - 75%
- Air changes: approximately 15 changes per hour
- Photoperiod: 12 hours light and 12 hours darkness - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.1 mL (approximately 88 mg) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 21 days
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 21 days (oservations at 1 hour, 24, 48 and 72 hours; additional observations were made on days four, seven, fourteen and twenty-one to assess the reversibility of the ocular effects).
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize J.H. 1959, Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics"
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: ophthalmoscope - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- within 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks:
- within 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Areas of diffuse corneal opacity were noted in all treated eyes at the 24-hour observation with areas of diffuse to translucent corneal opacity at the 48 and 72-hour observations. Areas of translucent corneal opacity were noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Opalescent corneal opacity over approximately 25% of the area with diffuse to translucent corneal opacity in the remaining area was noted in one treated eye at the 7-day observation. Areas of translucent corneal opacity were noted in one treated eye at the 7-day observation, in two treated eyes at the 14-day observation with diffuse to translucent corneal opacity at the 21-day observation. Vascularisation of the cornea was noted in two treated eyes at the 7, 14 and 21-day observations. The shape of the eyebal1 was distorted in two animals at the 14-day observation and persisted in one animal at the 21-day observation.
Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24, 48 and 72-hour observations. Iridial inflammation was noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Iridial inflammation was noted in two treated eyes at the 7 and 14-day observations.
Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24 and 48-hour observations with moderate to severe conjunctival irritation at the 72-hour observation. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in two treated eyes at the 7 and 14-day observations with minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation at the 21-day observation. Sloughing of the conjunctival membranes was noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Ectropion was noted in one treated eye at the 7-day observation and in two treated eyes at the 14 and 21-day observations. - Other effects:
- - Other observations: Residual test material was noted around the treated eye of all animals throughout the study. Purple-coloured staining was noted in all treated eyes during the study. The staining did not affect evaluation of ocular effects.
Due to sloughing of the conjunctival membranes, one animal was killed for humane reasons immediately after the 4-day observation in accordance with current U.K. Home Office guidelines. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
SKIN IRRITATION/CORROSION:
WOE: Skin irritation in vivo (Sun Chemical, 2006)
The potential of an aqueous preparation of Pigment Violet 3 PTM (21% PV3 PTM, 76.6% water, 2.4% additives) to cause acute dermal irritation or corrosivity was assessed by a single topical application of an amount of 0.5 mL of the test item for 4 hours to the intact skin of three New Zealand White rabbits (stepwise procedure starting with one animal and supplementing two additional animals), using a patch of 2 cm x 3 cm, covered with semi-occlusive dressing. After removal of the patch the application area was washed off. The cutaneous reactions were assessed immediately after removal of the patch and approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patch. There was no evidence of a corrosive or irritation effect on the skin, erythema and edema score 0.
WOE: Skin irritation in vivo (BASF, 1980)
The primary skin irritation potential of the read-across substance Similar Substance 01 was investigated by topical application to 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm intact or scarified skin of each of six young adult Vienna White rabbits. The duration of treatment was ca. 24 h, the test site on the front, middle or at the back. The scoring of skin reactions was performed 24, 48, 72 hours and 8 days after removal of the dressing. Local signs consisted of grade 0 edema for intact skin and grade 0 – 1 edema for scarified skin. After 8 days no improvement of effects on scarified skin was detected. For erythema no score could be calculated due to purple-colored staining of the skin. But with scarified skin, after 8 days necrosis could be detected in 4 animals, as well as low to high scurfs in 2 animals. in conlusion, signs of skin irritation were only observed on scarified rabbit skin. Based on these results, the test article is considered to be not irritating to rabbit skin.
WOE: Skin irritation in vivo (BASF, 1975)
The primary skin irritation potential of the read-across substance Similar Substance 02 was investigated by topical application to 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm intact skin of each of two young adult Vienna White rabbits. The duration of treatment was 20 h, the test site on the back of the test animal. The scoring of skin reactions was performed 24, 48, 72 hours and 8 days after removal of the dressing.
No local signs of irritation were observed. Purple-coloured staining of the skin and substance residues was noted. Based on these results, the test article is considered to be not irritating to rabbit skin.
EYE IRRITATION:
KEY: Eye irritation in vivo (Ferro, 1993)
The potential of Pigment Violet 3 PTM to cause damage to the conjunctiva, iris or cornea was assessed by a single ocular administration of 0.1 mL bulk volume (about 88 mg) of the undiluted substance to one eye each of three New Zealand White rabbits. The eye was not rinsed. The ocular reactions were assessed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after administration and in weekly intervals until day 21. The following test item-related clinical observations were recorded during the course of the study in the three animals:Areas of diffuse corneal opacity were noted in all treated eyes at the 24-hour observation with areas of diffuse to translucent corneal opacity at the 48 and 72-hour observations. Areas of translucent corneal opacity were noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Opalescent corneal opacity over approximately 25% of the area with diffuse to translucent corneal opacity in the remaining area was noted in one treated eye at the 7-day observation. Areas of translucent corneal opacity were noted in one treated eye at the 7-day observation, in two treated eyes at the 14-day observation with diffuse to translucent corneal opacity at the 21-day observation. Vascularisation of the cornea was noted in two treated eyes at the 7, 14 and 21-day observations. The shape of the eyeball was distorted in two animals at the 14-day observation and persisted in one animal at the 21-day observation.Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24, 48 and 72-hour observations. Iridial inflammation was noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Iridial inflammation was noted in two treated eyes at the 7 and 14-day observations.Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24 and 48-hour observations with moderate to severe conjunctival irritation at the 72-hour observation. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in two treated eyes at the 7 and 14-day observations with minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation at the 21-day observation. Sloughing of the conjunctival membranes was noted in one treated eye at the 4-day observation. Ectropion was noted in one treated eye at the 7-day observation and in two treated eyes at the 14 and 21-day observations.Scores calculated for the animals after 72 hours were 20 - 30 for corneal opacity (not reversible), 5 for iris lesions (not fully reversible) and 12 - 16 for conjunctiva (not reversible). Considering the irreversibility of the described ocular reactions the test item causes serious eye damage under the test conditions chosen.
SUPPORTING: Eye irritation in vivo (BASF, 1980)
In a Draize test in rabbits, 30 mg of the read-across substance Similar Substance 01 was applied into the conjunctival sac of one eye each of 6 Vienna White rabbits followed by a 8-day observation period. Signs of ocular irritation were scored according to the Draize scheme 1, 24, 48, 72 hours and 8 days after administration of the test substance. Corneal opacity, iritis, reddening of conjunctivae and chemosis were observed. The pathological findings on the eye and the irritation symptoms on the mucous membrane did not reverse within 8 days. In conclusion, the test item caused serious eye damage under the test conditions chosen.
SUPPORTING: Eye irritation in vivo (BASF, 1975)
In a Draize test in rabbits, 50 mg of the read-across substance Similar Substance 02 was applied into the conjunctival sac of the right eye each of two Vienna White rabbits followed by a 8-day observation period. As control, talcum was applied to the left eyes of the same animals. The test material caused severe and non-reversible inflammation and scarring on the mucous membrane of the eye. In conclusion, the test material caused serious eye damage under the conditions of this study.
Eye irritation in vivo (Sun Chemical, 2006)
The potential of an aqueous preparation of Pigment Violet 3 PTM (21% PV3 PTM, 76.6% water, 2.4% additives) to cause damage to the conjunctiva, iris or cornea was assessed by a single ocular administration of 0.1 mL bulk volume of the undiluted test substance to one eye of three New Zealand White rabbits. The eye was not rinsed. The ocular reactions were assessed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after administration. The following test item-related clinical observations were recorded during the course of the study in the three animals:
Irritation of the conjunctivae, which consisted of redness and discharge. The irritation had completely resolved within 24 hours. No iridial irritation or corneal opacity were observed, and treatment of the eyes with 2% fluorescein, 24 hours after test substance instillation revealed no corneal epithelial damage. There was no evidence of ocular corrosion.
Purple staining of the fur on the head and paws, caused by the test substance, was noted during the observation period. No test substance remnants were noted. No symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred.
In conclusion, the test material was not irritating to the eye. However, as an aqueous preparation of PV3 PTM was tested, the result of this study was not taken into account for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of PV3 PTM in its pure form.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
An aqueous preparation of the registered substance did not show a skin irritating potential in vivo. Furthermore, two analogous substances were not irritationg to the skin in vivo. In conclusion, there is sufficient weight of evidence to conclude that the substance does not have to be classified as skin irritant or corrosive under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the tenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.
The substance caused serious eye damage in vivo. As a result, the substance is classified with Eye Dam. 1; H318 under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the tenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.