Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 289-969-0 | CAS number: 90046-02-9 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Juniperus oxycedrus, Cupressaceae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Partition coefficient
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method, and under GLP. Test substance is adequately characterised. Therefore full validation applies.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The log POW values for Fluoranthene and DDT were taken from the EU guideline A.8. These values deviate from the corresponding OECD guideline 117. The values from EU guideline were chosen because registration of the compound is intended according REACH
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected on October 13 to 14, 2014 / signed on April 8, 2015
- Type of method:
- HPLC method
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Analytical method:
- high-performance liquid chromatography
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- < 0.3
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 1 at 5.3%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 0.93
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 2 at 5.3%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 1.5
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.36
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 3 at 2.9%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 2.35
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 4 at 3.9%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 4
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 5 at 1.6%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 4.6
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 6 at 1.5%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 4.76
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 7 at 1.8%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 5.33
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 8 at 1.8%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 6
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 9 at 2.8%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- ca. 6.18
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 10 at 6.2%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- > 6.2
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- 7.39
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Peak 11 and12 at 70.1%area (pH of the mobile phase and Temperature of the column)
- Conclusions:
- The substance has potential to bioaccumulate in the environment, according to CLP classification criteria for aquatic chronic toxicity (major compounds with log Pow >4)
- Executive summary:
The partition coefficients of the constituents of the test substance were measured according to the OECD 117/EU A8 guideline, HPC method under GLP. The system was calibrated with ten different reference substances, and the results for the sample were interpolated from the linear regression.
Reference
Reference Items
Measurement Data
The retention times (RT) which were recorded for the reference items are presented in the following table.
Table 4.7/1 Retention Times Reference Items
Compound |
RT 1 |
RT 2 |
RT 3 |
RT 4 |
RT 5 |
RT 6 |
|
min. |
min. |
min. |
min. |
min. |
min. |
Thiourea |
1.384 |
1.384 |
1.385 |
1.387 |
1.387 |
1.388 |
2-Butanone |
1.722 |
1.722 |
1.724 |
1.726 |
1.727 |
1.728 |
Acetophenone |
2.181 |
2.183 |
2.185 |
2.186 |
2.189 |
2.190 |
Naphthalene |
5.346 |
5.359 |
5.365 |
5.363 |
5.374 |
5.384 |
Diphenylether |
7.166 |
7.183 |
7.197 |
7.191 |
7.207 |
7.223 |
Phenanthrene |
10.106 |
10.135 |
10.148 |
10.134 |
10.160 |
10.186 |
Fluoranthene |
13.990 |
14.033 |
14.050 |
14.027 |
14.079 |
14.103 |
Triphenylamine |
24.963 |
25.035 |
25.106 |
25.037 |
25.164 |
25.180 |
DDT |
35.073 |
35.182 |
35.304 |
35.200 |
35.363 |
35.396 |
Calculated Values
For each reference item, the calculated capacity factors are presented in the following table.
Table 4.7/2 Capacity factors Reference Items
Compound |
Retention Time |
Retention Time |
Retention Time |
K |
|
min. |
min. |
% |
|
Thiourea |
1.386 |
0.002 |
0.137 |
0.000 |
2-Butanone |
1.725 |
0.002 |
0.144 |
0.245 |
Acetophenone |
2.185 |
0.003 |
0.156 |
0.577 |
Naphthalene |
5.365 |
0.013 |
0.237 |
2.871 |
Diphenylether |
7.194 |
0.020 |
0.273 |
4.191 |
Phenanthrene |
10.145 |
0.027 |
0.269 |
6.320 |
Fluoranthene |
14.047 |
0.040 |
0.285 |
9.136 |
Triphenylamine |
25.081 |
0.084 |
0.335 |
17.097 |
DDT |
35.253 |
0.123 |
0.349 |
24.437 |
log POW/ log K
The values for log K and log POWof the reference items are presented in the following table:
Table 4.7/3 log K and log POWof Reference Items
Compound |
log K |
log POW |
2-Butanone |
-0.6113 |
0.30 |
Acetophenone |
-0.2389 |
1.70 |
Naphthalene |
0.4581 |
3.60 |
Diphenylether |
0.6223 |
4.20 |
Phenanthrene |
0.8007 |
4.50 |
Fluoranthene |
0.9607 |
4.70* |
Triphenylamine |
1.2329 |
5.70 |
DDT |
1.3880 |
6.20* |
*log Kow as reported in the EU method A8. Note that these values are 5.1 for fluoranthene and 6.5 for DDT in OECD 117, 2004.
Correlation Results log K and log Pow
Dead time is 1.386 ± 0.002 minutes, with RSD 0.1%.
The RSD of the retention times of the reference items lay all below 0.4 %.
Equation of the regression:
log k = 0.3494 * log POW– 0.7731 with a coefficient of
determination r2= 0.9937
Test Item
Measurement Data
The retention times of the test item are presented in the following table:
Table 4.7/4 Retention Times Test Item
Measurement |
Peak 1 |
Peak 2 |
Peak 3 |
Peak 4 |
|
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
Measurement 1 |
1.620 |
1.877 |
2.164 |
2.936 |
Measurement 2 |
1.622 |
1.875 |
2.166 |
2.935 |
Measurement 3 |
1.622 |
1.888 |
2.170 |
2.935 |
Mean |
1.621 |
1.880 |
2.167 |
2.935 |
Standard Deviation |
0.001 |
0.007 |
0.003 |
0.001 |
Measurement |
Peak 5 |
Peak 6 |
Peak 7 |
Peak 8 |
|
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
Measurement 1 |
7.205 |
10.815 |
12.131 |
18.421 |
Measurement 2 |
7.195 |
10.796 |
12.123 |
18.409 |
Measurement 3 |
7.200 |
10.766 |
12.108 |
18.400 |
Mean |
7.200 |
10.792 |
12.120 |
18.410 |
Standard Deviation |
0.005 |
0.025 |
0.012 |
0.011 |
Measurement |
Peak 9 |
Peak 10 |
Peak 11 |
Peak 12 |
|
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
tR(min.) |
Measurement 1 |
31.363 |
35.237 |
43.701 |
45.552 |
Measurement 2 |
31.269 |
35.105 |
43.685 |
45.540 |
Measurement 3 |
31.273 |
35.157 |
43.687 |
45.544 |
Mean |
31.301 |
35.166 |
43.691 |
45.545 |
Standard Deviation |
0.053 |
0.067 |
0.009 |
0.006 |
For further information about areas of each peak, please see the report.
Calculated Values
The calculated values of Capacity Factor, log Capacity Factor, logOWare presented in the report. The log POWwas calculated from the capacity factor as follows:
log POW= (log K + 0.7731) / 0.3494
Result and Validity
Result
The chromatogram of the test item gave 12 peaks. With the calibration function log K versus log POW, the corresponding log POWs of the peaks were determined as follows:
Table 4.7.5/Results
Peak |
Mean Area |
Rel. Area % |
Mean Retention Time [min] |
log POW |
1 |
0.692 |
5.272 |
1.621 |
< 0.3 |
2 |
0.703 |
5.348 |
1.880 |
0.930 ± 0.017 |
3 |
0.375 |
2.855 |
2.167 |
1.499 ± 0.005 |
4 |
0.514 |
3.916 |
2.935 |
2.351 ± 0.000 |
5 |
0.212 |
1.615 |
7.200 |
3.995 ± 0.001 |
6 |
0.204 |
1.550 |
10.792 |
4.593 ± 0.003 |
7 |
0.235 |
1.790 |
12.120 |
4.757 ± 0.001 |
8 |
0.232 |
1.769 |
18.410 |
5.330 ± 0.001 |
9 |
0.365 |
2.775 |
31.301 |
6.030 ± 0.002 |
10 |
0.391 |
2.970 |
35.166 |
6.181 ± 0.002 |
11 |
0.528 |
4.017 |
43.691 |
> 6.2 |
12 |
8.687 |
66.123 |
45.545 |
> 6.2 |
These values are the means ± standard deviations of three independent determinations.
Note that Peaks 11 and 12 eluted outside the isocratic part of the HPLC program. Thus the calculation of the log POWrelated to peaks 11 and 12 is not possible. However, we noted that Peaks 1, 11 and 12 lay outside the calibrated range (log POW0.3 - 6.2).
Therefore the log POWof the peak 1 is stated as < 0.3 and the log Pow of peaks 11 and 12 is stated as > 6.2 .
Validity
The validity criteria and results are presented in the following table:
Table 4.7/6 Validity Criteria and Results
Peak |
Parameter |
Criterion |
Found |
Assessment |
1 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.008 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
0.009 |
not valid* |
|
2 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.032 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
0.930 |
valid |
|
3 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.009 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
1.499 |
valid |
|
4 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.001 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
2.351 |
valid |
|
5 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.002 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
3.995 |
valid |
|
6 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.006 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
4.593 |
valid |
|
7 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.003 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
4.757 |
valid |
|
8 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.002 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
5.330 |
valid |
|
9 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.004 |
valid |
Value withinofItems |
0.30 - 6.20 |
6.030 |
valid |
|
10 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.005 |
valid |
Value within Range of Ref. Items |
0.30 - 6.20 |
6.181 |
valid |
|
11 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.000 |
not calculable** |
Value within Range of Ref. Items |
0.30 - 6.20 |
6.461 |
not calculable** |
|
12 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.000 |
not calculable** |
Value within Range of Ref. Items |
0.30 - 6.20 |
6.514 |
not calculable** |
* The peak 1 of the test item lies close to the dead time of the method not within the range of log POWs of the reference items. Therefore, the corresponding log POWis stated as < 0.3.
** The calculation of the log POWof the test item peaks 11 and 12 is not possible, because the peaks eluted not in the isocratic part of the HPLC program. Extrapolation is not possible therefore.
[1]mAU = milli absorbance units
Description of key information
The data is relevant for classification in aquatic chronic toxicity hazard class, according to CLP criteria: the substance has potential for bioaccumulation (major compounds log Kow >4).
It should also be of concern for PBT assessment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A fully reliable experimental study, conducted according to a recognized OECD/EC method (HPLC) and under GLP, is available. It is considered as a key study. The results obtained on the constituents of the substance can be used for purpose of CSA.
Using he calibration function log K versus log POW established from the retention time obtained on the reference substances, the log POW of the 12 peaks detected on the chromatogram were determined as follows (means of three determinations):
Peak | Rel. Area % | log POW |
±Stand. Dev | ||
1 | 5.272 | < 0.3* |
2 | 5.348 | 0.930 ± 0.017 |
3 | 2.855 | 1.499 ± 0.005 |
4 | 3.916 | 2.351 ± 0.000 |
5 | 1.615 | 3.995 ± 0.001 |
6 | 1.550 | 4.593 ± 0.003 |
7 | 1.790 | 4.757 ± 0.001 |
8 | 1.769 | 5.330 ± 0.001 |
9 | 2.775 | 6.030 ± 0.002 |
10 | 2.970 | 6.181 ± 0.002 |
11 | 4.017 | > 6.2* |
12 | 66.123 | > 6.2* |
* peak outside the range of logKow of reference items
pH of the mobile phase : 7.39 ; Temperature of the column : 25 +/0.5°C.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.