Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test, OECD TG 471):
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and TA 102: negative with and without metabolic activation
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and E. coli WP2 uvrA: negative with and without metabolic activation


Mammalian cytogenicity (CHO chromosome aberration assay, OECD TG 473): negative with and without metabolic activation
Mammalian Mutagenicity (Mouse Lymphoma Assay, OECD TG 476, RA from CAS 5894-60-0): negative with and without metabolic activation


Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2002-04-15 to 2002-07-04
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EC 92/69/EEC L383 A: part B Determination of Toxicity-Mutagenicity
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ICH S2A Specific Aspects of Regulatory Genotoxicity Tests for Pharmaceuticals
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ICH S2B: A Standard Battery for Genotoxicity Testing of Pharmaceuticals
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
his operon
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Pre-test: 0.316, 1, 3.16, 10, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 3160, 5000 µg/plate
Main test: 100, 316, 1000, 3160, 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility properties and relative non-toxicity to bacteria
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
cyclophosphamide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 2-anthracene amide
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48 hours

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates in two independent experiments

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: growth of background lawn

OTHER:
Controls:
with S9: 2-anthracene amide (2-ATA - TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 102, 2 µg/plate in DMSO; cyclophosphamide (CS - TA 100 and TA1535, 1500 µg/plate in aqua ad iniectabilia)
without S9: sodium azide (NaN3 - TA 1535 and TA 100, 10 µg/plate in water); 9-aminoacridine (9-AA - TA 1537, 100 µg/plate in ethanol); 2-nitrofluorene (2-NF; TA 98, 10 µg/plate in DMSO), methyl methane sulfonate (MMS – TA 102, 1300 µg/plate in DMSO)
Evaluation criteria:
A result is considered positive if the number of revertants is significantly increased compared to the solvent control to at least 2-fold of the solvent control for TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 and 3-fold of the solvent control for TA 1535 and TA 1537 in both experiments. In addition, a significant concentration related effect is observed in positive results, and positive results have to be reproducible and the histidine independence of revertants confirmed.

Positive results have to be reproducible and the histidine independence of the revertants has to be confirmed by streaking on histidine-free agar
plates.

Cytotoxicity is defined as a reduction in the number of colonies by >50% compared with the solvent control and/or a sparse background lawn.
Statistics:
MANN and WHITNEY and Spearman’s rank.
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
TA 1537 (at 5000 µg/plate, +S9, only in plate incorporation test)
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS

- Precipitation: Non-interfering substance precipitate was noted at 5000 µg/plate in all test strains

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data

Table 2: Dose range-finding study number of revertants per plate (2 plates)

 

TA100

Conc.
(µg/plate)

Plate 1

Plate 2

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

114

137

No

0.316

110

126

No

1

123

134

No

3.16

137

150

No

10

129

159

No

31.6

134

119

No

100

133

137

No

316

119

125

No

1000

141

129

No

3160

114

121

No

5000

132

119

No

*solvent control with acetone

Table 3: Experiment 1 (plate incorporation): number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA98

TA100

TA102

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

 MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

30.3

31

No

128.3

144.3

No

269

287.7

No

100

38

27.7

No

122.7

137.7

No

265.7

289.3

No

316

28

27.3

No

122.3

137.3

No

251.3

282.3

No

1000

30.3

28.3

No

123.3

119.7

No

246

271

No

3160

31

30

No

127

136

No

257.7

285

No

5000

35.3

25.3

No

119.7

152

No

291

282

No

Positive control

1200.7

1211.3

No

1226.7

1259.7

No

1107.7

1277.7

No

*solvent control with acetone

Table 3: Experiment 1 (plate incorporation): number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA1535

TA1537

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

13.3

12.3

No

7

9.7

No

100

12.7

11.7

No

8.7

8.7

No

316

14.7

14.3

No

9.3

6.3

No

1000

12

12.7

No

10.3

6.7

No

3160

11

12.7

No

10.7

6

No

5000

12

14

No

9.3

0

Yes

Positive control

364

350

No

392.7

358

No

*solvent control with acetone

Table 4: Experiment 2 (preincubation): number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA98

TA100

TA102

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

51

34.3

No

127.3

164

No

278.7

290.3

No

100

51

37

No

127

152.7

No

167

278

No

316

46.7

36.3

No

120

146.7

No

278.7

298.7

No

1000

56.3

49.7

No

140.7

153.7

No

288.7

287

No

3160

52

43.7

No

132

158

No

297.7

286

No

5000

48.3

43

No

132

175.7

No

289.7

266.7

No

Positive control

910

906

No

1179.7

1226.7

No

1231.7

1220.3

No

*solvent control with acetone

Table 4: Experiment 2 (preincubation): number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA1535

TA1537

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

13

11.7

No

6

6

No

100

11

13.3

No

5

9

No

316

12.3

16.7

No

4.3

8

No

1000

13

16.3

No

5.3

7

No

3160

11

16.3

No

4

5

No

5000

12.3

14

No

4

6

No

Positive control

524.7

556.3

No

486.7

508.7

No

*solvent control with acetone

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results:
negative

No mutagenic effect was observed for the test substance tested up to the limit dose in any of the test strains in two independent
experiments without and with metabolic activation.
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
(adopted 1997)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Ministerium für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf, Germany
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
his operon
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I+II
- 62, 185, 556, 1667, 5000 µg/plate (with and without metabolic activation)
Experiment III:
- 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000 µg/plate (with and without metabolic activation)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: acetone
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: -S9: NaN3: 2 µg/plate (TA 100, TA 1535); 9-AA: 50 µg/plate (TA 1537); 2-NF: 4 µg/plate (TA 98); 4-NQO: 1 µg/plate (E.coli WP2 uvrA); +S9: 2-AA: 7 µg/plate (TA 1535, TA 1537), 2 µg/plate (TA 100), 10 µg/plate (E.coli WP2 uvrA); BaP: 30 µg/plate (TA 98)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates in 3 independent experiments (test substance); six plates per experiment for the solvent control

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: growth of background lawn
Evaluation criteria:
A test substance producing no biologically relevant positive response in any one of the bacterial strains tested is considered to be non-mutagenic in this system. A biologically relevant response is described as follows: If the number of revertants is at least twice the spontaneous reversion rate for TA 1535, TA 98, TA 100 or WP2 uvrA (or three times for TA 1537) and/or if there is a concentration related increasing number of revertants over the range tested.
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: no cytotoxicity, but tested up to limit concentration; precipitates from 1000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: no cytotoxicity, but tested up to limit concentration; precipitates from 1000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: no cytotoxicity, but tested up to limit concentration; precipitates from 1000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: no cytotoxicity, but tested up to limit concentration; precipitates from 1000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: no cytotoxicity, but tested up to limit concentration; precipitates from 1000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: from 1000 µg/plate and higher

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Historical control data were given in the study report. The results of the solvent control cultures lied within the range of the historical control data.

OTHER:
- Revertant counts higher than 1000 were counted and calculated as 1000.
- Study plan amendment: Due to invalid positive and solvent controls for the strains Salmonella typhimurium TA 100 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA parts of the first experiment had to be repeated (=second experiment).

Table 1: Mean values of experiment 1 and 2.

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(µg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2 uvrA

0

9±3

4±3

20±4

207±34

17±6

62

7±3

3±1

23±6

202±30

16±3

185

10±2

3±3

24±3

219±26

19±4

556

6±3

8±3

20±1

222±39

15±5

1667, P

11±3

3±3

25±6

187±5

13±3

5000, P

9±5

5±3

27±3

200±9

12±2

Positive controls, –S9

Name

NaN3

9-AA

2-NF

NaN3

4-NQO

Concentrations

(µg/plate)

2

50

4

2

1

Revertants per plate

677±107

328±45

363±64

1000±0

491±100

+

0

13±4

6±3

28±3

130±20

23±3

+

62

12±1

4±1

34±2

142±11

21±4

+

185

14±2

4±2

21±4

109±10

20±5

+

556

8±2

4±2

23±6

107±7

21±2

+

1667, P

12±2

4±3

28±6

129±12

19±4

+

5000, P

8±5

5±1

25±9

125±13

23±2

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2-AA

2-AA

B[a]P

2-AA

2-AA

Concentrations

(µg/plate)

7

7

30

2

10

Revertants per plate

531±45

595±58

1000±0

1000±0

206±23

P: precipitation observed

 

Table 2: Results of experiment 3.

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(µg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2 uvrA

0

9±2

4±1

21±4

105±12

20±6

1000, P

9±3

4±3

28±4

140±26

17±6

2000, P

13±5

1±1

22±4

134±33

28±11

3000, P

10±3

5±2

23±2

129±5

22±8

4000, P

10±4

2±2

19±1

137±21

25±1

5000, P

10±2

3±2

23±4

117±12

20±7

Positive controls, –S9

Name

NaN3

9-AA

2-NF

NaN3

4-NQO

Concentrations

(µg/plate)

2

50

4

2

1

Revertants per plate

704±73

147±13

400±71

1000±0

613±41

+

0

9±2

4±1

21±4

105±12

20±6

+

1000, P

9±3

4±3

28±4

140±26

17±6

+

2000, P

13±5

1±1

22±4

134±33

28±11

+

3000, P

10±3

5±2

23±2

129±5

22±8

+

4000, P

10±4

2±2

19±1

137±21

25±1

+

5000, P

10±2

3±2

23±4

117±12

20±7

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2-AA

2-AA

B[a]P

2-AA

2-AA

Concentrations

(µg/plate)

7

7

30

2

10

Revertants per plate

491±44

584±97

805±78

1000±0

274±103

 P: precipitation observed

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results:
negative

In a study according to OECD 471 and in compliance with GLP no mutagenic effect was observed for the test substance tested up to the limit concentration in any of the test strains in three independent experiments with and without metabolic activation.
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
02 Sep 2004 to 03 Dec 2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
(adopted 1997)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Target gene:
Not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
phenobarbital and beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I+II:
- 10.2, 20.3, 40.6, 81.3, 163, 325, 650, 1300 µg/ml (with and without metabolic activation)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility properties and relative non-toxicity to cells
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: -S9: mitomycin: 0.3 µg/ml (3 h treatment), 0.1 µg/ml (20 h treatment); +S9: cyclophosphamide: 15 µg/ml (3 h treatment)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration: 3 h and 20 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 20 h

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid (0.2 µg/ml; added 3 hours before harvest)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa (3%)

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 independent experiment

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 cells from each culture were evaluated for chromosome abberations.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative cell count

Evaluation criteria:
The test item is considered to have clastogenic properties if there is a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells bearing aberrations at any dose level over the concurrent control. The increase must exceed historical control values. The increases must be reproduced in both cultures.
Statistics:
Where necessary, the frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps, and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared with the concurrent vehicle control using Fischer's Exact test.
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data

Table 2: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 1, 3h treatment without activation (total count from 2 cultures)

 

Untreated

***

Solvent*

Control***

Positive

Control**

Low dose***

Mid dose***

High dose***

Cytotoxicity

no

no

no

no

no

no

 

Mean

Chromatid aberrations

gaps

0

0

3

0

0

1

deletions

0

0

25

0

0

0

interchanges

0

0

49

0

0

0

Chromosome aberrations

gaps

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

deletions

0

0

3

0

0

0

interchanges

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Polyploidy

0

0

0

0

0

0

Endo reduplication

0

0

0

0

0

0

 *Solvent control with ethanol

** Per 150 cells

*** Per 200 cells

NR not reported

Table 3: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 1, 3h treatment with activation (total count from 2 cultures)

 

Untreated

***

Solvent*

Control***

Positive

Control**

Low dose***

Mid dose***

High dose***

Cytotoxicity

no

no

no

no

no

no

 

Mean

Chromatid aberrations

gaps

0

0

3

0

0

1

deletions

0

0

25

1

0

22

interchanges

0

0

49

0

0

40

Chromosome aberrations

gaps

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

deletions

0

0

3

0

0

5

interchanges

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Polyploidy

0

0

0

0

0

0

Endo reduplication

2

0

0

0

0

0

 *Solvent control with ethanol

** Per 150 cells

*** Per 200 cells

NR not reported

Table 4: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 2, 20h treatment without activation (total count from 2 cultures)

 

Untreated

***

Solvent*

Control***

Positive

Control**

Low dose***

Mid dose***

High dose***

Cytotoxicity

no

no

no

no

no

no

 

Mean

Chromatid aberrations

gaps

0

0

0

0

0

1

deletions

1

1

7

1

1

0

interchanges

4

0

52

0

1

0

Chromosome aberrations

gaps

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

deletions

0

0

9

2

3

0

interchanges

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Polyploidy

0

0

0

0

0

0

Endo reduplication

0

0

0

0

0

0

 *Solvent control with ethanol

** Per 150 cells

*** Per 200 cells

NR not reported

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results:
negative

The substance was tested to OECD 473 (1997) under GLP. The test material did not induce any statistically significant, dose-related increases in the frequency of cells with chromosomal aberrations either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation or after various exposure times. The test material was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to CHO cells in vitro under the conditions of the test.
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
Please refer to the attached justification below and the overall justification for grouping of substances attached in IUCLID Section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results:
negative with and without metabolic activation

Executive summary:

The structural analogue trichloro(hexadecyl)silane (CAS 5894-60-0) was assessed for its potential to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y. It is concluded that the structural analogue is negative for mutagenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test. As explained in the justification for type of information, a similar outcome is considered for the target substance as well.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

In vivo testing is not required as no ambiguous or positive results for genetic toxicity were found in the in vitro studies.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

In the key Ames test according to OECD TG 471 and in compliance with GLP, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and E. coli strain WP2 uvrA were treated with up to 5000 µg/plate hexadecyl(trimethoxy)silane in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system in a plate incorporation assay. No increase of the number of revertants was observed in any strain and in any experiment. Precipitation was observed beginning with 1000 µg/plate and no cytotoxic effects were noted (Evonik, 2011).


In an Ames test according to OECD TG 471 and in compliance with GLP, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and TA 102 were treated with up to 5000 µg/plate hexadecyl(trimethoxy)silane in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system in a preincubation and a plate incorporation assay. No increase of the number of revertants was observed in any strain and in any test. Precipitation was observed at 5000 µg/plate and cytotoxic effects were observed in strain TA 1537 at 5000 µg/plate in the plate incorporation assay, only (LPT, 2002d).


The results of both studies are in agreement and give evidence that the test substance is non-mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay under the applied test conditions.


 


In the chromosome aberration assay, according to OECD TG 473 and in compliance with GLP, Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells were treated with up to 1300 µg/mL hexadecyl(trimethoxy)silane in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (RTC, 2005). The cells were treated for 3 h (with and without metabolic activation) and for 20 h (without metabolic activation). After 20 h the cells were fixed and stained with Giemsa after previous exposure to colcemid. The test material did not induce any statistically significant, dose-related increases in the frequency of cells with chromosomal aberrations either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation or after various exposure times. The test material was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to CHO cells in vitro under the conditions of the test.


 


No data is available for in vitro mammalian mutagenicity for the registered substance. However, an OECD TG 490 study with hexadecyl(trimethoxy)silane is on-going, but the results will not be available for this current dossier update. Therefore, as an interim measure, the hazard assessment was performed based on available data from the structural analogue trichloro(hexadecyl)silane (CAS 5894-60-0). In accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 Annex XI, 1.5 “Grouping of substances and read across” and in accordance with the Read across assessment framework (RAAF, ECHA 2017) read across from analogue substances has been applied to support the human health hazard assessment of hexadecyl(trimethoxy)silane (CAS 16415-12-6). Further details are provided in the analogue justification attached to the respective target entry.


In the key in vitro mammalian mutagenicity study (BSL, 2012), the structural analogue substance trichloro(hexadecyl)silane (CAS 5894-60-0) was assessed for its potential to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y. The study was conducted according to OECD TG 476 and in compliance with GLP. No biologically relevant increase of mutants was found after treatment with the test item (with and without metabolic activation). The Global Evaluation Factor (GEF; defined as the mean of the negative/vehicle mutant frequency plus one standard deviation; data gathered from ten laboratories) was not exceeded by the induced mutant frequency at any concentration. Concentrations with RTG values below 10% were not considered for evaluation of mutagenicity. No dose-response relationship was observed. Colony sizing showed no clastogenic effects induced by the test item under the experimental conditions (with and without metabolic activation). Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included in the test and gave the expected results. It was therefore concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on genetic toxicity of the test substance do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.